Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:02 am
Posts: 3148
Occupation: Vulture Capitalist
Dallasite wrote:
Robert Laity is a fucking nut. And I mean that. I slap him around on the Topix boards a lot. He is so proud of having filed couple of "criminal complaints" against President Obama. It's fun to ask him how those are working out for him. He's a die-hard birther who's head will explode when the President wins his second term.

Birfin' ain't what it used to be. Why, only 2 years ago a birther event could count on a huge crowd of say, 20-30 people. Times are tough. You wanna birf now, you have accept and promote all the birther BS (or dream up new and improved versions) in order to find someone to agree with any part of your lunacy.

Those remaining birthers have given up on the "void all Obama nominations and signed legislation" theory. It's hard enough to find anyone to agree that Obama will be kept off a single ballot. I tell ya, times are tuff for birthers and it's not going to get any easier.

This is not a plea for you to give Robert Laity a break of any kind. Please feel free to continue kicking his ass.

_________________
"You know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button."
Image
Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9345
Joseph Robidoux III wrote:
Dallasite wrote:
Robert Laity is a fucking nut. And I mean that. I slap him around on the Topix boards a lot. He is so proud of having filed couple of "criminal complaints" against President Obama. It's fun to ask him how those are working out for him. He's a die-hard

This is not a plea for you to give Robert Laity a break of any kind. Please feel free to continue kicking his ass.


I'd rephrase this slightly. I'd just say "please continue kicking his ass." I'm sure he knows he's free to do that.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9151
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
P&E: New York State Ballot Challenge Yet to be Addressed After More than a Month
Quote:
“DERELECTION OF DUTY AND MALFEASANCE”
Robert Laity wrote:
This letter apprises you of my Ballot access challenge, filed on December 2,2011, with the New York State Board of Elections requesting an Administrative HEARING and for the State of New York to remove Barack Obama from the 2012 NY State Presidential Ballot for reason of U.S. Constitutional disqualification to be President due to his not being a Natural-Born American citizen, inter alia. Mr. Obama stands accused of Treason against the United States of America, charges filed by Bona-fide American citizens, including myself, which, for no reasonable legal rationale have not been addressed by those in authority to do so. A failure to adjudicate these charges constitutes dereliction of duty and malfeasance. This dereliction of duty will have a profound effect on our liberties and the survival of our Republic and our State. It is a matter of National Security, an Issue that Justice Clarence Thomas and Ex Congressman Serrano don’t take seriously. Thomas told Serrano, at a Congressional Hearing, no less, that SCOTUS was “Evading the issue.” Instead of being appalled, the entire room burst into raucous laughter. What, I ask, is funny about misprision of Felony and Treason?

See: http://www/youtube.com/watch?v=O7gEH-tKoXA
Also See 18 USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381

There are Ballot challenges being lodged against Obama in all 50 States. He skated by the first time. I urge your committee to not allow him to usurp the Presidency and to defraud the voters of New York a second time. There is NO “President” obama: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/ ... ent-obama/

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19929
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
:yawn:

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3496
?(

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18538
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Chris Strunk & Bill Van Allen filed in New York.

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/citizen ... tural-born


In additon, I saw a real long thing in Chris Strunk's scribd come down my feed, but I don't know what it was. I didn't click it. He files too much stuff.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19929
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
mimi wrote:
Chris Strunk & Bill Van Allen filed in New York.

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/citizen ... tural-born


In additon, I saw a real long thing in Chris Strunk's scribd come down my feed, but I don't know what it was. I didn't click it. He files too much stuff.

OMG! But, but, but all they have to do is win once convince the Supreme Court they're right once.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:10 pm
Posts: 1
Dallasite wrote:
Robert Laity is a fucking nut. And I mean that. I slap him around on the Topix boards a lot. He is so proud of having filed couple of "criminal complaints" against President Obama. It's fun to ask him how those are working out for him. He's a die-hard birther who's head will explode when the President wins his second term.


There's a crew of posters on Topix that slap 'lame-ass' laity around! Most posters are just plain sick of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19929
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
I feel a disturbance in the Force. And that something will shortly be posted here by Jack Ryan.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
From a NY Obot Operative... filed today by Strunk's BFF Bill Van Allen and "sort of" one by Christopher Garvey.

New York Ballot Challenges - Van Allen & Garvey

Quote:
That objections are based upon the record of the divorce decree issued from the Hawaii court of competent jurisdiction British subject Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was married to the U.S. Citizen Stanley Ann Obama being of minor age at the time of the birth of Barack Hussein Obama II;


Yeah, that matters. :roll:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3772
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
Is a "minor" under 18 or under 21?

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
Sequoia32 wrote:
Is a "minor" under 18 or under 21?


He doesn't say, and I have no idea what it was at the time in HI or anywhere else, really, but of course it doesn't matter... she could have been 15 or 12 or...

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
Quote:
9. The evidence shows that at best, Barack Hussein Obama II may merely be a native born naturalized citizen :roll: not a "Natural-Born Citizen", a person born in the country of US Citizen parents as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the precedent set in Minor. v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875), 21 WalL. 162, and 22 L. Ed. 627. by Justice Waite holdingthat natural bom citizens (NBC) per se are so by virtue of birth on United States soil when both parents were Citizens of the United States [-( according to the US Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 5 de jure citizens without reaching the need of use of the 14th Amendment or the power of Congress granted with Arcticle I Section 8 paragraph 4 to define naturalization and immigration status person other than NBC persons; and as upheld by New York State jurisprudence as to NBC defined in state law. [-X


:lol:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9345
realist wrote:
Quote:
9. The evidence shows that at best, Barack Hussein Obama II may merely be a native born naturalized citizen :roll: not a "Natural-Born Citizen", a person born in the country of US Citizen parents as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the precedent set in Minor. v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875), 21 WalL. 162, and 22 L. Ed. 627. by Justice Waite holdingthat natural bom citizens (NBC) per se are so by virtue of birth on United States soil when both parents were Citizens of the United States [-( according to the US Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 5 de jure citizens without reaching the need of use of the 14th Amendment or the power of Congress granted with Arcticle I Section 8 paragraph 4 to define naturalization and immigration status person other than NBC persons; and as upheld by New York State jurisprudence as to NBC defined in state law. [-X


:lol:


I call your :lol: and raise you a ](*,) and a :yankyank:

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
Loh wrote:
I call your :lol: and raise you a ](*,) and a :yankyank:


Which brings me to the inevitable... =)) =)) =))

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7769
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Carnak say the answer is another case where Obama declared a natural born citizen.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19929
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Isn't there a 160+ Year old New York state case defining natural born citizenship differently?

I seem to remember it . . . from my youth. (It's cited in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark if memory serves.)

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2530
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Isn't there a 160+ Year old New York state case defining natural born citizenship differently?

I seem to remember it . . . from my youth. (It's cited in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark if memory serves.)


Lynch v Clarke. A great ruling...

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Isn't there a 160+ Year old New York state case defining natural born citizenship differently?

I seem to remember it . . . from my youth. (It's cited in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark if memory serves.)


Just a little one... obscure. I'm sure Bill just "forgot" about it when he stated a New York State case ruled in agreement with his two citizen parent meme. :lol:

Lynch v Clark
Quote:
It was thus the law of each and all of the states at
the Declaration or Independence, and so remained
until the National Constitution went into effect,
that a child born within their territory and
lieagance respectively, though of alien parents,
who were abiding temporarily, thereby became
a citizen of the state of which he was a native

[...]

The law on this subject which prevailed in all the
states, became the governing principle or common
raw of the United States, when the union
of the states was consummated, and their separate
legislation on the point was terminated. It
is, therefore, the law of the United States that
children born here, are citizens, without any regard
to the political condition or allegiance of their
parents.

Children of ambassadors, are, in theory, born within
the allegiance of the sovereign power represented
and do not fall within the rule.

[...]

It is an indisputable proposition, that by
the rule of the common law of England, if
applied to these facts, Julia Lynch was a
natural born citizen of the United States.
And this rule was established and inflexible
in the common law, long anterior to the
first settlement of the United States, and,
indeed, before the discovery of America by
Columbus. By the common law, all persons
born within the ligeance of the crown
of England, were natural born subjects,
without reference to the status or condition
of their parents. So if a Frenchman and
his wife, came into England, and had a son
during their stay, he was a liege man.
This was settled law in the time of Littleton,
who died in 1482.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:38 pm
Posts: 1713
Location: about 26,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy,
Occupation: Chemtrail Scheduling Supervisor, Southwest Division
bob wrote:
P&E: New York State Ballot Challenge Yet to be Addressed After More than a Month
Quote:
“DERELECTION OF DUTY AND MALFEASANCE”
Robert Laity wrote:
blah...blah...blah...blah...


To date there are two responses to this "letter to the editor" on the Pee & Eew. Both by Bobbie Laity himself. =))


_________________
“I wish I would have a real tragic love affair and get so bummed out that I'd just quit my job and become a bum for a few years, because I was thinking about doing that anyway.”
Jack Handey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
Strunk/Van Allen - Preliminary Statement Status

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
Realist:

Court will consider "Briefs on the Merits"

What merits? Do the plaintiffs intend to submit the "Georgia Comic Book"? If they do, can the defense submit the "Empty Chair Win"? Perhaps they could also add Malihi's note that the evidence had little if any probative value. Does NY have vexlit too?

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1964
borealis wrote:
Does NY have vexlit too?



yes, ask Andy Martin.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1964
Although that raises an interesting question. Suppose Andy Martin wanted to persue a ballot challenge suit in New York. Could Orly represent him?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
Chilidog wrote:
borealis wrote:
Does NY have vexlit too?



yes, ask Andy Martin.

Offtopic :
He wrote a cranky blog article last month that the"birthers were so done so Fogbow should STFU and disband.
He also commented that their attorneys had our entire member list and they would be pursuing legal remedies against all our members soon.

I tried to find the article again to check the date, but couldn't get Google to throw it up. Anyone care to enlighten me as to this threat? Ise ske-ered.

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group