Farrar v Obama Act III (SC of GA) - ACT IV SCOTUS

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:11 pm

It now on the docket :

Quote:

Case Number: S12D1180
Status: Docketed
Style: Farrar v. Obama et al.
Description: Civil - Discretionary Application - Miscellaneous
Docket Date: March 22, 2012
Calendar: June 2012
Oral Argument Date: **This date is not official until the Court Calendar is transmitted to the parties.
County Location: State
Lower Court Numbers: OSAHSECSTATECE121513660

Proceedings
Date Filings & Motions Date Orders
March 22, 2012 Discretionary Application
March 22, 2012 Motion for Stay/Supersedeas

http://www.gasupreme.us/docket_search/results_one_record.php?caseNumber=S12D1180

I see no Pro Hac Vice!

Tomtech · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:34 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:

I see no Pro Hac Vice!

Pro Hac Vice is not required since the Georgia Bar has acknowledged Orly's existence with a letter seeking additional information. =))

bob · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 4:59 pm

Quote:

Calendar: June 2012
Oral Argument Date: **This date is not official until the Court Calendar is transmitted to the parties.

Taitz has noticed (sorta):

Quote:

My case in the Supreme Court of GA is scheduled for June 2012

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33929 :twisted:

Piffle · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:19 pm

If it was filed on the 22nd, I'd say this is right on schedule. Ya gotta allow an extra ten days for the clerk to decipher the title when you're filing an emergency konstitional...

Orly tentatively wrote:

APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PLACING OF THE NAME OF CANDIDATE FOR THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2012 ELECTION BARACK OBAMA ON THE BALLOT FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION PENDING APPEAL DUE TO LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY AND DUE TO ELECTIONS FRAUD, USE OF A COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY INSTEAD OF A VALID BIRTH CERTIFICATE, USE OF A STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL, USE OF A FORGED SELECTIVE SERVICE CERTIFICATE AND A NAME, WHICH IS NOT LEGALLY HIS, AS A BASIS FOR HIS ELIGIBILITY FOR THE POSITION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT

Now that's not the kind of appellate cause they see every day.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23925

Not only is there no mention of pro hac vice being granted, there is no listing under "attorney" for the appellant.

Quote:

Proceedings
Date Filings & Motions Date Orders
March 22, 2012 Discretionary Application
March 22, 2012 Motion for Stay/Supersedeas

Disposition

Attorneys
Name Type Address Phone
Appellant
2059 Cave Spring Road
Cedar Town, Georgia 30125 (770) 748-6364

Michael K. Jablonski Appellee
260 Brighton Road, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4908 (404) 885-1725

MrBrown · **Joined:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm **Posts:** 411

Piffle wrote:

If it was filed on the 22nd, I'd say this is right on schedule. Ya gotta allow an extra ten days for the clerk to decipher the title when you're filing an emergency konstitional...

Orly tentatively wrote:

APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PLACING OF THE NAME OF CANDIDATE FOR THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2012 ELECTION BARACK OBAMA ON THE BALLOT FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION PENDING APPEAL DUE TO LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY AND DUE TO ELECTIONS FRAUD, USE OF A COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY INSTEAD OF A VALID BIRTH CERTIFICATE, USE OF A STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL, USE OF A FORGED SELECTIVE SERVICE CERTIFICATE AND A NAME, WHICH IS NOT LEGALLY HIS, AS A BASIS FOR HIS ELIGIBILITY FOR THE POSITION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT

Now that's not the kind of appellate cause they see every day.

The usurper's bots never allow her to present her crap in any hearing or case, so she has resorted to using her titles to smear her poop. She will be going in Smears First in all her titles 'cos that's the only place she can find to blurt out her litany of smears.
Like every crazy person who knows nobody believes them or will give them time to blab, she vomits her crazy talk out before anyone can object or get away. Pure crazy.

bob · **Posted:** Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:50 pm

Quote:

Obama’s GA attorney, Jablonski, finally found the certified package with the Supreme court complaint which I sent

Michael Jablonski wrote:

I tracked this down. Ms. Taitz did in fact forward to me. It was mishandled in my office.

The Truth wrote:

Another “misplaced” package, huh?

These people lie so much to everyone that it’s become second nature. They have even convinced themselves that they are good-looking, intelligent, and right about everything, and that people who disagree with their charade are just plain crazy. What a sad way to live.

It’s time to give Jablonski, and his number one client a rude awakening.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34269#comments :twisted:

Oh, the irony.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:32 pm

I've been advised that Farrar's petition was denied today. But I am unable to find hard corroboration.

But since it's a Friday I just wanted to mention it. (And, apparently, it was filed by Farrar, not his former lawyer.)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23925

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

I've been advised that Farrar's petition was denied today. But I am unable to find hard corroboration.

But since it's a Friday I just wanted to mention it. (And, apparently, it was filed by Farrar, not his former lawyer.)

I saw that statement early this morning at ORYR and I too also can find no corroboration.

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1452

realist wrote:

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

I've been advised that Farrar's petition was denied today. But I am unable to find hard corroboration.

But since it's a Friday I just wanted to mention it. (And, apparently, it was filed by Farrar, not his former lawyer.)

I saw that statement early this morning at ORYR and I too also can find no corroboration.

Ooo I hope it's true

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

(And, apparently, it was filed by Farrar, not his former lawyer.)

I recall David saying something to the effect of how his former lawyer, unable to practice in Georgia, will pick up the case again when it reaches SCOTUS.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23925

MaineSkeptic wrote:

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

(And, apparently, it was filed by Farrar, not his former lawyer.)

I recall David saying something to the effect of how his former lawyer, unable to practice in Georgia, will pick up the case again when it reaches SCOTUS.

She claimed on her site to be working on an appeal for GA. IIRC we never saw it There is a "something" filed and at least by the title of whateveritis she wrote it. There's no indication on the docket that she's been admitted pro hac vice in the SCOGA. There is notation that the pleading has been docketed, but no indication of a judgment/decision.

Quote:

Docket Search Results
Case Number: S12D1180
Status: Docketed
Style: Farrar v. Obama et al.
Description: Civil - Discretionary Application - Miscellaneous
Docket Date: March 22, 2012
Calendar: June 2012
Oral Argument Date: **This date is not official until the Court Calendar is transmitted to the parties.
County Location: State
Lower Court Numbers: 2012CV211537

Proceedings
Date Filings & Motions Date Orders
March 22, 2012 Discretionary Application
March 22, 2012 Motion for Stay/Supersedeas

Disposition

Attorneys
Name Type Address Phone
Appellant
2059 Cave Spring Road
Cedar Town, Georgia 30125 (770) 748-6364

Michael K. Jablonski Appellee
260 Brighton Road, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4908 (404) 885-1725

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1997

maybe we'll get an update sometime today?

orly claims this case is going to trial, so it's probably been denied already. :lol:

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2237

Another one bites the dust

Georgia Supreme Court wrote:

Disposition Date: April 11, 2012
Application denied
All the Justices concur.

http://www.gasupreme.us/docket_search/r ... r=S12D1180

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2483

On to SCOTUS ?

Reality Check · **Posted:** Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:19 pm

Of course, as long as FUBAR pays the filing fee.

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:08 pm

Reality Check wrote:

Of course, as long as FUBAR pays the filing fee.

With a rubber check?

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:30 pm

That's what Newt would do.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:45 pm

Reality Check wrote:

Of course, as long as FUBAR pays the filing fee.

Mebbe the first lawyer who helped him will advance the dough. After all, it means the circus gets to stay around a bit longer.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23925

Not yet on the SCOTUS Docket, but...

TAITZ - FARRAR ET AL., Application for Stay

Plutodog · **Posted:** Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:12 pm

realist wrote:

Not yet on the SCOTUS Docket, but...

TAITZ - FARRAR ET AL., Application for Stay

Yo, Taitz!

Joseph Robidoux III · **Posted:** Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:08 pm

realist wrote:

Not yet on the SCOTUS Docket, but...

TAITZ - FARRAR ET AL., Application for Stay

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:13 pm

Is Thomas the assigned judge for this appeal or is Orly shopping?

Joseph Robidoux III · **Posted:** Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:19 pm

Justice Thomas is the Supreme Court Justice assigned to hear requests from the 11th Circuit.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/Circuit%20Map.pdf

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:22 pm

Thanks

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Farrar v Obama Act III (SC of GA) - ACT IV SCOTUS

Who is online