Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 551 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 23  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 6064
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
Jez wrote:
Her form looks exactly like the one I got from the State of Louisiana. At the time I ordered mine (crica 2000), it was a photocopy of the original printed onto security paper. I've scanned/copied my own B/C before. There are some security features that show though.

Like the border around the paper.

Or, the date stamp from when it was issued.

It's a fake.

Nor does it matter. The birfers have said time and time again that only the original "vault copy" is good enough. It states right on this cert that it is only a copy.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
jy1977 wrote:
Actually, according to Hawaii Law, it might be possible to get access to Obama's records afterall. While it is not possible to inspect them or order certified copies, verification of any date contained in such records in easier to get:

§338-18 Disclosure of records.

(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is:
(5) An individual employed, endorsed, or sponsored by a governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record in preparation of reports or publications by the agency or organization for research or educational purposes.


Let us know how well this went...

The part you overlooked
Quote:

(a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.


Oops

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
jy1977 wrote:
Yes, it is completely possible to see one's Long-form BC. If one orders a Certified copy of a Birth Certificate, he or she will what Obama allegally posted whch is COLB. However, Hawaii Law allow for public inspection of all records pertaining your birth which would include a long-form BC. Assuming you qualify under the requirements of the Hawaii Statute, there is no way Hawaii can deny you your long-form BC. If they do, then they are breaking the law.


And yet, there is no longer a long form. Say what, you make the argument that they are breaking the law and report to us how successful the argument was... Of course, you forgot to read the full section of the HRS 338...

GIGO

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 2675
Jez wrote:
Her form looks exactly like the one I got from the State of Louisiana. At the time I ordered mine (crica 2000), it was a photocopy of the original printed onto security paper. I've scanned/copied my own B/C before. There are some security features that show though.

Like the border around the paper.

Or, the date stamp from when it was issued.

It's a fake.


Like mine issued in 2001, printed on colored security paper, with a security border of raised ink. And date-stamped.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
jy1977 wrote:
Yes, it is completely possible to see one's Long-form BC. If one orders a Certified copy of a Birth Certificate, he or she will what Obama allegally posted whch is COLB. However, Hawaii Law allow for public inspection of all records pertaining your birth which would include a long-form BC. Assuming you qualify under the requirements of the Hawaii Statute, there is no way Hawaii can deny you your long-form BC. If they do, then they are breaking the law.


So exactly what Hawaii law would say that? Would you be referring to §338-18?
Edit: I see my guess was correct from your subsequent post.


Quote:
§338-18 Disclosure of records. (a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.

(b) The department shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record. The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record:

(1) The registrant;

(2) The spouse of the registrant;

(3) A parent of the registrant;

(4) A descendant of the registrant;

(5) A person having a common ancestor with the registrant;

(6) A legal guardian of the registrant;

(7) A person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant;

(8) A personal representative of the registrant’s estate;

(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;

(10) Adoptive parents who have filed a petition for adoption and who need to determine the death of one or more of the prospective adopted child’s natural or legal parents;

(11) A person who needs to determine the marital status of a former spouse in order to determine the payment of alimony;

(12) A person who needs to determine the death of a nonrelated co-owner of property purchased under a joint tenancy agreement; and

(13) A person who needs a death certificate for the determination of payments under a credit insurance policy.

(c) The department may permit the use [of] the data contained in public health statistical records for research purposes only, but no identifying use thereof shall be made.

(d) Index data consisting of name and sex of the registrant, type of vital event, and such other data as the director may authorize shall be made available to the public.

(e) The department may permit persons working on genealogy projects access to microfilm or other copies of vital records of events that occurred more than seventy-five years prior to the current year.

(f) Subject to this section, the department may direct its local agents to make a return upon filing of birth, death, and fetal death certificates with them, of certain data shown to federal, state, territorial, county, or municipal agencies. Payment by these agencies for these services may be made as the department shall direct.

(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is:

(1) A person who has a direct and tangible interest in the record but requests a verification in lieu of a certified copy;

(2) A governmental agency or organization who for a legitimate government purpose maintains and needs to update official lists of persons in the ordinary course of the agency’s or organization’s activities;

(3) A governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks confirmation of a certified copy of any such record submitted in support of or information provided about a vital event relating to any such record and contained in an official application made in the ordinary course of the agency’s or organization’s activities by an individual seeking employment with, entrance to, or the services or products of the agency or organization;

(4) A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings; or

(5) An individual employed, endorsed, or sponsored by a governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record in preparation of reports or publications by the agency or organization for research or educational purposes. [L 1949, c 327, §22; RL 1955, §57-21; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 30, §2; HRS §338-18; am L 1977, c 118, §1; am L 1991, c 190, §1; am L 1997, c 305, §5; am L 2001, c 246, §2]


Gee, nothing in there about "requiring" the DOH to allow inspection is there? It just tells us who cannot order a COLB.
Then of course here is what Janice Okubo said:

Quote:
Birth certificate styles adjust to fit times and regulations

Question: What is the state’s policy for issuing a “Certification of Live Birth” versus a “Certificate of Live Birth”? My first, second and fourth children received certificates, but my third and fifth children received certifications. Why the difference? The certificate contains more information, such as the name of hospital, certifier’s name and title; attendant’s name and title, etc. The certification has only the child’s name, date and time of birth, sex, city/island/county of birth, mother’s maiden name, mother’s race, father’s name and father’s race. Why doesn’t the state just issue certificates? When did it stop issuing certificates? Is it possible to obtain certificates for my third and fifth children?

Answer: No, you can’t obtain a “certificate of live birth” anymore.

The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo.

The department only issues “certifications” of live births, and that is the “official birth certificate” issued by the state of Hawaii, she said.
Okubo explained that the Health Department went paperless in 2001.

“At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting,” she said.

Information about births is transferred electronically from hospitals to the department.

“The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests,” Okubo said.

Asked for more information about the short-form versus long-form birth documents, Okubo said the Health Department “does not have a short-form or long-form certificate.”

“The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said.

Okubo also emphasized the certification form “contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate.”


The State of Hawaii determines in what manner manner "authorized persons" are given access to the vital statistic data that they are authorized access and in the case of birth data it is the COLB and the index data. That has been the case since 2001.

You do have the choice of receiving a verification. The DOH explains what that entails:

Quote:
Letters of Verification

Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). This document verifies the existence of a birth/death/marriage/divorce certificate on file with the Department of Health and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event. (For example, that a certain named individual was born on a certain date at a certain place.) The verification process will not, however, disclose information about the vital event contained within the certificate that is unknown to and not provided by the applicant in the request.

Letters of verification are requested in similar fashion and using the same request forms as for certified copies.

The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.


Certified copies are defined in §338-13:

Quote:
§338-13 Certified copies. (a) Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.

(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department, certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18.

(c) Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printoutor other process approved by the director of health. [L 1949, c 327, §17; RL 1955, §57-16; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-13; am L 1978, c 49, §1]


See, the DOH can choose the format and since 2001 they have chosen the "computer printout" option as Ms Okubo explained.

What does the certificate look like? Check §338-11 Form of certificates:

Quote:
§338-11 Form of certificates. The forms of certificates shall include as a minimum the items required by the respective standard certificates as recommended by the Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, subject to approval of and modification by the department of health. In addition, the forms of death certificates shall require the individual’s social security number. The form and use of the certificates shall be subject to sections 338-16 to 338-18. [L 1949, c 327, §15; RL 1955, §57-14; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-11; am L 1997, c 293, §17]


Hawaii, like most states has moved to certificates that provide fewer details than were provided years ago. I hope this helps clarify things for you jy1977.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm
Posts: 3932
Epectitus wrote:
Danae may have shown that she possesses a copy of her "long form." But to this point she has provided exactly zero evidence that it was issued as response to a contemporary request.


For the record, Danae has posted a contemporary receipt for her payment of $10.

Frankly, I have little problem with believing that it's legit. I've never been as convinced as some that Hawaii has an absolute rule agaianst producing copies like this.

But it should also be noted that there's nothing on that receipt that indicates that the document issued in return for her $10 payment was, in fact, the document she shares. I mean, I could send $10 to Georgia, get back a Certification-esque document, and then post online the receipt and a scan of the original long-form that I got from my parents.

_________________
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms."
- Stephen Jay Gould

Barackryphal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Hawaii provides only two documents as I outlined above:

  1. Certificate of Live Birth (Computer printout)
  2. Letter of Verification
  3. Period, end of story

Danae's receipt shows that she ordered Option #1 and that is what she received. She is lying about what she received.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2388
elliewyatt wrote:
Like mine issued in 2001, printed on colored security paper, with a security border of raised ink. And date-stamped.

Mine... issued in 1980, was a much "lower tech" offering. No security paper. But it still shows when it was issued:


_________________
"Let me tell you, I'm a really smart guy."

― Donald Trump


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
Loren wrote:
Epectitus wrote:
Danae may have shown that she possesses a copy of her "long form." But to this point she has provided exactly zero evidence that it was issued as response to a contemporary request.


For the record, Danae has posted a contemporary receipt for her payment of $10.


So she did get the same COLB that Boone (sp) got which now shows Certificate of Live Birth?

Until I see some security features on the document... No way that Hawaii would send out such a document without at least a raised seal and signature and printed on security paper. The document as is right now, would allow for easy manipulation and forgery.

Let's see what happens here.

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
Epectitus wrote:
elliewyatt wrote:
Like mine issued in 2001, printed on colored security paper, with a security border of raised ink. And date-stamped.

Mine... issued in 1980, was a much "lower tech" offering. No security paper. But it still shows when it was issued:



Valid point but this was 1980, the States should have changed protocol by now given the amount of forgeries... It's unbelievable to me that a State would be this irresponsible...

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2388
nbc wrote:
Valid point but this was 1980, the States should have changed protocol by now given the amount of forgeries... It's unbelievable to me that a State would be this irresponsible...

Actually, my point was that even in 1980 the document would have shown when it was actually issued. And Danae's does not show anything.

_________________
"Let me tell you, I'm a really smart guy."

― Donald Trump


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 2675
nbc wrote:
Loren wrote:
Epectitus wrote:
Danae may have shown that she possesses a copy of her "long form." But to this point she has provided exactly zero evidence that it was issued as response to a contemporary request.


For the record, Danae has posted a contemporary receipt for her payment of $10.


So she did get the same COLB that Boone (sp) got which now shows Certificate of Live Birth?

Until I see some security features on the document... No way that Hawaii would send out such a document without at least a raised seal and signature and printed on security paper. The document as is right now, would allow for easy manipulation and forgery.

Let's see what happens here.


"See" what? The answer has been given by Janice Okubo in RC's post above:

Quote:
Answer: No, you can’t obtain a “certificate of live birth” anymore.

The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo.The department only issues “certifications” of live births, and that is the “official birth certificate” issued by the state of Hawaii, she said.

Okubo explained that the Health Department went paperless in 2001.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Danae received the current form for the birth certificate. It cost her $10

Image

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
Reality Check wrote:
Danae received the current form for the birth certificate. It cost her $10

Image


That's the document I was trying to locate... Thanks...

So did she then falsify a document? Or was it just an attempt to fool those at FR/WND?

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
nbc wrote:
So did she then falsify a document? Or was it just an attempt to fool those at FR/WND?


What she posted is a scan of her original 1969 birth certificate. Danae has a nice crisp new COLB on the 2008 form that she will never share with us. ;)

Though not identical in every detail this is what Miki Booth did. Miki implied that the 1980 version she posted for son was still available. She claimed she was going to order a copy and post it. Funny thing, she never posted that.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 2675
nbc wrote:
So did she then falsify a document? Or was it just an attempt to fool those at FR/WND?


I don't think she falsified a document, she just LIED about it. It's an older doc, issued many years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
jy1977 wrote:
Actually, according to Hawaii Law, it might be possible to get access to Obama's records afterall. While it is not possible to inspect them or order certified copies, verification of any date contained in such records in easier to get:


Still repeating your nonsense and avoiding dealing with the facts that I pointed out to you?....

Too bad... And history repeats itself

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
What the heck...
Found the smoking gun?

Image

DanaeCOLB‑OriginalCertificateofLive.jpg

799 × 464 - Danae+COLB+-+Original+Certificate+of ...

November 2009

Here’s one that is like Obama’s. It says Date Filed by Registrar, but it does not list an island of birth.
http://s477.photobucket.com/albums/rr13 ... r-crop.jpg

and

Image

Exif dates it as 02/23/2010 taken by an iPhone in Newberg, OR

The jpg Danae posted shows that it was edited with http://www.getpaint.net/ paint.net

Note the dust spec just above the bottom line about an left and down of the date received? It appears on the edited version as well...

Danae may want to explain

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Help us out nbc. I am not at the Ron Polarik level of photo expertise. :lol:

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
Reality Check wrote:
Help us out nbc. I am not at the Ron Polarik level of photo expertise. :lol:


There are two pictures which also show Danae's Certificate of Live Birth

One is still in Danae's photobucket and is dated 02/23/2010. This shows that she had at least a copy of her long form early this year. There is also one which is dated somewhere in November 2009, which is now no longer available other than in its cached format.

So we know that she must have had a copy of her live birth for a while now. Combine this with the latest 'scan' which has been edited significantly, removing the security background and other notable features which may reveal a fold just where we find one on the older pictures.

Playing with contrast etc, you can actually discern the blacked out data, as well as various rectangular areas which appear to have been 'blanked out'

To me the telling sign is the dust spec seen at the bottom of the enlarged picture which appears also on the one Danae posted.

There are other similarities but until I can locate a better version of the jpg which now has gone missing, I cannot do more.

Image

Well that was not that hard...

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
So as I said. She ordered the COLB then posted a copy of the original that we know now she had previously. She is a liar and not a very good one.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2609
Reality Check wrote:
So as I said. She ordered the COLB then posted a copy of the original that we know now she had previously. She is a liar and not a very good one.


I overlayed the two documents, exactly the same afaict including the dust spec...

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:19 pm 
Yes, it is certainly possible to see your long-form BC. If Hawaii DOH has it in their vault, you can see it and it would against the law for Hawaii to deny you access to the long-form BC. But I am sure they would make it difficult considering the situation of Obama that it would have to take a lawsuit to see your long-form BC. But it is certainly possible to see your long-form BC.

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurren ... 8-0001.htm

"Public health statistics" includes the registration, preparation, transcription, collection, compilation, and preservation of data pertaining to births, adoptions, legitimations, deaths, fetal deaths, morbidity, marital status, and data incidental thereto.

I would take this definition to include any and all records pertaining to someone whose birth was located in Hawaii including the long-form BC.

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurren ... 8-0018.htm

§338-18 Disclosure of records.

(b) The department shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record. The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record:

(1) The registrant;

(2) The spouse of the registrant;

(3) A parent of the registrant;

(4) A descendant of the registrant;

(5) A person having a common ancestor with the registrant;

(6) A legal guardian of the registrant;

(7) A person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant;


So assuming you qualify under the statute, you have the right to see and inspect your long-form BC from Hawaii. (Public inspection) However, if you choose to order a certified copy, you will receive the COLB. But, there is no way Hawaii can deny you access to your long-form BC if in fact the Hawaii DOH does have it on file.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18997
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
So Danae lied? Can't wait for someone to blog that. :P

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3802
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
nbc wrote:
What the heck...
Found the smoking gun?

Image


Can you find a better image of that NBC? Whose is it?

It is definitely the same document.

I can't believe (well, it IS freepers...) the freepers are drooling over a BC that doesn't have a stamp, seal or even an issue date.

Totally bogus.

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 551 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 23  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GreatGrey and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group