Ouch. Well, that's interesting information.... My brain hurts.

Despite all the razzle-dazzle, there was never any birther stuff in the actual suit. Just the claim that court committed fraud by misinterpreting a witness's testimony.

They never actually threw in any birfery stuff. They talked about it in the beginning but never did.

We need some "qualifying rules" for this contest - I didn't follow the Donofrio/Pidgeon case that they were sanctioned in, but it wasn't a birther case, was it? Yes, they are birthers, but does it count if it's not a birther case? I believe CEL3 had a sanction higher than $127k (and I think his was a real penalty/sanction, not just awarding opposing attorney fees), but again - not in a birther case (and pre-dating his birther activities a little bit). Does that count?

It was an Obama eligibility case to them and to many other birthers. Hmmm... well... I don't really know how many birthers followed it, but as bladebryan on freerepublic I got responses that clearly showed familiarity with case.

If the Pidge ends up in the Washington Court System - State Cases are heard in my county. I might just chat with my fellows at the courthouse about setting up a little shop for me. The IT guys at county don't have the best equipment, but with a little help from 'other sources' .... We can try....

Heck, I haven't been selected for a juror in quite some time....maybe my turn will come up with the Pidge if it ends up a jury trial in Thurston County Superior Court.

Engage

I live in the same county as Pidgeon (Snohomish). I would have to recuse myself as a juror in any case that Pidgeon was involved in, simply due to the fact I think he's pond scum.

RED ALERT! DOMESTIC TERRORIST SLEEPER CEll IDENTIFIED IN AURORA SHOOTING CELLPHONE VIDEO.

The Natural Born Citizen Blog is retired.

My new blog is http://darkknighttruth.wordpress.com.

I am writing there as Dark Knight Oracle.

Like a phoenix from some ashes (or something):



http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ... one-video/

Nuttier than a fruitcake.

Like a phoenix from some ashes (or something):

This blog will release two important reports in the days ahead. The first reveals a crucial media video that has completely avoided the national dialogue surrounding the tragic shooting in Aurora, Colorado. The second report is a piece of investigative journalism that, if reported by the main stream media, would be classified as a bombshell revelation.

The purpose and content of this blog will avoid all conspiracy theories. We are not defending James Holmes, not are we convinced of his guilt. In this country, a man is, by law, presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Every citizen is entitled to this presumption under law, regardless of the depravity of crimes alleged. Without the presumption, our system of justice will fail.

The media reporting has been negligent at best, and even intentionally deceptive at times. Numerous reports published by main stream media outlets have been proved wrong, and/or “updated” by removing prior inaccuracies without keeping a record of changes thereto. Such revisionary technique offends the code of conduct regarding journalism. An update should keep the original report, and add new material to it. An update should never remove previously reported material without keeping a record of such material available to the public. This blog will chronicle multiple instances of news reports that have been substantially changed from their original form.

The author of this blog is a retired legal professional. My identity and sources are irrelevant, since I will only report facts that are entirely verifiable in their own right. There will be absolutely no conjecture issued from this blog.

Dark Knight Oracle

The purpose and content of this blog will avoid all conspiracy theories. We are not defending James Holmes, not are we convinced of his guilt. In this country, a man is, by law, presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Every citizen is entitled to this presumption under law, regardless of the depravity of crimes alleged. Without the presumption, our system of justice will fail.

There is at least a small group of idiots who are into the idea that the Aurora theater massacre was a government plot, Leo among them. There is also the idea that four shooters were involved at the Sikh temple, again a government plot. Then there are the 9/11 and 7/7 conspiracy theorists. A major theme on conspiracy sites today is that the U.S. will be put under martial law in October, following a financial crisis, and that UN troops are already positioned to enforce it. This combination of fear and hatred comes out of something in the culture, not just out of the delusions of mental illness.

If you listen to the mainstream press, and even the alternative press, both state that people died at the bat man shooting. I now believe that people probably did die, but not at the theater. I believe that a drill took place at the theater, and inconvenient people the government wanted eliminated were murdered elsewhere and blamed on the bat man shooting. This is in contrast with my earlier posts, where I believed no one died at all. But new evidence has surfaced which includes the nurse who drowned in a lake near her home after tending the injuries of one or more of the victims. Regardless of what you have been told about bird shot, bloody little girls, people hitting the floor, etc take a look at what is here, and consider the evidence. First, the easy stuff. At no point did we ever get any CCD footage out of the theater. None for the emergency exit, none from inside the screening room, none from the lobby, none from the parking lot, we got NADA. None from a cell phone cam, absolutely NOTHING. Furthermore, the theater was a very nice modern theater which would have had those things in working order, and what about the mall itself? No footage from the mall either? Think about that. Why not? On top of that, we got no pictures after the fact from the inside of the theater. NONE, NADA. No bullet holes, no gas canisters, no shell casings, no blood on the floor, NOTHING. Why not? On the outside of the theater, in the back, there was blood on the sidewalk. But there is one problem with it. First and foremost, the spatters were CLEAN. NO FOOTSTEPS in them. People with some exposure to forensics who have posted on my forum have said that at crime scenes the blood ALWAYS has footprints in it, because it is impossible to stay away from it. Purportedly the blood on the ground was from someone carrying the little girl. In that case, whoever was carrying her would have stepped in the blood while carrying her, leaving bloody footprints and there were NONE. Furthermore, the blood spatters lead TOWARD the emergency exit, not away from it. The only way these two things could coincide is if a setup team laid the blood scene out and screwed up doing it. This scene could have happened as photographed only if the blood was in a container at the end of a handle, keeping whoever was dumping it on the sidewalk far enough away to not get it on themselves or walk in it. Stupid as they were, they started in the parking lot and worked their way toward the door, rather than starting at the door and working their way out into the parking lot. It's obvious in the following two photos.

In other words, for the conspiracist, it's more comforting to believe that someone evil is in charge than to accept that NO ONE is.

Yep. I understand that wish, honestly. It's not even all that irrational. We want to be safe, and we want the world set up in a sensible way ... I've had times when it's been tempting to look for bigger patterns in the mess of info out there. Surely SOMEONE must be behind _______ or surely there's someone pulling strings or whatever. Human nature, probably.

In the last couple weeks I went to check out a computer school near here, and I told the guy I talked to about it. He burst out laughing, and said it wasn't really an ebil plot against the poor ol' rooster who everybody loves to kick around whenever they're bored or havin' a bad day. He said Microsoft doesn't want people to pass just from studying -- they want you to spend some time DOING the things that they teach, so they can make sure you really have the talent or knowledge or whatever.

But it was great hating Microsoft all these years because they had messed with me!

Microsoft is notorious for this. I think it's a scam to get you having to take the last test over and over after you've already dumped the money into the first tests and can't afford to back out.

Microsoft is notorious for this. I think it's a scam to get you having to take the last test over and over after you've already dumped the money into the first tests and can't afford to back out.