Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3496

neonzx wrote:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=45924 :evil:

Quote:

N otice sent to the Secretary of State of California and the Attorney General of California, advising that they might be named as additional defendants in a RICO action against Obama, Pelosi and Obama for America

Posted on | April 26, 2012 | No Comments

"PLEASE FORWARD TO:

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Ethics Hotline for Attorneys Only
1149 S Hill St Fl 4, Los Angeles, CA, 90015"

borealis · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:04 pm

realist wrote:

neonzx wrote:

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=45899 :evil:

Quote:

My case is still pending in the Supreme Court of MS since April 19th. Dem Party tried to use AG of MS Democrat Jim Hood to pull a fast one and usurp the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the state. Bad idea! :twisted:

Posted on | April 26, 2012 | No Comments

Dumbass never had a "case pending" in the SCOMS.

Did she believe she did because Coleman is a retired SCOMS justice?

Reality Check · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:05 pm

Why doesn't she just save time and add everyone who voted for Obama in 2008? You know, all 69,456,897 of us.

borealis · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:06 pm

jtmunkus wrote:

neonzx wrote:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=45924 :evil:

Quote:

N otice sent to the Secretary of State of California and the Attorney General of California, advising that they might be named as additional defendants in a RICO action against Obama, Pelosi and Obama for America

Posted on | April 26, 2012 | No Comments

"PLEASE FORWARD TO:

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Ethics Hotline for Attorneys Only
1149 S Hill St Fl 4, Los Angeles, CA, 90015"

Should we designate a RICO thread for her nutso threats?

Joseph Robidoux III · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:16 pm

5150

No need for any additional digits.

chancery · **Joined:** Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:51 pm **Posts:** 192

tjh wrote:

Halil Suleyman Ozerden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halil_Suleyman_Ozerden

Halil Suleyman "Sul" Ozerden (Turkish: Halil Süleyman Özerden) (born
December 5, 1966), is a Turkish American federal judge for the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. He was
nominated by George W. Bush on January 9, 2007 ...

In Mississippi? Amazing. I actually cringed when I clicked the link, because I expected to be rickrolled.

Too bad his name wasn't pulled from the wheel.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

neonzx wrote:

http://courts.ms.gov/scripts/websiteX_cgi.exe/docket?case_num=75279
It says right there Case Docket for Case!

She does learn. After the "Empty Chair" case in GA, she's going for an Empty JUDGE'S Chair trial in MS. All she has to do is find an empty courtroom ....

woodworker · **Joined:** Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm **Posts:** 347

158674 (has nothing to do with the likelihood of the actual ones above, but I bet you'all can figure out why).

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

Comments to Orly's threats to CA SoS and AG posting...

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=45924 :evil:

N otice sent to the Secretary of State of California and the Attorney General of California, advising that they might be named as additional defendants in a RICO action against Obama, Pelosi and Obama for America

Quote:

Paul Jackson
April 26th, 2012 @ 2:19 pm

And a pony.

orly taitz
April 26th, 2012 @ 2:53 pm

you are so smart

Sisyphus
April 26th, 2012 @ 3:09 pm

Are you going to add them to the RICO action in MS, or are you contemplating a new RICO in CA?

West Coast Carl
April 26th, 2012 @ 3:12 pm

RICO is powerful anti-Obot artillery.
I hope you will use it wherever possible. =))

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:44 pm

Didn't Orly just land herself in a world of trouble with the California Bar?

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

More comments from her "My case is still alive in MS state court" posting...

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=45899 :evil:

Quote:

Linda M.
April 26th, 2012 @ 1:26 pm

Dr. Taitz can you explain to us – now that it’s not going to be removed to federal court, will you still pursue the RICO action?

orly taitz
April 26th, 2012 @ 1:32 pm

of course, you can pursue it in state court

1956BMW · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:00 pm

MaineSkeptic wrote:

fava wrote:

314159

Yes I have 1 in there twice.

We have cookis too.

In addition to that piece of pi?

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:02 pm

TollandRCR wrote:

Didn't Orly just land herself in a world of trouble with the California Bar?

California has a bar?

rajah · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:26 pm

Mikedunford wrote:

TollandRCR wrote:

Didn't Orly just land herself in a world of trouble with the California Bar?

California has a bar?

Yeah, I remember getting pissed there once, at least I think I remember.
Regards ...........Dick
(Translation Pissed = Drunk)

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:28 pm

borealis wrote:

Should we designate a RICO thread for her nutso threats?

I was about to ask something along those lines, but more like a thread for specifically for this California nonsense, as this could get pretty messy. There are lots of folks in California who have "had it up to here" with Orly. This might trigger who knows what.

I've got two questions. First -- Does this outrageous threat constitute Bad Behavior per the CA Bar rules of conduct, or whatever they are called?

Second -- I cannot recall but isn't it TOO LATE to challenge the eligibility of a candidate on the California Primary ballot? The Ballot Guide is already out, for crying out loud! If so, this is more outrageous than usual, even for Orly. I think she is really losing it for real.

June bug · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:40 pm

Objective Doubter wrote:

Second -- I cannot recall but isn't it TOO LATE to challenge the eligibility of a candidate on the California Primary ballot? The Ballot Guide is already out, for crying out loud! If so, this is more outrageous than usual, even for Orly. I think she is really losing it for real.

Rules, schmules! This is the biggest Konstitushonal krisis in the history of the USSR*!! Rules be damned - full speed ahead I tells ya'!

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3496

realist wrote:

More comments from her "My case is still alive in MS state court" posting...
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=45899 :evil:

Quote:

Linda M.
April 26th, 2012 @ 1:26 pm
Dr. Taitz can you explain to us – now that it’s not going to be removed to federal court, will you still pursue the RICO action?

orly taitz
April 26th, 2012 @ 1:32 pm
of course, you can pursue it in state court

Followed by:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Followed by:

Quote:

orly taitz
April 26th, 2012 @ 4:20 pm

defendants can remove a case from a circuit court to the federal court in some instances, however plaintiffs can file an opposition.
In this case it was not in the circuit court. The case is in the Supreme Court. There is no rule allowing the case to be just removed to the federal court when it is awaiting adjudication in the Supreme Court of the state.
This is just outrageous.

fiascoist · **Joined:** Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:42 am **Posts:** 35

197425

And 8 will never ever ever happen, doesn't need to when you are part of the International Justice League

CatMe · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:59 pm

TollandRCR wrote:

Didn't Orly just land herself in a world of trouble with the California Bar?

You're being sarcastic, right?

=))

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:04 pm

CatMe wrote:

TollandRCR wrote:

Didn't Orly just land herself in a world of trouble with the California Bar?

You're being sarcastic, right?

=))

Maybe, but I hope not. If the California Bar does not react to this breach of ethics, I cannot see it reacting to anything else that Taitz does. Threatening the Attorney General and Secretary of State ought to, in a rational world, get their attention.

Maru · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:10 pm

BFB wrote:

867-5309

Oh .... wait ...

Jenny, Jenny...

I go for 742765. And yes I know she does one more than once.

wavey davey · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:20 pm

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

nbc · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am **Posts:** 2530

wavey davey wrote:

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

I'm lost... :roll:

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

wavey davey wrote:

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

What, no Powerball pick to go with them?

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:25 pm

Ahem.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Who is online