OrlyLogic is a wonder to behold. Approving a PHV application without local counsel Is the same as approving a PHV application without a residential address. Yeah, come on Judge Coleman, that local counsel thing is just such a minor detail. Can't you just see/ hear her fluttering /s/ and /s/ and saying in that coquettish voice, "But your Honor, is only fair, they leave off one little eensy detail, I should get equal chance to leave off a detail too."

The "Hijack the proceedings from the Judge when he is sick for a few days and declare this Self Appointed All Encompassing Emergency Discovery phase" trick, eh.....
This is a master stroke, especially the way she has the judge wrapped around her finger, the way she bullies him into giving her everything she wants by Dictating what he MUST do next, no if, ands , or buts. What hutzgah.
This one Can't Fail, not at all. She has out maneuvered them all.
She's got this one sewn up tight, RICO and treason and getting all those who have done her harm....this is too much to stop.
Its a bulldozer of a case, with "totality" far greater then any previous birther case, and its heading straight for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Defense counsel's only option is to wave the white hanky and ask Orly for surrender terms.

I'm a little late to the real in-depth legal stuff of all things Orly (I only found Fogbow after she came to MS with her silliness) so forgive the stupid question, but is there something about the MS case that makes it any different than all the others? I'm doing my best to keep up with what's going on (and has gone on) in the other states, but it's still hard for me to judge whether this is normal procedure for her or if there is something about the MS case that might really give her the rope to hang herself with.

From Orly' s email to Judge Coleman:

I wonder why she needs the judge to rule on her "subpoena to support a subpoena" request if Viviano and Gaston agreed to be deposed. Maybe Gnome Corsi got wind of the scheme and asked them not to cooperate with Orly.

The only difference I see here is that the the Democratic Party lawyers are willing to hold her feet to the fire. Orly's crap appears to me to just be Orly being Orly.

I hope we can provide some sanity.


Unfortunately, it's completely normal procedure. She reads something on the web (or ONCE in a LAW LIBRARY!!!!) and flings it like a chimpanzee flinging feces in every direction, in the hopes that something might stick. AND she re-filesflings her newly found poop back into every other case which she ever filed.

You clearly have LOTS to learn about OrlyLaw, so hang in there.

Been there, done that.

(although the results didn't satify the birthers)

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/tag/wild-bill/

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/ ... -decision/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2123806/posts

One notable difference is that the SCOMS appointed a referee to hear her petition. I think Taitz believes that's a sign that her case is important, and worthy. (And not that an appellate court routinely appoints a referee to make findings of fact.)

I'm not sure what you mean by a "referee" being appointed. As far as I know, Judge Coleman is a Senior Status (Special) Judge. We seem to have a lot of those here and they're just retired judges who continue working part-time so the courts don't get so backlogged. They just appointed a Special Judge to hear a local election challenge too.

Right. Thing is, Orly is operating under the impression that because it's a "special judge", her case is special.

Thanks. I can see where her ego would lead her to believe that.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432#comments

Yeh Ms. Frightwig, go for it!

Oh, please!

*Wicked chuckle* Oh, I remember those.......

Did they forget to tell her he was in the hospital??

I might be wrong here, but I thought she filed this post-primary. Also Obama wasn't on the ballot for the primary. So did I forget something?

You forgot you were talking about Orly?

Thanks I needed a good laugh.
So I guess she's creating some quick spin to keep her smarter questioning FMs in line?

'Tis possible, but I think "copulating with a Planter's can" is the explanation Ockham would prefer.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432#comments [/quote]
I guess this will be most helpful. It will bring the current proceedings to a screeching halt for a couple of months. And then they will restart with nothing different than possibly a dark colored eye on plaintiff (NADT).

Orly filed this complaint on Feb. 14, a month before the primary. Obama was indeed on the ballot. He won.

Who, exactly, does she think is exerting this pressure> Does she even realize that we're so red that Santorum took MS? I'm sure there are plenty of politicians here who would love to get rid of Obama and would jump at the chance to do it.

The pressure is coming from "them." The same "them" that's behind all the anxieties of the tinfoil hat brigade.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432