* Edit post
* Delete post
* Report this post
* Information
* Reply with quote

Donofrio, Pidgeon to Collaborate on Quo Warranto, Chrysler

Postby realist » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:18 pm
New Docket Entry...

02/12/2010 6381 Notice of Appeal from Feb. 5, 2010 Order Denying FRCP Rule 60 Motion To Reconsider June 9th, 2009 Rejection Order and June 19th, 2009 Rejection Opinion (related document(s) 6342[RECAP] ) filed by Leo C. Donofrio on behalf of South Holland Dodge, Inc.. (Donofrio, Leo) (Entered: 02/12/2010)



The great constitutional/bankruptcy legal team of Donofrio and Pidgeon are not letting any grass grow under their feet.

Link Shortly

As is the custom and practice at PJ, I am going to start a new thread for the appeal.

Is it legal? It just says February 12th. No history included? What about the fact that Lady Jane Grey, Queen of England, was executed for treason on this date? It's not legal.

Doesn't Leo have to get over the hurdle of the fact that they were late filing? This seems like a waste of time. Even more of a waste of time than a birther case.

You can appeal the denial of a reconsideration motion. But the only issue you can raise it whether the court erred in denying the motion.

This is, of course, an excuse to backdoor in the basis for seeking reconsideration. So expect to see the same fraud allegations in an attempt to explain why they were entitled to the more-lenient one-year window to file.

Donofrio awakens from a nap:

No. 1: [url=http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/old-chryslers-attorneys-have-withdrawn-their-improper-birther-footnote-from-the-reply-memo/]Old Chrysler

Gee, Leo, it certainly shows up on PACER, right where it should be.

Methinks you're pulling an Orly...(The Court Ate My Document) bullshit.



And just in case your public (who lurk here) wants to see it, here ya go:



Hope this is helpful, Leo...I live to serve.

As usual, Danae is right on top of things:

Scrubbed - Chrysler Dealer Rejection Order removed from public internet

Okay, so instead of going to PACER -- the official public access system for the federal courts -- Leo goes to the commercial website belonging to the bankruptcy claims agent Kurtzman Carson Consultants.

What a freakin idiot.

Some lawyer left this comment for Danae:

Anybody here a freeper? Here's the freeper thread on the "scrubbing":

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2463719/posts

Dianna Cotter's freeper name is Danae. She always posts her own stories. First she says:



And someone tells her to look it up on PACER, to which she replies:



_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson

What a bunch of fuckin' idiots.

I wonder if they can read the little tab in my screenshot that says "Public Docket" for Chrysler Bankruptcy?

Usually, Dianna pops back in with some kind of dismissal of plain facts. Must be too many Obots for her to crawl out from under her rock.

Not like she hasn't been online. She posted quite a few comments over on Free Republic. Just not on her own story. She doesn't know what to say about that. So she comments on other stories:


_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson

I don't know how you do it, mimi. There isn't enough alcohol or meds available for me to go to that place. What I like about the Examiner is that there is no moderation there. And, if I don't want to be Obot Dave I can be Jesus.

What the bleep does she think would happen if you suddenly cut the budget in half, a miraculous healing and suddenly everything is all right again?!

I haz a confuzed about Steve & Leo's threat to file a Rule 11 motion.

Chrysler's position is supported by the court's rulings. So there's no way for both the court to be correct and Chrysler to have filed a false pleading. Chrysler (and the court) will immediately recognize this. So: Can Steve & Leo's Rule 11 motion be the basis for a counter Rule 11 motion filed by Chrysler?

If the Steve & Leo follow through on their Rule 11 threat, I predict the court will not be amused. Given Steve & Leo's track record (jumping in way too late, filing a frivolous recon motion, alleged birtherism), is it likely the court will sanction them and/or refer them to their respective bars?

I certainly don't have a crystal ball, but that if they did that might set some sort of record for an attorney (Donofrio - and I'm not certain about Pidgeon) to be sanctioned on his first-ever case in federal court!

I'm not a freeper. I occasionally see a link in google and I'll go see that, or if someone posts something here.

If I'm there, I sometimes remember to look and see what a few have been up to.

Like Major Kook:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:road ... b=comments

Lucas Smith:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:insp ... =no-change

RSOL Phil:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:phil ... =no-change

or Dianna Cotter, a/k/a Danae:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:dana ... =no-change

Oh, the P&E is so funny:

_________________


ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!

That's as close to an admission of fault as you're going to get. They backtracked from "public docket sabotaged" to, "Oh, well, yeah it's still publicly available, but not at the place where we originally linked to it."

Incidentally, do they really not understand what "Not For Publication" means? That is something that I can say they literally taught us in the first week of law school. (Come on! You guys should be relieved! Unlike Phil Berg, your epic fail won't be etched into the Federal Supplement and Federal Reporter to be easily accessible forever.)

Part of this good news may be due to Toyota's gross negligence. Under its current CEO, Toyota set out to displace General Motors as the world's largest automobile manufacturer. The principles upon which the company had been founded were relaxed if not abandoned; the lessons about quality control that W. Edwards Deming had taught Japanese manufacturers were badly taught to the incoming generation of Toyota executives. What had been a badge of quality has now become a symbol of risk. Families have been killed and people imprisoned for vehicle accidents over which they had no control. GM, along with Ford and whatever Chrysler becomes, may be the beneficiaries -- if they have learned the lesson that quality matters.

Once upon a time, when such a great failure occurred, the person with ultimate responsibility for the failure would commit seppuku. The more recent case of Japan Air Lines flight 123, which had a bulkhead rupture in flight, is illustrative of the same ethos. That airplane crashed into Mount Takamagahara, killing 505 passengers and 15 crew members -- to date, the deadliest airplane accident. The CEO accepted responsibility and resigned with apologies. I suppose that if the CEO is the grandson of the founder of Toyota, no resignation is expected even if the company is severely wounded by the very policies and practices that he set in place. He appears to plan to stay on to reverse what he himself had put in place, even if his resignation would go some distance towards reassuring the public that Toyota is reforming and returning to what it had once been.

[/rant from a Lexus owner (made by Toyota)] Good for GM!

Hey gang,

It is not a secret that I admire Leo on many levels. With that, I was reading through the local Tacoma paper and noted an AP article. Here is the online version;

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... TE=DEFAULT

Perhaps not related (though I think it is) but interesting (very). I emailed Leo to see if it was regarding his clients...no answer as of yet.

Good day, all.

-Noz

Leo's putative clients were Chrysler dealers, not GM dealers. My explanation for GM's action is above.

Oh. Good point. What do you want to bet that this turn of events with one will have an impact on the other? Thanks for clarifying my ignorance and oversight.

-Noz