Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

User avatar
verbalobe
Posts: 8463
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#26

Post by verbalobe » Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:18 pm

...However, I was not alerted by your White House Press Office that preparations were then under way for you to go before the nation to release the Adobe PDF electronic image of the State of Hawaii Certificate of Birth, File Number 151-61-10641, signed by your mother (Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama on August 7, 1961, Attendant David A. Smilan Sinclair and the Local Registrar of Births on August 8, 1961, ...FIFH. Did this guy say he was a journalist?





In another vein, I do kinda get a kick out of his overall approach. Innovative (for a birther). He wants all these documents - birth certificates, passport records, immigration records, family ties, etc., etc. - each of which (if it exists) is held under the jurisdiction of any of a number of official agencies. So why do battle with all of those, when you can go to someone (the FBI) who (the hallucinating birther presumes) has gathered it all together in one place for you?





http://stockcutouts.com/images/secret%2 ... 0large.jpg


THE AGGREGATOR!




Of course, one of the MANY problems with this approach (and by no means the most fundamental, I'm guessing -- such as whether FBI dossiers are even subject to FOIA) is that Obama in most cases would have had to give each of those agencies permission to share any background records with the FBI.





Honestly, it's like these people don't even live on the planet.



User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9284
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#27

Post by GreatGrey » Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:14 pm

It is akin to Taitz saying she successfully qualified to run to be California's Secretary of State, when her primary effort was opening her checkbook.Not according to Rikker. [-X


I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
kate520
Posts: 14128
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#28

Post by kate520 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:30 pm

In “Journalism is War”, George Archibald recounts stories behind these stories – Democratic vice-presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro’s financial ethics problems in 1984, Reagan media adviser Michael Deaver’s lobbying scandal leading to his perjury conviction in 1986, House Speaker Jim Wright’s disgrace and resignation in 1989, subsequent congressional scandals in the early 1990s and cultural conflict stories to the present.Ah, but did he then write about Gingrich's ethics hearing, censure, $300,000 fine and loss of speakership? (Which, by the way, involved the very same thing he brought Jim Wright down for?) Or [link]Trent Lott's,http://www.adl.org/MWD/ccc.asp[/link] ties to racists and supremacists?


Patriotism is the last refuge of a Scoundrel.
Samuel Johnson
April 7, 1775

User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7646
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#29

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg » Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:49 pm

New birther FOIA suit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Assigned to Judge Reggie Walton.











U.S. District Court


District of Columbia (Washington, DC)


CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-02028-RBW





ARCHIBALD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al


Assigned to: Judge Reggie B. Walton


Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act


Date Filed: 11/16/2011


Jury Demand: None


Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act


Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant


Plaintiff


GEORGE H. ARCHIBALD represented by GEORGE H. ARCHIBALD


27 West Main Street


No. 1


Berryville, VA 22611


PRO SE








V.


Defendant


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE





Defendant


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION





Defendant


ROBERT F. BAUER








Date Filed # Docket Text


11/16/2011 [link]1,[/link]


COMPLAINT against ROBERT F. BAUER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616043781) filed by GEORGE H. ARCHIBALD. (Attachments: # [link]1,[/link] ATTACHMENTS 1-6, #[link]2,[/link] Civil Cover Sheet)(rdj) (Entered: 11/18/2011)


11/16/2011 SUMMONS Not Issued as to ROBERT F. BAUER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (rdj) (Entered: 11/18/2011)


"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7646
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#30

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg » Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:52 pm

Local news coverage by the [link]Clarke Daily News,http://www.clarkedailynews.com/berryvil ... ent-page-1[/link]:


I’m not a ‘birther,’" Archibald said after filing his lawsuit.







The FBI responded to my request by saying that it generally cannot release these types of personal documents without the authorization and consent of the third party unless the public interest in disclosure outweighs the personal privacy interest and that significant public benefit would result from the disclosure of the requested records,” Archibald said.


"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 11147
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Here
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#31

Post by Whatever4 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:54 pm

Local news coverage by the [link]Clarke Daily News,http://www.clarkedailynews.com/berryvil ... ent-page-1[/link]:


I’m not a ‘birther,’" Archibald said after filing his lawsuit. BB-- we has a thread already.


"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (R-ME)

User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7646
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#32

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg » Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:56 pm

GREENIE! Delete please. :oops:


"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43204
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#33

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:26 pm

It is akin to Taitz saying she successfully qualified to run to be California's Secretary of State, when her primary effort was opening her checkbook.Not according to Rikker. [-X [-X Thanks, GG. Now I have to go see a psychiatrist.



User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9284
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#34

Post by GreatGrey » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:34 pm

It is akin to Taitz saying she successfully qualified to run to be California's Secretary of State, when her primary effort was opening her checkbook.Not according to Rikker. [-X [-X Thanks, GG. Now I have to go see a psychiatrist.There's a 12 Step program you could try instead.


I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 43204
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#35

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:36 pm

Well, maybe if I take enough Rohypnol I can just forget this and get the horrible visions out of my mind.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 23575
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#36

Post by bob » Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:17 am

An old Clarke Daily News article: [/break1]clarkedailynews.com/winchester-fbi-office-refuses-foia-request-on-obama-records/20583]Winchester FBI Office Refuses FOIA Request on Obama Records


By News Staff on May 13 2011.





By [highlight]George Archibald[/highlight]





The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s office in Winchester that answers the public’s Freedom of Information Act requests has told [highlight]this reporter[/highlight] that the FBI will not release any documents in its files about President Obama’s background until Mr. Obama personally completes a form for them that proves his own identity.Archibald writes about this as if he was a disinterested reporter, but omits that he is reporting about his own FOIA request.





From comments section, it is implied that Archibald is not the CDN's staff, but it agrees with him politically and therefore gave him this soapbox.


Imagex5 Imagex2 Imagex3 Imagex2

User avatar
jtmunkus
Posts: 5642
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Location: Cone of Silence

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#37

Post by jtmunkus » Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:35 am

anudder nutter.



User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31119
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#38

Post by mimi » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:17 am

anudder nutter.One of his big stories while at TWT[/break1]wanttoknow.info/890629washingtontimesfranklin]http://www.wanttoknow.info/890629washin ... esfranklinSeems he quit the Washington Times and bashed them. According to them, he later begged for his job back. They didn't rehire him.[/break1]mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/big-next-week-for-twt_b3404]http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/b ... -twt_b3404I wonder why they'd be so upset? George Archibald, who describes himself “as the first reporter hired at the Washington Times outside the founding group” and author of a commemorative book on the Times’ first two decades, has now joined a long line of disillusioned conservative writers who departed and warned the public about extremism within the newspaper.In an Internet essay on recent turmoil inside the Times, Archibald also confirmed claims by some former Moon insiders that the cult leader has continued to pour in $100 million a year or more to keep the newspaper afloat. Archibald put the price tag for the newspaper’s first 24 years at “more than $3 billion of cash.”[/break1]consortiumnews.com/2006/122706.html]http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/122706.html[/break1]huffingtonpost.com/george-archibald]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-archibaldI think the address he's using for his lawsuit is that for subsidized low-income elderly. I think it's part of this: [/break1]org/about/]http://communityhousingpartners.org/about/ He's only in his early-mid sixties. Maybe he's a manager guy or something. age was from his bio: [/break1]worldji.com/people/view/43]http://www.worldji.com/people/view/43Freakin' commie socialist bastid.



A Legal Lohengrin
Posts: 10415
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#39

Post by A Legal Lohengrin » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:54 am

anudder nutter.One of his big stories while at TWT.So basically, this is a disgruntled nut angry that he was fired by the Moonie cult for being too insane even for them.



User avatar
esseff44
Posts: 12507
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#40

Post by esseff44 » Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:04 pm

t-witch wrote:Oh wow - I remember seeing that a few years ago when the whole Jeff Gannon thing was going on, and some people were trying to connect him to the sex scandal referenced in the article. There was a point where some people were claiming he was some little kid that had been kidnapped from Iowa, I think, (in particular, the missing kids mother) and that the kid had been taken so he could be one of the kids used in the sex ring or something like that. It was so surrealistic!Yes, I remember it well. The young man in question was one of a group who blew the lid off of Boy's Town and the horrible scandal linked to sexual child abuse there. There were large numbers of male prostitutes involved in the larger scandal that reached into the heart of the Pentagon and Congress. There was one well-known and well-connected figure that committed suicide in a related connection as an organizer for the orgies. I was in Washington at the time and became acquainted with a couple of the providers of services at these events. I had no reason to doubt the stories they told and who their customers were. Most of the scandal got swept under the rug pretty fast and those that did report on it were marginalized.As for the Boy's Town side of the story, a book was written about it by one of the children's lawyers, IIRC. They were sent to prison for perjury for testifying against the local political bosses. It's a very ugly, sickening story. There was also a documentary made about it.



User avatar
majorbabs
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:13 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#41

Post by majorbabs » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:47 pm

Do you think we should send a copy of this lawsuit to Orly? And maybe highlight the parts about the FBI running backround checks on presidential candidates? You think she might be interested since she stated during the NH hearing that ever a janitor at the White House gets a backround check while Obama had none?




User avatar
realist
Posts: 34354
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#43

Post by realist » Wed May 23, 2012 7:01 pm

In the Mississippi thread service and proper service were recently topics of discussion.





Just FYI -





Docket Update...





2012-05-23 - [link]2,[/link] Order


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34354
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#44

Post by realist » Wed May 30, 2012 3:35 pm

So the Order posted above received attention.Docket Update...U.S. District CourtDistrict of Columbia (Washington, DC)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-02028-RBWARCHIBALD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et alAssigned to: Judge Reggie B. WaltonCause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act Date Filed: 11/16/2011Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 895 [highlight]Freedom of Information Act[/highlight]Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant 05/30/2012 SUMMONS (5) Issued as to ROBERT F. BAUER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dr) (Entered: 05/30/2012)


ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34354
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#45

Post by realist » Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:43 am

Docket Update...





07/06/2012 7 RESPONSE re 6 Answer to Complaint filed by GEORGE H. ARCHIBALD. (jf, ) (Entered: 07/09/2012)





07/06/2012 [link]8,[/link] MOTION to ser case for Trial by GEORGE H. ARCHIBALD (jf, ) (Entered: 07/09/2012)







ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 15904
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#46

Post by RTH10260 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:36 am

Hmmm -- how does Ms Ruemmler have a position as a defendant when she was not served (apart being WH staff not responsive to FOIA requests?How does Robert Bauer have a position in a FOIA request when he is not part of the government anymore (apart of having had a WH position not responsive to a FOIA REQUEST).I bet we will see Taitz vs Ruemmler quoted in dissmissal order :)



User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: FEMA Camp PI Okanogan, WA 98840

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#47

Post by SueDB » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:08 pm

Hmmm -- how does Ms Ruemmler have a position as a defendant when she was not served (apart being WH staff not responsive to FOIA requests?


How does Robert Bauer have a position in a FOIA request when he is not part of the government anymore (apart of having had a WH position not responsive to a FOIA REQUEST).





I bet we will see Taitz vs Ruemmler quoted in dismissal order :)They seem to be their own worst enemy...


“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7646
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#48

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg » Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:11 pm

Poor, stoopit George. He's quibbling over the Answer? Wrong move when a Motion to Dismiss was filed. Is this supposed to pass as his opposition to the MTD? If not he has effectively conceded that dismissal is proper.And if it is, dismissal is still in order. He failed to rebut the arguments raised by the motion. They cannot be (successfully) rebutted because FOIA simply has no application here.


"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

Emma
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:25 am

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#49

Post by Emma » Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:24 pm

Just saw this, and in reading the first link I see he asks for information regarding the FBI's 'background check' of President Obama.





Federal elected officials do not undergo a background check, nor do they receive 'security clearance'.



OrlyIsAnAirport
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:21 pm

Archibald v US DOJ, et al.

#50

Post by OrlyIsAnAirport » Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:31 pm

Just saw this, and in reading the first link I see he asks for information regarding the FBI's 'background check' of President Obama.





Federal elected officials do not undergo a background check, nor do they receive 'security clearance'.Yep, the authority for administrating security clearances is held by the president and then delegated to others. A security check on the president makes absolutely no sense.



Post Reply

Return to “Birther Case Discussion”