Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5755
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
So, what is the NY deadline for filing a challenge? Are they SOL to refile in Albany?

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18538
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
via Bill Van Allen:

NYSBOE FOIL Response -- Copies of All Determinations 2012 Presidential Primary
http://www.scribd.com/billvanallen/d/84 ... al-Primary


Shows there are a lot of these that we don't know about.

Also shows that birthers are a bigger FAIL than I had known. I didn't think that possible.


ETA: Most challenges against Obama, but not all. Some were against Santorum and Romney.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
mimi wrote:
via Bill Van Allen:

NYSBOE FOIL Response -- Copies of All Determinations 2012 Presidential Primary
http://www.scribd.com/billvanallen/d/84 ... al-Primary


Shows there are a lot of these that we don't know about.

Also shows that birthers are a bigger FAIL than I had known. I didn't think that possible.


ETA: Most challenges against Obama, but not all. Some were against Santorum and Romney.


So, Mimi, how big is the fail quotient? Does it exceed 200? Pity people are just so stupid and can't do better for themselves and their communities other than feed their self-ingratiated paranoia.

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
From reading them, it's not clear that *all* are "birther" challenges. The language in the dismissals of known birthers is the same in all, but there are some where the language is different.

Each of the challenges have been separated out and added to Jack's challenge folder. I think there were 19 of them.

http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/3345747

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5177
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
realist wrote:
From reading them, it's not clear that *all* are "birther" challenges. The language in the dismissals of known birthers is the same in all, but there are some where the language is different.

Each of the challenges have been separated out and added to Jack's challenge folder. I think there were 19 of them.

http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/3345747


Jack just doesn't get enough recognition for all he does. Realistically.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18538
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Garvey got a letter:


http://www.scribd.com/billvanallen/d/86 ... Action-Til

So he filed some kind of notice that he was going to appeal.
http://www.scribd.com/billvanallen/d/86 ... -Statement

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5177
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
ZorbasLeGreque wrote:
There is a Jack Ryan who liked to shag his wife in public. I really hope that this is not our Jack Ryan or has he changed like Saulus ? (BTW Paulus was still an asshole).


That Jack Ryan has many reasons to hate Obama. Ours? I hear he's a big Obama fan. Plus I hear our Jack Ryan doesn't currently have a wife or two, and may never have been married to a Borg... although he may have to check his records on that.

Ours is more like the Patriot Games one in an existential way.

:xo

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1964
ZorbasLeGreque wrote:
There is a Jack Ryan who liked to shag his wife in public.


To be fair to him, it was Seven of Nine. you can't blame a guy for boasting a bit.

:lol:

ETA: I wonder if he even made her wear the costume.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19929
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
We can thank that Jack Ryan for POTUS 44, too.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5755
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
 ! raicha wrote:
This is a good place to end the Jack threadjack. :mrgreen:

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:46 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 7499
Location: Outa da doghaus and I ain't goin' back!
Occupation: Arf! Arf! Arooooooooooo! (Get that damned kitty!)
raicha wrote:
This is a good place to end the Jack threadjack. :mrgreen:

:-? I wuz still trying to understand the Jack threadjack! :-?

_________________
  • I know that there are no limits to which the powers of privilege will not go to keep the workers in slavery.
  • My friends, it is solidarity of labor we want. We do not want to find fault with each other, but to solidify our forces and say to each other: “We must be together; our masters are joined together and we must do the same thing.”
  • Pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living.
—Mother Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:23 pm
Posts: 18
According to e-law, Judge Schack granted the motion to dismiss on April 11. However, I see motions from Strunk, to stay proceedings and for other relief, coming up on the 23rd and 24th. Is this dead, or what?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19929
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
It's been DoA since it was conceived in Strunk In Esse's tortured mind, and dead as a doornail since it was filed, but Strunk will never accept that.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:23 pm
Posts: 18
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
It's been DoA since it was conceived in Strunk In Esse's tortured mind, and dead as a doornail since it was filed, but Strunk will never accept that.


I suppose what I should have asked is, does the Court now recognize this as dead? Does anyone know what Strunk's "other relief" motion, which was filed the day after the dismissal motion was finally granted, is seeking? Does he want the judge to go best two out of three?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2103
According to http://obamaballotchallenge.com/update- ... tions-case

Strunk wrote:
Schack’s reaction to the filing was to dismiss the entire case except for the Motion for leave to appeal and the motion for leave to supplement filed yesterday. See the docket schedule of motions attached.
I am presently preparing a motion to reconsider (however have not received the memorandum and order yet from the court) and doing an OSC before Justice Schmidt Monday in my 29642-2008 case against the NYS BOE
Best regards
Chris Strunk


So, it is dead to sane people, but he will be filing a motion to reconsider, as required in the Birfer Rules of Civil Procedure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5246
[img]http://myspace.roflposters.com/images/rofl/myspace/1219075187134.jpg.[roflposters.com].myspace.jpg[/img]

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
From OBC

Quote:
NOTICE of PETITION Index No 21948-2012 served in Brooklyn New York – OSC is next on Monday: Electoral College Crime

Posted by By GeorgeM at 15 November, at 01 : 18 AM Print

From: <chris@strunk.ws>
Date: Wed, November 14, 2012 6:34 pm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/NOT ... nd-to-VOID
Monday will be the showdown for the OSC that will require copying and overnight service of say 200 pages times 28.
Donations are welcome
Best regards
Chris Strunk


Strunk v Jeffries, et al.

I dunno wassup up with Monday. "Apparently" the petition was filed 11/14... yesterday. Ahhh seeking a TRO/Injunction... whatever... to stay the certification of the NY vote until and unless nbc defined or sumpin'...

Quote:
this Petition requests expedited emergency equity relief with a CPLR §7805 injunction with a stay of New York Electoral College vote due by December 15, 2012 until the Court renders a declaratory judgment on the issues of law under CPLR §7806 regarding U.S. Constitution: Article 2 in its entirety, especially Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 3 (A2S1C3) as amended by the Article 7 Amendments the 12th, the 14th especially sections 3 and 4, the 20th, and the 25th; further, especially as to the U.S. Constitution Article 2Section 1 paragraph 5 (A2S1C5) term of art “natural born Citizen” (NBC) natural law issue versus the idiom“born a citizen” positive law created by the New York State Board of Elections (NYS BOE); further, the U.S. Constitution: Article 3 Section 3; Article 4; Article 6; and furthermore, related New York State law and regulations as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation as applies with use of NYS Civil Service Law §105, and that Petitioner seeks equity relief on six (6) issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a matter of State Law
heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641, and Complaint with Index No.: 2008 29642;and also, Petitioner challenges the New York U.S. Senate Election as void ab initio with U.S. Constitution Amendment 17 and NYS Constitution Article 3 §7 grounds; and that based upon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, with imminent irreparable harm as time is of the essence and without another forum for relief, alleges of captioned Respondents and related persons as follows:

[...]

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9151
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
OBC: [FWD: Progress on OSC due Monday for NYS SC Index 21948-12 NEED DONATIONS FOR COPY - MAILING:
Quote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/OSC-with-NOTICE-of-PETITION-INDEX-No-21948-2012-in-re-Complaint-of-attempt-to-commit-a-crime-by-NY-Public-Officers-in-the-2012-Electoral-College-an
Am working on the MOL and Order and will be ready tomorrow morning to appear at court.
Need copy money for 30 copies of say 200 pages each and overnight mailing times 28.
Note the following:

That Petitioner contends that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton conspired together with their Muslim Brotherhood associate President Mosey of Egypt and Mohamed al-Zawahiri, the younger brother of Al Qaeda leader Ayman Al Zawahiri, to have Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman (Arabic: ??? ??? ???????, ‘Umar ‘Abd ar-Ra?man; born 3 May 1938), commonly known in the United States as “The Blind Sheikh”, released from Federal prison by in fact using al Qaida to kidnap the Ambassador from the Benghazi Embassy Annex or CIA safehouse, where the Libyan gun buy back was underway, to exchange Stevens for the Blind Sheikh. As follow-up with the cover-up, Obama on September 19, 2012 appeared on the Letterman Show to reinforce the false flag cover story (see: http://www.washingtonpost.com/obama-us- ... eload=true). The “trailer” was in fact produced by a Palestinian National on Federal probation from a 1999 bank fraud conviction working for the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas along with the Palestinian terrorist cousin of Walid Shoebat (see http://shoebat.com/shoebat-foundation/i ... f-muslims/ ) in support of the false flag abduction of US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens; and then on the day due to the nature of the three defenders killing more than 100 al Qaida attackers during the four hour fire fight, the attack / kidnapping by al Qaida went sideways, ending in the Ambassador’ rape and death and the continued incarceration of The Blind Sheikh, the slaughter of Egyptian Coptic and Israelis blamed for the movie trailer and Obama lies, now invasion of Israel.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9341
bob wrote:


New York needs to beef up their anti-Strunk shields. Perhaps if this pinhead had to put up a $10K contempt bond for every kook suit, it would deter his lunacy.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9151
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
OBC: Note of Issue/Certificate of Readiness for Strunk/Obama NY Trial:
Quote:
I will know by Monday where we stand on say a Thursday or Friday trial in which I have to bring Paul Irey (Digital and Other Document Professional) to Town to testify. that is a further fund raising hurdle.

Oh: Send money.

Strunk hurts my head, but it appears he's trying to enjoin New York's Electors from voting:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/NOT ... rime-by-NY

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm
Posts: 513
Location: Under the stars
Strunk's insane lying bullshit incorporates Paul Irey's lying insane bullshit as a daffydavit. Irey claims to "have been accepted previously as an expert witness by the courts". I find that difficult to believe. OK, he might have been allowed to spout his delusional mendacity, I fin drivel in a court, but surely o sane court could have allowed his nonsense onto the record as any sort of expert witness testimony, could they?

Is Irey lying? Wouldn't surprise me!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9341
Sam the Centipede wrote:
Strunk's insane lying bullshit incorporates Paul Irey's lying insane bullshit as a daffydavit. Irey claims to "have been accepted previously as an expert witness by the courts". I find that difficult to believe. OK, he might have been allowed to spout his delusional mendacity, I fin drivel in a court, but surely o sane court could have allowed his nonsense onto the record as any sort of expert witness testimony, could they?

Is Irey lying? Wouldn't surprise me!


Hate to be the one to say this, but yes, one court did in fact qualify Irey as an expert, although as an expert on typesetting.

One judge did, anyway.

Judge Reid.

I was there.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7769
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
One judge did, anyway.

Judge Reid.

I was there.


Of course Irey's testimony was then stricken from the record.

In Strunk's filing Irey claims to be an expert in typography but most of his affidavit is talking about Adobe software. The real craziness is when Irey and Henry Blake start analyzing the LFBC from the Mississippi case. They conclude that the LFBC was provided by Onaka to Tepper and Begley and is a new forgery produced by Hawaii.

Buried in Strunk's nonsense is a copy of a judgment against Strunk from November. Strunk tried to file for an injunction to stay the certification of the election of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand because the idiot thinks that you have to be qualified to be a legislator to vote for senator. He got this by misreading the 17th Amendment. Judge Schmitd denied it and figured out that Strunk was trying to sneak around Judge Schack's order to not file any more lawsuits without permission against any official of the state of NY. Judge Schmidt said the Governor and the BOE were essential parties. Now Strunk is putting his stupid motion against Gillibrand back in his suit against the electors except now he wants the election declared void and a new election for senate scheduled. Whatever judge gets this pile of poop needs to put a hurt on Strunk.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5949
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
Hate to be the one to say this, but yes, one court did in fact qualify Irey as an expert, although as an expert on typesetting.

I'd like to see his resume. Many people refer to themselves as "engineers" too, but can barely do simple math.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2530
Strunk also wants to disqualify electors who will hold an office of trust or profit under the US, when they are sworn in on Jan 2, 2013. Similarly he wants to disqualify some under the same statute, arguing that 'under the US' includes state offices.

No foundation for that..

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group