Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ]     
Author Message
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Posts: 6454
Location: downstairs
New York Times, April 3 2011

Quote:
G.O.P’s 2012 Strategy Puts Focus on Timing ...

This time, Republicans are taking a different approach against President Obama, who opens his re-election campaign this week. The road toward ousting an incumbent always runs uphill, but Mr. Obama’s adversaries are trying to level their odds in two significant ways.

The first: a delay by top candidates in entering the race. Aside from conserving energy and resources, that would distance contenders like Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi and former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts from the unpredictable budget showdown between Republicans and Democrats in Washington.

The second: an effort by party leaders to slow down the anointment of a nominee once delegate selection begins early next year. Instead of a flash verdict produced by tiny electorates in the states that vote earliest, the Republican National Committee seeks a longer competition to battle-test its standard-bearer the way Hillary Rodham Clinton tested Mr. Obama in 2008.

“It makes for a stronger nominee at the end,” said Ed Gillespie, a former party chairman and senior aide to President George W. Bush. Considering that incumbent presidents seeking re-election since 1900 have won 14 times and lost only 5, Republicans need such a nominee.

_________________
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.--Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Posts: 6454
Location: downstairs
Copying from another thread.

Politico, April 3, 2011

Quote:
Right seeks edge in 'oppo' wars

Tired of being on the receiving end of damaging stories developed by liberal groups such as Media Matters and the Center for American Progress, conservatives are looking to launch their own opposition research army to dig up dirt on the left.

In the last year, a mix of big-money Republican-allied independent groups, tea party non-profits, guerilla videographers, and some scrappy bloggers and talk show hosts has created a raft of fledgling investigative research and reporting efforts to uncover and publicize alleged corruption, flip-flops and plain-old gaffes by Democrats and their allies headed into the 2012 elections.

The effort attracted notice last month when one of the deepest-pocketed conservative groups, Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies – or Crossroads GPS – launched an initiative called Wikicountability to crowd-source investigations of President Barack Obama’s administration by collecting government documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. As a start, Crossroads GPS pushed three relatively low-impact findings based on FOIAs – including that $3.66 million in taxpayer money was used to pay for an ad promoting last year’s Democratic healthcare overhaul.

“The left is still beating the right at the game of doing investigative reporting, but I think the right has finally realized both the need and the problem,” said Erick Erickson, editor of Red State, an influential conservative blog that occasionally features or aggregates researched reporting by conservatives critical of the left. “After a couple of years of thinking the right was dropping the ball, I finally think the train is moving and building up momentum.”

_________________
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.--Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 3896
Location: Brigadoon
Occupation: Retired
Adelante wrote:
Copying from another thread.

Politico, April 3, 2011

Quote:
Right seeks edge in 'oppo' wars

Tired of being on the receiving end of damaging stories developed by liberal groups such as Media Matters and the Center for American Progress, conservatives are looking to launch their own opposition research army to dig make up dirt on the left.
/snip


FIFY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5957
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
If Jesse "The Body" Ventura sez it's so, it's so.

[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o<

It's gonna be Sarah!

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 2120
Location: Philadelphia, PA
The best GOP strategy is to fund a third party on the left.

_________________
"I believe that 90% of the things alleged in the complaint didn't happen. But that's not going to make following this lawsuit any less enjoyable." - Sterngard Friegen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5957
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
Res Ipsa wrote:
The best GOP strategy is to fund a third party on the left.

Anything other than the nutjobs.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 2012: GOP Strategy
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9175
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Politico: Republican lawmakers sour on 2012 field
Quote:
The we-need-somebody-else chatter is reminiscent of fretting among Republicans four years ago that ultimately resulted in former Sen. Fred Thompson’s much-hyped but ill-fated candidacy and the unease Democrats felt eight years ago when their worries about Howard Dean’s general election prospects prompted much pining for then-New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.

[...]

There were politicians who are putting off decisions (Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels), politicians who’ve said they won’t run (former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie), individuals who aren’t even politicians (Gen. David Petraeus) and individuals who aren’t even named (two members cited a to-be-determined business executive or military leader).

The float of Petraeus, currently commander of the war in Afghanistan and rumored to be the next CIA chief, highlights the GOP’s quandary. He has repeatedly said he won’t be a candidate, even citing Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman’s famous formulation, but that hasn’t lessened the ardor among some of his Republican admirers. It’s an indication of the view among some party stalwarts that they’ll need someone better than a conventional pol to beat an incumbent president expected to raise a historic sum of money. (See also: David Petraeus, Joe Scarborough eyed for '12)

[...]

“I talked to Gen. [Dwight] Eisenhower, and he’s thinking about it,” Roberts joked. “He thinks his age might be a factor but, if necessary, he’d come back and run.”

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ]     

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group