TW - he can't read. I don't think it was intentional. I think it merely reflects a part of the problem he has.

Obama's LFBC was scanned directly as a PDF file. You are scanning as a TIFF file, and converting to PDF. Doing this, you will never, ever get similar results.

TW - he can't read. I don't think it was intentional. I think it merely reflects a part of the problem he has.

News Release of May 22, 2011
Expanded Analysis of President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth
by Douglas Vogt Re: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Dear Sir/Madam, I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs and [highlight]the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense.[/highlight] When this comes to the public’s attention, it will be the greatest scandal in the country’s history—nothing comes even close. This will surpass the all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.

What President Obama Presented to the Public is an alleged Certificate of Live Birth.

What President Obama presented is not the hospital birth certificate. [no shit, Sherlock] [highlight]The birth certificate would have the imprint of the baby’s footprint,[/highlight] weight, length and other information. [highlight]Some even have religion.[/highlight] The Birth Certificate would be the source of the same information that would be typed onto the Certificate of Live Birth (the Long Form, COLB). What President Obama released is supposedly the Long Form that the County gets from the hospital, which is typed on a blank form given to the hospitals by the county. That copy is then [highlight]mailed[/highlight] to the county Board of Health and kept as a legal government document. On Obama’s form (Figure 1) the County Clerk supposedly hand stamped the form on the upper right hand corner with a bates number stamp. The number is a sequential number that reflects the sequence of Certificates that come into the County Health Department on a daily basis. The number was most likely stamped by hand is because the number is crooked. There were electronic bates numbering machines but I don’t think that was used because I am not sure they were available back in 1961 and if one was used it would have imprinted the number straighter. The County Clerk also hand stamps the date of acceptance (box 20 and box 22). Obama’s Long Form was supposedly received on August 8, 1961, four days after his birth. The County Clerk would then sign the certificate (box 21) with his or her whole legal name, no initials.

One of the reasons I mentioned the Federal law is because when President Obama gave his news conference, presenting his alleged Certificate of Live Birth, he stated that they had to get special permission to get a copy of his Certificate. His statement appears to be blatantly wrong because t[highlight]hese are public documents[/highlight] and he could have requested a copy himself at any time as well as his Secretary of Health and Human Services could have audited the County’s records and get a copy any time they wanted.

Is this the same "scanner expert" that Jabba the Corsi is yapping about?

We believe so.

The "expert" software salesman Mr. Vogt has expanded his analysis of why the digital image of Obama's long-form BC is a forgery.

http://www.vectorpub.com/Obamas_certifi ... alease.pdf

I've been a casual user, at best, of both of those programs since the early 1990s, so I don't know this for sure, but it appears to me that that statement is demonstrably wrong. I thought the metadata on the .pdf posted at the White House site showed that the document was scanned directly into the computer using a Mac's on-board program? If either of those programs were used, the file would have had to have been translated from .pdf to Photoshop or Illustrator native format, then saved again as a .pdf. There would have been fingerprints left, if my meager knowledge of the subject is not incorrect. And the metadata would have showed something else.

Dr Conspiracy 'destroys' the Vogt 'arguments'

Wow. I had no idea Doc had such great credentials.

All this stuff about Adobe products being used is just nothing but irrelevant bullshit.""
Not quite accurate, the document properties view cleaarly shows this was a PDF document,PDF version 1.3. PDF files were developed by, Acrobat, the primary PDF reader Acrobat was developed by Adobe. full program name that was used:
Adobe Acrobat Mac wersion 1.3.
look at document properties view, Vogt is an Idiot yet the scan supplied was done in Adobe Acrobat. Got it?

All this stuff about Adobe products being used is just nothing but irrelevant bullshit.""
Not quite accurate, the document properties view cleaarly shows this was a PDF document,PDF version 1.3. PDF files were developed by, Acrobat, the primary PDF reader Acrobat was developed by Adobe. full program name that was used:
Adobe Acrobat Mac wersion 1.3.
look at document properties view, Vogt is an Idiot yet the scan supplied was done in Adobe Acrobat. Got it?

Guess what tomorrow is?

Bwahahahahah! Good catch!


The one year anniversary of Les Kinsolving becoming persona non grata at WND!

Should we serve pie or cookies?