Not while Stern's alive.

^^^^

Oh fer crissakes:



xxxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=27283

Now she wants the appeals court to order Judge Lamberth to order inspection of the birth certificate.

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=27283

The highlighted passage is particularly awesome in its arrogance and irony.

Raicha, just one more example of what Orly means by "no stone left unturned".

This should make for some "entertainment" iif Judge Lamberth decides to preside over the Taitz v. Hillary FOIA case!

Pretty sure she's setting up the "I was really only asking Hawai'i for a verification, not for document disclosure even though that's what I've been focused on for two years, see?" appeal.

Taitz' latest proposed filing bat dropping is filled with nutty freshness. In it she does the hokey pokey, turns herself around and professes that's what it's all about.

I particularly like her use of the word "unauthenticated" in that sentence.

Irony much?

Of course, the mention of the New York Times article by Judge Lamberth in footnote 1 of his opinion has nothing to do with his ruling in Ruemmler. He ruled, very simply, that the Office of White House Counsel is not subject to FOIA.

I'm certain Orly's ridiculous rant will fool the D.C. appellate court into believing her version, though.

I haz a question. Let’s suppose the 9th Circuit, recognizing that this is the most important matter of national security evah, orders the materials moved to Hickam Field immediately to protect against spoliation while that particular mandemus is being considered. In the meantime, here comes Her Orlyship with another mandemus (see final sentence for definitive spelling) and states:



So what happens if the DC Circuit orders an inspection at the Dept. of Health but the materials have already been moved to, say, Hickam Field? This appears to have the potential of causing a de facto conflictus curiae -- a rarely encountered situation that only the Supreme Court can resolve with a Writ in Flagrante Conflicto.

Yoo hoo, Dr. Orly! Do yourself a favor and add some language to this newest mandemus to request that the inspection be ordered either at the Dept of Health or, if the 9th Circuit has already ordered the military to take custody of the LFBC, that the inspection should take place, uh, you know…wherever.

Just a tip. This is standard practice when one brings essentially the identical "emergency matter" requesting extraordinary relief to more than one court of appeals at the same time.

Piffle, as you know, no one will take either "petition" seriously. So there is absolutely no chance of conflicting orders.

Incidentally, some very wise old person predicted when the first mandemus petition was filed that it would be followed by another filed in D.C.

Ya never know. I think Orly should cover all the bases.


Yoo hoo, Orly! That abolishment-of-mundanus thingy in the Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure applies only to the Circuit Courts in the state. Nuttin' prohibits the Hawaii appellate court from issuing a mundanus. Are you absolutely certain you want to go the rehearing route in Circuit Court? Wouldn't it be faster to get the Hawaii Court of Appeals to issue an emergency mundanus? After all, the New Hampshire primary ballots are being printed in mere weeks.

Well, yeah. The footnote was merely explaining the circumstances under which the Petitioner, Attorney Pro SeDoctor Orly Taitz Esquire JD DDS etc., became aware that the Respondent had come into possession of the two paper certificates demanded under FOIA. Judge Lamberth did not make any determination whatsoever as to the veracity of the contents of the birth certificate copies and, of course, neither one was offered as evidence by anyone.

I'm curious whether the DC and 9th Circuits will be kind and just deny these. Or will they file them as new actions, demand a filing fee, and then deny.

Smug statements like this one remind me of the hubris of Xerxes. Or Napolean's disasterous overconfidence when he invaded Russia. Or Custer's underestimation of the American Indian warrior. Or Oliver O. Howard's complacency at Chancellorsville.

As has been repeatedly and convincingly argued by leading birther legal analysts such as Thayne Doak and Racer Jim, Obama has to win every court challenge to survive, whereas Orly only has to prevail just once. One honest ruling and the long usurpation will be over. Doubtless they are right.

Pay up!!

New Docket Entries...

I'd prefer she fill out the IFP form and try to save a few bucks ($455).

Of course, she gets to double her paying fees fun as she also appealed Astrue.

I would, too, since it could make her guilty of perjury and eligible for a five year vacation in Club Fed.

Idle question...suppose a Taitz wanted to pursue the crazy birfer crusade and had a filthy rich hubby who wanted nothing to do with it, refused to fund it in any way/shape/form, and said crazy bitch wasn't making any money in her dental torture biz so she can't afford court charges. Would said crazy bitch qualify for IFP under some sort of exception?