#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

[bob]

Yahoo!: NBA playoffs: Knicks advance past Sixers as Jalen Brunson does something not seen since Michael Jordan.

Some Brunson news that I can use!

[Sam the Centipede]

I was thinking "I don't remember what this case claims to be about." On the basis that others might be thinking the same, here's a extracts from a reality-based Salt Lake Tribune piece quoted in an earlier post by Luke:

The suit, which leans on baseless claims of fraud in the 2020 elections, seeks to kick President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and nearly 400 members of Congress out of office and reinstate Donald Trump to the White House.
[…]
The lawsuit claims members of Congress violated their oaths of office by allegedly failing to investigate and covering up evidence of foreign election interference that rigged the election against Donald Trump.
[…]
The complaint asks that the 387 members of Congress who voted to certify Biden’s election be immediately thrown out of office and barred from ever running again. Biden and Harris would also be removed from the White House and banned from running, as would former Vice President Mike Pence.

The article also describes how the nutters demand Trump be declared President, bypassing completely the prescribed order of succession. So that shows the limit of the nutters' respect for the constitution, no, it's all about Trump worship. Of course there is also a demand for a large fleet of golden ponies in damages. Well, don't ask, don't get!

[northland10]

I was thinking "I don't remember what this case claims to be about." On the basis that others might be thinking the same, here's a extracts from a reality-based Salt Lake Tribune piece quoted in an earlier post by Luke:

The suit, which leans on baseless claims of fraud in the 2020 elections, seeks to kick President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and nearly 400 members of Congress out of office and reinstate Donald Trump to the White House.
[…]
The lawsuit claims members of Congress violated their oaths of office by allegedly failing to investigate and covering up evidence of foreign election interference that rigged the election against Donald Trump.
[…]
The complaint asks that the 387 members of Congress who voted to certify Biden’s election be immediately thrown out of office and barred from ever running again. Biden and Harris would also be removed from the White House and banned from running, as would former Vice President Mike Pence.

The article also describes how the nutters demand Trump be declared President, bypassing completely the prescribed order of succession. So that shows the limit of the nutters' respect for the constitution, no, it's all about Trump worship. Of course there is also a demand for a large fleet of golden ponies in damages. Well, don't ask, don't get!

That was the earlier case(s). The current case is against the 3 female liberal justices (and 100 Jane Does though not part of the appeal) who Raland Brunson claimed voted to deny their cert petition thus denying their God-given right to petition the government.

Of course, their pony is that Trump begins POTUS again because of a ruling, which they will not get.

This one has been a huge fail for many reasons:

1. You can't sue judges for rulings
2. They sued SCOTUS justices in the Utah STATE court (removed to the federal court by the defendants).
3. We do not know who voted yes or no to the denial of Raland's earlier case.
4. They only sued 3 female justices, which would not even make a majority of those who voted yes, if it were not unanimous, which we do not know.

[Sam the Centipede]

Wow! Shows how out of touch I am (or was!).

Thanks for the correction.

[bob]

It will probably get distributed for the 23 May conference since there was an explicit waiver of a response (distribution is next Wednesday) but sometimes the printed instructions and schedule is not always followed.

It was distributed to the May 23 conference. Meaning May 28 is when SCOTUS will announce the petition's death.

Betting window is open as to denial or dismissal (due to lack of quorum)!

[bob]

Grifters gotta.

[bob]

USA Today: Knicks star Jalen Brunson fractures hand as injuries doom New York in NBA playoffs.

[RTH10260]

Stop lobbing balls in the courts of law

[bob]

Stop lobbing balls in the courts of law

I would search the bird site for chatter about the Brunsons, and was pleased when most people talked bout the basketball star. A breath of sanity.

[bob]

With the three sued justices not participating, the six remaining justices denied cert. in Raland's latest.

On to the inevitable rehearing petition.

[bob]

Newsweek: Every Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sits Out Decision in Rare Move.

It is rare because it is rare for someone to be so dumb as to sue judges over an adverse ruling. A judge's recusal where they are a party (even an unwilling one) is common.

N.b.:

Every liberal U.S. Supreme Court justice sat out of a decision this week in a rare move for the nation's highest court.

On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson sat out of a decision in Brunson v. Sotomayor, et al. Each of the three liberal justices was named as a defendant in the case. They did not provide a specific reason for sitting out and are not required to do so.

The case was brought by Raland Brunson, who attempted to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election and named the three justices as defendants for denying a writ of certiorari in a previous appeals case.

Newsweek reached out to the Supreme Court via email for comment.

The justices' absence comes days after Sotomayor delivered a speech at Harvard in which she revealed that some past cases had made her emotional.

Notice what the article "forgets" to mention: the cert. denial. Or that this was just a routine conference case, and not oral arguments.

Other clickbaters are doing similar tricks.

[northland10]

Why is Newsweek even reporting on this?

[bob]

Why is Newsweek even reporting on this?

Since being sold, Newsweek has become little more than your average clickbait farm.

The Epoch Times also covered this "historic" case. 'nuff said.