If Orly decides to actually file her draft motion, she may indeed invite the Judge to properly grant her the rewards she is looking for. But it will not be what Orly had in mind )

Just saying...

To me it's obvious that the worst lawyer has lost a couple of marbles. She is unable to sort out two cases she thinks she has filed: for one the Election Committee review of the three IN residents, and a purported case of Taitz and Kern that she "filed" with the SOS of IN. That latter obviously dropped into a black hole and was never seen again. Orlena seems to think the current case includes the black hole cause she filed an ammended out-of-order something or other.

Was this referring to the question: Has Orly Taitz already been disbarred

Regrettably, that seems to be highly unlikely, now that the CA Bar has fully endorsed her endeavors.

It's always those RUE 60 motions that get them:

REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO RUE 60 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

Also, the document has an occurrence of the rare its' construction. This is most commonly found WRT Improv Tribal Style Belly Dance.

Shouldn't it be g_d (or gunderscored) for her? ETA sorry, the world moved on! I missed a whole page

Kewl. Orly's FMs are touting the August 8 hearing as "game-changing history."

I love it when birfers get all deluded ecstatic over the next This Is It event.

Same old same old MO. Build up a hearing with delusions and lies, then when you lose claim the courts are corrupt and the judge is guilty of treason and complicit in Obamaforgerygate and complicit in all sorts of Group W Bench stuff and added to RICO... rinse/repeat.

I can't believe that idiot Billy Stein wrote a letter to an IN state rep and his senator telling them Orly's lies and delusions and asked them to attend.

[/quote]
To me it's obvious that the worst lawyer has lost a couple of marbles. She is unable to sort out two cases she thinks she has filed: for one the Election Committee review of the three IN residents, and a purported case of Taitz and Kern that she "filed" with the SOS of IN. That latter obviously dropped into a black hole and was never seen again. Orlena seems to think the current case includes the black hole cause she filed an ammended out-of-order something or other. [/quote]


As to which she was never granted leave. Contrary to what Orly delusionally believes, the August hearing is NOT going to include those dangling black hole causes of action.

It's been so long and there have been so many warped twists from Lady Liberty, that I cannot recall what the hearing is really about on August 8. I know Orly, as usual and without any rational reason to do so, has morphed this into another opportunity to plead her case, present evidence, etc. But is it about procedure, IIRC, about whether a motion can be heard again or not? Is that it? Egads, she has once again scrambled my brains!

It's not just you OD. She can't even keep her own shit straight. Her brains, just like all of her cases have become like eggs in a blender (NADT) to the point that everything she spews is exactly the same as everything else for exactly the same reasons. And everything that has ever happened in the last 50 years is directly tied to Obama committing fraud, or to those covering up for Obama's fraud. And anyone that doesn't concede this "Absolute, Undeniable, Orly-Fantasy-Fact" is nothing more than a traitor covering up for those covering up for the fraud committed by Obama. That is all she can see, and for her there is no other focus and no other reality.

Whatever the case is "actually" about is completely irrelevant because they are all about the exact same thing.

The hearing is in regards to her Rule 60 motion to try to resurrect her dead case. IIRC that is the only motion pending.

While I've seen no indication this hearing is going to address anything other than the Rule 60 motion, other motions (objection to Orly's appearance and motions for sanctions) are, I believe, pending. Arguably, the way they conducted the previous hearing (not allowing Orly to represent clients officially) amounted to granting the motion, and not spending so much as a word on the motion for sanctions was basically denying it sub silentio.

However, no order has been issued on any of these other motions.

I'm not sure exactly why the judge sat on the motion for sanctions instead of ruling on it, but the filing of continued nonsense in the case may remind her of this, especially if the defendants remind the judge it's still pending.

There was this Order on the Motion for Sanctions

I guess Indiana wants to play with Orly some more. She thinks she is in the right...yep, the very far fringe of the fringe of the right.

And this never appeared on the docket, right? IIRC, when confronted with the renewed possibility of sanctions, in some posts on the House of Malware, OrLena gloated that the motion for sanctions had been dismissed -- and then posted the PDF. That was the first any of us knew of that, I believe. Why would that not have been docketed?

Anyhow, thanks for reminding about what is supposed to be the reason for the hearing. OrLena is never deterred by what is supposed to be, as we all know. Do we have anyone expected to be in attendance?

Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was submitted in the Superior Court of the State of Indiana Marion County
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=196253

IN Petition for a Writ of Mandamus 7.23.12
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/IN-Petition-for-a-Writ-of-Mandamus-7.23.12.pdf

(Slow loading ... no idea what's in it)

Edit 2

PETITION FOR A LEAVE OF COURT FOR A RELATOR STATUS FOR PLAINTIFFS, STATE OF INDIANA EX
RELATOR V ELECTIONS COMMISSION, SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA AND TO PROCEED A5 RELATORS
WITH A WRIT OF MANDAMUS/WRIT OF PROHIBITION/ QUO WARRANTO DECERTIFYING ELECTIONS
WIN IN 2012 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION BY CANDIDATE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II DUE TO
FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF INDIANA ELECTIONS CODE IC-3.5.7
REQUEST TO HEAR PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE HEARD DURING AUGUST 8, 201.2
HEARING OF TAITZ ET AL V ELECTIONS COMMISSION ET AL WITH THE SAME PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANTS

Edit 3 : A new phrase for the Obly/English dictionary/phrasebook : .. first and for most ...

PETITION FOR A LEAVE OF COURT FOR A RELATOR STATUS FOR PLAINTIFFS, STATE OF INDIANA EX RELATOR V ELECTIONS COMMISSION, SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA AND TO PROCEED A5 RELATORS WITH A WRIT OF MANDAMUS/WRIT OF PROHIBITION/ QUO WARRANTODECERTIFYING ELECTIONS WIN IN 2012 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION BY CANDIDATE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II DUE TO FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF INDIANA ELECTIONS CODE IC-3.5.7

REQUEST TO HEAR PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE HEARD DURING AUGUST 8, 201.2
HEARING OF TAITZ ET AL V ELECTIONS COMMISSION ET AL WITH THE SAME PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANTS





Orly NEVAH DISAPPOINTS

For anyone not wishing to risk Orly's pdf, the "pleading" above is available at Jack's.

PETITION FOR A LEAVE OF COURT FOR A RELATOR STATUS FOR PLAINTIFFS, STATE OF INDIANA EX RELATOR V ELECTIONS COMMISSION, SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA [highlight]AND TO PROCEED A5 RELATORS WITH A WRIT OF MANDAMUS/WRIT OF PROHIBITION/ QUO WARRANTO

Same rehashed shit...different day. I would think by now she would have some eff'in clue that she has no evidence that court or prosecutor would accept.

"In politics stupidity is not a handicap."
-- Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), Napoleon I of France

Bush etc....

Oh my -- the crazy is even stronger in this one than usual. But maybe, just maybe, someone will notice that she is in full-on UPL mode.

She begins by arguing that
Yep -- in addition to her usual dreck, complete with Chito Papa, John Sampson (complete with unredacted SSNs), Doug Vogt, and Shurf Joe daffydavits, etc., she demands that Obama's name be removed from the ballot because it supposedly doesn't match the one on his birth certificate. She supplies a copy of the LFBC ... copied upside down. She conveniently overlooks the bit about "or marriage license application," of course.

And then, to add that final tasty bit of irony to her UPL, her "Plaintiffs" include one Bob Kern.

To steal from Pat: The proposed order lacks only "...and a pony."

OMFG! This is way above my non-legal education. WHAT IS A RELATOR? And how is it used properly (since we know that OrLena ain't gotta cloo).

Wikipedia:

Okay, I know this is a stretch, but can you put yourself in Orly's pea-brain for a second and figure out how she thinks this applies now? Reading the pile of poo isn't has not caused the synapses necessary for my brain to twist enough to get it.