INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

[bob]

I lurve that Greene went "as a member of the Oversight Committee," and the court said, "Ma'am, this is a Wendy's," and sent her to the public line.

[Kriselda Gray]

I don’t see that on his timeline FWIW.

The thing that makes me question it is his calling her Judge Chutney. I'd be surprised if he knew the word, much less had any clue as to what Chutney even is. It seems too highbrow for one of his 'nicknames'

[RVInit]

As an added bonus, I never saw a narcissist testify. Deep down, they know they can't hold it together during direct, let alone cross because they have no control over the situation.

If you want to see a narcissist testify, search YouTube for the Alex Murdaugh trial and find the video where he testified. He really thought he could schmooze the jury that way he had schmoozed people his entire life.

Murdaugh did far better than TFG could ever do, but the jury saw through it all anyway.

[jcolvin2]

The thing that makes me question it is his calling her Judge Chutney. I'd be surprised if he knew the word, much less had any clue as to what Chutney even is. It seems too highbrow for one of his 'nicknames'

Whether or not it was written by Trump or one of his surrogates, I think the “Judge Chutney” comment conveys the casual racism that the MAGA base has come to expect from Dear Leader’s social media posts. The nickname demeans by linking the judge with something associated with non-white people. (Granted much of what passes for chutney in this country is a pale reflection of the original, having been jellied and sweetened for the early 20th century British palate.)

[Ben-Prime]

Off Topic

The thing that makes me question it is his calling her Judge Chutney. I'd be surprised if he knew the word, much less had any clue as to what Chutney even is. It seems too highbrow for one of his 'nicknames'

Whether or not it was written by Trump or one of his surrogates, I think the “Judge Chutney” comment conveys the casual racism that the MAGA base has come to expect from Dear Leader’s social media posts. The nickname demeans by linking the judge with something associated with non-white people. (Granted much of what passes for chutney in this country is a pale reflection of the original, having been jellied and sweetened for the early 20th century British palate.)

Having done two years out of Our Embassy in London, you can have my caramelized onion chutney covering a slice of double Gloucester cheese when you pry both out of my cold, dead hands.

[Foggy]

I said to ol' Wifehorn in the car on Sunday, "Judge Chutney" is an obvious racist dog whistle, and I have been watching for it, but his white supremacist redneck supporters would have no idea what chutney is, much less that (yes, a version of it) is sold in Indian restaurants.

They've never been to an Indian restaurant. They've never seen one. There are no Indian restaurants in East Armpit, Alabama.

So Judge Chutney doesn't work. Unless he says it again, I has a suspicious about that Untruth^®.

[Suranis]

As seen on discord, someone copied an ad they got when going to Truth Social to look at the https://truthsocial.com/@BidenHQ account. Which is indeed very funny.

Truthad.jpg (48.5 KiB) Viewed 1411 times

Oh and as for why they joined Truthsocial?

veryfuny.png (23.36 KiB) Viewed 1412 times

Wouldn't it be funny if they started getting more traffic than Trump on his own site?

[noblepa]

I said to ol' Wifehorn in the car on Sunday, "Judge Chutney" is an obvious racist dog whistle, and I have been watching for it, but his white supremacist redneck supporters would have no idea what chutney is, much less that (yes, a version of it) is sold in Indian restaurants.

They've never been to an Indian restaurant. They've never seen one. There are no Indian restaurants in East Armpit, Alabama.

So Judge Chutney doesn't work. Unless he says it again, I has a suspicious about that Untruth^®.

In one of his recent postings regarding the NY trial, he made the statement that "the monkeys are running the asylum".

First of all, the phrase is usually "the inmates are running the asylum".

More importantly, though, IMHO, is the use of the work "monkey". That is often used as a racist euphamism for black people.

Is it just me, or is he becoming more and more obvious in his racism? He always showed glimmers of racism, but he seems to be more and more open about it.

[Foggy]

Is it just me, or is he becoming more and more obvious in his racism?

It's not just you.

He always showed glimmers of racism, but he seems to be more and more open about it.

He's always been a racist shitstain and he's getting worse because older and more desperate about his own inferiority.

Remember that a black man was a much more intelligent, successful, and popular president. He can never match up, not in his head, not in mine.

[Suranis]

Also, he got attention before by throwing veiled insults at people. There's no reason he wouldn't do it now when he is desperate for attention.

And he isn't a -cist. He despises EVERYONE.

[p0rtia]

Chutkan gag* order

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content ... 7-2023.pdf

Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 57.7(c), it is hereby ORDERED that: All interested parties in this matter, including the parties and their counsel, are prohibited from making any public statements, or directing others to make any public statements, that target (1) the Special Counsel prosecuting this case or his staff; (2) defense counsel or their staff; (3) any of this court’s staff or other supporting personnel; or (4) any reasonably foreseeable witness or the substance of their testimony.

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

Chutkan gag* order

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content ... 7-2023.pdf

Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 57.7(c), it is hereby ORDERED that: All interested parties in this matter, including the parties and their counsel, are prohibited from making any public statements, or directing others to make any public statements, that target (1) the Special Counsel prosecuting this case or his staff; (2) defense counsel or their staff; (3) any of this court’s staff or other supporting personnel; or (4) any reasonably foreseeable witness or the substance of their testimony.

Yep, this aligns precisely with my expectations.

[jcolvin2]

Off Topic

You have well and truly gone native.

Having done two years out of Our Embassy in London, you can have my caramelized onion chutney covering a slice of double Gloucester cheese when you pry both out of my cold, dead hands.

[keith]

Off Topic

You have well and truly gone native.

Having done two years out of Our Embassy in London, you can have my caramelized onion chutney covering a slice of double Gloucester cheese when you pry both out of my cold, dead hands.

OK, we've just gone through a jar of carmelized onion in spicy shiraz jam, more a chutney than a jam. We tried it with everything, and it was better than great, but we never found that perfect match. Gloucester cheese you say? I think I'm on a mission now.

FYI shiraz is a wine grape variety. Most of the world calls it syrah.

[sugar magnolia]

Off Topic

You have well and truly gone native.

Having done two years out of Our Embassy in London, you can have my caramelized onion chutney covering a slice of double Gloucester cheese when you pry both out of my cold, dead hands.

OK, we've just gone through a jar of carmelized onion in spicy shiraz jam, more a chutney than a jam. We tried it with everything, and it was better than great, but we never found that perfect match. Gloucester cheese you say? I think I'm on a mission now.

FYI shiraz is a wine grape variety. Most of the world calls it syrah.

But did you try it with roast pork?

[keith]

Pork chop, not roast. Also lamb, crackers, cheddar cheese, not sure what else.

[bob]

Notice of appeal filed:

Although this was a nonfinal decision, the appellate court likely will rule it is still appealable under the collateral-order doctrine.

[NewMexGirl]

The appeal will happen concurrently with the trial so that’s a good thing, shouldn’t delay the trial itself, at least according to Popehat. Chutkan seems pretty determined to stick with the March date.

Correct me if I’m wrong, as I so often am. One of the things I admire most about IAALs is the ability to tell someone they’re a dumb mofo, but tactfully.

[bob]

The appeal will happen concurrently with the trial so that’s a good thing, shouldn’t delay the trial itself, at least according to Popehat.

Correct. Unless there's a stay pending appeal, but I doubt either the district or appellate court will be inclined to grant that.

Given the upcoming trial date, I would not be surprised if actually expect the D.C. Cir. to expedite this appeal.

[Uninformed]

Apparently tfg’s lawyer John Laura who submitted the appeal of Judge Chutkan’s gag order is not a member of the bar for the DC Court of appeals (this can be rectified).

[noblepa]

One would think that a lawyer would know that he must be admitted to practice before the appellate court.

Apparently, one would be wrong.

He's not the same one who forgot to check the box for a jury trial in New York, is he?

Only the best.

[bill_g]

I think it was Lady Hantavirus that forgot to tick the box.

[Sam the Centipede]

Via Vanity Fair:

“I’ve been a member of the DC bar and the federal trial court bar for nearly 40 years. This is a routine request from the federal appellate court to join its bar, which I will do in order to represent President Trump in this important matter.”

The esteemed members of the Fogbar can adjudicate as to whether this is a purely administrative thing, whether it is bad to be caught in this way, or what.

[Reality Check]

The esteemed members of the Fogbar can adjudicate as to whether this is a purely administrative thing, whether it is bad to be caught in this way, or what.

I think I know what would say. Attorneys are supposed to know the rules. Has Lauro never once filed an appeal in his 40 year career?

[Maybenaut]

I’ve never filed an appeal in any federal court, except military courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. Even I know each circuit requires admission.