Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 3326
Location: Kailua, HI (home) Honolulu, HI (work)
Occupation: Development Director for The Arc in Hawaii (non-profit supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities)
SueDB, not that it's likely to make any difference since it seems the GA bill is probably going to die a (mostly) unmourned death, but based on the quote from WND:
Quote:
The state's Presidential Eligibility Assurance Act would specify, "It is [highlight]unlawful for any presidential elector from this state to cast his or her electoral college vote for a candidate who is not approved[/highlight] by the Secretary of State as having submitted adequate evidence of eligibility. Any person who violates this Code section shall upon conviction be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature."

I take this to mean that Hatfield is trying to criminalize a vote by a presidential elector in the electoral college, not by a regular voter in the actual presidential election.

_________________
"This leap...is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity."
Judge Clay D. Land - Oct. 13, 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2601
Location: In exile in NOVA
June bug wrote:
SueDB, not that it's likely to make any difference since it seems the GA bill is probably going to die a (mostly) unmourned death, but based on the quote from WND:
Quote:
The state's Presidential Eligibility Assurance Act would specify, "It is [highlight]unlawful for any presidential elector from this state to cast his or her electoral college vote for a candidate who is not approved[/highlight] by the Secretary of State as having submitted adequate evidence of eligibility. Any person who violates this Code section shall upon conviction be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature."

I take this to mean that Hatfield is trying to criminalize a vote by a presidential elector in the electoral college, not by a regular voter in the actual presidential election.


That how I read it too. It's a sign of how crazy this bill is that only one other bill has a provision like that the Nebraska bill:

Quote:
(3) It is unlawful for any presidential elector from
18 Nebraska to cast his or her electoral college vote for a candidate
19 who is not certified by the Secretary of State as constitutionally
20 eligible to serve in accordance with section 32-620. Any presidential
21 elector violating this subsection shall be guilty of a Class IV
22 felony.

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 3932
Location: Brigadoon
Occupation: Retired
June bug wrote:
SueDB, not that it's likely to make any difference since it seems the GA bill is probably going to die a (mostly) unmourned death, but based on the quote from WND:
Quote:
The state's Presidential Eligibility Assurance Act would specify, "It is [highlight]unlawful for any presidential elector from this state to cast his or her electoral college vote for a candidate who is not approved[/highlight] by the Secretary of State as having submitted adequate evidence of eligibility. Any person who violates this Code section shall upon conviction be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature."

I take this to mean that Hatfield is trying to criminalize a vote by a presidential elector in the electoral college, not by a regular voter in the actual presidential election.


Yeah. That'll work.

](*,) ](*,)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9394
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
P&E comment:
RJ wrote:
The following expresses my cynical prognostication relative to the possibility of even one state passing and signing into law a sufficiently specific requirement of irrefutable, visible proof of Constitutional eligibility to run for the presidency and be listed on that state’s ballot:

obama will sue said state on the grounds that as the sitting president he is exempt from the requirement which can only apply to future candidates for the office. He will assert said law cannot be applied retroactively!!!! And the courts will likely side with him.

Also, too many of the proposed laws being floated among states identify requirements that are, in my opinion, insufficiently specific to trap obama and keep him off an individual state’s ballot.

I would so love to be wrong . . .

The good news is you are wrong.

The bad news is it is not for the reasons you think.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4130
Location: Southwest of down east
RJ wrote:
Also, too many of the proposed laws being floated among states identify requirements that are, in my opinion, insufficiently specific to trap obama and keep him off an individual state’s ballot.


Uh huh, I'm afraid that's true: A lot of those birfer bills are insufficiently specific. Hell, some of them read like the special requirements could apply to other unintended candidates, some of whom are perfectly good Americans -- quality white folks, even.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11155
Location: FEMA Camp 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
DaveMuckey wrote:
June bug wrote:
SueDB, not that it's likely to make any difference since it seems the GA bill is probably going to die a (mostly) unmourned death, but based on the quote from WND:
Quote:
The state's Presidential Eligibility Assurance Act would specify, "It is [highlight]unlawful for any presidential elector from this state to cast his or her electoral college vote for a candidate who is not approved[/highlight] by the Secretary of State as having submitted adequate evidence of eligibility. Any person who violates this Code section shall upon conviction be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature."

I take this to mean that Hatfield is trying to criminalize a vote by a presidential elector in the electoral college, not by a regular voter in the actual presidential election.


Yeah. That'll work.

](*,) ](*,)


My point is that I cannot write in anyone I please for President - If anyone I please gets the most votes for President, then the elector cannot vote for someone that is not "pre approved by the state". ](*,)
Edit: add a little colour

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9708
SuEdB wrote:
My point is that I cannot write in anyone I please for President - If anyone I please gets the most votes for President, then the elector cannot vote for someone that is not "pre approved by the state".


I think some of these assbat state legislators who are proposing this garbage are openly inviting a repetition of Sherman's March to the Sea. I hope they enjoy it if they get it.

_________________
"[T]he American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered together under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages, and. . .they grow more timorous, more sniveling, more poltroonish, more ignominious every day." H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:30 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11155
Location: FEMA Camp 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
SuEdB wrote:
My point is that I cannot write in anyone I please for President - If anyone I please gets the most votes for President, then the elector cannot vote for someone that is not "pre approved by the state".


I think some of these assbat state legislators who are proposing this garbage are openly inviting a repetition of Sherman's March to the Sea. I hope they enjoy it if they get it.


It is going to be more like Obama's March to the Sea.

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2601
Location: In exile in NOVA
After today I won’t be around the board too much for a while, I’m going back to Wales for a visit and am not sure when, if , and how much I’ll be online. Barring accidents normal service will be resumed on March 22nd.

In the meantime here is a summary of how I see the current position on birther bills and what may happen next week.

Bills are to all intents dead for this legislative session in ME, HI, CT, IN,MT, AZ (but see below),IA & NH. On some there may be movement because some legislatures allow bills to be carried forward at the end of a session but I think it’s unlikely.

TX & TN have published next week’s hearing schedules and none of the birther bills are scheduled yet.

MO has had its public hearing and is awaiting an executive session of the committee. The committee has published its agenda for next week and no executive session is scheduled. One could be added but if this stands then Spring Break kicks in on March 17th and nothing will happen until at least March 29th. I tend to think this is the most likely one to pass but as the weeks tick by it becomes increasingly difficult.

NE of course has had its public hearing yesterday and will need an executive session. I wouldn’t expect one next week and from what the local media is saying about other bills it seems unlikely that any non- priority bill that’s not out of committee yet will get passed. On top of that, despite my praise of BDZ’s performance yesterday, looking at her booklet today I suspect she’s killed it.

OK is quite interesting. Two bills are dead but one (SB91) was heavily amended in committee and is awaiting its third reading. The sponsor of one of the failed bills has tabled a floor amendment to re-introduce its vattelist provisions via this bill. At this stage there’s no telling if the will ever get called for action on the senate floor. There’s no public advance notice, the Floor Leader just gets up and asks the President to recognize senator x on bill y. My gut feeling is that it’s not going to happen and there is a deadline approaching: bills have to get their 3rd reading by March 17th. To add to the uncertainty OK has a parliamentary device that allows them to approve third reading while still reserve the possibility of further amendments.(Did I mention that when I said “interesting” I meant as in the old Chinese curse?)

GA also has 3rd reading deadline coming up on March 16th and despite what Rep Hatfield was saying last night I think he’s whistling in the wind. At the moment there are no meetings of the relevant sub committees and committees scheduled and I expect both GA bills to effectively die next week

AR of course has a bill but the Democratic majorities will put paid to that one, it’ll probably never be seen again.

There are birther rumours of bills to be introduced in AL ,which I discount, and PA which I take a bit more seriously but with a full time legislature like PA that could be months away. For my part I’m surprised that no bill has been introduced in SC since there’s at least one birther rep there who’s tried before.

Finally to return to AZ. Orly has dropped hints of the issue being resurrected there by means of an amendment maybe a ‘strike everything’ amendment to another bill. Knowing her contacts and that Judy Burges tried that last year I’ve got to give that some credence. I may be adding 2 +2 and making 625 but there is a Senate Bill 1412 on Early Voting which is currently in House Judiciary. Some AZ tea partiers , who refer to it as the voter fraud bill, are trying to pressure Speaker Kirk to remove it Judy Burges’ State Government Committee – I wonder, I wonder. :-k

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6731
Have a safe and happy trip WD! Your effort on the birther bills has been phenomenal. Thank you so much.

I would be willing to keep an eye on MO next week. House and Senate have bills there, right?

since I have a particular interest in failure in MO ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:50 pm
Posts: 31
Location: Florida
Thanks WD. Enjoy your trip. Your work is appreciated.

_________________
empiricism > ideology


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2601
Location: In exile in NOVA
kimba wrote:
Have a safe and happy trip WD! Your effort on the birther bills has been phenomenal. Thank you so much.

I would be willing to keep an eye on MO next week. House and Senate have bills there, right?

since I have a particular interest in failure in MO ;)


Thanks Kimba - you're right although it's the House bill that's the main interest - I think the Senate Bill will probably disappear without trace.

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 3326
Location: Kailua, HI (home) Honolulu, HI (work)
Occupation: Development Director for The Arc in Hawaii (non-profit supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities)
Have a wonderful time on your trip, WD. And thanks so much for such terrific work in tracking all these pestilential bills! :-*

_________________
"This leap...is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity."
Judge Clay D. Land - Oct. 13, 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Posts: 6666
Location: downstairs
Bon voyage, WD! :hug:

_________________
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.--Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:18 pm
Posts: 2465
Location: Paris, France
Adelante wrote:
Bon voyage, WD! :hug:


taith ddiogel WD!!!

_________________
Incorrible. Please do not incorrige me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Posts: 3213
Location: Orlyfornian S.S.R.
Safe travels, WD!

_________________
"These people are the Energizer Bunnies of Stupid."
--SqueekyFromm, girl reporter

Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4819
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
have a wonderful trip, WD ...

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23911
Have a safe and great trip, WD.

Thanks again for all the work on the bills. :-bd

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:10 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11155
Location: FEMA Camp 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Have a nice trip, see ya next fall...

Oh well,

Enjoy your sojourn, Thanks for the gathering all this info...

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 13247
Location: location, location
Occupation: Rocket surgeon
Yes, have a safe and enjoyable trip, and thanks for all your hard work on this.

Boy, that new avatar of Estiveo's looks really ... grumpy. :mrgreen:

_________________
Ankeny and progeny live together in perfect harmony ...



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9394
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Apuzzo kills many electrons while adding nothing to the discourse: The States Have the Constitutional Power to Pass Legislation Prescribing Presidential Ballot Access Requirements Including Determining Whether a Candidate Meets the Eligibility Requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5

Really, the only thing slightly of note that Apuzzo says:
Quote:
While the Constitution does not define a 'natural born Citizen,' the states can apply the definition of the 'natural born Citizen' clause in keeping with the sources stated herein.

It will come to no surprise to attorneys that states often do interpret the U.S. Constitution, in a variety of contexts. (And if someone thinks the state is wrong, the inevitable result is a lawsuit.) Now, of course, the states are bound by SCOTUS's definitions, but given Apuzzo's usual list of greatest hits (Minor, Dred Scott, etc.), he of course concludes the states will all agree with him.

Apuzzo adds this curious comment:
Quote:
If the states apply the correct definition of a "natural born Citizen" which is a child born in the U.S. to U.S. citizen father and mother, there is not going to be any patchwork.

Or the states can decide to do a compact which would avoid the patchwork.

Or let one state get sued so that the courts can give us a uniform definition.

1. States can avoid SCOTUS's rulings by entering into a compact?

2. Unless said suit went all the way to SCOTUS (and there's no indication one would), there still wouldn't be a uniform definition. This happens all the time in the law (hello, "circuit conflict"!); an attorney really ought to know this.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9708
bob wrote:
Apuzzo adds this curious comment:
Quote:
If the states apply the correct definition of a "natural born Citizen" which is a child born in the U.S. to U.S. citizen father and mother, there is not going to be any patchwork.

Or the states can decide to do a compact which would avoid the patchwork.

Or let one state get sued so that the courts can give us a uniform definition.

1. States can avoid SCOTUS's rulings by entering into a compact?

2. Unless said suit went all the way to SCOTUS (and there's no indication one would), there still wouldn't be a uniform definition. This happens all the time in the law (hello, "circuit conflict"!); an attorney really ought to know this.


I guess he forgot to read that part of the Constitution called the Compact Clause.

Art I, sec. 10 wrote:
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

_________________
"[T]he American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered together under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages, and. . .they grow more timorous, more sniveling, more poltroonish, more ignominious every day." H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Posts: 3213
Location: Orlyfornian S.S.R.
Foggy wrote:
Boy, that new avatar of Estiveo's looks really ... grumpy. :mrgreen:


Grumpy? Damn, I was going for snide faux ennui. :yawn: wait, what? 8-)

_________________
"These people are the Energizer Bunnies of Stupid."
--SqueekyFromm, girl reporter

Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18983
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Have a nice trip, WD!

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birther Bills Summary
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20268
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Foggy wrote:
Yes, have a safe and enjoyable trip, and thanks for all your hard work on this.

Boy, that new avatar of Estiveo's looks really ... grumpy. :mrgreen:

[-X

Too crowded already.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group