Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9601 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 ... 385  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6637
OrlyLogic is a wonder to behold. Approving a PHV application without local counsel Is the same as approving a PHV application without a residential address. Yeah, come on Judge Coleman, that local counsel thing is just such a minor detail. Can't you just see/ hear her fluttering /s/ and /s/ and saying in that coquettish voice, "But your Honor, is only fair, they leave off one little eensy detail, I should get equal chance to leave off a detail too."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 411
Foggy wrote:
She's just so damned excited about being in the "discovery phase".

After all this time and all these lawsuits, she finally gets to depose witnesses. Starting with some nice, soft, friendly witnesses, a couple of birther bimbos who will do what they're told.

I just hope neither Viviano or Gaston has ever been deposed before. If so, they might notice one or two differences that might make them uneasy ... :lol:


The "Hijack the proceedings from the Judge when he is sick for a few days and declare this Self Appointed All Encompassing Emergency Discovery phase" trick, eh.....
This is a master stroke, especially the way she has the judge wrapped around her finger, the way she bullies him into giving her everything she wants by Dictating what he MUST do next, no if, ands , or buts. What hutzgah.
This one Can't Fail, not at all. She has out maneuvered them all. =D>
She's got this one sewn up tight, RICO and treason and getting all those who have done her harm....this is too much to stop.
Its a bulldozer of a case, with "totality" far greater then any previous birther case, and its heading straight for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Defense counsel's only option is to wave the white hanky and ask Orly for surrender terms.

_________________
It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indiana, Orly Taitz or Lena. We have no idea, who is residing in the Taitz house: is it Orly Taitz or is it
Lena Lettmifeeenisch ? If it is Lena, what, happened to Orly Taitz ?
Lila Dubert


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Posts: 1961
Location: The landmass between New Orleans and Mobile
I'm a little late to the real in-depth legal stuff of all things Orly (I only found Fogbow after she came to MS with her silliness) so forgive the stupid question, but is there something about the MS case that makes it any different than all the others? I'm doing my best to keep up with what's going on (and has gone on) in the other states, but it's still hard for me to judge whether this is normal procedure for her or if there is something about the MS case that might really give her the rope to hang herself with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2128
From Orly' s email to Judge Coleman:
Quote:
4. Taitz is requesting a ruling on prior requests for subpoenas that were submitted to Your Honor.

I wonder why she needs the judge to rule on her "subpoena to support a subpoena" request if Viviano and Gaston agreed to be deposed. :-k Maybe Gnome Corsi got wind of the scheme and asked them not to cooperate with Orly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 592
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
I'm a little late to the real in-depth legal stuff of all things Orly (I only found Fogbow after she came to MS with her silliness) so forgive the stupid question, but is there something about the MS case that makes it any different than all the others? I'm doing my best to keep up with what's going on (and has gone on) in the other states, but it's still hard for me to judge whether this is normal procedure for her or if there is something about the MS case that might really give her the rope to hang herself with.


The only difference I see here is that the the Democratic Party lawyers are willing to hold her feet to the fire. Orly's crap appears to me to just be Orly being Orly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2475
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
I'm a little late to the real in-depth legal stuff of all things Orly (I only found Fogbow after she came to MS with her silliness)

I hope we can provide some sanity.
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
so forgive the stupid question .. but it's still hard for me to judge whether this is normal procedure for her or if there is something about the MS case that might really give her the rope to hang herself with.


Unfortunately, it's completely normal procedure. She reads something on the web (or ONCE in a LAW LIBRARY!!!!) and flings it like a chimpanzee flinging feces in every direction, in the hopes that something might stick. AND she re-filesflings her newly found poop back into every other case which she ever filed.

You clearly have LOTS to learn about OrlyLaw, so hang in there.

With the participation of fully-obly-informed counsel we HOPE for a different outcome ...

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:46 pm
Posts: 109
verbalobe wrote:
Why even file lawsuits? Wouldn't be cheaper and easier to just fill blog after blog with FAKE lawsuits?


Been there, done that.

(although the results didn't satify the birthers) :lol:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/tag/wild-bill/

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/ ... -decision/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2123806/posts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9197
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
One notable difference is that the SCOMS appointed a referee to hear her petition. I think Taitz believes that's a sign that her case is important, and worthy. (And not that an appellate court routinely appoints a referee to make findings of fact.)

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Posts: 1961
Location: The landmass between New Orleans and Mobile
bob wrote:
One notable difference is that the SCOMS appointed a referee to hear her petition. I think Taitz believes that's a sign that her case is important, and worthy. (And not that an appellate court routinely appoints a referee to make findings of fact.)

I'm not sure what you mean by a "referee" being appointed. As far as I know, Judge Coleman is a Senior Status (Special) Judge. We seem to have a lot of those here and they're just retired judges who continue working part-time so the courts don't get so backlogged. They just appointed a Special Judge to hear a local election challenge too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3371
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
bob wrote:
One notable difference is that the SCOMS appointed a referee to hear her petition. I think Taitz believes that's a sign that her case is important, and worthy. (And not that an appellate court routinely appoints a referee to make findings of fact.)

I'm not sure what you mean by a "referee" being appointed. As far as I know, Judge Coleman is a Senior Status (Special) Judge. We seem to have a lot of those here and they're just retired judges who continue working part-time so the courts don't get so backlogged. They just appointed a Special Judge to hear a local election challenge too.


Right. Thing is, Orly is operating under the impression that because it's a "special judge", her case is special.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Posts: 1961
Location: The landmass between New Orleans and Mobile
Mikedunford wrote:
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
bob wrote:
One notable difference is that the SCOMS appointed a referee to hear her petition. I think Taitz believes that's a sign that her case is important, and worthy. (And not that an appellate court routinely appoints a referee to make findings of fact.)

I'm not sure what you mean by a "referee" being appointed. As far as I know, Judge Coleman is a Senior Status (Special) Judge. We seem to have a lot of those here and they're just retired judges who continue working part-time so the courts don't get so backlogged. They just appointed a Special Judge to hear a local election challenge too.


Right. Thing is, Orly is operating under the impression that because it's a "special judge", her case is special.

Thanks. I can see where her ego would lead her to believe that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9197
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Quote:
Bruriah Sarah wrote:
What are the rules of discovery? Does Tepper have the right to see the names of the witnesses even while you are still in the process of discovery? If not, is it possible that the Judge would rule in the defendent’s favor?

Taitz wrote:
I do not understand your question? What names of witnesses?

Paul Jackson wrote:
In any case counsel for both sides have a right to know any witnesses their opponent plans to call and what their testimony will entail, any witnesses they plan to depose and any exhibits planned to be used in deposition and/or court, in advance (and with proper notice) of counsel doing so.

Taitz wrote:
right now we are waiting for judge Coleman to either grant me pro hac vice to issue subpoenas in MS or he needs to sign the subpoenas himself. The fact that this judge sat on the case for over a month and did not even contact the parties until after the primary and now is not granting pro hac or does not sign MS subpoenas, leads me to believe that there is some pressure on him to kill this case, and I am just about ready to go to the Supreme court of MS with a formal complaint

:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432#comments :twisted:

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1430
bob wrote:
Quote:
Bruriah Sarah wrote:
I am just about ready to go to the Supreme court of MS with a formal complaint[/highlight]

:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432#comments :twisted:



Yeh Ms. Frightwig, go for it!

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12899
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
Oh, please! -xx

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6417
Location: Edmonds, WA
Wild Bill wrote:
verbalobe wrote:
Why even file lawsuits? Wouldn't be cheaper and easier to just fill blog after blog with FAKE lawsuits?


Been there, done that.

(although the results didn't satify the birthers) :lol:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/tag/wild-bill/

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/ ... -decision/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2123806/posts


*Wicked chuckle* Oh, I remember those.......

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Posts: 1961
Location: The landmass between New Orleans and Mobile
Did they forget to tell her he was in the hospital??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
I might be wrong here, but I thought she filed this post-primary. Also Obama wasn't on the ballot for the primary. So did I forget something?

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Posts: 1961
Location: The landmass between New Orleans and Mobile
borealis wrote:
I might be wrong here, but I thought she filed this post-primary. Also Obama wasn't on the ballot for the primary. So did I forget something?

You forgot you were talking about Orly?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
borealis wrote:
I might be wrong here, but I thought she filed this post-primary. Also Obama wasn't on the ballot for the primary. So did I forget something?

You forgot you were talking about Orly?

=)) Thanks I needed a good laugh.
So I guess she's creating some quick spin to keep her smarter questioning FMs in line?

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3371
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
borealis wrote:
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
borealis wrote:
I might be wrong here, but I thought she filed this post-primary. Also Obama wasn't on the ballot for the primary. So did I forget something?

You forgot you were talking about Orly?

=)) Thanks I needed a good laugh.
So I guess she's creating some quick spin to keep her smarter questioning FMs in line?


'Tis possible, but I think "copulating with a Planter's can" is the explanation Ockham would prefer.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3940
Location: Switzerland
bob wrote:
Taitz wrote:
..., and I am just about ready to go to the Supreme court of MS with a formal complaint[/highlight]

:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432#comments :twisted:[/quote]
I guess this will be most helpful. It will bring the current proceedings to a screeching halt for a couple of months. And then they will restart with nothing different than possibly a dark colored eye on plaintiff (NADT).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2128
Orly filed this complaint on Feb. 14, a month before the primary. Obama was indeed on the ballot. He won. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:44 am
Posts: 1961
Location: The landmass between New Orleans and Mobile
Quote:
there is some pressure on him to kill this case, and I am just about ready to go to the Supreme court of MS with a formal complaint


Who, exactly, does she think is exerting this pressure> Does she even realize that we're so red that Santorum took MS? I'm sure there are plenty of politicians here who would love to get rid of Obama and would jump at the chance to do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3371
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Quote:
there is some pressure on him to kill this case, and I am just about ready to go to the Supreme court of MS with a formal complaint


Who, exactly, does she think is exerting this pressure> Does she even realize that we're so red that Santorum took MS? I'm sure there are plenty of politicians here who would love to get rid of Obama and would jump at the chance to do it.


The pressure is coming from "them." The same "them" that's behind all the anxieties of the tinfoil hat brigade.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23583
:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=38432 :evil:

Quote:
Kurt Knabke
April 17th, 2012 @ 2:52 pm

Bruriah Sarah

Tepper will receive a witness list from Orly prior to the trial. The judge will decide on the motions by both parties prior and during the trial. The decision on the merits of the case will come at the end of the trial. Check with Orly for she is the lawyer.

Kurt

orly taitz
April 17th, 2012 @ 3:06 pm

Mr. Knabke is correct

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9601 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 ... 385  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Shizzle Popped and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group