"It is profoundly antisocial and un-American to empower the nonproductive segments of the population to destroy the country -- which is precisely why Barack Obama zealously supports registering welfare recipients to vote," Vadum, the author of a book published by World Net Daily that attacks the now-defunct community organizing group ACORN, writes in a column for the American Thinker.
"Encouraging those who burden society to participate in elections isn't about helping the poor," Vadum writes. "It's about helping the poor to help themselves to others' money. It's about raw so-called social justice. It's about moving America ever farther away from the small-government ideals of the Founding Fathers."

"Encouraging those who burden society to participate in elections isn't about helping the poor," Vadum writes. "It's about helping the poor to help themselves to others' money. It's about raw so-called social justice. It's about moving America ever farther away from the small-government ideals of the Founding Fathers."

I just went over and read the comments on the American Thinker article. Whoa! There are a whole lot of people that agree that only property owners should be allowed to vote. OMFG! It is mind boggling that anyone could ever believe such a thing.

I suppose they can go ahead and believe what ever they want, but the chances of it ever happening are slim to none, and slim left town (hat tip to his Rooster-ness for the Slim reference). At least, I hope there is no chance of this happening. There isn't, is there?

The Jon Stewart show has already exposed this racist twit deep thinker. Be patient and wait through the commercial because it is worth it. http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-o ... organizers

Watch the whole think or cue up to 1:27.

The "whole think"? You've been watching too many youtubes of Taitz.

Let me feenish correct it without it being memorialized in your capture forever!

I just went over and read the comments on the American Thinker article. Whoa! There are a whole lot of people that agree that only property owners should be allowed to vote. OMFG! It is mind boggling that anyone could ever believe such a thing.

I suppose they can go ahead and believe what ever they want, but the chances of it ever happening are slim to none, and slim left town (hat tip to his Rooster-ness for the Slim reference). At least, I hope there is no chance of this happening. There isn't, is there?

PHILLIPS: The Founding Fathers originally said, they put certain restrictions on who gets the right to vote. It wasn’t you were just a citizen and you got to vote. Some of the restrictions, you know, you obviously would not think about today. But one of those was you had to be a property owner. And that makes a lot of sense, because if you’re a property owner you actually have a vested stake in the community. If you’re not a property owner, you know, I’m sorry but property owners have a little bit more of a vested interest in the community than non-property owners.

The Jon Stewart show has already exposed this racist twit deep thinker. Be patient and wait through the commercial because it is worth it. http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-o ... organizers

Watch the whole thinkg or cue up to 1:27.

Really like the white Christian conservative lady who is a community organizer.

Vadum is scum.

I remember that clip. What I didn't remember was how much Vadum looks like he could be Larry Sinclair's older brother.

Excellent article, but I don’t think it goes far enough. We should not only purge welfare slackers and other un-Americans from the voter rolls — including anyone who is unemployed and therefore not a producer, but voting should be proportional depending on net worth or taxes paid. No one could argue that someone making, say, $50,000 per year contributes to the well-being of the country as much as someone making millions and creating jobs. It’s not even close. To argue that there is any sort of equality between workers and a job creators is pure socialism. Why not have votes apportioned based on income, wealth, or taxes paid, to make it more proportional to one’s actual contribution to the country? For example, if you don’t pay any taxes, you have no vote, as everyone here heartily endorses. If you pay $10,000 in taxes, you get one vote. If you pay $1,000,000 in taxes you get 100 votes. It’s only fair. ~joethepatrioticAmerican

mario piperni highlighted some of the comments from the American Stinker column.



more:
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1OLSD3/ma ... o-vote.php


I went back to the Stinker and was relieved to see only 68 comments. There wasn't much support for this article. Sometimes those articles get hundreds and hundreds of comments, so even the RWNJ's at The Stinker realize Vadum has jumped over the sanity line.

mario piperni highlighted some of the comments from the American Stinker column.



more:
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1OLSD3/ma ... o-vote.php