Watchdog: We'll seek Kagan's disbarment and impeachment
Complaint alleges Obama's new Supreme Court appointee lied to Senate
Posted: August 06, 2010
12:55 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

A formal complaint has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court asking that Elena Kagan – the bench's newest occupant – be disbarred, and an attorney who submitted the request for a criminal investigation into her statements said the effort will be expanded also to seek her impeachment, following the Senate's 63-37 approval of her appointment today.

"On behalf of Freedom Watch and Declaration Alliance, and as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court bar, I hereby file a complaint to disbar Elena Kagan from practice before the U.S. Supreme Court and for referral to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal investigation and for obstruction of justice," wrote Larry Klayman, president of Freedom Watch.

The letter was dispatched to Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito.

The letter said Kagan, while associate White House Counsel in the Clinton White House, "falsified a medical report of the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) in an intentional effort to mislead not just Congress and the White House concerning the efficacy and health risks of partial birth abortion, but also to mislead the various federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court which ultimately relied on this falsified medical report."

The Return of Larry Klayman
Submitted by Kyle on March 9, 2009 - 3:10pm

Back during the Clinton administration, Larry Klayman was, in the words of the Washington Post, “in the middle of most every Democratic scandal ricocheting through Washington”:



Klayman was the source of countless harassing lawsuits against both the administration and the Clinton’s personally stemming from his own incessant hatred of both Bill and Hillary Clinton and the fact that he is, as Jacob Weisberg says, completely “off his rocker”:

In one TV interview, Klayman suggested the killer was "perhaps the president himself."

[Paul Rolf] Jensen has also sued Judicial Watch Larry Klayman for slander (after briefly working on Klayman's ill-fated Florida Senate run in 2004).

Link to TPM Jensen/Lakin article.

Larry Klayman, the lawyer for Wright, said the filing does not amount to an anti-Muslim action but maintained that the mosque sacrificed public safety.

“The mosque is radical, the imam is radical,” Klayman said. “We believe they will go out and recruit people in the African-American community to do their bidding.”

Klayman also has brought cases against Dick Cheney, Osama bin Laden, Fidel Castro and the Teamsters, as well as his own mother.

Larry Klayman Decries Evils of Litigation!And don't miss our next story, "Casanova: 'I'm a One-Woman Man.' "
By Timothy NoahPosted Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 5:13 PM ET

The unhinged prose that followed responded to an item filed by Newsweek reporter Daniel Klaidman. Klayman did not dispute the fact that he is suing his mother, Shirley Feinberg. He claims his mom won't pay him back $50,000 he spent on private nurses for her mother, his grandmother, Yetta Goldberg, who died last August at 89. He did not want this suit to become public, but the Clintonites, he asserted, learned about it and leaked word to Newsweek. . . .


It turned out that Klayman's own brother had gone to the press with the story rather than Clintonites. Weisberg reported that Klayman had brought the suit in the name of a collection agency that he owned rather than filing in his own name.

The AP and others should be careful what they report, however. Klayman has sued more than one journalist whose reporting was perceived (by Klayman) to be defamatory or as portraying Klayman in a false light. The Judicial Watch website provides the text of complaints against David Segal of The Washington Post and Harvey Berkman of The National Law Journal. Klayman also complained of FOX News Channel's coverage of the suits, stating that "it is clear that Fox News is now on the run and is heading 'establishment mainstream left.'"

By Bob Unruh

Yeah, but Klayman is an attorney. He is just riling up the people. He knows what he's doing.

Can he be disbarred if he's involved?

Klayman says he's gonna get Justice Roberts to give him discovery which he will then give to a pitchfork mob to indict Obama?

His latest blog entry on the top right side of my blog.

whatevs

As previously reported by WND, my group Freedom Watch is pursuing a lawsuit before another judge named Roberts, Judge Richard Roberts of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which seeks to pry the lid off of the can of corruption that led to Obamacare’s passage. Obama and his leftist comrades held secret meetings behind closed doors with lobbyists from Planned Parenthood, the pharmaceutical companies and others who sought to line their pockets with political favors. This helps explain why Obamacare not only contains an illegal mandate, but actually furthers the killing of unborn babies, reduces competition in the pharmaceutical industry to lower prices for consumers, and other atrocities against our freedoms and rights. If I am correct, this Judge Roberts is poised to order Obama to come clean on these illegal meetings and allow discovery into this sordid affair.

Yeah, eggsactly, whatevs. Can you say, "self-promotion"?

The magistrate heard evidence from the children’s pediatrician who reported allegations of sexual abuse to children services, and from a social worker at children services who found that sexual abuse was “indicated.” Although the social worker’s finding was later changed to “unsubstantiated” when Klayman appealed, the magistrate explained that the supervisor who changed the social worker’s finding did not testify. The magistrate pointed out that he was obligated to make his own independent analysis based upon the parties and the evidence before him. In doing so, the magistrate found


{¶26} The magistrate further found it significant that although Klayman denied any allegations of sexual abuse, he never denied that he did not engage in inappropriate behavior with the children. The magistrate further found it notable that Klayman, “for all his breast beating about his innocence * * * [he] scrupulously avoided being questioned by anyone from [children services] or from the Sheriff’s Department about the allegations,” and that he refused to answer any questions, repeatedly invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, about whether he inappropriately touched the children. “Even more disturbing” to the magistrate was the fact that Klayman would not even answer the simple question regarding what he thought inappropriate touching was. The magistrate stated that he could draw an adverse inference from Klayman’s decision not to testify to these matters because it was a civil proceeding, not criminal.
{¶27} After reviewing the record, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling Klayman’s objections regarding the magistrate’s finding that Klayman inappropriately touched the children.

Well, it would be truly shocking if the birfer Larry Klansman turned out to be a child molester.

It would be equally shocking if any birfer ended up convicted of such a crime.

Certainly, no convicted child molesters are actually filing birfer suits from behind bars.

Perhaps Larry Klansman can join this distinguished club.