a mother raper, father stabber

FIFY

Alice's Restaurant????

Yup. From back in the days when Arlo Guthrie wasn't almost as batshit crazy as Orly Taitz. He was so cute as a kid.

(Unfortunately, he hasn't aged well. He's now a Paulite Republican who embraces just about any right-wing conspiracy theory that comes down the pike. Sigh.)

About once a month, Guthrie posts short writings to the Announcements area of http://www.arlo.net, often sounding libertarian themes. However, on February 1, 2011, his post was to promote the cause of the public employee unions being opposed by Wisconsin Republicans, and to favor the cause of labor unions in general. Previously Guthrie had made comments in public disparaging musicians' unions and stating that he had refused to join one.

Yup. From back in the days when Arlo Guthrie wasn't almost as batshit crazy as Orly Taitz. He was so cute as a kid.

(Unfortunately, he hasn't aged well. He's now a Paulite Republican who embraces just about any right-wing conspiracy theory that comes down the pike. Sigh.)

I did not know that. Very disappointing.

We walked in, sat down, Obie Orly came in with the twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one, sat down. Man came in said, "All rise." We all stood up, and Obie Orly stood up with the twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy pictures, and the judge walked in sat down with a seeing eye dog, and he sat down, we sat down. Obie Orly looked at the seeing eye dog, and then at the twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one, and looked at the seeing eye dog. And then at twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one and began to cry, 'cause Obie Orly came to the realization that it was a typical case of American blind justice, and there wasn't nothing she could do about it, and the judge wasn't going to look at the twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence against us. And wshe was fined $50 grand and had to pick up the garbage in the snow, but that's not what I came to tell you about.

Came to talk about the dgraft.

You can get anything that you want
At AliceMalihi's restaurant
You can get anything that you want
At AliceJudge Clay Land's restaurant
Walk right in, it's around the back a Friday Smack
'Bout a half a mile from the railroad track
You can get file anything that you want
At AliceMalihi's restaurant
You can eat say anything that you want
At AliceMalihi's restaurant
I said, you can eat dream anything that you want
At AliceMalihi's restaurant.

Can a presiding judge abuse his judicial discretion and violate due process of the
party when ruling in favor of a party who's had the burden of proof and who
showed contempt of the court, never appeared in court, and never provided
requested proof?

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=140457

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... -final.pdf

David Farrar
Leah Lax
Thomas MaClaren
Laurie Roth
v.
Barack Obama

Later, the case was filed with the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia which ruled that the superior court had no jurisdiction to hear the case and later the supreme court
of Georgia refused to hear the case as they considered the appeal to be a
Discretionary appeal.

Interesting... So Orly can represent 4 "plaintiffs" in GA Admin court, drop them like a bad habit in Superior and the Supreme Court cuz she can't obtain pro hac vice, then file a Petition for Stay with SCOTUS on their behalf (representing them again at SCOTUS cuz, you know, as she states, she's "licensed" before SCOTUS), based on and admin judge's "recommendation" to the SoS, and citing the Superior Court's "ruling" and the Supreme Court's ruling to decline to hear the case... or something. And only name Obama in the Petition, as opposed to the original Farrar case naming the SoS and the Democratic Party of GA EC.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... -final.pdf

I'm not sure about her reasoning for doing it, but of all the things Orly has done, this strikes me as not having anything wrong with it. A lawyer who had nothing to do with any of the cases previously, but were admitted to the SCOTUS bar, could represent those clients. I'm not sure there's anything more wrong with her representing them at the SCOTUS level than there would be for another lawyer who had nothing at all to do with the case previously.

It is still destined to be filed in the circular can, but that's because it's complete garbage, not because Orly is complete garbage, although she is.

APPLICATION FOB STAY OF THE CERTIFICATION OF VOTES FOR CANDIDATE BARACK
OBAMA IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA DUE To LACK OF
ELIGIBILITY AND USE OF FORGED AND FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED IDENTIFICATION
DOCUMENTS AND PENDING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IANAL and very confuzzeled:

What does Orlena want, a temporary restraining order aka stay or an opinion on the GASC decision? IMHO she should have asked SCOTUS if it was proper that they kicked ass rather than giving her right against Mahili. Not that it would change anything as the SOS made the final decision. As for the OrlyLaw keyword of the month, stay, I must have missed to whom this order is to be directed to, apart that it doesn't seem to be a party of the Mahili hearing under discussion.