New Jersey Ballot Challenge - Apuzzo...

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10643

realist wrote:

We the Purple speaks...

Quote:

Of the judge’s decision, Purpura told Patriots:

They’re saying he doesn’t have to prove who he is. [-(

Wait a minute…that’s absurd! You have to read the decision. I”m going to go a little deeper when I write my article. But I’m not going to write it today. I was angry yesterday to see their behavior, which was disgraceful. When the judge walked in, his robe was open, as if to say, “I don’t want to be bothered with this.” =))

In my opinion, this decision was written prior to his hearing of this case.

Gee, who'd a thunk that a busy judge wouldn't want to be bothered with birther bullshit, in a case brought by a totally incompetent buffoon representing a totally vexatious litigant? How dare a Judge read the law and follow it, rather than gallop along down the Putz's rabbit hole of insanity.

P.S. I don't know why the Judge bothered to put on a robe at all. This idiocy doesn't deserve any respect or dignity. [-X

BFB · **Posted:** Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:06 am

rajah wrote:

rosy wrote:

Is English his first language?

No! He speaks Noo Joizee
Regards .............Dick

Reality Check · **Posted:** Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:21 pm

I have a new blog post up about Mario's perfect record in Birther cases:

Mario Apuzzo’s Amazing Birther Legal Adventures

If you read the comments on the article I linked at his blog you will understand why I decided to review his record.

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1428

Reality Check wrote:

I have a new blog post up about Mario's perfect record in Birther cases:

Mario Apuzzo’s Amazing Birther Legal Adventures

If you read the comments on the article I linked at his blog you will understand why I decided to review his record.

Great read RC =D>

The comments over at the loser's site are comedy gold, with jay jay and kbo having a fit over their assertions, I'm surprised the children running that site even let Woodman's and other's comments through. :roll:

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

BillTheCat wrote:

The comments over at the loser's site are comedy gold...

Linky for rikker please!

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5242

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpu ... f-and.html

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:37 pm

Why doesn't someone ask Apuzzo about section 214 of the Vattell masterpiece? And has Apuzzo yet reconciled the admissions in Chief Justice Fuller's dissent yet?

Or is Apuzzo still too busy examining the goat entrails in the jam pot found in Dolly Madison's kitchen?

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5242

Oh people have for 3 years. He just pretends nobody has ever asked the questions

kate520 · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:07 pm

I think it's a hoot that KBOA has "found out" who we all are. So typical of the birther mentality, she cannot be wrong. My name is Emily and I, believe it or not, am a lawyer! And RC is Tolland. And Tolland...does not really exist except as a monkey sock puppet.

Ain't life grand? $\:D/$

BFB · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:25 pm

kate520 wrote:

I think it's a hoot that KBOA has "found out" who we all are. So typical of the birther mentality, she cannot be wrong. My name is Emily and I, believe it or not, am a lawyer! And RC is Tolland. And Tolland...does not really exist except as a monkey sock puppet.

Ain't life grand? $\:D/$

Damn. I wanna be a perfesser, too.

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5242

215 of Vattel is pretty damning too

Quote:

§ 215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country.

It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed. By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him; I say “of itself,” for, civil or political laws may, for particular reasons, ordain otherwise. But I suppose that the father has not entirely quitted his country in order to settle elsewhere. If he has fixed his abode in a foreign country, he is become a member of another society, at least as a perpetual inhabitant; and his children will be members of it also.

That means that Chester Arther would have been an "NBC" And that Obama probably is one, according to vattel.

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 718

Ooh, I'm askeered! Hey, KBOA, have you figured me out yet? If someone half-way round the world can figure out that you're full of shit and an enemy of democracy to boot, you should have no trouble in finding me out. Here, I'll give you a clue, my initials are SLPP and I live in Derbyshire (pronounced Darby-sher), quite near Chatsworth where Pride & Prejudice was filmed.

When are you and your fellow idiots going to recognise that you are enemies of the Constitution you claim to revere?

gshevlin · **Joined:** Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:05 pm **Posts:** 105

Visiting Mario's site reminds me that there is an alternate worlview that I do not inhabit, that some people are totally convinced by. The total lack of comprehension and willingness to embrace reality on part of the majority of the commenters at Mario's blog is both puzzling and frightening at the same time, as is their general lack of grace and manners.

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 565

Offtopic :

I just found out that KBOA will be outing me, too, also. [-X

After a dilligent investigation she discovered my real name is JAR, which is short for Just A Rock!! -xx

It took her extra time as she was having difficulty pronouncing GA-niece in her new video.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:23 pm

Has the Putz admitted that he lost, again, and how decisive the loss was?

MN-Skeptic · **Joined:** Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:36 pm **Posts:** 185

TollandRCR wrote:

Has the Putz admitted that he lost, again, and how decisive the loss was?

He's been too busy posting over at John Woodman's site - http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/06/birther-bust-bombshell-prominent-legal-expert-st-george-tucker-directly-refutes-mario-apuzzos-crank-natural-born-citizen-claim/

Paul Pieniezny · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:55 pm

kate520 wrote:

I think it's a hoot that KBOA has "found out" who we all are. So typical of the birther mentality, she cannot be wrong. My name is Emily and I, believe it or not, am a lawyer! And RC is Tolland. And Tolland...does not really exist except as a monkey sock puppet.

Ain't life grand? $\:D/$

I wanted to access the google doc that KBOA has made and adverised in this discussion in order to find out who was who around here, and got a message that my google account was not authorized to read it.

Stupid KBOA - what is the use of a doc that is protected this way - and what can be the veracity of such a doc if the obot in question cannot verify the info contained on him or her. (Not that I expect to be there, of course)

BFB · **Posted:** Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:03 pm

Paul Pieniezny wrote:

kate520 wrote:

I think it's a hoot that KBOA has "found out" who we all are. So typical of the birther mentality, she cannot be wrong. My name is Emily and I, believe it or not, am a lawyer! And RC is Tolland. And Tolland...does not really exist except as a monkey sock puppet.

Ain't life grand? $\:D/$

I wanted to access the google doc that KBOA has made and adverised in this discussion in order to find out who was who around here, and got a message that my google account was not authorized to read it.

Stupid KBOA - what is the use of a doc that is protected this way - and what can be the veracity of such a doc if the obot in question cannot verify the info contained on him or her. (Not that I expect to be there, of course)

I had the same problem.

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

BFB wrote:

I had the same problem.

Me too.

Tarrant · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:05 pm **Posts:** 752

Paul Pieniezny wrote:

kate520 wrote:

I think it's a hoot that KBOA has "found out" who we all are. So typical of the birther mentality, she cannot be wrong. My name is Emily and I, believe it or not, am a lawyer! And RC is Tolland. And Tolland...does not really exist except as a monkey sock puppet.

Ain't life grand? $\:D/$

I wanted to access the google doc that KBOA has made and adverised in this discussion in order to find out who was who around here, and got a message that my google account was not authorized to read it.

Stupid KBOA - what is the use of a doc that is protected this way - and what can be the veracity of such a doc if the obot in question cannot verify the info contained on him or her. (Not that I expect to be there, of course)

Given that she keeps posting a link to it and telling birthers to go take a look, it's quite likely she has no idea other people can't access the document.

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5242

Knowing birthers, they probably say "That's shocking! WELL DONE!!!" without actually clicking the link.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9327

Tarrant wrote:

Given that she keeps posting a link to it and telling birthers to go take a look, it's quite likely she has no idea other people can't access the document.

The fact that nobody other than us has even noticed indicates nobody gives a shit about the inept lunatic Tracy Fair and her bizarre activities.

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:36 pm

Purpura posted here:

http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com ... ommon-law/

And he sez "Where Do We Go From Here? Tomorrow Part II, The Shocking Truth!"

Lola_Getz · **Posted:** Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:52 am

kate520 wrote:

I think it's a hoot that KBOA has "found out" who we all are.

I can't figure out what she thinks she's accomplished by that. So she knows who we are. Big effing deal. What does that mean, exactly? Tracy's patting herself on the back over her mad research skillz but, really, why would anyone care who we are other than us?

Reality Check · **Posted:** Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:49 am

mimi wrote:

Purpura posted here:

The article reads like it was written by a whiny five year old after he dropped his ice cream cone.
:-({|=

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

New Jersey Ballot Challenge - Apuzzo...

Who is online