Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2579
Location: In exile in NOVA
.
Quote:
New case Supreme Court of California, emergency application to stay certification of votes in 2012 election

Posted on | November 3, 2012 | No Comments

snip

SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

Dr. Laura Roth, in her capacity as a candidate ) Case #

For the U.S. President ) Petition for Extraordinary Emergency Writ of

Dr. Orly Taitz, in her capacity as a candidate ) Mandamus/ Stay of certification of 2012

for the U.S. Senate and a registered CA voter ) election for the U.S. President and for the U.S. Senate


More at :twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=361408 :twisted: but nothing new that I've noticed just the same old stuff. :horse:

Edit: Wrong wingnut in thread title :oops:

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
It will be denied, but it's too bad no sanctions will be imposed. Someone with a real case will be shortchanged because of this vexatious piece of litigation.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9208
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
No standing. Denied. Next.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:47 pm
Posts: 1000
Location: In the Situation Room monitoring Orly Taitz's judicial terrorism
Occupation: Fighting evil
"There was a systemic jury nullification." ](*,)

"Parties:
Dr. Laura Roth- Candidate for the U.S. President from American Independent party in the primary election in the state of California. Dr. Roth lost her race within a very small margin
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ Candidate for the U.S. Senate in the state of California in the primary election." (No mention of Taitz losing by a very small margin =)) )

_________________
Jihadist Orly is not just a bumbling and poorly trained judicial terrorist: She's a full blown terrorist advocating for armed insurrection and inciting violence against our President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2475
She quotes her experts, but doesn't mention they were ruled not to be , and that such zibbits as WERE entered were stricken by a real Judge (not to mention their little-if-any probative value).

Quote:
I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and informed consent.


What the heck is THAT ?

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
tjh wrote:
She quotes her experts, but doesn't mention they were ruled not to be , and that such zibbits as WERE entered were stricken by a real Judge (not to mention their little-if-any probative value).

Quote:
I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and informed consent.


What the heck is THAT ?

The craptice of law by a cargo cult worshiper.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:47 pm
Posts: 1000
Location: In the Situation Room monitoring Orly Taitz's judicial terrorism
Occupation: Fighting evil
"Additionally, allowing Mr. Obama to be certified would violate Califomia Electior Code S€ction 1203, which states “Anyone who files or submits for filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy that it or any part of it has been made falsely is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the state for 16 months or two or three years or by both fine and impisonment” and Califomia Elections Code Section 18500 that stales, “Any person who commits fraud and person who aids or abets fraud or attempts to aid or abet fraud, in connection with any vote cast to be cast or attempted to be cast is guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment for 16 months or two or years”." (sic)

In Orly's world, probably just voting for President Obama would qualify as aiding and abetting "fraud." She will need some pretty large gulags to accommodate all the newly convicted felons. I have dibs on the Malibu or Santa Barbara gulag.

_________________
Jihadist Orly is not just a bumbling and poorly trained judicial terrorist: She's a full blown terrorist advocating for armed insurrection and inciting violence against our President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6421
Location: Edmonds, WA
Laurie Roth lost in California to fellow birther Ed Noonan.

Noonan - 16,926
Roth - 16,326

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3516
](*,)

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4005
Location: Southwest of down east
Welsh Dragon wrote:
.
Quote:
New case Supreme Court of California, emergency application to stay certification of votes in 2012 election

Posted on | November 3, 2012 | No Comments

snip

SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

Dr. Laura Roth, in her capacity as an ex-candidate ) Case #

For the U.S. President ) Petition for Extraordinary Emergency Writ of

Dr. Orly Taitz, in her capacity as an ex-candidate ) Mandamus/ Stay of certification of 2012

for the U.S. Senate and a registered CA voter ) election for the U.S. President and for the U.S. Senate

FIFH.

Just what Orly needs: a new exigent emergency to mis-mangle. Has anyone ever heard of a suit brought in the capacity as a candidate or is it just me?

This must be one of those swell Orlylaw improvements. It makes those stuffy captions so much more interesting. Goes well with those 200-word motion titles too.

Dr. Orly Taitz in her capacity as vacant-space landlord
Dr. Orly Taitz in her capacity as prosecuting witness
Dr. Orly Taitz in her capacity as lead-footed licensed driver
Christopher Earl Strunk in his capacity as FOIA information recipient and Eagle Scout
Barrack Obama in his capacity as non-citizen & usurper
Philip Berg in his capacity as lying scumbag and soon-to-be-former lawyer

Hey, I kinda like it.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4005
Location: Southwest of down east
tjh wrote:
She quotes her experts, but doesn't mention they were ruled not to be , and that such zibbits as WERE entered were stricken by a real Judge (not to mention their little-if-any probative value).

Quote:
I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and informed consent.


What the heck is THAT ?

I think she used the root canal form by mistake.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
=))

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6421
Location: Edmonds, WA
I have to honestly say, Dr. Orly surprised me with this one.

I fully expected her to file this one Wednesday morning rather than before Tuesday.

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2475
Piffle wrote:
I think she used the root canal form by mistake.


Best OblyLaw analysis EVER !!!!

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11010
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Hmmmm....File this before the election and take the chance that - since the elections hasn't happened yet, the matter isn't ripe. Filing after Tuesday the matter is overripe and moot???? Or will this run from election day to the certification day (about a month give or take)??? For what it's worth, Orly should file her usual STAY and continuance until January 21, 2013.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5526
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
She's bringing back .........<drum roll, please>.............

POLARIK!!!!!!!!!!!!





In paragraph 5.12.2. WTF?

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm
Posts: 526
Location: Under the stars
tjh wrote:
She quotes her experts, but doesn't mention they were ruled not to be , and that such zibbits as WERE entered were stricken by a real Judge (not to mention their little-if-any probative value).

Quote:
I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and informed consent.


What the heck is THAT ?

Ah, applying Occam's Razor to Ms Taitz's screechy screed, I have some insight: Taitz thinks the word "foregoing" means "following" because almost the only true and correct statement in that midden of mendacity is that she is Orly Taitz. But who would claim that if it were not true?

I think the root canal explanation is the best for the informed consent... Taitz informed? Difficult to believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4005
Location: Southwest of down east
Sam the Centipede wrote:
Ah, applying Occam's Razor to Ms Taitz's screechy screed, I have some insight: Taitz thinks the word "foregoing" means "following" because almost the only true and correct statement in that midden of mendacity is that she is Orly Taitz. But who would claim that if it were not true?
Having personally observed several rhinoceros middens in South Africa that approached six feet or more, the answer to your well-propounded rhetorical question is obvious.

I hope that the sentence above makes sense, although I am reluctant to vouch for it. The rhino, after all, backs up to its midden. It follows no other rhinocerous and foregoes nothing.

Nevertheless, your analysis works for me because the rhino has an amazing ability to shit and piss in virtually any direction with astounding velocity and volume.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2579
Location: In exile in NOVA
Orly's new great white hope - Justice Kennedy.

Quote:
one of 3 largest legal research engines Legal News/FindLaw.com covers my latest Patition for stay of certification of votes in the Supreme Court of CA

Posted on | November 4, 2012 | No Comments
New case Supreme Court of California, emergency application …

10 hours ago
Dr. Laura Roth, in her capacity as a candidate ) Case # Dr. Orly Taitz, in her capacity as a candidate ) Mandamus/ Stay of certification of 2012 for the U.S. Senate …

legalnews.findlaw.com/article/0eLCbH55kk3j4?q… – Cached

Supreme Court of Ca is extremely liberal and will not rule against obama, however, I will forwar this appeal to Anthony Kennedy in SCOTUS, who lately was more conservative and more reasonable than Roberts. So brace yourselves for a denial by the Supreme Court of CA, but possibility of a stay being ordered by Anthony Kennedy, who is in charge of the 9th circuit


:twisted: :twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=361469 :twisted: :twisted:

Well a girl can dream can't she?

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 435
Location: Lord's Cricket Ground
I wonder if at any point, Orly realise that her client is actually Laurie Roth?

Nah, didn't think so either...

_________________
"Howzat?!" Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 13609
Location: New England
Occupation: Professor of Sociology
Can Orly go directly to the California Supreme Court with this "case?"

_________________
"Someone should tell Mrs. Reagan that young people -- not even young people on drugs -- are not the ones responsible for the major problems besetting the world!" John Irving, A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Novel, p. 370.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
TollandRCR wrote:
Can Orly go directly to the California Supreme Court with this "case?"

Sure. But that's not the right question. And the answer to the right question is "never; it's simply not done."

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 4409
Location: between the candle and the star
I saw a comment about the screwy numbering "system" she used on this doc and thought you were kidding. OMFFSM what the HELL is that stuff? I pity whomever has to write the opposition to that... They'll go nuts just trying to get the references to her POS right. Good Lord!

_________________
We have all the wins in court. And Obama is the President.
- Epectitus


I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm
Posts: 739
Do we know it's filed? She may be using us to proofread (though proofreading can't make that POS into a viable pleading).

_________________
I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a document. - Thomas Jefferson, quoting Charles Babbage on Orly Taitz's submissions.

The ADP notes that the affiant [Zullo] signed the "affidavit" solely in his personal capacity and without any title, even an imaginary one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Informed consent ????
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:33 am
Posts: 289
Sam the Centipede wrote:
tjh wrote:
She quotes her experts, but doesn't mention they were ruled not to be , and that such zibbits as WERE entered were stricken by a real Judge (not to mention their little-if-any probative value).

Quote:
I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and informed consent.


What the heck is THAT ?

Ah, applying Occam's Razor to Ms Taitz's screechy screed, I have some insight: Taitz thinks the word "foregoing" means "following" because almost the only true and correct statement in that midden of mendacity is that she is Orly Taitz. But who would claim that if it were not true?

I think the root canal explanation is the best for the informed consent... Taitz informed? Difficult to believe.


=)) =)) =))

Do you suppose she meant "on information and belief" but decided the root canal language will do?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Joseph Robidoux III and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group