Maryland Ballot Challenge (Tracy Fair)

SueDB · **Posted:** Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:11 am

raicha wrote:

But Tracy, if you do lose just appeal. Three years from now, after the appeals court has ruled against you and you have no other appeal options, file a motion for reconsideration in this trial court and then ask to amend your complaint to add anything you want.

It's really very simple in Orlylaw.

It should be finally resolved somewhere around 2021.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23561

SHOCKER!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

Doc No./Seq No.: 32/0
File Date: 08/27/2012 Close Date:08/27/2012Decision:
Document Name: Opinion: See 8/27/12 Final Judgment
Copies to Darsie, Obama, Miltenberger, and Fair

Doc No./Seq No.: 33/0
File Date: 08/27/2012 Close Date: 08/27/2012 Decision:
Document Name: Final Judgment: Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief is Dismissed.
Copies to Obama, Fair, Miltenberger, and Darsie

sorry... couldn't resist. :lol:

verbalobe · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:44 pm

Quote:

Final Judgment: Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief is Dismissed.

Yaaarrrggh, Matey, now she's got 'em where she wants 'em.... sweatin' cannonballs, 'e is! Thar'll be frogmarchin' fer shure after this victory! Whomp whomp whomp!

Hektor · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:44 pm

But I thought Tracy schooled that judge on NBC. Maybe she should have asked leave to play one of her Youtubes.

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2115

The search continues for

ONE

HONEST

JUDGE.

:-({|=

Piffle · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:02 pm

verbalobe wrote:

Yaaarrrggh, Matey, now she's got 'em where she wants 'em.... sweatin' cannonballs, 'e is! Thar'll be frogmarchin' fer shure after this victory! Whomp whomp whomp!

Yikes, I thought I'd somehow forgotten Talk Like a Pirate Day. :oops:

Phew. Nope, it's not until September 19th.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6633

Quote:

If those causes of action were not in the complaint, the judge cannot grant the judgment on them, he can grant on what is in the complaint.

Orly seems to have learned something from Judge Nishimura.

Piffle · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:20 pm

Quote:

If those causes of action were not in the complaint, the judge cannot grant the judgment on them, he can grant on what is in the complaint.

That's the beauty of REEK-O! In one fell swoop, you can sweep in all torts, all crimes, all violations of international treaties, violations of common sense, traffic violations and even canon law.

But wait! There's more.

With clever use of John and Jane Does, you can use REEK-O to bring all charges against all people!

But wait! There's more.

If you file your REEK-O as a class action on behalf of everyone in the country except for a few atheists and Muslins, you can be assured of standing.

But wait! There's more.

lf get a Texas judge appointed by a Republican, your REEK-O is guaranteed to win!

Tracey has a lot to learn, if you ask me. But it's sweet of Orly to mentor her.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:36 pm

Taitz isn't mentoring Tracy Fair. Taitz is showing off.

Piffle · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:38 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Taitz isn't mentoring Tracy Fair. Taitz is showing off.

How very uncharitable of you, Stern. I am disappointed. :lol:

Paul Lentz · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:42 pm

A blast from the recent past:

Quote:

On 8/17/2012 12:11 PM, Tracy wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone know...

Today during my dismissal hearing I had typed up a brief that had a lot of new evidence and I was able to admit that into the record. The Atty Gen took about 5 minutes and really had a lame case (We go by this one law 8-502).I took about a half hour and was able to get loads of evidence on the record and showed them a dozen+ laws that they were omitting aqnd statutes they have broken.

When talking about my allegations: Fraud, Negligance, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Nonfaesance, I was able to claim that they neglected their duties by adding an ineligible candidate to the ballot ((several laws I have say, they must make sure a candidate is eligible according to all federal law) and I was able to bring in NBC and Minor and the Civil Rights Act and 14th amendment debates and loads of other amendments and laws...I was able to prove Obama is not natural born. :lol:

I was SOOO NERVOUS!
But, the judge was looking at everything and said he's putting it on advisory??? Something like that. Anyone know what that means? He said he wants to read over this case closely and then make a decision, because he said I had a LOT of there that he saw I didn't get to.

I GUESS THAT'S GOOD NEWS?

Opinion and Dismissal decison is PENDING!

PRAY EVERYONE, THAT THIS JUDGE HAS THE GUTS!!

Tracy

Now, isn't that very interesting in retrospect? :lol:

Gee, KBOA, ya lil' dickens, I guess you were wrong about the Attorney General's case being "lame." I guess you were wrong your presentation's effectiveness, including being wrong about your "evidence," and your "proof" that President Obama is not a natural born citizen.

Now, because I know you are a big fan of Thomas Jefferson quotes, let me give you this one as a soothing consolation prize: :-({|=

Final Judgment: Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief is Dismissed.
Thomas Jefferson

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Shagnastie · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:54 pm

Foggy - Time to change the title of this thread to ...

Maryland Ballot Challenge (Smackdown for Tracy)

:lol:

$\:D/$

Foggy · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:56 pm

That's the Butterfly Lady's call. Anyone can edit the title of their own thread, by editing the first post.

Shagnastie · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:58 pm

Thanks.

Butterfly Lady ... [-o<

Jamuhuri · **Joined:** Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:57 pm **Posts:** 90

The dismissal ORDER and the best part ...PLAINTIFFS TO PAY COSTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS =D>

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wKK ... edit?pli=1

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5251

WHAT? Birthers actually have to shell out money for their entertainment?? Say it ain't so!

Edit: I notice some cruel person left the comment

Quote:

Hey Tracy. WHOMP WHOMP WHOMP

I don't know who could have been so insensitive as to do something like that

SueDB · **Posted:** Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:23 am

Sounds like the Judge readjusted her "Whomper"... =D>

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23561

While the opinion is disorganized and not all that well-written, what makes it extra sad for Tracy is that Judge Stansfield was named by the only Republican governor of Maryland since Spiro Agnew. And even he doesn’t agree with her!

:lol:

shrek · **Posted:** Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:46 am

And she had him eating out of her hand too. Also...

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23561

Now at Jack's...

2012-08-27 - MD - Opinion and Order Dismissing Case

esseff44 · **Posted:** Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:40 am

realist wrote:

Now at Jack's...

2012-08-27 - MD - Opinion and Order Dismissing Case

It's there being prepared. It seems there is a rather long queue. Thank you for you making it available to us.

bob · **Posted:** Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:49 am

ORYR: Fair v Obama: Judge Relies On Case That Didn't Rule Plaintiff A Natural Born Citizen

Tracy Fair wrote:

At first I was upset, when I heard that my Obama Ballot Challenge was dismissed.
I figured it had to do with some kind of standing or jurisdiction issue.
But when I finally read the decision, I WAS FUMING!

WHAT A TOTALLY BOGUS DECISION
(IT’S LOOKS LIKE THE OBOTS WROTE THIS DECISION!)

So, it looks as though another judge has decided to define natural born citizen, according to the Indiana,
Ankeny v. Governor & Wong Kim Ark cases, when they clearly do not DEAL with natural born citizenship.

The whole decision contradicts itself, when you actually read the case excerpts he cites and there was a lot of evidence left out and not mentioned in the decision. The court claims Obama is a natural born citizen according to the Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark, just as the Georgia cases did, but if you scroll down and look at the bottom of page 7, and read footnote 14 which is taken from the Ankeny case decision, it clearly states:

Quote:

FOOTNOTE 14 (Ankeny v. Governor)
14 We note the fact that the Court in Wong Kim Ark did not actually pronounce the plaintiff a "natural born Citizen" using the Constitution's Article II language is immaterial. For all but forty-four people in our nation's history (the forty-four Presidents), the dichotomy between who is a natural born citizen and who is a naturalized citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment is irrelevant. The issue addressed in Wong Kim Ark was whether Mr. Wong Kim Ark was a citizen of the United States on the basis that he was born in the United States. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. at 705, 18 S. Ct. at 478

Tarrant · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:05 pm **Posts:** 757

So for years birthers were upset and fuming over the fact that their cases were being dismissed for lack of standing, accusing the judicial system of being "scared" of hearing them on the merits (ignoring for now that standing IS a part of the merits of the case).

Now here we have Tracy saying she would have been OK with losing for standing but furious that they actually addressed her arguments and found them wrong.

For birthers, Ankeny has been that gift that keeps on giving, and every case that "reaches the merits" and cites it just adds to the collection of cases cited by the defense next time around.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6633

Quote:

(IT’S LOOKS LIKE THE OBOTS WROTE THIS DECISION!)

Whomp Whomp Whomp, kenyababy.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:59 pm

According to TWLITHOTU, Ankeny doesn't count because the birthers who lost it were pro pers.

(Of course, no birther lawyer -- including TWLITHOTU -- offered to take the case to SCOTUS and it is possibly the only case that was or will be susceptible to a merits determination on appeal to SCOTUS in the whole sordid history of birther litigation.)

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Maryland Ballot Challenge (Tracy Fair)

Who is online