Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]     
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3773
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
Quote:
In their efforts to vet applicants, some companies and government agencies are going beyond merely glancing at a person's social networking profiles and instead asking to log in as the user to have a look around.

--snip--

Until last year, the city of Bozeman, Mont., had a long-standing policy of asking job applicants for passwords to their email addresses, social-networking websites and other online accounts.

And since 2006, the McLean County, Ill., sheriff's office has been one of several Illinois sheriff's departments that ask applicants to sign into social media sites to be screened.

Chief Deputy Rusty Thomas defended the practice, saying applicants have a right to refuse. But no one has ever done so. Thomas said that "speaks well of the people we have apply."


http://www.sacbee.com/2012/03/20/435126 ... d-for.html

:shock:

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 2461
Location: Virginia
Occupation: FEMA Camp Activities & Re-Education Coordinator.
NPR had a piece about this today. I think it’s an outrageous invasion of privacy and I wouldn’t consent to it. [-(

_________________
On the June day of 14, 192011.
MsDaisy makes fun of the stupid @: http://crazyinternetpeople.blogspot.com/
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:09 am
Posts: 2517
Location: Virginia
Occupation: Top banjo-scrabble-science fiction professional in the world
It's not just an invasion of the applicant's privacy. It's an invasion of privacy for every person who is unfortunate enough to be linked digitally with the dupe who gives access.

_________________
STUDYING


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 6:04 pm
Posts: 1995
Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Occupation: I'm the Grand Panjandrum of the uber-sekrit cabal that controls our faithful puppet George Soros, the Trilateral Commission, and Agenda 21 (among other things) as part of our grand plan to dominate maple syrup production.
Considering that my facebook profile is partially fiction (I list the Hamburgler as one of my mentors), um no, I wouldn't consent to this. What's next though, they ask you for your pin number so they can check your banking history?

_________________
It is easy to hope when things go right. Harder to choose to believe in it when things are blackest. However even the greatest darkness can be slain with the faintest of lights. And hope is more than enough to flicker in the dark.

I blog about my life and mental health issues @ Life of a Schizophrenic


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am
Posts: 5518
Occupation: retired
Hektor wrote:
Considering that my facebook profile is partially fiction (I list the Hamburgler as one of my mentors), um no, I wouldn't consent to this. What's next though, they ask you for your pin number so they can check your banking history?


For my last little part-time, temporary on-call job, I had to sign a consent form for them to do a credit check. That's you banking history and a whole lot more.

_________________
Mark Twain
Quote:
Research shows that 87.666 per cent of all statistics are made up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8012
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
I wish I could say that this was unbelievable, but it isn't. This is completely inappropriate though.

In this economy, few will refuse such a request.

Last year, my mom's employer warned employes that if they said negative things about the casino or their job on FB, they would be fired. How can that possibly be legal?

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9369
LM K wrote:
I wish I could say that this was unbelievable, but it isn't. This is completely inappropriate though.

In this economy, few will refuse such a request.

Last year, my mom's employer warned employes that if they said negative things about the casino or their job on FB, they would be fired. How can that possibly be legal?


It's called "employment at will." Or, as the pugs call it, "right to work," even though it's really "right to be fired for any reason or no reason."

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6633
You gotta admit that's pretty clever/ballsy of employers to try to save themselves the time and money of learning something on their own by making it a condition of the interview continuing. Does anybody think anything on their Facebook is private, despite your settings? These employers are just too lazy/ cheap to do some homework on their candidates before the interview.

I don't have a Facebook account, never will. No Facebook, no Twitter, no MySpace. Don't put my name or picture on yours if you want to be my friend. People are going to be sorry someday they gave up their privacy. When Facebook and Twitter eventually go out of business, where's all that information going to go? It's like when the video rental companies went out of business one by one. Where'd all the credit card and other info they demanded go?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Posts: 3144
Location: Orlyfornian S.S.R.
I killed my Facebook account several months ago because of privacy concerns. (and a stalker) I still have one remaining sock-puppet there, but even he hasn't seen the need to log on recently.

I should prolly delete my Twitter and Google+ accounts too, also, since I rarely check them, but that would involve effort.

That said, please allow me to say this about that: I don't miss "social media" one litlle bit. I did have a couple days of withdrawl when I bagged Facebook, but that quickly turned into an overwhelming sense of freedom. I found out that I didn't give a rat's ass what somebody I barely talked to in high school was doing with...whatever. I come from a small family, but those I connected with on Facebook were all fucking whiners, attention whores or self-centered concern trolls. (with the exception of one brother who actually likes people and makes witty and trenchent observations about reality. He just e-mails me shit now. Works for me.)

Funny thing is, fambly and "friends" keep trying to guilt me, invite me back and ,"Oh, well, if you were back on Facebook you'd have known about (fill in the blank)"

Hmm... :-k Exclusion. Isolation. Ridicule. Invitations to come... back... to...

FaceCult.

I'ma go play wif my cat. She never tries to make me take a personality test, but she does require boops 'n' scritches. That's a "like" I can give.

_________________
"Service by flying monkey is not a method recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
And for good reason. Nuff said."

--Mikedunford

Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 7502
Location: Outa da doghaus and I ain't goin' back!
Occupation: Arf! Arf! Arooooooooooo! (Get that damned kitty!)
Too late, Estiveo. We already got book made on you. We just ain't letting on for now!

:twisted:

_________________
  • I know that there are no limits to which the powers of privilege will not go to keep the workers in slavery.
  • My friends, it is solidarity of labor we want. We do not want to find fault with each other, but to solidify our forces and say to each other: “We must be together; our masters are joined together and we must do the same thing.”
  • Pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living.
—Mother Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3773
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
Facebook warns users not to share their password with potential employers, threatens legal action

Quote:
A Facebook privacy official, responding to reports that employers have been asking potential employees in interviews for their passwords to social networks in order to view their profiles, released a blog post Friday morning telling members not to disclose the information and warning employers against the practice.

As the Mercury News reported in January and the Associated Press reported earlier this week, jobseekers say that some potential employers have requested their Facebook password in order to view their private profiles.

In a Friday blog post, Facebook Chief Privacy Officer Erin Egan told Facebook users that providing their password to anyone else is a violation of Facebook's user agreement, as well as unfair to the user.

"If you are a Facebook user, you should never have to share your password, let anyone access your account, or do anything that might jeopardize the security of your account or violate the privacy of your friends," Egan wrote


http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/busine ... -potential

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5251
Remember kids, facebook values your privacy. It knows exactly how much its worth.

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 7502
Location: Outa da doghaus and I ain't goin' back!
Occupation: Arf! Arf! Arooooooooooo! (Get that damned kitty!)
I'm looking at asking for employment at your firm. Could I get FB names and passwords of all management and line staff to help me decide if I should go forward with that idea?
:D ;;) :-

_________________
  • I know that there are no limits to which the powers of privilege will not go to keep the workers in slavery.
  • My friends, it is solidarity of labor we want. We do not want to find fault with each other, but to solidify our forces and say to each other: “We must be together; our masters are joined together and we must do the same thing.”
  • Pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living.
—Mother Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Posts: 3144
Location: Orlyfornian S.S.R.
Story today on teh Nooz (kgo7) that local LEOs are asking detainees for their Facebook passwords to "establish a timeline and help verify your alibi."

And these morons are buying it, then getting busted for other stuff that they've copped to on the FB pages. Usually photos of them using drugs.

Morons.

And yet...being stoopit is not a defense so, screw 'em.

_________________
"Service by flying monkey is not a method recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
And for good reason. Nuff said."

--Mikedunford

Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Baghdad by the Bay (tm Herb Caen)
Estiveo wrote:
Story today on teh Nooz (kgo7) that local LEOs are asking detainees for their Facebook passwords to "establish a timeline and help verify your alibi."

And these morons are buying it, then getting busted for other stuff that they've copped to on the FB pages. Usually photos of them using drugs.

Morons.

And yet...being stoopit is not a defense so, screw 'em.


As my cop ex-roomie always said: "If they were smart, we wouldn't catch 'em."

_________________
“I have seen purer liquors, better segars, finer tobacco, truer guns and pistols, larger dirk and Bowie knives, and prettier courtesans here in San Francisco than in any other place I have ever visited, and it is my un-biased opinion that California can and does furnish the best bad things that are obtainable in America." Hinton R. Helper -1855


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Posts: 3144
Location: Orlyfornian S.S.R.
Taverl wrote:
As my cop ex-roomie always said: "If they were smart, we wouldn't catch 'em."


:lol: Zactly.

I had a boyfriend once upon a time (30+ years ago) who rented a room from an L.A. County Shurff. The other two lodgers were LAPD. Divorced lawmen, the bunch of them. They all gave my (musician) bf any low weight bags o' pot that they confiscated during their shifts. It was easier than writing it up for them, and they knew my bf and I were discrete. Cops got the best dope, right?

They did not know that we were both dealing coke to support our heroin habits. Hence the discretion. Thank dog for sobriety and the statute of limitations.

I wonder what my Facebook page would have looked like if Facebook existed then? :-k

_________________
"Service by flying monkey is not a method recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
And for good reason. Nuff said."

--Mikedunford

Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 7502
Location: Outa da doghaus and I ain't goin' back!
Occupation: Arf! Arf! Arooooooooooo! (Get that damned kitty!)
Estiveo wrote:
I wonder what my Facebook page would have looked like if Facebook existed then? :-k

:bwaha:

_________________
  • I know that there are no limits to which the powers of privilege will not go to keep the workers in slavery.
  • My friends, it is solidarity of labor we want. We do not want to find fault with each other, but to solidify our forces and say to each other: “We must be together; our masters are joined together and we must do the same thing.”
  • Pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living.
—Mother Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Posts: 3144
Location: Orlyfornian S.S.R.
Plutodog wrote:
Estiveo wrote:
I wonder what my Facebook page would have looked like if Facebook existed then? :-k

:bwaha:

Zactly.

_________________
"Service by flying monkey is not a method recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
And for good reason. Nuff said."

--Mikedunford

Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]     

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group