I disagree. You can teach a dog what stayto be means, birthers not so much don't need teaching.

Identifying any pest with Orly will get you sued by PETA.

...Van Irion is statute-challenged. He is allergic to legal research or subject to law library dust mite sensitivity.

One of the goals of Liberty Legal Foundation is to publicly test the court system. The best way to expose corruption is to give the courts clear and simple cases that ask for clear and simple answers to fundamental questions. If the courts are corrupt, our cases will help expose this corruption.

John,The Georgia Superior Court tried to pull a fast one. They initially refused to file our Petition for Appeal. They claimed that our papers lacked two dollars for the two motions that were included along with our petition. We DID include the $213.50 filing fee for the petition, but they were going to sit on our documents and not file any of them, in part because of the missing $2. The Superior Court’s clerk’s office made several other excuses as to why our petition couldn’t be filed. I won’t bore you with the details. Suffice to say they tried several excuses, none of which reflect normal operating procedures for any court I’ve heard of. Each time I explained why their reason didn’t make any sense under the law or court rules, they moved on to another excuse. After being transferred, placed on hold, hung up on, and argued with, they finally agreed to file the petition, but still refused to file the motions until they got their $2. In my experience as an attorney, including being temporarily admitted in 4 states outside Tennessee, and admitted to practice at every level of Federal and State courts, this is unheard of.To top off our little story, the Georgia Superior Court didn’t contact our office to tell us that there was a problem with our filing. They just sat on our petition and emergency motion. Had we not called to verify that our petition was filed we would have missed tomorrow’s filing deadline. (This is why we call to verify filings.) The $2 was personally delivered today and the emergency motions are now filed.

One of those motions is an Emergency Motion for Stay and Preliminary Injunction prohibiting the Georgia Secretary of State from including candidate Barack Obama on the Georgia Presidential Primary ballot. Read the filing on our website. Quoting from the motion,

“should this Court incorrectly deny this motion it would confirm that the judicial branch is now unwilling to enforce the clearest and most basic requirements of the U.S. Constitution. Harm to Petitioner that would result from such incorrect refusal to grant this motion represents nothing less than the loss of our constitutional form of government for all Americans.“

Idunno if this was posted.

From Obama Ballot Chumps Challenges:

That's interesting. So what he's saying is that even if he fails, he succeeds. Send money.

Correctly, of course, no cc to Orly. Boy, will she have a mad at Mr Jablonski!

Correctly, of course, no cc to Orly. Boy, will she have a mad at Mr Jablonski!

So, no motion to dismiss.

Just consolidate the cases.

IMO, if there's any plan to file a motion to dismiss, it makes a lot more sense to get the cases consolidated first. That way there's only one motion and one judge; it's just a lot less paperwork if nothing else.

Plus, consolidation can probably be granted pretty quickly. Especially since it's been framed as a request, rather than as a motion. There's at least 30 days to respond to a motion to dismiss.

Maybe I missed the part about why ignoring them wouldn't have been a better strategy.

Or waiting till Friday to write that letter. Jablonski shouldn't be in too much hurry.

Didn't we agree he had 30 days to respond to ANY of these?

Didn't we agree that the petitions are invalid until they name the right defendant?

Didn't the Butterfly just explain to me that he was never properly served in any event?

And didn't we agree that the lawyers for the plaintiffs would have a damn difficult time advancing the case at all before the primary (two weeks from today)?

Maybe I'm confuzzled. I was hoping for crickets for a few more days, and HatfIrion starting to flip out.

I'd note that I do NOT think that the letter constitutes a formal appearance on behalf of Obama - instead he references the local rule that requires attorneys to notify the court when cases are related. Note that he specifically requests that they all be in front of Judge Wright.

Maybe Jablonski really likes Judge Wright. Maybe Mr. Jablonski & Mr. Obama were impressed with the high caliber of Judge Wright's recent order denying Ms. Taitz' phv application.