Crap!!!! I forgot to write down where I left off this afternoon.

It is good to see Tes back in the fray. I wish she were here.

You say the judge could not assume without the birth certificate being submitted that the president was an NBC, but for you to offer an argument that he is not an NBC, you must acknowledge for purposes of legal argument that he says he is one–otherwise you would not have a claim to argue.

Since the burden of proof is yours, you are obligated to prove that he is not what he claims to be, which is an NBC. He is not required to prove that he is.

Let me use a hypothetical. You join my karate school because I say I’m a black belt certified karate instructor. After losing several tournaments, you conclude I’m lying and sue me for fraud. I skip the hearing, and the judge says, “I’ll give you a default ruling in your favor right now.” You decline, saying, “No! I want the case heard on its merits so I can prove she’s not a black belt certified karate instructor!” In other words, you accept the burden of proof to show I am not what I claimed.

First exhibit–-a record of your losses; this proves only that you suck, not that I’m not an instructor. Next exhibit–-a copy of my license from my Website, which your lawyer’s IT guy claims has to be fradulent because it has layers. That does not prove I’m not an instructor. Next, your lawyer presents several self-proclaimed karate historians who suspect my legitimacy because I’m not Asian, which they claim–without evidence–that 95% of black belts are. Their testimony is the only evidence the lawyer submits of their “expert” value as witnesses. Further, they’ve never been trained as karate instructors or taken part in licensing karate insturctors. Finally, your lawyer swears in someone who says I advertised myself in 1980 as a certified Tai Chi instructor.

None of this proves that I’m not a karate instructor and, based on the merits of the evidence presented, the judge concludes it’s not enough to prove that I’m not what you are alleging I falsely claimed to be: a certified karate instructor. Thus, he rules against you and in my favor.

Now do you see why you lost? It was presumed he was claiming to be an NBC, which is why he submitted his name for the ballot. You acknowledged this was his claim and you were contesting it. Yet, you provided no valid evidence or experts to cast doubt on this claim. The judge had no choice but to rule your case was insufficient to challenge the defendant’s claim. He is the defendant because he’s DEFENDING himself against your allegation that he's not what he claims to be--an NBC.

Raicha just beat me, but...

She's been conferring, so it took her a while to call Kemp a commie in public (actually, she let someone else call him a commie, Obly isn't responsible for anything posted on her blog, just ask her.) No telling what she called him in just Fluffy's presence.

Yes, I left the senders email in there on purpose.

Bookmark this link.

Very cool, I did not know we could do that. much thanks. (I didn't finish reading the OBOT manual Soros sent me because I was busy drinking birther tears).

search.php?search_id=active_topics

And open the pages using the new icon on the left side of each topic.

I think a lot of people use that method.

Like I like 'em: Short and sweet.

But...but, does this mean SoS Kemp ignored all those carefuly crafted appeals and letters and eggspert legal opinions and warnings on birfistani blogs and, and...

He's still her "plaintiff" and she'll be representing him in his failed appeal, I'm certain.

So I am thinking Ms. Taitz needs to consider a change in careers...pole dancer maybe?

An interesting development, I sent her an email that was intended to be balanced and tempered...one that offered her some sound personal advice. She actually replied, not once but twice from an entire different email account. I am waiting to see what her next response is to the exchange and will post it here upon receipt.

So I am thinking Ms. Taitz needs to consider a change in careers...pole dancer maybe?

So I am thinking Ms. Taitz needs to consider a change in careers...pole dancer maybe?

An interesting development, I sent her an email that was intended to be balanced and tempered...one that offered her some sound personal advice. She actually replied, not once but twice from an entire different email account. I am waiting to see what her next response is to the exchange and will post it here upon receipt.

Just before you leave, post an inconsequential comment. Then when you come back, all you have to do is list your own comments and PRESTO! that's where you were. I think a lot of people use that method.

Over/under on the Georgia courts granting Taitz PHV?

Carl Manning
Submitted on 2012/02/07 at 5:21pm

I’m a Georgian in the Atlanta area and for the longest time, I thought Jimmy Carter and lately Newt Gingrich were our worst embarrassments. Now, Brian Kemp has just taken the cake. [nope... now it's birthers] Did the CIA/Black Ops threaten him, or is he just another blithering idiot??? How in the world did he go from “if you don’t show up, you do so at your own peril” to supporting the Judge’s horrible miscarriage of justice when he never showed up whatsoever??? This calls for an investigation by a committee of the Georgia Legislature into possible criminal activity and impeachment proceedings against the Secretary of State.

Over/under on the Georgia courts granting Taitz PHV?

Not one of the plaintiffs used all his/her allotted time. The judge didn't cut any of them off because of time constraints. They had all the time they wanted to use.

He let in all the legal arguments and evidence the plaintiffs put on. What did he not allow into evidence?

I bet they're not gonna let my comment through at ORYR. I asked 'em, if doG really supports the lying, unpatriotic, unAmerican birther SCUM, how come he keeps kickin' y'all in the nuts?

Over/under on the Georgia courts granting Taitz PHV?

Well, folks have descended upon Brian Kemp's Facebook page. Some people defending him, but lots of unhappy Birthers.

He chose to play with birfers, this is part of the bargain at his own peril.