.


More at http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=361408 but nothing new that I've noticed just the same old stuff.

It will be denied, but it's too bad no sanctions will be imposed. Someone with a real case will be shortchanged because of this vexatious piece of litigation.

No standing. Denied. Next.

"There was a systemic jury nullification."

"Parties:
Dr. Laura Roth- Candidate for the U.S. President from American Independent party in the primary election in the state of California. Dr. Roth lost her race within a very small margin
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ Candidate for the U.S. Senate in the state of California in the primary election." (No mention of Taitz losing by a very small margin )

She quotes her experts, but doesn't mention they were ruled not to be , and that such zibbits as WERE entered were stricken by a real Judge (not to mention their little-if-any probative value).



What the heck is THAT ?

The craptice of law by a cargo cult worshiper.

"Additionally, allowing Mr. Obama to be certified would violate Califomia Electior Code S€ction 1203, which states “Anyone who files or submits for filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy that it or any part of it has been made falsely is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the state for 16 months or two or three years or by both fine and impisonment” and Califomia Elections Code Section 18500 that stales, “Any person who commits fraud and person who aids or abets fraud or attempts to aid or abet fraud, in connection with any vote cast to be cast or attempted to be cast is guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment for 16 months or two or years”." (sic)

In Orly's world, probably just voting for President Obama would qualify as aiding and abetting "fraud." She will need some pretty large gulags to accommodate all the newly convicted felons. I have dibs on the Malibu or Santa Barbara gulag.

Laurie Roth lost in California to fellow birther Ed Noonan.

Noonan - 16,926
Roth - 16,326

FIFH.

Just what Orly needs: a new exigent emergency to mis-mangle. Has anyone ever heard of a suit brought in the capacity as a candidate or is it just me?

This must be one of those swell Orlylaw improvements. It makes those stuffy captions so much more interesting. Goes well with those 200-word motion titles too.

Dr. Orly Taitz in her capacity as vacant-space landlord
Dr. Orly Taitz in her capacity as prosecuting witness
Dr. Orly Taitz in her capacity as lead-footed licensed driver
Christopher Earl Strunk in his capacity as FOIA information recipient and Eagle Scout
Barrack Obama in his capacity as non-citizen & usurper
Philip Berg in his capacity as lying scumbag and soon-to-be-former lawyer

Hey, I kinda like it.

I think she used the root canal form by mistake.

I have to honestly say, Dr. Orly surprised me with this one.

I fully expected her to file this one Wednesday morning rather than before Tuesday.

Hmmmm....File this before the election and take the chance that - since the elections hasn't happened yet, the matter isn't ripe. Filing after Tuesday the matter is overripe and moot???? Or will this run from election day to the certification day (about a month give or take)??? For what it's worth, Orly should file her usual STAY and continuance until January 21, 2013.

Ah, applying Occam's Razor to Ms Taitz's screechy screed, I have some insight: Taitz thinks the word "foregoing" means "following" because almost the only true and correct statement in that midden of mendacity is that she is Orly Taitz. But who would claim that if it were not true?

I think the root canal explanation is the best for the informed consent... Taitz informed? Difficult to believe.

Having personally observed several rhinoceros middens in South Africa that approached six feet or more, the answer to your well-propounded rhetorical question is obvious.

I hope that the sentence above makes sense, although I am reluctant to vouch for it. The rhino, after all, backs up to its midden. It follows no other rhinocerous and foregoes nothing.

Nevertheless, your analysis works for me because the rhino has an amazing ability to shit and piss in virtually any direction with astounding velocity and volume.

Orly's new great white hope - Justice Kennedy.



http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=361469

Well a girl can dream can't she?

I wonder if at any point, Orly realise that her client is actually Laurie Roth?

Nah, didn't think so either...

Can Orly go directly to the California Supreme Court with this "case?"

Sure. But that's not the right question. And the answer to the right question is "never; it's simply not done."

I saw a comment about the screwy numbering "system" she used on this doc and thought you were kidding. OMFFSM what the HELL is that stuff? I pity whomever has to write the opposition to that... They'll go nuts just trying to get the references to her POS right. Good Lord!

Do we know it's filed? She may be using us to proofread (though proofreading can't make that POS into a viable pleading).

Do you suppose she meant "on information and belief" but decided the root canal language will do?