Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5871 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227 ... 235  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4000
Location: Southwest of down east
thorswitch wrote:
tjh wrote:
US District Court Judge Calls Taitz On Fraudulently Obtained Documents
http://www.larrysinclair.org/2011/09/01/us-district-court-judge-calls-taitz-on-fraudulently-obtained-documents/
(Sep 1, 2011)
Wow. Aside from is mention that he does believe there's a legitimate question about Obama's eligibility based on his father's citizenship at the time Obama was born, there's a whole lot of actual sense being made in that post. That's just f'ing scary!


Yup. When, comparatively speaking, Larry Sinclair comes off as a paragon of sanity and reason, yer darn right that's scary. :o

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6634
Emma wrote:
That doesn't count. Ms Guthrie is part of the conspiracy.


Yeah that's what's funny about this place - a source is cited that debunks a birther claim, and there's always someone helping birthers dismiss it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:25 am
Posts: 2883
kimba wrote:
Emma wrote:
That doesn't count. Ms Guthrie is part of the conspiracy.


Yeah that's what's funny about this place - a source is cited that debunks a birther claim, and there's always someone helping birthers dismiss it.


Helping them? That's their reply to anything that proves them wrong. It's how conspiracy-theorists' brains are wired.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5253
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Paul - the piece of trash Taitz has defecated on the District Court is a 0 out of 20. Poorly written, poorly conceived, irrelevant to the issues presented, unresponsive to the trenchant opposition, contumacious, without legal or factual support, and filled with blather. Anyone presenting this trash to a court should be summarily disbarred.


Stern, we keep telling you that it's bad to just focus on the good points. Sheesh.

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:42 am
Posts: 1439
Location: Garage Dubois, Choisy-le-Roi
Occupation: teacher (of English and translation), translator
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Paul - the piece of trash Taitz has defecated on the District Court is a 0 out of 20. Poorly written, poorly conceived, irrelevant to the issues presented, unresponsive to the trenchant opposition, contumacious, without legal or factual support, and filled with blather. Anyone presenting this trash to a court should be summarily disbarred.



Was there ever an Orly filing that would have earned more than 0/20?

Before I started cherry-picking (I think I am the first to notice that this filing uses Obama's tax returns both as newly discovered evidence and as a reason for the DOJ to prosecute Obama years ago [and I AM claiming copyright on that, but waivering it for any use by Judge lamberth] which may indicate two people or two personae of Taitz working on this) I made the point that as a satire on Taitz's style it is merely a "good try, must do better next time".

And still you say, and I agree, that it is trash.

I am reminded of Mrs Ceaucescu, who pretended to be a scientist and had her scientific papers weitten by ghost writers. Who of course put in deliberate errors that even a first-year student would notice. Not saying anything, of course. ?(

_________________
Orly Taitz (Svetlana Averbukha). Can't plead, can't drill. Slightly blonde. Can bore a little.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:01 pm
Posts: 300
There really is no one appropriate forum to post this, so I chose this one as the most likely where this will come up first.

For those of you who like reading court opinions and want to see how the 2nd Circuit Federal Court lowered the hammer on truther attorneys, give this a read: Gallop v. Chaney. The plaintiff got off in this case, but Orly as a pro se attorney would not. Let's hope Lambert and the Federal Circuit (as we all know will be in play soon), have the gumption to follow the 2nd Circuit lead.

_________________
When the going gets weird, the weird get going.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5522
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
kreisman wrote:
There really is no one appropriate forum to post this, so I chose this one as the most likely where this will come up first.

For those of you who like reading court opinions and want to see how the 2nd Circuit Federal Court lowered the hammer on truther attorneys, give this a read: Gallop v. Chaney. The plaintiff got off in this case, but Orly as a pro se attorney would not. Let's hope Lambert and the Federal Circuit (as we all know will be in play soon), have the gumption to follow the 2nd Circuit lead.



Quote:
One of Gallop’s counsel of record, William Veale, is further sanctioned for filing a frivolous and vexatious motion to disqualify the panel ...


Among counsel's "disdainful and unsubstantiated conclusions about the panel members’ emotional stability and competence to serve objectively" was an allegation that one panel member “would or should provoke a congressional investigation." Sound familiar?


Quote:
Like other papers submitted by Gallop and her team of attorneys in this appeal, the response presents only irrelevant information in a jarringly disorganized manner, united solely by its consistently patronizing tone. The response is a comprehensive compilation of every rumor, report, statement, and anecdote that may reveal an inconsistency or omission in an “official version” of the 9/11 attacks ... .

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1941
Location: Unfortunately, deep in the Bible Belt
kreisman wrote:
There really is no one appropriate forum to post this, so I chose this one as the most likely where this will come up first.

For those of you who like reading court opinions and want to see how the 2nd Circuit Federal Court lowered the hammer on truther attorneys, give this a read: Gallop v. Chaney. The plaintiff got off in this case, but Orly as a pro se attorney would not. Let's hope Lambert and the Federal Circuit (as we all know will be in play soon), have the gumption to follow the 2nd Circuit lead.


Wow. It's like Gallop and Orly were twins separated at birth. The differences are minor -- truther vs birther -- but Judge Lambert could almost cut and paste much of the remarks found Gallop v. Cheney and apply them to Orly.

_________________
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19990
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Gallop's lawyers were only sanctioned $15,000 (plus "double damages" -- which won't be much) while Rhodes' lawyer hit the bigs with a $20,000 love tap.

Some Court of Appeals or, maybe, a Chief Judge of a District other than Bundogs, needs to take an interest in her contumacy. That interest should translate into some Bar action.

Yes, I know. Any. Day. Now.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4000
Location: Southwest of down east
kreisman wrote:
There really is no one appropriate forum to post this, so I chose this one as the most likely where this will come up first.

For those of you who like reading court opinions and want to see how the 2nd Circuit Federal Court lowered the hammer on truther attorneys, give this a read: Gallop v. Chaney. The plaintiff got off in this case, but Orly as a pro se attorney would not. Let's hope Lambert and the Federal Circuit (as we all know will be in play soon), have the gumption to follow the 2nd Circuit lead.


Yup, that's a good one all right.

BTW, it'll be the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or possibly the 0th Circuit, but it won't be the Federal Circuit. While the Federal Circuit is also located in DC, it is a specialized appellate court that hears appeals from certain designated Article I tribunals, patent and trademark cases from district courts nationwide and a few other types of cases designated by statute. AFAIK, Orly has yet to file a patent suit against the President in Judge Lamberth's court. :lol:

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7277
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
Piffle wrote:
... AFAIK, Orly has yet to file a patent suit against the President in Judge Lamberth's court. :lol:

Well, everything she has filed is patently ridiculous. Does that count? :lol:

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over into the Orly Zone." -- Geritol

ZOOM IN, BABY. IT'S ALL WRONG.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9188
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Quote:
Update: Next court hearing on subpoena in Hawaii in Orly Taitz v Loretta Fuddy, director of Health, is November 21

If an emergency hearing is granted, it will be earlier, otherwise the next hearing will be November 21st in Orly Taitz v Loretta Fuddy, subpoena to allow expert inspection of Obama’s allegedly genuine 1961 long form birth certificate, which was found to be a forgery by 20 experts and which was used to obtain a stolen Social Security number [XXX-XX-XXXX], which Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service and which was never assigned to him according to E-verify and SSNVS

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=26520

TRANSLATION: If an emergency hearing in (the dismissed) Taitz v. Fuddy is not granted, then the next hearing is in November in federal court in Hawaii.

Quote:
PS Obots are sending desinformation. Please, spread the ord and e-mails and articles with wording “Orly Taitz subpoena Hawaii” it will help bump this issue up in searches

On google, the first page of results for that search all go to birther sites.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4000
Location: Southwest of down east
bob wrote:
Quote:
Update: Next court hearing on subpoena in Hawaii in Orly Taitz v Loretta Fuddy, director of Health, is November 21

If an emergency hearing is granted, it will be earlier, otherwise the next hearing will be November 21st in Orly Taitz v Loretta Fuddy, subpoena to allow expert inspection of Obama’s allegedly genuine 1961 long form birth certificate, which was found to be a forgery by 20 experts and which was used to obtain a stolen Social Security number [XXX-XX-XXXX], which Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service and which was never assigned to him according to E-verify and SSNVS

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=26520

TRANSLATION: If an emergency hearing in (the dismissed) Taitz v. Fuddy is not granted, then the next hearing is in November in federal court in Hawaii.


Geez. Bob is the best. But still, could someone please translate this for me?

If the emergency hearing is granted before [the end of the world] then it will be earlier than a forgery by 20 experts according to E-verify to obtain a stolen Social Security number.

Do I have it right? If not, could someone help me diagram that sentence?

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:38 pm
Posts: 1714
Location: about 26,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy,
Occupation: Chemtrail Scheduling Supervisor, Southwest Division
bob wrote:
Quote:
PS Obots are sending desinformation. Please, spread the ord and e-mails and articles with wording “Orly Taitz subpoena Hawaii” it will help bump this issue up in searches

On google, the first page of results for that search all go to birther sites.

Has Orly Taitz been disbarred? I ask if Orly Taitz has been disbarred because I wonder if disbarred attorneys, as I thought I read somewhere that Orly Taitz had been disbarred, can issue subpoenas. Has anyone else read that Orly Taitz has been disbarred? Perhaps I am mistaken that Orly Taitz has been disbarred.

_________________
“I wish I would have a real tragic love affair and get so bummed out that I'd just quit my job and become a bum for a few years, because I was thinking about doing that anyway.”
Jack Handey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 639
Dallasite wrote:
Has Orly Taitz been disbarred? I ask if Orly Taitz has been disbarred because I wonder if disbarred attorneys, as I thought I read somewhere that Orly Taitz had been disbarred, can issue subpoenas. Has anyone else read that Orly Taitz has been disbarred? Perhaps I am mistaken that Orly Taitz has been disbarred.


To my knowledge the Orly Taitz Disbarrment hearing has not taken place.

But who knows? Orly Taitz Disbarred seems to be a popular web search.

So you may be on to something

_________________
"Yeah, these are the guys who will take down the President. Two old dudes, one in his underwear, yammering about internet screen names under the roar of a Texas swamp cooler." - raicha

"idunno why anybody is worried about Sharia Law creeping into our judicial system. They should be worried about Orly Law." - mimi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19990
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word. No discipline or disbarment for Orly Taitz. Spread the word.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:56 am
Posts: 331
Location: I stay ova dea.
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:


Quote:
Like other papers submitted by Gallop and her team of attorneys in this appeal, the response presents only irrelevant information in a jarringly disorganized manner, united solely by its consistently patronizing tone. The response is a comprehensive compilation of every rumor, report, statement, and anecdote that may reveal an inconsistency or omission in an “official version” of the 9/11 attacks ... .



Ahhh April Gallop. Talk about having her cake and eating it too. She first sued American Airlines (and won) to cover her sustained injuries at the Pentagon when Flight 77 crashed into the building.
Then she files a lawsuit that sues the government saying that no airplane crashed into the Pentagon, to cover her injuries sustained, when the non-existent Flight 77 crashed in to the Pentagon.

Yeah, she bought in to the 911 lies hook, line an sinker. She's made some outrageous claims (and says that she was a witness) to various events, that she wasn't even there for (if you read her original testimony in her first lawsuit)

Just another deluded truther.


ETA;: For more on April Gallop and her lawsuits, there is an ongoing thread over at James Randi's forum:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=7672977

_________________
If money is the root of all evil, why do churches constantly ask for it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4000
Location: Southwest of down east
Richard Nixon was disbarred in New York but not in California. It appears that he had the good sense to resign in CA first.

Like Nixon, Orly Taitz's disbarment in California has not yet been perfected. Also, too.

Also like Nixon, Orly Taitz cannot legally practice law in New York.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5958
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
But Nixon didn't have a screeechy voice. I'd like to say he was not a crook too. Also.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23576
bob wrote:
Quote:
Update: Next court hearing on subpoena in Hawaii in Orly Taitz v Loretta Fuddy, director of Health, is November 21

If an emergency hearing is granted, it will be earlier, otherwise the next hearing will be November 21st in Orly Taitz v Loretta Fuddy, subpoena to allow expert inspection of Obama’s allegedly genuine 1961 long form birth certificate, which was found to be a forgery by 20 experts and which was used to obtain a stolen Social Security number [XXX-XX-XXXX], which Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service and which was never assigned to him according to E-verify and SSNVS

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=26520

TRANSLATION: If an emergency hearing in (the dismissed) Taitz v. Fuddy is not granted, then the next hearing is in November in federal court in Hawaii.

Quote:
PS Obots are sending desinformation. Please, spread the ord and e-mails and articles with wording “Orly Taitz subpoena Hawaii” it will help bump this issue up in searches

On google, the first page of results for that search all go to birther sites.


Uhhhhhh... perhaps I'm missing something. Taitz v Fuddy is D-E-A-D.

Her "supposed" hearing for November 21 is in Taitz v Astrue on the Motion to Compel, unless Judge Lamberth zaps her "Motion for Reconsideration" first OR unless Magistrate Judge Puglisi rules on the papers beforehand and zaps the MtC.

And if Judge Lamberth zaps her MtR I suppose she can then move Judge Puglisi for a stay or sumpin' pending a couple of years of appeals. :D

Am I missing something?

Just sayin'.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1941
Location: Unfortunately, deep in the Bible Belt
ZekeB wrote:
But Nixon didn't have a screeechy voice. I'd like to say he was not a crook too. Also.


However, it doesn't mean that Orly has been disbarred -- yet. Would Nixon spin in his grave if he knew that Orly had been disbarred. I guess we'll never know how Nixon would feel if Orly was disbarred.

_________________
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:02 am
Posts: 3178
Occupation: Vulture Capitalist
realist wrote:
Uhhhhhh... perhaps I'm missing something. Taitz v Fuddy is D-E-A-D.

Her "supposed" hearing for November 21 is in Taitz v Astrue on the Motion to Compel, unless Judge Lamberth zaps her "Motion for Reconsideration" first OR unless Magistrate Judge Puglisi rules on the papers beforehand and zaps the MtC.

And if Judge Lamberth zaps her MtR I suppose she can then move Judge Puglisi for a stay or sumpin' pending a couple of years of appeals. :D

Am I missing something?

Just sayin'.


You've possibly omitted one scenario.

In the unlikely event that Judge Lamberth does not rule on Orly's MTR prior to Nov 21, it wouldn't surprise me if Magistrate Judge Puglisi postpones the hearing after being notified of Judge Lamberth's inaction by Ms Nagamine. I got the impression from Chief Judge Mollway that the Hawaii hearing won't occur if there is no underlying case in DC.

Even if Orly refuses to inform the HI court, you can rest assured Ms Nagamine will.

_________________
"You know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button."
Image
Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5958
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
Joseph Robidoux III wrote:
You've possibly omitted one scenario.

In the unlikely event that Judge Lamberth does not rule on Orly's MTR prior to Nov 21, it wouldn't surprise me if Magistrate Judge Puglisi postpones the hearing after being notified of Judge Lamberth's inaction by Ms Nagamine. I got the impression from Chief Judge Mollway that the Hawaii hearing won't occur if there is no underlying case in DC.

Even if Orly refuses to inform the HI court, you can rest assured Ms Nagamine will.

I haven't seen any evidence that some woman ever filed a MTR. Was that just a threat? If it was ScribD, I missed the linky dinky.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:02 am
Posts: 3178
Occupation: Vulture Capitalist
Document #36 is Orly's motion to reconsider. Document #38 is her reply to Document #37 (the government's opposition to #36).

_________________
"You know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button."
Image
Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23576
ZekeB wrote:
Joseph Robidoux III wrote:
You've possibly omitted one scenario.

In the unlikely event that Judge Lamberth does not rule on Orly's MTR prior to Nov 21, it wouldn't surprise me if Magistrate Judge Puglisi postpones the hearing after being notified of Judge Lamberth's inaction by Ms Nagamine. I got the impression from Chief Judge Mollway that the Hawaii hearing won't occur if there is no underlying case in DC.

Even if Orly refuses to inform the HI court, you can rest assured Ms Nagamine will.

I haven't seen any evidence that some woman ever filed a MTR. Was that just a threat? If it was ScribD, I missed the linky dinky.


Yes, she did, in Taitz v Astrue. http://www.scribd.com/doc/64827157/TAIT ... 46770-36-0

My point in the post was that Orly stated the November 21 hearing is in Taitz v Fuddy when in fact it is in Taitz v Astrue on her Motion to Compel.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5871 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227 ... 235  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: anotherparadox, Yoda and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group