Well, whodathunkit? Taitz is preparing to file a Reply to the Defendant's Opposition to her Motion for Reconsideration! NO HELPING ORLY FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Taitz v Astrue draft of reply to opposition to motion for reconsideration
Posted on | September 28, 2011 | No Comments
PDF and docx versions below
Draft to reply to opposition
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ pro se
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: [/break1]com]email@example.com, [/break1]firstname.lastname@example.org]email@example.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. Orly Taitz, in pro se ) Hon. Royce C. Lamberth
) Case No. 11-cv-00402
) Motion for Reconsideration
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the )
Social Security Administration, )
) [Request for Oral argument
) to be held within 20 days]
Respondent . )
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz”) submits this reply to opposition to motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Opposition by the defendant, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue did not oppose any substantive points of the motion for reconsideration and the motion should be considered unopposed on the merits. In case the court believes, that the substantive points were addressed, the Plaintiff provides the following argument in reply to opposition and in support for motion for reconsideration.
Defendant Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security administration through his attorneys, Department of Justice-US Attorneys’ office, is claiming that the fact that Barack Obama, an individual without a valid social security number according to e-verify, is occupying the position of the US president and Commander in Chief, does not represent an emergency situation and therefore there should not be a reconsideration.
In response Plaintiff herein is using Your Honors’ own lexicon: “They are either toying with the nation or showing their stupidity”.
Taitz provided irrefutable evidence, showing that Barack Hussein Obama has used in his tax returns and his selective service a Connecticut Social security number XXX-XX-XXXX [redacted by TF], which was never assigned to him according to E-verify. Even without e-verify, fraud is evident, as the number starts with 042, a number sequence assigned to the state of CT, where Obama never resided. Can our Commissioner of Social Security and our Department of Justice led by Eric Holder be so completely brain dead to suggest, that having a criminal with a stolen social security number and a forged birth certificate and an unknown allegiance does not represent an emergency?
[highlight]For Michael Astrue, a licensed attorney, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; for the US attorneys, representing him, to even suggest, that there is no “legitimate public interest” in knowing whether we have a criminal in the White House with a fraudulently obtained Social Security number, is simply unthinkable, it represents a total lack of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, that they were sworn to protect. This behavior by the Commissioner of the Social Security administration and US attorneys representing him, is simply criminal, it simply amounts to obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting Social Security fraud and possibly treason against the United States of America. If this is not an emergency, what is, if there is no public interest in knowing, whether we have a criminal in the White House, when is there a public interest[/highlight]? Can there be a more dire emergency? We have a breach of the national security in the highest office in the land, and our Department of Justice does not grasp that this is an emergency?
It is hard to believe that we have such an unprecedented stupidity, therefore we are left to deduct, that we have an unprecedented level of corruption in all three brunches of our government, which allows this crime to go on for nearly three years. Specifically because it is the highest level of emergency, we need Your Honor to address the evidence and reconsider the motion for summary judgment.
But, that's not all:
Newly available evidence
Defendant claims, that the Plaintiff fails to identify newly available evidence. Defendant claims, that the information provided by Taitz was received by her earlier and was not submitted timely. Clearly the department of Justice suffers from a case of collective dyslexia or does not understand simple English.
Only recently Taitz received an affidavit from Mr. Papa, attesting to this information, as well as affidavit from Linda Jordan. None of this information was available to Plaintiff before, there were no latches and she had no reason to believe that this information could be available. Information of Barack Obama’s use of Connecticut social security number XXX-XX-XXXX [again} in his tax returns, is a newly discovered evidence for the Plaintiff, which was not available to her before.
There's more of the brilliance but I'm askeered of raicha, so...maybe someone can Scrib'd this.