http://paraleaglenm.wordpress.com/



Well, Leonard, not a damn thing. He sez different... kinda... I think.

full "story" at the link

What a jackass. He really thinks the government needs a "warrant" before evicting him? Apparently what really happened is that the city declared his building unsafe and uninhabitable. Then, rather than following timely legal procedure to object to the city's determination, he sat on his ass for too long:

My new solar lights I bought for my garden don't work. I'm torn between blaming Dr. Hate and Orly.

I suppose this explains his comment at WND the other week about being in a lawsuit with the city.

They're probably installed backwards. Did O'rly do it?

[quote]By February of 2009 I had faxed congressmen one-hundred and seventy-seven times, imploring them to investigate Obama’s Article II eligibility. If just TWO of them, including Senator McCain, had submitted a simple one-page letter to the President of the Senate on January 6, 2009, Obama would not be president . . . assuming the same standards that were applied to McCain in SR511 were valid for Obama.

.....

In 2009 I warned congress almost two-hundred times, but they refused to take action. Defeat, to them, seemed a foregone conclusion. In fact, McCain said three weeks before November 2, 2008, “We have nothing to fear with Barack Obama in the White House.”

So, he bothers Congress at least 377 times about Obama but can't be bothered to show up for his traffic ticket and is upset when he is found guilty?

I made a really stupid mistake when I installed solar lamps in my front garden (the side that gets sufficient sun). The sun powers a special (replaceable) battery that comes installed in the lamps. So I stuck the lamp onto the mounting shaft and the mounting shaft onto a spear-thingie that goes into the ground (already loosened) and pushed down on the mounting shaft. It went in very easily.

You noticed that I omitted the step of reading the instructions. When the lamps did not work on the first night after a full day of exposure to the sun, I read the instructions. There is a plastic tab inside the battery compartment of the lamp that prevents the battery from draining itself in storage or otherwise damaging itself. It also prevents the battery from providing power to the lamp even when fully charged. Discarding the plastic tab as instructed, I let the lamps charge another full day. They worked.

Well its so obvious it was congress that got him evicted

Mounting shafts? Tollie

He should call CELIII ASAP. CEL is an expert at claiming outrageous damages as a result of an eviction.

Leonard is not the owner (at least as I read his screed). Should not his beef be with the owner (if indeed he has one) and not the city?
I dunno. Just asking.

It sounds like it, though we need more facts. It looks like he was a renting tenant in a building owned by Landlord. The city probably commenced the process of condemning the building at some point, with plenty of notice and time for Landlord to object if he wanted to. Landlord didn't. So the city condemned, and out went all the tenants.

What the 4th Amendment has to do with this nonsense is beyond me. Much less Obama.

That is exactly what realist told me. He will be visiting in a few weeks and I plan on stumbling around in the dark until then. I'm sure he will also be impressed by my ingenious solution to my crabgrass problem - covering it with mulch.

A professor of mine once told me about installing a set of outdoor lights at his house that was governed by a photoelectric sensor, set to turn the lights on in the absence of sunlight. Unfortunately, it didn't occur to him to locate the sensor in a place that was not illuminated by the new lights, so every time the lights went on they went back off.

The fact that Prof. Wigner had won the Nobel Prize in Physics was of no avail.

My ex did his thesis based on some theory that a couple guys won the Nobel prize in Economics for. At one point I made it clear that what they wrote was obvious (to be fair, they also wrote an equation with a bunch of greek letters interspersed with the numbers). Ever since then, my boss has told clients that I just barely missed being a Nobel prize winning economist.

OT did you see "your" (Maru's) birthday video? It was hilarious.

The fellow seems to be disconnected from reality. Look how he "answers" a simple question:


To which paralegalnm "answers":



Uh, no, paralegalnm, what's the "analogy"?

I'm right; the world is wrong.

I didn't know "buildings" had 4th Amendment rights.

I wish I knew what his legal theory actually was. Does he think the city needed a warrant? Why would it need one when it's not trying to seize evidence in furtherance of some crime it believes has been committed?

I'm sure his legal analysis and position on his being evicted as a tenant from his landlord's building which was (it sounds) condemned by the city is very much in line with his legal analysis of natural born citizenship... extremely flawed.

The man is a way better and average photographer, but a way worse than average "legal mind" or paralegal, or whatever title he wishes to confer upon himself... though he dun gud slapping down Apuzzo's kerning on the "fake" long-form BC of Obama.