VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1428

realist wrote:

You'll also shortly learn that the Arpaio affidavit was "corrected".

Oh my.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6634

Quote:

HIGH PROFILE CASE

Is that due to requests by the media or individuals, or was that an instruction from Judge Lewis to elevate the case's status? I think he was really enjoying that sucking up from Klayman and he was also very aware of the camera. I really wonder about him after that little exchange about if Klayman amended his complaint would he allege foreign birth. Kind of Larry Seidlin-ish, or Malihi-ish, like he might like to have the circus come to his courtroom.

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:42 pm

Quote:

Loren wrote: Y'know, if Klayman had been willing to forego his 20+ minutes of random Birther talking points, and had instead focused on actually rebutting the defense's arguments, I think he might've at least scored some rhetorical points by pointing out that Obama's nomination is barely even a formality at this point.

[...]

I'm not saying this would've been a *successful* approach. (I watched the proceedings this morning, but haven't read any of the briefs.) But it would've at least confronted the defense's argument, rather than blabbering on about Vattel and whatnot.

Birfers were watching. I think the Paypal bell rings every time he mentions Vattel. ;;)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23562

What I have decided to do is expand the Voeltz Docket on page 1 of this thread and will link documents there as I have them uploaded.

You may go there to view the documents as I get them up.

Gimme a few.. it's LOTS.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:43 pm

kimba wrote:

Quote:

HIGH PROFILE CASE

Is that due to requests by the media or individuals, or was that an instruction from Judge Lewis to elevate the case's status? I think he was really enjoying that sucking up from Klayman and he was also very aware of the camera. I really wonder about him after that little exchange about if Klayman amended his complaint would he allege foreign birth. Kind of Larry Seidlin-ish, or Malihi-ish, like he might like to have the circus come to his courtroom.

I think it was 5000 people watching on WND and Jack Ryan paying for a courier to get documents that did it.

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

realist wrote:

You'll also shortly learn that the Arpaio affidavit was "corrected".

June 11 version Arpaio daffidavit

Quote:

7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud may likely have been committed in key identity documents ...

June 12 version Arpaio daffidavit

Quote:

7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents ...

There may be more.

Edit: Had the cites backwards.

Loren · **Joined:** Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm **Posts:** 3897

In Klayman's latest Reply brief, the final exhibit is a faxed copy of an email from a New York librarian to Jerome Corsi.

I don't recall ever seeing this at WND before. And that, plus the fax date, further supports the theory that Corsi's been collaborating with Klayman to some degree.

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 566

realist wrote:

What I have decided to do is expand the Voeltz Docket on page 1 of this thread and will link documents there as I have them uploaded.

You may go there to view the documents as I get them up.

Gimme a few.. it's LOTS.

Thanks realist.

I appreciate you taking the time to re-ink the docket in blue! :-bd

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23562

We still don’t have SOS Motion to Dismiss (or any Memo in Support) … but have everything else, which is better than what we did have.

SHOWS

(1) OBAMA called 5/30 hearing – and won

(2) OBAMA noticed 6/18 hearing – and issues were Motions to Dismiss – nothing in notice of hearing re: NBC

nbc · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am **Posts:** 2532

Poor webserver appears to be overloaded right now.

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:21 pm

neonzx wrote:

Over at OBC

Quote:

I just talked with Larry Klayman (11 A.M. PT). He is not as concerned about the timing of the judge’s instructions. He feels the Obama attorneys are scrambling for technicalities to dismiss, because they don’t have the law and facts on their side.

He thinks the issues lie in the interactions of Florida laws with each other and with Federal law and that it’s clear cut that the states have the right/responsibility to control their elections, that Obama has in fact already been nominated, that the voters’ interests are foremost and tat it is clearly not in their best interests to wait longer to decide that an ineligible candidate should be taken off the ballot.

Klayman was interviewed by an AP reporter, who he described as a”Communist.” :lol:

The reporter asserted that the issue was “already settled,” wanted to know when Voeltz became a Democrat and which Republicans Larry thought were ineligible for the Vice President (he replied “Rubio”). That should make for some interesting copy.

I found it strange how Klayman was claiming that the "voter of FL" get cheated upon when actually it's only the designated Democrats that get to decide who represents their choice as Democratic candidate. And no Democratic voter group designated a challenger to offer an option of choice.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:09 pm

Plus there's no Democratic (or Republican) nominee for each state. There's the guy leading the state's delegates, but the total totals aren't fixed yet.

Dallasite · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:43 pm

Interesting. This is Scott Rille of the failed NBC amicus brief:
Scott_53_1350: Scott Rille: I Am A Christian Gentleman, Honest, Trusting...
Maybe he should have a talk with Thai Eats?

Edit: Oh, and here at AloneAngels

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Dallasite wrote:

Interesting. This is Scott Rille of the failed NBC amicus brief:
Scott_53_1350: Scott Rille: I Am A Christian Gentleman, Honest, Trusting...
Maybe he should have a talk with Thai Eats?

Edit: Oh, and here at AloneAngels

Creepy.

72 y/o male
Ideal match description:
I believe a sweet, blue eyed, blonde, Christian Princess (preferably from Ukraine) of child-bearing age who adores and wants children, and has similar values and interests would find me compatible and fun to happily share the rest of our lives together. I deeply covet and highly value the "cozy" home she will create for our beautiful children and me! Her supreme happiness, fulfillment as a woman, and the happiness of our children will always be my first priority! I am a one-woman man, faithful, and seek a life-long partnership of happiness with my FSU Princess!

And his photos are mostly from the 1970s, I'd say.

BFB · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:29 pm

neonzx wrote:

Creepy.

72 y/o male
Ideal match description:
I believe a sweet, blue eyed, blonde, Christian Princess (preferably from Ukraine) of child-bearing age who adores and wants children, and has similar values and interests would find me compatible and fun to happily share the rest of our lives together. I deeply covet and highly value the "cozy" home she will create for our beautiful children and me! Her supreme happiness, fulfillment as a woman, and the happiness of our children will always be my first priority! I am a one-woman man, faithful, and seek a life-long partnership of happiness with my FSU Princess!

That is just eeew. Children?? At 72?? (Figure he'd be 73 or 74 by the time the kid is born). Selfish fuck.

chinacreekpj · **Joined:** Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:09 pm **Posts:** 1334

The way I read it is this:

Quote:

Looking for a hot Aryan woman who is willing to "lie back and think of England" and who won't object to being held prisoner in my home.

ducktape · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:37 pm

BFB wrote:

neonzx wrote:

Creepy.

72 y/o male
Ideal match description:
I believe a sweet, blue eyed, blonde, Christian Princess (preferably from Ukraine) of child-bearing age who adores and wants children, and has similar values and interests would find me compatible and fun to happily share the rest of our lives together. I deeply covet and highly value the "cozy" home she will create for our beautiful children and me! Her supreme happiness, fulfillment as a woman, and the happiness of our children will always be my first priority! I am a one-woman man, faithful, and seek a life-long partnership of happiness with my FSU Princess!

That is just eeew. Children?? At 72?? (Figure he'd be 73 or 74 by the time the kid is born). Selfish fuck.

Actually, all he needed to say is "I'm 72, and I have a bunch of money." Because he sure isn't going to get his sweet (yadda yadda yadda) of childbearing age to even answer his ad any other way.

Not lots of money? Not worth scamming? Fuggeddaboutit.

verbalobe · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:42 pm

Not that any of that has any bearing on the fact that every frickin' word of his "brief" is WRONG -- not that it would matter, as it will be thoroughly ignored regardless.

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

ducktape wrote:

Not lots of money? Not worth scamming? Fuggeddaboutit.

I think not lots of money. He's living in a mobile home park (not that there's anything wrong with that.)

Quote:

Royal Palms Mobile Home Park is a beautiful, well maintained 55+ community. Residence enjoy the 1,400 square foot clubhouse with kitchen, billiard room, library, with pool and laundry facilities. The 3 star community has approximately 80% retired residence.

He might have a problem moving in his 25-40 year old bride.

/threadjack

Emma · **Joined:** Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:25 am **Posts:** 2877

Roboe wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

* Edited to sound less advertising-like

"What if it's artificial insemination?"

=))

editorkorir · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:51 pm

neonzx wrote:

72 y/o male
Ideal match description:
I believe a sweet, blue eyed, blonde, Christian Princess (preferably from Ukraine) of child-bearing age who adores and wants children

Maybe he's seen one too many interviews with the late Tony Randall (AKA Felix Unger) extolling the virtues of a young blonde Princess who gives birth when the husband is 78.

Somerset · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:27 pm

Dallasite wrote:

Interesting. This is Scott Rille of the failed NBC amicus brief:
Scott_53_1350: Scott Rille: I Am A Christian Gentleman, Honest, Trusting...
Maybe he should have a talk with Thai Eats?

Edit: Oh, and here at AloneAngels

There's a whole cottage industry in SE Asia catering to "gentlemen" like Mr. Rille.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

ducktape wrote:

Actually, all he needed to say is "I'm 72, and I have a bunch of money."

Very rich 72-YO boasting to his friend about his hot new bride.

Friend: what did you do ... tell her you were SIXTY two?

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:50 pm

neonzx wrote:

ducktape wrote:

Not lots of money? Not worth scamming? Fuggeddaboutit.

I think not lots of money. He's living in a mobile home park (not that there's anything wrong with that.)

Quote:

Royal Palms Mobile Home Park is a beautiful, well maintained 55+ community. Residence enjoy the 1,400 square foot clubhouse with kitchen, billiard room, library, with pool and laundry facilities. The 3 star community has approximately 80% retired residence.

He might have a problem moving in his 25-40 year old bride.

/threadjack

Shit, looks like Larry Sinclair's estate.

DrPaulMaas · **Joined:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:59 pm **Posts:** 1

http://www.scribd.com/doc/97515967/Obam ... r-the-Judi

http://www.scribd.com/doc/97330751/Moti ... ck-Hussein

http://www.scribd.com/doc/95730212/Midw ... -Precedent

http://www.scribd.com/doc/95727166/Voel ... -Precedent

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

VOELTZ - FL BALLOT CHALLENGE (ACTS I II & III)

Who is online