So, I’ve been going through the laws and hoping that we may have a good chance in Maryland because the actual qualifications state you must be a Natural Born Citizen. I’ve added pretty much every law that is related and I called the Board of Elections on exactly how to go about challenging someone on the ballot.
So in MD, you must petition the court for a hearing and it must be with two days after the candidates are certified by the Board of Elections. She said they certify them on January 23rd, so I would have to file, between then and the 25th, to make it in time. She said my council will have to file the petition, would Orly be willing to file a pro hac vice here, to be my council? [Excellent idea -- go with council having a proven track record. ] I really believe, that I could go in there myself [We have confidence in you, Tracy, you don't need council. We bet Obama will also be pro se.] and prove he is ineligible [This is in a real court, so here is a good hornbook on evidence.], but that might be a dumb thing to do, not knowing HOW it all works [Neither does Orly]. If she is able, I can meet her at the airport and drive to Annapolis, where the Circuit Court is located, just so you know/ So anyways, we got about a month and a half on this one [Tick tock, less than a month now], hipefully we will already have it taken care of by then!!!!!

In 1866 while introducing bill H.R. 127 (14th Amendment) Jacob M. Howard (Author of the Citizenship clause) states:
“This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.”
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?co ... &recNum=11
MEANING that they changed NOTHING with the 14th Amendment, only that they were declaring what was already the law.

The LAW he was referring to, was the Civil Rights Act of 1866 which states:
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States;”
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/recons ... sact1.html

Everyone seems to forget the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, which is why the Law/Amendment went astray. If you look at the congressional records, while they were debating the 14th Amendment, you will find the truth and you will see that the 14th Amendment has been 100% perverted!

What exactly did “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” mean to the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment? Luckily we have Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, author of the Thirteenth Amendment, and the one who inserted the phrase:
“The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY ELSE. That is what it means.”
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?co ... &recNum=14

It really is slam dunk proof (CLEAR AND COMVINCING EVIDENCE) of Obama's ineligibilty 'cuz all her cources are from the LIbrary of Congress!

Whomp whomp whomp!

So, she follows with a mishmash brilliant analysis of statutory provisions.

<cue intro to the Andrea Shea King Show>

[...]

Think about it: If you don't heed the call now, what are you going to tell your grandchildren you did in the war?

If you remember the 60s, you weren't there. If you never filed a ballot challenge, you were a plastic birther. A sunshine patriot.

What should we use to indicate that we believe Tracy is getting advice* from her Rice Krispies?

Maybe we need to substitute our own sniglet. Would clownsel work?

Maybe we need to substitute our own sniglet. Would clownsel work?

Tracy wants Orly Taitz to represent her -- pro hac vice -- to represent her. So no matter what you call it, as long as it reeks of buffoonery, it will be appropriate.

The pronunciation of “pro hac vice” seems to be a matter of dispute. Most lawyers pronounce it “pro hawk vee-chay,” “pro hack visee,” or “pro hawk veese.” According to http://www.speaklegalenglish.com, any of these are acceptable. Dictionary.com’s Legal Dictionary adds “pro hack veeka.” However, Merriam-Webster prefers the classical Latin pronunciation – “pro hawk wickeh.” Lesson: no matter how you pronounce it, someone is going to think you’re wrong.