Reality Check wrote:
I smell another piece of Hurlbutt coming.

Not surprising at all, another insane rant by Hurlbut, I'm sure told to him by Purpura and Laster, legal geniuses.
It's always hard to tell what any of these idiots are saying but at first blush is "appears" they've either not gotten the word on the denial of all their ridiculous motions or, they did and (yeah, unhappy) they're now asking for an en banc hearing kind of as a Motion to Reconsider or something.
From Conservative News and Views
Frustrated HCR bill plaintiffs demand en banc hearing in Third CircuitQuote:
[blah, blah, blah, standing, Bond v U.S. etc.]
Delays in the appeal
Today Purpura and Laster filed a motion for an en banc hearing, and [highlight]wrote an angry letter to Chief Judge Theodore A. McKee[/highlight]

of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. They listed seven separate motions and requests that the court has ignored or [highlight]denied on specious grounds[/highlight].
These motions and requests concern two specific issues. First, as soon as Purpura and Laster filed their appeal, the Justice Department requested an extension of time. The only argument that they offered was that they had four other briefs on cases about the health care reform bill also due in July. In short, they argued that they were too busy. The Third Circuit’s own rules say that counsel cannot get an extension of time merely because he is too busy. But the court’s chief clerk extended the time anyway—for 30 days, well over the 14-day limit that the rules set. Purpura and Laster have asked the court to vacate the extension. When the original deadline passed, they also filed for summary judgment. The court has ignored both motions.
[hey guys... check your mail. Or maybe your yahoos]
Appellant's motion to vacate the order granting the government an extension of time to file a response brief is denied and
Appellant's motion for default of appeal and order for declaratory relief is also denied. [snip they won't tell me who recused themselves and two judges denined our request for recusal and Obama appointed them (forget the Senate confirmations)

]
The two plaintiffs have now filed a
Motion to Recall and Vacate and Request for Judicial Intervention by an En Banc Court.
[whatever the hell that is] They list seven motions and requests that the court has ignored or handled inappropriately:
Show Cause Order for a TRO which has still not been signed; (Ignored)
Motion to Vacate a procedurally infirm Extension of Time; (Ignored)
Motion for a Summary Judgment; (Ignored)
Motion for Recusal; July 15, 2011 (Denied July 28, 2011)
Request for the names of judges that recused themselves; (Ignored)
A request to be informed of which Judges are on the panel; (Ignored)
Entry of a Motion Entry for Default. (Ignored)
How do these match up? From today's docket in the Third Circuit:
Quote:
08/01/2011 Open Document ORDER (SLOVITER, JORDAN and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges) The appellant's motion for an injunction pending appeal is denied. Appellant's motion to vacate the order granting the government an extension of time to file a response brief is denied. Appellant's motion for default of appeal and order for declaratory relief is also denied. Appellant's motion requesting that the court disclose the names of those judges who have recused themselves from this case is denied. Appellants motion for entry of default is denied., filed. Panel No.: BLD-236. GREENAWAY, JR., Authoring Judge. (DW)
08/01/2011 Open Document ORDER (GREENAWAY JR., Circuit Judge) denying Motion to Recuse Judge Greenaway, JR. filed by Appellants Nicholas Purpura and Donald R. Laster, Jr., filed. Panel No.: BLD-236. GREENAWAY, JR., Authoring Judge. (DW)
