Some interesting tidbits:

She's not a Vattelite:

I guess she's not a fan of Ron Polland either:

And as everyone knows, courts and the law are not in the real world.

And as everyone knows, the fundamental question of what is a President, how is it defined, how is it decided and instituted, etc. -- not in the legal realm either.

Perhaps, like her namesake, she will advocate resorting to extralegal means of removal?

Interesting.

OMG! The Mein Kampf of the Birfer Movement! Here's a little understatement:



Some documents? Like a Birth Certificate, maybe?

OTOH, if she knocks out the 2 parent idiots, this could be a good thing.

parsy, who Damn!, tries to be fast and smart.

I think she's blown her cover.

I think she's blown a gasket.

I think she's a leaky hose hoax.

It's getting pretty bad when you can't tell the genuinely stupid Birfers from the Birfer parodies. I definitely think she has more on the ball than she lets on, like she's reeling in a fish. From her poems, I'm guessing maybe junior high school English teacher and/or debate coach? They have an Emily Dickinson - Edgar Lee Masters feel to them.

parsy, who is glad there is a squeeky thread

I think Squeeky is actually a he. Someone with a rather poor view of women, who therefore writes with a poor feminine affect.

Naw, Squeeky is the former Jennifer4Hillary, Puma with an attitude amongst other things.

Could be a HE, or a couple? Whatever, she/he/they are, is making a move to become the Head of The Birfer Brain Trust. Minimum IQ of 36 required. Reading, writing, and thinking skills optional.

parsy, who is still trying to get past the "they have some documents on their side" statement.

I'm not 100% sure of that, Plutodog, or maybe Jennifer4Hillary was a parody, too, or maybe the Squeeky character has been passed on to another puppeteer. But I had similar thoughts when I saw the Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter postings at the OC Weekly ... that this is not what (or who) it appears to be.

But trying to apply logic and reason to birtherism? Can't be done and still remain a birther. It's the problem that all of these "true believer" groups have -- you have to suspend all disbelief to be a Tea Partier, or a Rush fan, or for that matter, a member of the GOP. It doesn't matter what your affiliation or background -- as soon as you notice the emperor's lack of clothes, they'll throw you out and scream that they knew you were a RINO or obot all along. If whoever is playing Squeeky thinks the birfers are going to give up their myths just because she points out their illogic, she'll find the people fighting her aren't the obots at all.

Nope, I think Squeeky is a he, who thinks he is very clever. And is happy to have his own thread on The Fogbow. I don't get the humor in all of this; it seems like a tremendous waste of time and effort to me.

I'm with ya. He/she/it thinks it's clever... I think it's dull and unimportant.

(emphasis mine)

Um, confused here. Why do you have to suspend all disbelief to be a Rush fan?

Down, girl. She means Limpballs.

You've not ever heard of Rush Limbaugh?

His EIB Network gives it all away. Are you a Rush Limbaugh fan, TS?

I notice that Squeeky is the latest member of the Patriot Heart Forum. There is something strange about her. Notice how she puts a "u" after the "q". That is not normal for a birther.
Regards ..........Dick

Ah! Of course! oops

Thanks for clarifying that

(It's TW - Thor's Witch, not Thor Switch *g*)

Gods, no, not a fan of Limbaugh - fan of the band Rush. Got confused

How Birthers Can Handle the OBOT “Airplane” Argument
The good news from squeeky:

http://gretawire.forums.foxnews.com/top ... D-argument

Excerpt:





And it gets even dumber from there. See, the price was cheap because rich people paid for it, 9 cents on the dollar. And Squeeks is good at figuring this stuff out because:

I think Squeeky is an Obot having some fun. I'm pretty sure Squeeky is a guy though, but one who( no offense if it's a PJer doing opposition work) doesn't know women well enough to imitate one.

Yep, that's exactly what I have been saying. Or, he really doesn't like women very much. Kinda sad.

Offishul Complait:

I'm one of those who looks forward to our version of easter eggs hidden behind the "sekrit" tag with great anticipation.


When it's put into the signature with the same tag line, that takes some of the thrill and pleasure out of seeing and opening the "sekrit" button. Since I'm starting to get grumpy about it, I thought I should share that and ask that sekrits be reserved for individual, unique use.


On the other hand, I LOVE seeing great tagline remarks suchlike "more info at the link"!

Could be, and there have definitely been some squeeky snarkers out there. But this squeeky has never been real intelligent (or typically female in the admirable sense) in any incarnation.