Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 280 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4558
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
raicha wrote:
bob wrote:
birthers.org: Opening the Back Door to the Obama Eligibility Lock Down

Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and WND.com, now have the unique opportunity to present to the world the evidence that the document is in fact a fraud. And there is nothing Esquire or Obama can do to stop it. [highlight]Since Obama will not be mentioned as a defendant, he has no cause to have his wonderful government lawyers intervene, in fact his personal lawyers can not do anything. The fact is Obama simply will be told what we have been told, he has no standing. Divine ]justice is not only just, it is sweet[/highlight].


It's good that Esquire will not be relying on the wags at birthers.org for legal advice. While "truth is an absolute defense" to a defamation claim, it is certainly not the only defense. Esquire has many other defenses available to it to defeat this idiotic lawsuit.

Besides that, the key "misrepresentation" allegedly committed by Esquire is not a "lie" about Obama's birth certificate. The "lie" that allegedly damaged WND was the statement that WND was pulling Corsi's book.

The birth certificate is irrelevant to the claims in the complaint. Of course we all know that here, but I post for the benefit of our lurking birther friends. How you doing How YOU doon?


FIFY

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm
Posts: 3896
squee127 wrote:
This may be the reason there has been no filings on the case - Larry is busy filing another frivolous lawsuit, this time on behalf of a crazy christian homophobe who's upset that someone quoted what he said.


According to WND, Maddow said:

Quote:
The Muslims are calling for the execution of homosexuals in America. This was just released yesterday and it shows you that they themselves are upholding the laws that are even in the Bible of the Judeo-Christian God. But they seem to be more moral than even the American Christians do because these people are livid about enforcing their laws. They know homosexuality's an abomination. If America won't enforce the laws, God will raise up a foreign enemy to do just that.


And what Dean actually said was:

Quote:
Muslims are calling for the execution for homosexuals in America, this was just released yesterday and it shows you that they themselves are upholding the laws that are even in the Bible, the Judeo Christian God. They seem to be more moral than even the American Christians do. Because these people are livid about enforcing their laws, they know homosexuality is an abomination. And I continually reach out to the homosexual communities on this radio show, and I warn them, which ones love? Here you have Obama condemning it behind the backs of the homosexuals but to their faces he's promoting it. I say this to my gay friends out there the ones that continuously nitpick everything I say. Hollywood is promoting immorality and the God of the Heavens in Jesus names is warning you to flee from the wrath to come, yet you have Muslims calling for your execution. If America won't enforce the laws, God will raise up a foreign enemy to do just that's what you're seeing in America today. Read Leviticus 26 America.


In other words, here's how Maddow quoted Dean:

Quote:
Muslims are calling for the execution for homosexuals in America, this was just released yesterday and it shows you that they themselves are upholding the laws that are even in the Bible, the Judeo Christian God. They seem to be more moral than even the American Christians do. Because these people are livid about enforcing their laws, they know homosexuality is an abomination. And I continually reach out to the homosexual communities on this radio show, and I warn them, which ones love? Here you have Obama condemning it behind the backs of the homosexuals but to their faces he's promoting it. I say this to my gay friends out there the ones that continuously nitpick everything I say. Hollywood is promoting immorality and the God of the Heavens in Jesus names is warning you to flee from the wrath to come, yet you have Muslims calling for your execution. If America won't enforce the laws, God will raise up a foreign enemy to do just that's what you're seeing in America today. Read Leviticus 26 America.


Here's the video, with the quote at 2:55. The audio makes it sound like it was a continuous statement, but the quotation marks on the screen imply otherwise.


_________________
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms."
- Stephen Jay Gould

Barackryphal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23548
Still no activity in the case...

Quote:
1:11-cv-01179-RMC FARAH et al v. ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC. et al
Rosemary M. Collyer, presiding
[highlight]Date filed: 06/28/2011[/highlight]
[highlight]Date of last filing: 06/28/2011[/highlight]

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:51 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5952
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
realist wrote:
Still no activity in the case...

Quote:
1:11-cv-01179-RMC FARAH et al v. ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC. et al
Rosemary M. Collyer, presiding
[highlight]Date filed: 06/28/2011[/highlight]
[highlight]Date of last filing: 06/28/2011[/highlight]

Has Esquire replied? How long do they have before a reply is required?

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9353
ZekeB wrote:
realist wrote:
Still no activity in the case...

Quote:
1:11-cv-01179-RMC FARAH et al v. ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC. et al
Rosemary M. Collyer, presiding
[highlight]Date filed: 06/28/2011[/highlight]
[highlight]Date of last filing: 06/28/2011[/highlight]

Has Esquire replied? How long do they have before a reply is required?


They have to serve the defendants before the clock even starts ticking. The only clock ticking now is the one where their case gets automatically dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Just out of the gate they have bungled the case, by captioning a plaintiff that doesn't exist and one of the defendants under the wrong name. That itself won't lead to the dismissal of the case, but merely an embarrassing "captioned incorrectly as" note in rulings.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:34 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5952
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
Just out of the gate they have bungled the case, by captioning a plaintiff that doesn't exist and one of the defendants under the wrong name. That itself won't lead to the dismissal of the case, but merely an embarrassing "captioned incorrectly as" note in rulings.

So when the trial is over and judgment is rendered, Corsi gets sixty-five cents and his lawyer gets thirty-five cents? Okay.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3370
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
Loren wrote:
squee127 wrote:
This may be the reason there has been no filings on the case - Larry is busy filing another frivolous lawsuit, this time on behalf of a crazy christian homophobe who's upset that someone quoted what he said.


Original trimmed to keep length down.
Quote:
According to WND, Maddow said:

Quote:
Muslims are calling for the execution for homosexuals in America, this was just released yesterday and it shows you that they themselves are upholding the laws that are even in the Bible, the Judeo Christian God. They seem to be more moral than even the American Christians do. Because these people are livid about enforcing their laws, they know homosexuality is an abomination. And I continually reach out to the homosexual communities on this radio show, and I warn them, which ones love? Here you have Obama condemning it behind the backs of the homosexuals but to their faces he's promoting it. I say this to my gay friends out there the ones that continuously nitpick everything I say. Hollywood is promoting immorality and the God of the Heavens in Jesus names is warning you to flee from the wrath to come, yet you have Muslims calling for your execution. If America won't enforce the laws, God will raise up a foreign enemy to do just that's what you're seeing in America today. Read Leviticus 26 America.


Here's the video, with the quote at 2:55. The audio makes it sound like it was a continuous statement, but the quotation marks on the screen imply otherwise.


I looked at the quote and the clip. It might have been better if Maddow inserted a verbal elipsis (something like "Mr. Dean then went on to say"), but I'm not seeing anything particularly egregious in Madow's edits. They certainly don't seem to change the overall tone or meaning of what Dean said. I think it's a serious stretch to say that she quoted him "out of context".

Maddow also immediately noted that Dean and his "ministry" had subsequently denied calling for the execution of gays. It is true that her tone of voice and mannerisms implied that she did not find Dean's disclaimer to be particularly convincing. Given that Dean had pretty clearly stated that nations that do call for the execution of gays "seem to be more moral than even the American Christians do", I can certainly see how someone might think that his disclaimer might have been a tad bit insincere.

It's also interesting to note that the complaint does not appear to take any notice of the material in the same Maddow segment where she criticizes Dean for his claim that gays molest an average of 117 people before getting caught. This means that, apparently, he thinks that saying that he's said things that condone the execution of gays casts him in a false light, but that reporting that he's made up bullshit statistics about gays being serial sexual molesters actually casts him in a true light.

Edit: Edited a few times to fix quotes, and an accidental duplicate following this one was deleted. And I really need to have more coffee.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23548
Interesting. No Return of Service noted on the docket, but...

New Docket Entry...

Quote:
06/28/2011 1[RECAP] COMPLAINT against ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616040100) filed by WORLDNETDAILY.COM, JOSEPH FARAH, JEROME CORSI, WND BOOKS. (Attachments: # 1[RECAP] Civil Cover Sheet)(jf, ) (Entered: 06/29/2011)

06/28/2011 Summons (3) Issued as to ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN. (jf, ) (Entered: 06/29/2011)

08/03/2011 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1[RECAP] Complaint by ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/03/2011)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm
Posts: 3896
realist wrote:
Interesting. No Return of Service noted on the docket, but...

New Docket Entry...


Notice how the defense counsel is "Attorneys for Defendants Hearst Communications,Inc. and Mark Warren."

Like I said before, "Esquire Magazine, Inc." is a nonexistent company.

_________________
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms."
- Stephen Jay Gould

Barackryphal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
WND: Esquire seeks more time to answer lawsuit over faked report
Quote:
Plaintiffs agree to delay in dispute over 'Where's The Birth Certificate?'

Esquire magazine, part of the Hearst media empire, has asked for extra time to respond to a lawsuit brought by WND, WND Books, the companies' founder Joseph Farah and author Jerome Corsi over the magazine's faked report claiming that the book "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President" had been recalled and repudiated by the publisher.

[...]

The legal action is being taken, Farah added, "not because we desire to restrict First Amendment-guaranteed protections, but because we want to police them and guard them."

[...]

Punctuating the mass of evidence already compiled showing that Esquire's false report damaged sales of "Where's the Birth Certificate," is an email received today by WND from a reader who reports having seen the Esquire report and then dropping her plan to purchase the book.

"I was one of those who had already placed the book in my cart at Amazon, waiting for it to come out, because it intrigued me," she wrote. "But I did see the Esquire piece when it was released … and was very surprised when I saw that. I wondered if it could be true but didn't see anything in the article leading me to believe that it was a prank, so was perplexed. [highlight]I never ended up ordering the book from Amazon because I figured the books were being retracted[/highlight]."

This WND reader is in luck: the book is still available on Amazon. (Presently ranked 6,020.)

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7266
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
bob wrote:
WND: Esquire seeks more time to answer lawsuit over faked report
Quote:
Punctuating the mass of evidence already compiled showing that Esquire's false report damaged sales of "Where's the Birth Certificate," is an email received today by WND from a reader who reports having seen the Esquire report and then dropping her plan to purchase the book.

"I was one of those who had already placed the book in my cart at Amazon, waiting for it to come out, because it intrigued me," she wrote. "But I did see the Esquire piece when it was released … and was very surprised when I saw that. I wondered if it could be true but didn't see anything in the article leading me to believe that it was a prank, so was perplexed. [highlight]I never ended up ordering the book from Amazon because I figured the books were being retracted[/highlight]."

Counsel for Plaintiff:

"You see, your honor -- and we have a googolplex of evidence for this -- our livelihood depends on a readership that is entirely uncritical in its reading. To members of the World Net Daily family and especially to the target audience of the books of G'nome Corsi, if you read a thing, it's true. That's just the way it is.

Experts call this mode of reading "stupid."

Now of course none of these people read Esquire, for the same reason, really, that WND and our sister sites in the Batshitosphere so diligently screen comments: Patriots either protect themselves, or need to be protected, from contrary viewpoints. Not because we have a monopoly on the truth -- though we do -- but because the cognitive dissonance to a "stupid" reader of trying to absorb and uncritically accept competing ideas can be very disturbing.

Anyway -- yes, Your Honor, I am getting to my point -- you might know some regular people (I do) who aren't this special kind of "stupid." When they find something "perplexing" they go and try to figure it out, find an answer that explains things. But the kind of person who would buy and enjoy a book entitled "Where's the Birth Certificate?" after the birth certificate has been released is the kind of person who becomes perplexed, and then goes and makes a plate of hors dovers, and puts it out of their mind.

Were the Founding Fathers perplexed? No! So this evidence shows, that as the earth-shattering news published by Esquire..."

Counsel for Defense: Objection.

Court: Sustained.

"...as the story spread to other publications, inevitably it reached some of these "stupid" readers. And that's what we have evidence of.

If anything, WND has a higher journalistic calling than, say, Esquire or the New York Times, knowing as we do that our readers believe everything we print. Well... everything anybody prints. Or says. Provided it's something they already agree with. And for Esquire to pick on us with their so-called "humor" just proves that their editors are well aware of this, and maliciously capitalized on "stupidity."

One final note: There are a lot of them out there. The true market for an author of Corsi's stature... er, girth... er, apoplexy... er, mendacity, is practically unlimited. Just look at the US Congress today."

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over into the Orly Zone." -- Geritol

ZOOM IN, BABY. IT'S ALL WRONG.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7133
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
Brilliant, Verbie.
:lol: :lol: ;)

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am
Posts: 5517
Occupation: retired
On the mark, as usual. =D>

_________________
Mark Twain
Quote:
Research shows that 87.666 per cent of all statistics are made up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8009
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
bob wrote:
WND: Esquire seeks more time to answer lawsuit over faked report
Quote:
Plaintiffs agree to delay in dispute over 'Where's The Birth Certificate?'

The legal action is being taken, Farah added, "not because we desire to restrict First Amendment-guaranteed protections, but because we want to police them and guard them."


Is it me, or is the idea of policing and guarding the first amendment noxious? Policing and guarding implies suppression. Which is exactly what Farah and Corsi are doing; they don't like what was said so they are trying to suppress such speech.


bob wrote:
Quote:
Punctuating the mass of evidence already compiled showing that Esquire's false report damaged sales of "Where's the Birth Certificate," is an email received today by WND from a reader who reports having seen the Esquire report and then dropping her plan to purchase the book.

"I was one of those who had already placed the book in my cart at Amazon, waiting for it to come out, because it intrigued me," she wrote. "But I did see the Esquire piece when it was released … and was very surprised when I saw that. I wondered if it could be true but didn't see anything in the article leading me to believe that it was a prank, so was perplexed. [highlight]I never ended up ordering the book from Amazon because I figured the books were being retracted[/highlight]."


This WND reader is in luck: the book is still available on Amazon. (Presently ranked 6,020.)


What "mass of evidence"? Where is the email, Farah? Am I to believe that a WND reader read an Esquire mag article, decided that the satire must be true and cancelled her Amazon order during the 95 mins from the article's publication to when the article was updated to point out that the article is satire? Seriously; in 95 mins, a conservative found the article on Esquire, cancelled her order and neglected to check WND to confirm that the book was being pulled? If she pre-ordered the book, the book would have already shipped by the time Esquire published their article. If she didn't pre-order the book, then the book wasn't pulled by WND when she purchased the book. If she hadn't pre-ordered the book, and had Esquire been correct, she would have been unable to order the book from Amazon.

I look forward to seeing this woman's email, proof of cancellation and affidavit saying that she hasn't been able to get WTBC since Esquire published their article to the date the lawsuit was filed. If she cancelled the book and then reordered it or purchased it elsewhere, no harm was sustained by the plaintiffs.

Farah quotes an email from a reader in a previous article.

I also noticed that Farah has yet to provide any evidence that the following happened:

Quote:
That the faked report had an impact seems apparent. {snip.....}

The issue was noticed by a WND reader, who reported calling the Borders store in Northridge, Calif., seeking the book. He said in an e-mail:

I called the store and asked if they had the book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?" by Jerome Corsi and the guy laughed at me and said he wasn't sure but he would look for me. He went on to say isn't that outdated being Obama just released his birth certificate and shouldn't they at least rename it. So, I played with him a bit and said the book was far beyond just the birth certificate issue and told him maybe it should be renamed "Where's the Real Birth Certificate?" and he said, why is it fake? I said many people that have examined the online image have stated it was indeed a manipulated document. He said well they must be right, in a smart-a-- tone. Anyway, after that he put me on a hold for a few minutes and then came back on and said he searched and they do not carry the book and said he was just told the publisher pulled the book."

A subsequent telephone call to the store by WND confirmed the conversation, as a clerk said, "I think they pulled it."

"We had it, but I'm almost certain the publisher pulled it," he continued. "They didn't figure anyone would buy the book once the birth certificate was disclosed."

"There's no story here," said a spokeswoman for the Borders corporate headquarters, Mary Davis. "The bookseller saw the headline on the Esquire article below and mistakenly took it as truth. The book was coincidentally out of stock at the store and the bookseller mistakenly attributed that to this headline. Totally innocent on his part."


:^o :^o

Show me the evidence, Farah/Corsi. Show me the redacted email you quote. Show me an affidavit from Mary Davis.

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19941
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
So far WND's "evidence" is one credulous fan of Corsi and hearsay. Well, that's one book sale lost. Damages? Maybe $3.75. Sounds like this lawsuit will be going the way of the birther litigation.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3496
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
So far WND's "evidence" is one credulous fan of Corsi and hearsay. Well, that's one book sale lost. Damages? Maybe $3.75. Sounds like this lawsuit will be going the way of the birther litigation.


Hey, now. Give 'em some time to put together an affidavit or two, then they'll have the case wrapped up...

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23548
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
08/09/2011 3 Letter from Christopher Tilton, Service of Process Head "Let this be filed" by Judge R.M. Collyer (rdj) (Entered: 08/11/2011)


And just FYI the complete docket now shows:

Quote:
06/28/2011 1[RECAP] COMPLAINT against ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616040100) filed by WORLDNETDAILY.COM, JOSEPH FARAH, JEROME CORSI, WND BOOKS. (Attachments: # 1[RECAP] Civil Cover Sheet)(jf, ) (Entered: 06/29/2011)

06/28/2011 Summons (3) Issued as to ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN. (jf, ) (Entered: 06/29/2011)

08/03/2011 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1[RECAP] Complaint by ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/03/2011)

08/04/2011 MINUTE ORDER granting 2 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint. Defendants Hearst Communications, Inc. and Mark Warren shall answer or otherwise reply to the Complaint no later than September 6, 2011. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 8/4/2011. (lcrmc1) (Entered: 08/04/2011)

08/04/2011 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Hearst Communications, Inc. and Mark Warren's[highlight]answer due by 9/6/2011[/highlight]. (cdw) (Entered: 08/08/2011)

08/09/2011 3[RECAP] Letter from Christopher Tilton, Service of Process Head "Let this be filed" by Judge R.M. Collyer (rdj) (Entered: 08/11/2011)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 636
realist wrote:
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
08/09/2011 3 Letter from Christopher Tilton, Service of Process Head "Let this be filed" by Judge R.M. Collyer (rdj) (Entered: 08/11/2011)


Hilarious

_________________
"Yeah, these are the guys who will take down the President. Two old dudes, one in his underwear, yammering about internet screen names under the roar of a Texas swamp cooler." - raicha

"idunno why anybody is worried about Sharia Law creeping into our judicial system. They should be worried about Orly Law." - mimi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2107
Didn't Ed Hale make a similar mistake in Liberi v Belcher. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm
Posts: 3896
realist wrote:
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
08/09/2011 3 Letter from Christopher Tilton, Service of Process Head "Let this be filed" by Judge R.M. Collyer (rdj) (Entered: 08/11/2011)


No surprise there. I've been saying that since June.

_________________
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms."
- Stephen Jay Gould

Barackryphal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7133
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
obot 1024 wrote:
realist wrote:
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
08/09/2011 3 Letter from Christopher Tilton, Service of Process Head "Let this be filed" by Judge R.M. Collyer (rdj) (Entered: 08/11/2011)


Hilarious

Scrib'd hates me this morning. Can you tell me what's so hilarious?

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:56 am
Posts: 232
Scrib'd hates me this morning. Can you tell me what's so hilarious?
letter from process server
...CT Corp System is not the registered agenr for entity by the name of Esquire...
Accordingly, we are returning the documents...

has hand written note from judge (let this be filed)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23548
Update on Docket Entries...

Quote:
08/26/2011 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Special Motion to Dismiss by HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Declaration of Kristina E. Findikyan, # 4 Exhibit 1 to Findikyan Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 2 to Findikyan Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 3 to Findikyan Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 4 to Findikyan Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 5 to Findikyan Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 6 to Findikyan Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 7 to Findikyan Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 8 to Findikyan Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 9 to Findikyan Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 10 to Findikyan Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 11 to Findikyan Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 12 to Findikyan Declaration, # 16 Exhibit 13 to Findikyan Declaration, # 17 Exhibit 14 to Findikyan Declaration, # 18 Exhibit 15 to Findikyan Declaration, # 19 Exhibit 16 to Findikyan Declaration, # 20 Exhibit 17 to Findikyan Declaration, # 21 Exhibit 18 to Findikyan Declaration, # 22 Exhibit 19 to Findikyan Declaration, # 23 Exhibit 20 to Findikyan Declaration, # 24 Exhibit 21 to Findikyan Declaration, # 25 Exhibit 22 to Findikyan Declaration, # 26 Exhibit 23 to Findikyan Declaration, # 27 Exhibit 24 to Findikyan Declaration, # 28 Exhibit 25 to Findikyan Declaration, # 29 Exhibit 26 to Findikyan Declaration, # 30 Exhibit 27 to Findikyan Declaration, # 31 Exhibit 28 to Findikyan Declaration, # 32 Exhibit 29 to Findikyan Declaration, # 33 Exhibit 30 to Findikyan Declaration, # 34 Exhibit 31 to Findikyan Declaration, # 35 Exhibit 32 to Findikyan Declaration, # 36 Exhibit 33 to Findikyan Declaration, # 37 Exhibit 34 to Findikyan Declaration, # 38 Exhibit 35 to Findikyan Declaration, # 39 Exhibit 36 to Findikyan Declaration, # 40 Exhibit 37 to Findikyan Declaration, # 41 Exhibit 38 to Findikyan Declaration, # 42 Exhibit 39 to Findikyan Declaration, # 43 Exhibit 40 to Findikyan Declaration, # 44 Exhibit 41 to Findikyan Declaration, # 45 Exhibit 42 to Findikyan Declaration, # 46 Exhibit 43 to Findikyan Declaration, # 47 Exhibit 44 to Findikyan Declaration, # 48 Exhibit 45 to Findikyan Declaration, # 49 Exhibit 46 to Findikyan Declaration)(Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

08/26/2011 5 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

08/26/2011 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Kristina E. Findikyan, :Firm- the Hearst Corporation, :Address- 300 West 57th Street, 40th Floor, New York, New York 10019. Phone No. - (212) 649-2009. Fax No. - (212) 649-2035 by HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kristina E. Findikyan, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

08/26/2011 7 MOTION to Stay Discovery and Rule 26 Disclosures by HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

08/30/2011 MINUTE ORDER granting 6 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Kristina E. Findikyan is now admitted pro hac vice to this Court for this matter. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 8/30/2011. (lcrmc1) (Entered: 08/30/2011)

08/31/2011 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jonathan R. Donnellan, :Firm- the Hearst Corporation, :Address- 300 West 57th Street, 40th Floor, New York, New York 10019. Phone No. - (212) 649-2051. Fax No. - (646) 280-2051 by HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MARK WARREN (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jonathan R. Donnellan, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Handman, Laura) (Entered: 08/31/2011)

09/09/2011 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants' Motions by JOSEPH FARAH (Klayman, Larry) (Entered: 09/09/2011)

09/09/2011 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants' Motions by JOSEPH FARAH (Klayman, Larry) (Entered: 09/09/2011)

09/12/2011 MINUTE ORDER granting 8 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Jonathan R. Donnellan is now admitted pro hac vice to this Court for this matter. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 9/12/11. (lcrmc1) (Entered: 09/12/2011)

09/12/2011 MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiffs shall reply to the 4 Motion to Dismiss and Special Motion to Dismiss and 7 Motion to Stay Discovery and Rule 26 Disclosures no later than September 23, 2011. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 9/12/11. (lcrmc1) (Entered: 09/12/2011)

09/12/2011 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Reply to 4 and 7 due by 9/23/2011. (cdw) (Entered: 09/13/2011)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:02 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18560
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Looks like Joey Farah is gonna get beat up in court, if it gets that far.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19941
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
I hope Farah is paying his lawyer hourly and that his lawyer wasn't stoopid enough to take this dog on a contingency.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 280 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group