Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
1 guest wrote:
You know, in all the versions I've seen, Minor vs. Happersett - this one for example: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/h ... 62_ZO.html - J. Waite NEVER addressed "natural born Citizens." He only wrote about "natural-born citizens."

Someone should get Apuzzo's take on that.


:-bd

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 3285
Location: Kailua, HI (home) Honolulu, HI (work)
Occupation: Development Director for The Arc in Hawaii (non-profit supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities)
realist wrote:
1 guest wrote:
You know, in all the versions I've seen, Minor vs. Happersett - this one for example: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/h ... 62_ZO.html - J. Waite NEVER addressed "natural born Citizens." He only wrote about "natural-born citizens."

Someone should get Apuzzo's take on that.


:-bd

Ditto!

You are 1 guest who's surely welcome here!

_________________
"This leap...is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity."
Judge Clay D. Land - Oct. 13, 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:05 pm
Posts: 216
1 guest wrote:
You know, in all the versions I've seen, Minor vs. Happersett - this one for example: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/h ... 62_ZO.html - J. Waite NEVER addressed "natural born Citizens." He only wrote about "natural-born citizens."

Someone should get Apuzzo's take on that.


I asked him about that...he ignored it and went on rambling.

_________________
Mario's arguments are so far out there, GPS couldn't help him to arrive to a logical conclusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7263
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
Jim wrote:
1 guest wrote:
You know, in all the versions I've seen, Minor vs. Happersett - this one for example: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/h ... 62_ZO.html - J. Waite NEVER addressed "natural born Citizens." He only wrote about "natural-born citizens."

Someone should get Apuzzo's take on that.


I asked him about that...he ignored it and went on rambling.

I've asked him before whether NBCs (however spelled or punctuated) are citizens, with the same result. But now he has provided his answer: No.

The arrant imbecility of this position could not now be more clear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Well, you dummies, here's where you're all wrong.

Comments from ORYR

Quote:
Anonymous said...[Reply]

We don't use british common law
dumbfuck

July 4, 2012 7:45 PM

Anonymous said...[Reply]

We use The Law of Nations, Article I Section 8


So there ya go.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:05 pm
Posts: 753
And except for a few other parts regarding international law, we use nothing else from it. We certainly didn't take our right to bear arms from it, or most of our other guaranteed Constitutional rights. Just Presidential eligibility for the most part, but it was so super secret that the Founders didn't even bring it up when talking about it.

They wanted it hidden to be used as a trump card for the day an Undesirable won the office, but unfortunately they hid it so well that not a single judge or constitutional scholar in the country knew about it 200 years later until Leo Donofrio discovered it in 2008, just days after the election. And since then, the corrupt courts, who still won't recognize said trump card, have been blocking the pursuit of Justice and the installation of the WhiteRight candidate.

_________________
The One, the Only, Sterngard...Orly Taitz: She never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3936
Location: Switzerland
realist wrote:
Well, you dummies, here's where you're all wrong.

Comments from ORYR

Quote:
Anonymous said...[Reply]

We don't use british common law
dumbfuck

July 4, 2012 7:45 PM

Anonymous said...[Reply]

We use The Law of Nations, Article I Section 8


So there ya go.

OMFSM -- Do they now accept rulings by the United Nations, and the ICC, and .... :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9134
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Apuzzo: Barack Obama Ballot Challenge Proceeding Forward in the NJ Supreme Court

Apuzzo kills many electrons to announce he filed with SCoNJ a reply brief to New Jersey's opposition and Obama's opposition.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7767
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
I like Genova's opposition. Instead of getting into Apuzzo's idiotic theories he just says the case was decided and there is no reason to rehash it.

Apuzzo is still childishly referring to the President as the "putative 'sitting president'". What an asshole. He should be sanctioned for that alone. Apuzzo also seems to be changing his theory. Now the citizenship of the mother doesn't matter because although we gave women the right to vote and pass on "citizenship" when it comes to "natural born citizenship" the mother doesn't matter because the founding fathers knew women were second class citizens and it has never changed.

His headline is misleading too. Nothing has changed other than some letter briefs have been filed. They still has not been certified.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9332
bob wrote:


Whoop de diddle de fuck. So soon, the case citation for an unpublished Appellate Division per curiam opinion will have a comma and "certif. denied" and an N.J. citation appended to it.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19906
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
:yawn:

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5510
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
bob wrote:


I :xo New Jersey's and Obama's opposition -- simple letter briefs informing the court that their briefs filed in the N.J. Court of Appeals will do just fine for this proceeding, TYVM, so they'll simply recycle and refile and rest on those.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7767
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
I was able to confirm with a phone call that this case has been scheduled for conference at the NJ Supreme Court on September 5th. We should know within a few days if it was denied certification or scheduled for hearing.

Also, someone at Doc's notice Mario has been busy editing on Wikipedia a reference to Kerchner v Obama in this article to remove the word "sanctions". He also inserted the phrase "Article II natural born Citizen", which a term concocted by Mario.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:56 am
Posts: 331
Location: I stay ova dea.
Reality Check wrote:
Also, someone at Doc's notice Mario has been busy editing on Wikipedia a reference to Kerchner v Obama in this article to remove the word "sanctions". He also inserted the phrase "Article II natural born Citizen", which a term concocted by Mario.



Thank you for the "Undo" function on wikipedia to take care of pesky mites who have a serious conflict of interest (against Wiki Policies)

_________________
If money is the root of all evil, why do churches constantly ask for it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 435
Location: Lord's Cricket Ground
DeeLite wrote:
Reality Check wrote:
Also, someone at Doc's notice Mario has been busy editing on Wikipedia a reference to Kerchner v Obama in this article to remove the word "sanctions". He also inserted the phrase "Article II natural born Citizen", which a term concocted by Mario.



Thank you for the "Undo" function on wikipedia to take care of pesky mites who have a serious conflict of interest (against Wiki Policies)

Indeed, he tried it twice, getting caught each time and had a note left on his talk page about Wiki's NPOV policy. So what did the Putz do? Why, he logged out and tried again as an IP-user, apparently not aware of IP-geotracing ](*,)

_________________
"Howzat?!" Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:05 pm
Posts: 216
Roboe wrote:
Indeed, he tried it twice, getting caught each time and had a note left on his talk page about Wiki's NPOV policy. So what did the Putz do? Why, he logged out and tried again as an IP-user, apparently not aware of IP-geotracing ](*,)


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

_________________
Mario's arguments are so far out there, GPS couldn't help him to arrive to a logical conclusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Just bumping as a reminder that the NJ Supreme Court was to conference on the Apuzzite's certification to the Court of We the Purple's and Moron's BS today.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1964
I ran across this today from a birther and was wondering if some of the better minds here could help me craft a response

Quote:

It is further my understanding that during the New Jersey Administrative hearing  Ms. Hill agreed to a stipulation that the image of the birth certificate posted on the White House web site would not be used as evidence in that case, as his campaign had never presented it to the state or the court as proof of his eligibility in the first place (because there was no requirement for them to do so), correct?



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Chilidog wrote:
I ran across this today from a birther and was wondering if some of the better minds here could help me craft a response

Quote:

It is further my understanding that during the New Jersey Administrative hearing  Ms. Hill agreed to a stipulation that the image of the birth certificate posted on the White House web site would not be used as evidence in that case, as his campaign had never presented it to the state or the court as proof of his eligibility in the first place (because there was no requirement for them to do so), correct?



As far as I remember the hearing, that's a true statement.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12869
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
Yes, especially the part about there being no requirement to do so. ;;)

And if a birth certificate HAD been required, they sure as hell wouldn't have submitted the PDF on the White House website.

They'd have submitted a COLB.

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2097
Chili: The text you cite is taken word-for-word from the snopes article on the hearing.
Edit: fixed link


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 4402
Location: between the candle and the star
AnitaMaria wrote:
Chili: The text you cite is taken word-for-word from the snopes article on the hearing.


Fixing the link for you (there was an extra "s" before the "http") - it should work now :D

_________________
We have all the wins in court. And Obama is the President.
- Epectitus


I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7767
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Apuzzo's petition for certification to the NJ Supreme Court was denied on Friday. I hope to have a copy of the order shortly. I believe it includes an invitation for the defendant's to seek costs. :-bd

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 3973
Location: Southwest of down east
Reality Check wrote:
Apuzzo's petition for certification to the NJ Supreme Court was denied on Friday. I hope to have a copy of the order shortly. I believe it includes an invitation for the defendant's to seek costs. :-bd

TYVM, RC. :-bd :-bd Will await the doc with baited breath. :D

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Reality Check wrote:
Apuzzo's petition for certification to the NJ Supreme Court was denied on Friday. I hope to have a copy of the order shortly. I believe it includes an invitation for the defendant's to seek costs. :-bd


Well, there's a shocker!!

Obviously a corrupt court. :D

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group