Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

realist wrote:

It is not yet filed, which is why I've not yet sent it to Jack or linked to it.

It appears she got it done.

Quote:

Filed in MS today

Posted on | June 18, 2012 | No Comments

Activity in Case 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA Taitz et al v. Democrat Party of Mississippi et al Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23525

Yep... just picked it up.

Quote:

Document Number: 37 MOTION for Judicial Notice of a Sworn Affidavit, Reply in Opposition to [35] MOTION to Supplement, and MOTION for an Emergency Evidentuary Hearing, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit of Joseph M. Arpaio)(ND)

links shortly

bob · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:45 pm

Taitz wrote:

Continuous filings by the defendants unduly burden the court with unnecessary pleadings

Need to upgrade to the professional irony meter.

SueDB · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:46 pm

bob wrote:

Taitz wrote:

Continuous filings by the defendants unduly burden the court with unnecessary pleadings

Need to upgrade to the professional irony meter.

Is there a heavy duty irony meter in the works? :lol:

Edit: mebbe they could use titanium in some parts...

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 565

SueDB wrote:

bob wrote:

Taitz wrote:

Continuous filings by the defendants unduly burden the court with unnecessary pleadings

Need to upgrade to the professional irony meter.

Is there a heavy duty irony meter in the works? :lol:

Edit: mebbe they could use titanium in some parts...

Offtopic :

Teh Megatron 2000 Multimeter is both an Irony meter (flip switch to the left) and a Gullibility meter (flip switch to the right). It has multiple sensitivity settings, jewelled movements, titanium springs and an invar needle that reduces the effects of hysteresis when the meter is repeatedly pegged. Wally World has them on special through August!

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1963

bob wrote:

Taitz wrote:

Continuous filings by the defendants unduly burden the court with unnecessary pleadings

Need to upgrade to the professional irony meter.

I see that she is putting her Indiana Schooling to use.

ducktape · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:26 pm

Maybe she could get her buddy Strunk to write an amicus brief explaining how the courts are being burdened with all these filings.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6626

Quote:

Taitz wrote:Continuous filings by the defendants unduly burden the court with unnecessary pleadings

Orly Taitz: Legal Concern Troll

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23525

Quote:

Document Number: 37 MOTION for Judicial Notice of a Sworn Affidavit, Reply in Opposition to [35] MOTION to Supplement, and MOTION for an Emergency Evidentuary Hearing, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit of Joseph M. Arpaio)(ND)

links shortly

Sorry for the delay.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10643

realist wrote:

Quote:

Document Number: 37 MOTION for Judicial Notice of a Sworn Affidavit, Reply in Opposition to [35] MOTION to Supplement, and MOTION for an Emergency Evidentuary Hearing, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit of Joseph M. Arpaio)(ND)

links shortly

Sorry for the delay.

I like the part about B&T's retroactive verification of forgeries. =))

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6626

TexasFilly wrote:

I like the part about B&T's retroactive verification of forgeries. =))

"as cover up" ](*,)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23525

"legitimating forged documents" is pretty good too. Also. :lol:

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 718

"Attorneys Begley and Tepper submitted to this court a certification from registrar Alvin T Onaka, where Onaka is stating that this court has tangible interest in getting information about original Obama's records."

Apart from the penultimate two words being in the wrong order, surely this is a lie to the court? Mr Onaka is not claiming that the court has a tangible interest in President Obama's vital records, and neither are B&T. Is she trying to put the court in the position of those who HI allow to get hold of a birth certificate?

Lena's learned a couple of new words: imperative and self-serving. She's learned the words and by golly she's gonna use them.

Edit: Better English, I speaks it.

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:32 pm

Once again proving that she has absolutely zero knowledge of the law,

Alleged Attorney Orly Taitz wrote:

Plaintiff is not seeking this honorable court to issue to issue a judicial notice, deeming those documents to indeed be forgeries...

Courts don't "issue a judicial notice", they "take judicial notice". A request for a court to take judicial notice does not cause the court to declare anything at all regarding the thing that is presented for notice. Nothing "issues". The court merely decides whether it will include the presented fact in its consideration of the case at hand or not.

Taitz asks the court to take "judicial notice" of the Arpaio affidavit; "notice of this affidavit being released". The court could say, "Hokay, it can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned that this affidavit was released."

Then what? So what? Judicial notice doesn't make the affidavit admissible. It doesn't make the affidavit relevant. It doesn't accomplish a thing except to show that Orly Taitz knows nothing about the law.

kate520 · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:33 pm

Oh, I like the one about Mr. Onaka being utterly complicit and trying to cover his guilty ass by pretending to authenticate Obama's non-BC because he was the one who actually put it there in 2004... or something.

She really is a crazy broad. :roll:

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3491

Just to be a stickler, how can the "affidavit" be an "affidavit" if it is only a copy and not the original? Isn't it technically not an "affidavit?"

ducktape · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:11 pm

OK, so here's my question that I've been wondering about for some time.

Orly makes a habit of accusing everyone she doesn't like of crimes, and here she is actually making an accusation in a court document of explicit criminal acts by the opposition legal team as well as the Hawaii registrar. And this isn't even her typical threats to the courts about misprision and complicity and High Treason if they rule against her, but explicit and real criminal acts.

Does this ever come back to bite her in the ass ... ever?

I've always been told that if I was accusing someone of a crime, I'd damned well better be able to back it up with real and actual evidence or I was going to be in a world of hurt. I realize that that's probably because the person I was accusing could sue me for defamation, but do the courts really allow this to happen and just leave it up to the people accused to decide if they want to sue?

Good legal minds, please enlighten me.

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 565

Well, I see that she has taken a breather from her screeches of CA ballot fraud to rededicate herself once again to ObamaForgeryFraudGate. SIGH!!

It takes a special kind of lawyer insane nitwit to demand from the court that an "Adobe Illustrator" expert be provided unfettered access to the original microfilm of the copy of an original LFBC.

Orly nevah disappoints. NEVAH!! ](*,)

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

I smile when I remember that every time Orly files one of these inane, hateful piles of crap, she's triggering Messrs. B&T to start the meter running again, toward a tab that Ms. Orly stands a good chance of having to pay herself.

Edit: ETA: We've recently been told that there's at least one SoCal attorney who charges $550/hr. I imagine Orly could extrapolate from there.

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1963

given that the judge is well known to be slow, how long before Orly loses patience and starts threatening him??

Dallasite · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:56 pm

Thai Eats wrote:

As Onaka submitted verification to this court and Obama made alleged birth certificate public, Onaka would be prevented from claiming privacy and refusing to present the original documents he used as a basis for his certification, submitted to this court by Begley and Tepper.

She still doesn't understand privacy laws. ](*,)

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Dallasite wrote:

Thai Eats wrote:

As Onaka submitted verification to this court and Obama made alleged birth certificate public, Onaka would be prevented from claiming privacy and refusing to present the original documents he used as a basis for his certification, submitted to this court by Begley and Tepper.

She still doesn't understand privacy laws. ](*,)

FIFY

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

neonzx wrote:

Dallasite wrote:

Thai Eats wrote:

As Onaka submitted verification to this court and Obama made alleged birth certificate public, Onaka would be prevented from claiming privacy and refusing to present the original documents he used as a basis for his certification, submitted to this court by Begley and Tepper.

She still doesn't understand privacy laws shit. ](*,)

FIFY

FIFBOY

kate520 · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:02 pm

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:03 pm

Is there a scheduled hearing in this case?

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Who is online