Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge

shrek · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:22 pm

Quote:

ANNOUNCEMENT: Commander Kerchner Leads Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge
Article II Super PAC Email

Greetings!

Commander Charles Kerchner(Ret) has taken up the mantle to lead a team of Pennsylvanian's who will be filing a ballot challenge in the state of Pennsylvania. He has asked Article II Super PAC to make this announcement on his and his teams behalf. If you know of folks in Pennsylvania who wish to take part in or assist the team in their efforts please contact the Article II Super PAC. To learn how to do this please click this link - http://www.art2superpac.com/paballot.html

bob · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:24 pm

Too slow by a minute!

Sooo: Is Berg back in?

shrek · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:27 pm

bob wrote:

Too slow by a minute!

Sooo: Is Berg back in?

Taverl · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:27 pm

shrek wrote:

ORYR reports

Quote:

ANNOUNCEMENT: Commander Kerchner Leads Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge
Article II Super PAC Email

Greetings!

Commander Charles Kerchner(Ret) has taken up the mantle to lead a team of Pennsylvanian's who will be filing a ballot challenge in the state of Pennsylvania. He has asked Article II Super PAC to make this announcement on his and his teams behalf. If you know of folks in Pennsylvania who wish to take part in or assist the team in their efforts please contact the Article II Super PAC. To learn how to do this please click this link - http://www.art2superpac.com/paballot.html

"Pennsylvanian's" what, exactly?

Paul Pieniezny · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:37 pm

bob wrote:

Too slow by a minute!

Sooo: Is Berg back in?

You can say what you want about Berg, but he never believed the Vattel nonsense, so I do not really believe he will be back in court again. Of course, if Georgia was a two-way circus with Orly and the Minor Happersetters "destroying" each other's arguments, a Berg participation would make it a three-way vaudeville, with Berg using Obama's SSN from Connecticut (attesting to its veracity and conformity, of course) to prove Obama was adopted while in Indonesia.

Happy days are here again!

Hm, unfortunately not.

Maru · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:41 pm

Is Mario admitted in PA?

My little half-wit fluffball Weeny is from the same town in PA s Kerchner. She is cuter.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23596

Quote:

Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge News
February 5th, 2012

For Immediate Release - 4:00 p.m. 05 Feb 2012

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) Leading a Group in Pennsylvania to File Ballot Access Challenge/Objection to Obama

For the past several months CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) has been researching and planning for a ballot access challenge/objection to be filed against Obama in Pennsylvania. CDR Kerchner was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al brought by Atty Mario Apuzzo which was taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but turned away every step of the way by court created technicalities such as standing. In collaboration with Article II Super PAC, CDR Kerchner has gathered a group of plaintiffs and PA lawyers who plan to bring the challenge. If you would like to help with this effort in PA, please contact the Article II Super PAC at: http://www.Art2SuperPAC.com

Why do these morons think multiple "plaintiffs" is a necessary (or even good) thing?
Of course, they could be filing multiple challenges/lawsuits against various defendants, but if "Cmdr" Kerchner has been doing research (and we all know how good that is

) and working with legit attorneys, then they should know what THE challenge is.

Perhaps he's going to work with Dummitt and Van Irion as well to sue the Democratic Party of the Federation too. Also. Perhaps, unlike AL, someone might be willing to sponsor Van Irion in PA.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:12 pm

I have it on Good Authority that the Obama campaign already knows about the attempt to hire Mario Apuzzo for Round 2.

Maybe this time Apuzzo will get sanctioned monetarily.

xKat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:06 pm **Posts:** 412

Do we know where in PA they are trying to file?

If it is in the 5 county Philadelphia region I can probably attend.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:15 pm

xKat wrote:

Do we know where in PA they are trying to file?

If it is in the 5 county Philadelphia region I can probably attend.

Ask Commander Kerchner.

xKat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:06 pm **Posts:** 412

Stern

I am happy to observe the birthers in person and report back. My afternoon in the Eastern District with Orly, Berg and the Lisas (Liberi and Ostella) was a lot of fun.

However, I draw the line at any direct interaction with them. I just can't do it. My sincere gratitude to all of you who are able to converse with them.

I am happy to wait for Commander Kerchner to file where he may. Hopefully it will be nearby.

mimi · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:46 pm

The goat sez he's been working on it.

Quote:

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) Leading a Group of Citizens in Pennsylvania to File a Ballot Access Challenge/Objection to Obama

For the past several months CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) has been researching and planning for a ballot access challenge/objection to be filed against Barack Hussein Obama II in Pennsylvania on the fact that Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father Obama Sr. was a FOREIGN NATIONAL. Obama Sr. was never a U.S. Citizen, and was not even an immigrant to the USA. Obama is the first person sworn in (illegally and unconstitutionally) as the President and Commander in Chief of our military since the founding generation who were exempt from the natural born Citizen requirement via a grandfather clause in the Constitution whose father was a foreign national, was never an immigrant to this country, and was never a Citizen of this country. This is outrageous. He slipped through the cracks of the 2008 primary nomination process last time due to an enabling media not vetting him properly and which is covering up for him, a cowardly Congress, and a Republican Party establishment that wants to run their own ineligible candidates and are thus complicit in abrogation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. But he will be challenged every step of this way by We the People this time. He is not constitutionally eligible to be the President.

CDR Kerchner was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al brought by Atty Mario Apuzzo which was taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but turned away every step of the way by court created technicalities such as standing. In collaboration with Article II Super PAC, CDR Kerchner has gathered a group of plaintiffs and PA lawyers who plan to bring the challenge.

http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/0 ... -to-obama/

And then the paypal thing.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:49 pm

mimi wrote:

The goat sez he's been working on it.

Quote:

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) Leading a Group of Citizens in Pennsylvania to File a Ballot Access Challenge/Objection to Obama

For the past several months CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) has been researching and planning for a ballot access challenge/objection to be filed against Barack Hussein Obama II in Pennsylvania on the fact that Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father Obama Sr. was a FOREIGN NATIONAL. Obama Sr. was never a U.S. Citizen, and was not even an immigrant to the USA. Obama is the first person sworn in (illegally and unconstitutionally) as the President and Commander in Chief of our military since the founding generation who were exempt from the natural born Citizen requirement via a grandfather clause in the Constitution whose father was a foreign national, was never an immigrant to this country, and was never a Citizen of this country. This is outrageous. He slipped through the cracks of the 2008 primary nomination process last time due to an enabling media not vetting him properly and which is covering up for him, a cowardly Congress, and a Republican Party establishment that wants to run their own ineligible candidates and are thus complicit in abrogation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. But he will be challenged every step of this way by We the People this time. He is not constitutionally eligible to be the President.

CDR Kerchner was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al brought by Atty Mario Apuzzo which was taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but turned away every step of the way by court created technicalities such as standing. In collaboration with Article II Super PAC, CDR Kerchner has gathered a group of plaintiffs and PA lawyers who plan to bring the challenge.

http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/0 ... -to-obama/

And then the paypal thing.

Now THATS an Orly-worthy sentence.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:55 pm

Could someone provide me with a 100-150 word explanation of Apuzzo and Kerchner's theories so that I can forward to George Soros? As you may know, I am an expert in only Orly Taitz's theories, which means that I have lost 25 IQ points in the last 3 years.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:57 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

xKat wrote:

Do we know where in PA they are trying to file?

If it is in the 5 county Philadelphia region I can probably attend.

Ask Commander Kerchner.

He resides in the Lehigh Valley area, so a court filing would most likely be in the Commonwealth Court of Lehigh or Northampton County. (The Commonwealth Court has original jurisdiction to hear legal matters involving state and local government and regulatory agencies, including election disputes.)

xKat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:06 pm **Posts:** 412

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

xKat wrote:

Do we know where in PA they are trying to file?

If it is in the 5 county Philadelphia region I can probably attend.

Ask Commander Kerchner.

He resides in the Lehigh Valley area, so a court filing would most likely be in the Commonwealth Court of Lehigh or Northampton County. (The Commonwealth Court has original jurisdiction to hear legal matters involving state and local government and regulatory agencies, including election disputes.)

Thanks, I wasn't sure where he was (and didn't look).

Lehigh and Northampton aren't really close, but hopefully I can still arrange things at work to go to a hearing if there is one.

Somerset · **Posted:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:12 pm

Paul Pieniezny wrote:

'Zactly. Because every birfer knows

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23596

Quote:

He slipped through the cracks of the 2008 primary nomination process last time due to an enabling media not vetting him properly and which is covering up for him, a cowardly Congress, and a Republican Party establishment that wants to run their own ineligible candidates and are thus complicit in abrogation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. But he will be challenged every step of this way by We the People this time. He is not constitutionally eligible to be the President.

I'm part of We the People, and I'm not challenging him, simply because he's eligible, and you asshats know damn well he's eligible. You and your ilk, Kerchner, and especially your BFF Apuzzo and his asshole buddy Donofrio (who certainly know) are despicable and anything but patriots. Thank goodness there are real patriots who will not allow you to destroy the Constitution and sever the rule of law.

Wow! What a load of hogwash... and all that right after the Orly-esque sentence. :lol:

If they (Kerchner, et al.) did not know of Obama's background by the 2008 primary, they are some dumb mofos.

lyssandri · **Posted:** Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:17 am

realist wrote:

Why do these morons think multiple "plaintiffs" is a necessary (or even good) thing?

I think they believe that if they have a nice long list of plaintiffs on their briefs and motions, it makes them look more legitimate - like "See how many people care about his issue?"

It the whole "win in court via popularity contest" mentality they have.

bob · **Posted:** Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:49 am

Quote:

Sec of State of PA was non-responsive to voter inquiry

George W. Ellis wrote:

Dr. Taitz, I just wanted to follow up to reassure you that I had not forgotten about this. As you had requested of me to contact the PA Secretary of State to see if she would allow your appearance in a PA Obama Ballot Challenge in Court, please be advised that after I did write to the SOS last week, she has yet to respond back to me. Due to the uncertainty resulting from her continuing failure to respond, I have changed my plans since the 7-day period to challenge Obama here runs from 2/15-2/21, and of course starts next week. Isimply do not want to go further with this thing without some reasonable assurace of competent, experienced counsel to face Obama and his minions in Court. Thank you again for your offer to assist me in this effort, plus the great work that you do in all of the Courtrooms in America in defense of lawful elections and Constitutional government. I will remain a grateful fan.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31494 :twisted:

Tomtech · **Posted:** Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:52 am

bob wrote:

Quote:

Sec of State of PA was non-responsive to voter inquiry

George W. Ellis wrote:

I simply do not want to go further with this thing without some reasonable assurace of competent, experienced counsel

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31494 :twisted:

George; challenging Obama is proof that you do not have "competent, experienced counsel". :rimshot:

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:11 am

Bummer about that requirement in Pennsylvania that the motion for PHV must be filed by the sponsoring attorney, huh? And that the sponsoring attorney must be on all the pleadings.

Xyxox · **Joined:** Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:09 pm **Posts:** 29

You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy than at a plaintiff's table during a birther ballot challenge hearing.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:25 am

Bummer about that requirement in Pennsylvania that the motion for PHV must be filed by the sponsoring attorney, huh? And that the sponsoring attorney must be on all the pleadings.

Dr. Blue · **Joined:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:01 am **Posts:** 311

realist wrote:

Why do these morons think multiple "plaintiffs" is a necessary (or even good) thing?

Well, you need at least two for it to be "We the People", right? :roll:

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge

Who is online