Georgia Ballot Challenge

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:04 pm

realist wrote:

Orly never disappoints... :lol:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=291831 :evil:

[b]Elections challenge was renewed in GA against Barack Hussein Obama, Sec of State of GA and Barack Hussein Obama were served through their attorneys

Hmmmmmmmmmmm --- I seem to remember a lecture at Teh Fogbow Online Law School teaching me that process service on a new case in court ought to happen directly to the targeted defendant at his residential respective business address and not thru some attorney chosen to represent in some prior case #-o

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23593

tjh wrote:

realist wrote:

Orly never disappoints... :lol:

Quote:

Shockingly, in spite of all the evidence of fraud and forgery provided by the Plaintiffs and lack of any evidence from the defense, pursuant to yet unknown reasoning and consideration :^o

Judge Malihi found all the evidence to be “not sufficiently persuasive”. Later Fulton County Superior court ruled that they could not address the issue during the Primary election, as Mr. Obama was not a final Democratic Party candidate yet.

You left out a highlight. Think they'll go for an empty chair this time?

I don't think there will be a "this time".

The primary challenge is d-e-a-d right up to the GASC denying to take the issue up. She can't just send a pile of poo and "re-open" a dead case. She's going to have to do better than that. Not. Gonna. Happen... even setting aside her lack of proper service, unless they just waive service, which is not likely.

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:16 pm

realist wrote:

Orly never disappoints... :lol:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=291831 :evil:

[b]Elections challenge was renewed in GA against Barack Hussein Obama, Sec of State of GA and Barack Hussein Obama were served through their attorneys

Quote:

/snip/
I am re-issuing a formal challenge for the general election and incorporate by reference all of the prior pleadings and exhibits.I am also adding as an exhibit a sworn affidavit by Sheriff Arpaio of AZ, attesting to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is committing fraud by using a forged birth certificate, forged Selective service Certificate and a forged/fraudulently obtained Social Security number.

I am also serving you herein with a legal action Judd et al v Obama et al 12-cv-1507, which was filed in Federal court, where Secretary of State of Georgia Brian Kemp and Candidate on the ballot Barack Hussein Obama are named among the defendants. I am incorporating by reference all of the arguments and exhibits of the complaint. I will have to forward exhibits by a separate file due to the size of the file.
/snip/

.

Unreal...

Incorporating by reference on a fresh court case? Meaning the defendants need to unearth their prior court documents and hope they match those of plaintiff? Or buy them afresh on own cost from the court iff publically available? Another new rule in OrlyLaw unearthed :lol:

Or as mentioned above: Unreal ](*,)

Shagnastie · **Posted:** Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:23 pm

woodworker wrote:

" ... ANYONE WHO HIRES YOU IS STOOOPID).

She's primarily self-employed ... :knitting:

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:29 pm

Shall the Fogbow Community hope that the assigned judge assigned incorporate a certain $20k ruling of Judge Land "by reference" too, also :?:

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9402

RTH10260 wrote:

Incorporating by reference on a fresh court case?

In OrlyLaw, every new insane case you file incorporates every insane case you ever filed, ever, against everyone, for everything everyone ever did to you, ever in your life, ever. Didn't you ever take OrlyLaw 101?

vic · **Posted:** Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:45 pm

Incorporating all prior cases in every new case is how Orly is rewarding the copier salesman for his testimony.

chinacreekpj · **Joined:** Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:09 pm **Posts:** 1334

I'm confused, is Farrar a plaintiff in both this case and the Georgia case?

bob · **Posted:** Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:28 pm

Quote:

Follow up letter sent to Secretary of State of GA Kemp, seeking a date for a general election hearing against Obama in GA

Quote:

I am forwarding to you documents, showing request for a general election challenge against candidate Obama by my My Client Mr. Farrar. All of the evidence against Mr. Obama is listed in the legal pleadings brought in U.S. District court that are attached as well. I served the Attorney General Sam Olens via certified mail and your counsel Mr. Russo via e-mail. I did not hear back from Mr. Russo or Mr. Olens and therefore I am contacting you directly.

Please, advice me on what date will you hear Mr. Farrar’s general election challenge against Mr. Obama

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=300703 :twisted:

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1430

bob wrote:

Quote:

Please, advice me on what date will you hear Mr. Farrar’s general election challenge against Mr. Obama

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=300703 :twisted:

[/quote]

Howzabout November 7th, bitch? :twoup:

Mark · **Posted:** Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:58 pm

I thought Kemp was defendant in the Judd case. WTF is Orly doing contacting a represented party?

bob · **Posted:** Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:00 pm

Mark wrote:

I thought Kemp was defendant in the Judd case. WTF is Orly doing contacting a represented party?

It's not like there's a rule against such behavior....

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:02 pm

There is a case -- a precedent -- holding the SoS doesn't have jurisdiction to hear a general election challenge when the office is the Presidency. The SoS should cite it and tell Taitz to FOAD.

Mark · **Posted:** Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

There is a case -- a precedent -- holding the SoS doesn't have jurisdiction to hear a general election challenge when the office is the Presidency. The SoS should cite it and tell Taitz to FOAD.

Thanks to Bob for pointing out Section 2-100(C)(1) which allows a lawyer to communicate with a public official, even if represented. The Discussion section states: "To prevent any possible abuse in such situations, the counsel for the opposing party may advise that party (1) about the risks and benefits of communications with a lawyer-party, and (2) not to accept or engage in communications with the lawyer-party." I suppose the drafters of Section 2-100 forgot to add Stern's suggestion as the third option: "(3) Tell the lawyer-party to FOAD."

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:59 am

bob wrote:

Quote:

Follow up letter sent to Secretary of State of GA Kemp, seeking a date for a general election hearing against Obama in GA

Quote:

I am forwarding to you documents, showing request for a general election challenge against candidate Obamaby my My Client Mr. Farrar.All of the ....

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=300703 :twisted:

Orlena lawyering in GA without licence and no pro hack visa either! #-o

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:03 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

There is a case -- a precedent -- holding the SoS doesn't have jurisdiction to hear a general election challenge when the office is the Presidency. The SoS should cite it and tell Taitz to FOAD.

But not before proceeding thru a trial hearing with Orlena using up some of her credit card limit... :twisted:

Roboe · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:27 am

Just out of curiousity and because IANAL, but doesn't Orly need PHV for this new case? For her to go around representing a client in Georgia, wouldn't that constitute practicing law without a license? Or can she get by on a technicality, seeing as it's following on from a previous case?

Edit: Whoops, forgot I had read the previous page in this thread. Oh well, I guess this is another feature of OrlyLaw

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10671

The answer to the question being discussed, whether a lawyer must be licensed in the state where the client resides, is "no". The lawyer must be licensed in the jurisdiction where the legal proceeding is brought.

Reality Check · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:55 am

Roboe wrote:

Just out of curiousity and because IANAL, but doesn't Orly need PHV for this new case?

Yes, Orly needs a new application for PHV admission. ALJ Malihi admitted her for the original hearing by letting her ignore most or all of the requirements. He got what he deserved. Orly tried to use that admission as grounds for being admitted in the Farrar appeal to the Georgia Superior Court. The court denied it because she failed to supply most of the required information and had no sponsor from Georgia. Taitz is fully aware she is not admitted to practice without going through the PHV application process for this new case.

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2128

I guess the Secretary of State of Georgia is not playing birfer games this time. Farrar has now apparently sent his own complaint out of an "abundance of caution."
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=303103 :evil:

Quote:

SENT TO THE SEC OF STATE OF GA
Posted on | September 19, 2012 | No Comments

David Farrar
1:48 PM (30 minutes ago)

to me

Dear Sec. Kemp,
I am filing this complaint in the abundance of caution since neither I, nor my attorney: Dr. Taitz, have received any acknowledgement from Mr. Russo on this subject.
This is to serve notice upon you, sir; that I, being an elector of the state of Georgia, do challenge Candidate Barack H. Obama’s name being placed on Georgia’ general election ballot of November 6, 2012 as being unqualified for the public office sought, and to request an immediate hearing to present my prima facie evidence of same.
It is my understanding that Dr. Orly Taitz was granted Pro hac vice to represent me in this complaint by Judge Michael Malihi. I am requesting that you reconsider my earlier challenge as I will be including by reference all of the evidence against Candidate Barack H. Obama that Dr. Taitz listed in her Judd v. Obama complaint.
I am filing this complaint in the abundance of caution since I, nor my attorney: Dr. Taitz, have not received any acknowledgement from Mr. Russo on this subject.

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

AnitaMaria wrote:

I guess the Secretary of State of Georgia is not playing birfer games this time. Farrar has now apparently sent his own complaint out of an "abundance of caution."

I miss our ex animo friend! Does anyone know, has he been posting anywhere lately?

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:19 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

I guess the Secretary of State of Georgia is not playing birfer games this time. Farrar has now apparently sent his own complaint out of an "abundance of caution."
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=303103 :evil:

Quote:

SENT TO THE SEC OF STATE OF GA
Posted on | September 19, 2012 | No Comments

David Farrar

Proposed reply

Quote:

Dear Sir, as you mention your representation by attorney in this matter, please be advised that we only conmmunicate with you legal adviser.

Piffle · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:34 pm

RTH10260 wrote:

Proposed reply

Quote:

Dear Sir, as you mention your representation by attorney in this matter, please be advised that, in an abundance of caution, we only conmmunicate with you legal adviser.

FIFY.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:45 pm

The SoS can ignore Taitz with impunity. Farrar, too. The legal authority for the proposition that the SoS does not have jurisdiction to entertain the claim Farrar has made is Terry v. Handel.

NEXT CASE!

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23593

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

The SoS can ignore Taitz with impunity. Farrar, too. The legal authority for the proposition that the SoS does not have jurisdiction to entertain the claim Farrar has made is Terry v. Handel.

NEXT CASE!

A case with which they should be familiar... well, ex animal anyway... Taitz not so much.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Georgia Ballot Challenge

Who is online