Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

SueDB · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:30 pm

Absolutely hilarious. Time well spent!

=))

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 773

That is outstanding, Piffle!

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:40 pm

She should probably very careful about making any real or implied threats to our State officials, even if just threats of legal actions. They don't take kindly to getting shot at (and obviously shoot back) so I suspect they might be hyper-vigilant about that sort of thing for the foreseeable future.

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20 ... |text|Home

p.s. I know her threats are legal actions and not physical threats, but the State is not going to be in any mood to give her a pass on even that much any time soon. Our AG is the only State-wide elected Democrat and as such seems to feel like he has something to prove.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:51 pm

Wonderful! Do ya suppose the guy knows he's infamous?

MsDaisy · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:20 pm

Highlands wrote:

realist wrote:

OH!! Be sure to check out EXHIBIT A

:-bd

When I open that link, the entire document is in some crazy gibberish language. I hate Scribd. :((

Quote:

L L@Z_CJ]BZLC@
Imdj Xidl`zlgg Cri| Zdlzv l d Bdilgcr`ld dzzcr`m| d`j dxxdrm`z ]`lzmj Rzdzm Rm`dzmbd`jljdzm uncm `czcrlmz| l jmrlwmj l` xdrz o| nmr `}kmrc} }`}bbmg}i idu}lz cwmr znm xdzgc}r |mdr l` unlbn nm) d d` dzzcr`m| cr xdrz|) nd diimemj zndz Odrdba Codkd l `cz mileloim zcncij znm cgglbm cg znm Xrmljm`z cg znm ]`lzmj Rzdzm L` Gmor}dr| ?84?) Zdlzv lkxcrzmj nmr gdlimj
4
dre}km`z zc Klllxxl o| glil`e znl dbzlc` dedl`z znm Klllxxl Rmbrmzdr| cg Rzdzm d`j znmKlllxxl Jmkcbrdzlb Xdrz|) l`lzldii| }`jmr Klllxxl Bcjm ?2+4=+<74) d d x}zdzlwmbndiim`em zc Xrmljm`z Codkd“ t}dilglbdzlc` d`j mmal`e nl rmkcwdi grck znm Klllxxl“Jmkcbrdzlb xrmljm`zldi xrmgmrm`bm xrlkdr| odiicz Znm crlel`di bckxidl`z ud }`zlkmi| glimjd`j zn} f}rljlbzlc`dii| jmgmbzlwm) gdlimj zc zdzm d bidlk) d`j cznmrulm jmglblm`z l` kd`| cznmr rmxmbz O}z omgcrm znm Nl`j Bc}`z| Blrb}lz Bc}rz bc}ij ncij d nmdrl`e cr r}im c` d`| cg znm f}rljlbzlc`di cr kmrlz l}m rmedrjl`e Zdlzv“ bckxidl`z) znm Klllxxl xrmljm`zldi xrmgmrm`bm
Bdrm 264?+bw+88?>8+NZU+I_D Jcb}km`z < Glimj 8:#?5#4? Xdem 4 cg ?4

Still won't work. :((

Hay, mine was doing that too until I clicked on my user account and under “Reading” I clicked “Display documents in HTML mode (recommended)”, saved the changes and it worked fine after that.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:24 pm

Sugar Mag, that's just happened a few hours ago. What was it all about? Why was someone wanting that lawyer dead so bad, they would shoot up his staff trying to get to him?

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20 ... /120429001

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5352

esseff44 wrote:

Sugar Mag, that's just happened a few hours ago. What was it all about? Why was someone wanting that lawyer dead so bad, they would shoot up his staff trying to get to him?

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20 ... /120429001

Insert Lawyer joke here.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:09 pm

Shagnastie wrote:

I hereby nominate Piffle Allen Poe (... or is it Edgar Allen Piffle?) for Fogbow Poet Laureate :xo

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +1 =D>

Plutodog · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:54 pm

Without a doubt on Piffle Poe. Well deserving of an anthology, in fact.
=D>

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:51 pm

esseff44 wrote:

Sugar Mag, that's just happened a few hours ago. What was it all about? Why was someone wanting that lawyer dead so bad, they would shoot up his staff trying to get to him?

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20 ... /120429001

Not a lot of information so far other than the fact that 2 men have been arrested and charged with plotting to kill the attorney. The two charged with the plot are not the same two who were involved with the actual shooting. Still no word on why they wanted him killed, either.

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1452

Quote:

OPPOSITION TO AN ATTEMPT BY THE DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATE TO REMOVE THE CASE TO THE FEDERAL COURT WHILE THE CASE IS PENDING IN THE SUPREME COURT

PETITION TO EXPEDITE REASSIGNEMENT OF A STATE JUDGE AS A SPECIAL JUDGE FOR THE ELECTIONS CONTEST. REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED HEARING ON THE ISSUE OF THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FROM PLACEMENT OF CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA ON THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT DUE TO USE BY OBAMA OF A FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE, STOLEN CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REDACTED AND USE OF A LAST NAME WHICH IS NOT LEGALLY HIS

REQUEST FOR ASSIGNMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE OR A PANEL OF JUDGES AS A SPECIAL JUDGE
DUE TO URGENCY OF THE CASE AND IMPORTANCE OF THE CASE FOR THE NATIONAL SECURITY

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=50875 :evil:

nbc · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am **Posts:** 2616

It's a draft. Pretty hilarious. Poorly written, no real legal arguments, failing to understand the legal foundations for removal. Fascinating. Orly is getting in good shape...

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:38 am

Quote:

There is no legitimate reason for the Secretary of State to oppose the Plaintiffs at all, as the Plaintiffs are seeking to uphold lawful elections and halt elections fraud. It would be reasonable for the Secretary of State not to waste taxpayer’s money on any opposition at all and simply file a stipulation that they will follow the findings of the presiding judge, who is the trier of the facts. This is not the fight of the Secretary of State at all.

Huh? Is she for real? Not only does she file these ridiculous cases but now she wants to tell a defendant that SHE named, that they shouldn't defend their position? If "this is not the fight of the Secretary of State at all," why did she name him as defendant???? Oh I get it! In OrlyLaw, Orly decides what the opposition's position should be and when they should simply acquiesce since we know Orly has "irrefutable," "explosive" evidence!

And if that weren't outrageous enough, she adds a new bomb, "embezzlement":

Quote:

Defendant Secretary of state is simply engaging in embezzlement of the taxpayer funds and misappropriation of the taxpayer funds by using those funds to draft pleadings and argue against RICO actions brought against other defendants.

jtmunkus · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:42 am

I love Orly's tactic of intentionally failing to address the law. It's worked so well for her in the past, so why not?

I see May shaping up to be the Month of the Sanction. Mississippi, Hawai'i, and Indiana - PLAY BALL!

ZekeB · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:21 am

jtmunkus wrote:

I love Orly's tactic of intentionally failing to address the law. It's worked so well for her in the past, so why not?

Well um, yes. The Judge is supposed to do the research and discovery and everything for her. Why bother addressing points of law? Those are a given in her tiny little brain.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23943

Update: From the Clarion Ledger

Doctor arrested in suspected murder plot
AG investigators meeting with attorney when gunfight ensues

Quote:

GREENWOOD — Authorities say a 70-year-old oncologist is accused of hiring two men to kill the lawyer who represented his ex-wife when they divorced in the 1990s.

Dr. Arnold Smith of Greenwood and William Paul Muller, 54, a brickmason from Morgan City, were arrested Sunday and held without bond on a charge of conspiracy to kill lawyer Lee Abraham, Greenwood police said.

[...]

Greenwood police arrested Smith on Sunday morning, according to the police docket. The attorney general's office arrested Muller.

"We can't currently make any comment as it relates to a criminal investigation," said Jan Schaefer, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Jim Hood.

much more at the link

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:21 am

When they were arrested, did they have Tire Screws?

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4221

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=50875 :twisted:

Quote:

David Milstein
April 30th, 2012 @ 5:00 am

I thought I told you to ignore Mississippi. It’s a complete waste of time and resources now. Nothing is going to happen with your Mississippi case. It is hopelessly, endlessly bogged down.

orly taitz
April 30th, 2012 @ 5:14 am

if an obot will tell me to jump from a high floor, do you expect me to do it? [ [-o<

]
Why should i follow an advice, which makes zero sense

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23943

realist wrote:

Just FYI - The SDMS has posted Orly's Letter/Notice of Improper Removal to Federal Court on the PACER Docket. It has now replaced the previous version (not file stamped) at Jack's and may be viewed here
MS - SDMS - TAITZ - Letter/Notice of Unlawful Removal

FURTHER UPDATE... The Court (SDMS) has now posted the above as Document 11 and is considering it as a Motion...

MS - SDMS - TAITZ - 11 MOTION Notice of Improper Attempt to Remove Case,

Hokay! Let's try this all again, with new info from the docket...

Quote:

This is how the docket reads:

Taitz et al v. Democrat Party of Mississippi et al
Assigned to: District Judge Henry T. Wingate
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson

Case in other court:
Circuit Court of Hinds County, Ms, 251-12-00107 CIV

Cause: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Date Filed: 04/24/2012
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

04/30/2012 10 NOTICE of an Improper Attempt by the Defendant to Remove the case to the Federal Court, While it is being Considered by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 04/30/2012)

04/30/2012 11 MOTION (Demand) for Immediate Termination of Unlawful Proceedings in the Federal Court and MOTION (Demand) for Sanctions against the Defendant Secretary of State and Defendants Attorney, filed by Orly Taitz. (ND) (Entered: 04/30/2012)

The documents are identical.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:17 pm

realist wrote:

The documents are identical.

Uh oh, looks like she really means it!

much ado · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:17 pm

realist wrote:

The documents are identical.

Is that a mistake by the clerk? It's probably easy to upload the wrong document when you're laughing that hard.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:31 pm

For us non-lawyers, what exactly is a NOTICE in legal procedure? Can you just make'm up as you go along?

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:54 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

For us non-lawyers, what exactly is a NOTICE in legal procedure? Can you just make'm up as you go along?

It's Orly Law, OD. The rules are very similar to Calvin Ball.

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:56 pm

Is it a good idea to be CCing the 5th Circuit and SCOTUS on case documents?

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23943

Mikedunford wrote:

Is it a good idea to be CCing the 5th Circuit and SCOTUS on case documents?

Rhetorical question? :lol:

Answer = No.

But in Orlylaw... ](*,)

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Who is online