Mr. Wiscol,
Here is my response to Kreep’s allegation that my complaint is bizarre and without merit. Please, see attached all of the supporting documents. Kreep is currently working with a convicted forger Lisa Liberi and unethical attorney Philip Berg who is currently awaiting decision in his trial conducted by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PA.

Berg colluded with the same forger Liberi, they defrauded their client and the Board. Berg admitted to fraud and to the fact that he lied to his client for two years about a case being active, while it was dismissed. Berg and Liberi initially defrauded the board by submitting manufactured letters, where they claimed that Berg alerted the client. Those letters from forger Liberi and from Berg, where submitted under penalty of perjury, later Berg admitted to defrauding the client and the board.

Out of jealousy and greed Kreep colluded with forger Liberi and an unethical attorney Philip Berg, who is about to be either sanctioned or disbarred, and two of them filed a bogus law suit against me, my husband, investigator Neil Sankey and 20 other parties, including Oracle, Lexis-Nexis, Intellius, Reid Elsevier. The action was an attempted shake down with bogus charges. In the process they provided fraudulent statements, bizarre allegations, manufactures statutes, where 2 statutes were combined to create a statute and claim that all of the parties owe them billions of dollars under this manufactured statute. Kreep’s behavior in manufacturing this bogus law suit against me and others was so outrageous, unethical and such a clear violation of professional code of ethics, that he should be disbarred for it, he definitely should not be allowed to take an oath of a judge. If he could be complicit in this, he can be complicit in anything. I hope that members of the public contact the District Attorney in San Diego county, where Kreep resides, District Attorney in Orange county, where the case was filed and in Philadelphia, where Berg resides and demand this matter to be criminally prosecuted. They should contact the PA bar and get the information on Berg’s case and CA bar demanding to expedite my complaint against Kreep, before this man gets on the bench and causes enormous damage to a lot of people.

I am attaching documents, confirming everything I am saying.

Is there a link to a text transcript or a summary of what is said in that video for us computer-audiologically-impaired individuals? (My sound card ain't working well... can't hear videos much )

3 Responses to “Obama’s hired guns produced their highly intellectual response to my filling of the application for stay with Justice Thomas: “(she)… is a birther zombie with a decaying body”. Why, you may ask? One of the the pages of the brief on the blog did not scan well, was not clear”

<snip>

Sandra K
July 3rd, 2012 @ 12:55 pm

Don’t worry about these people Orly. They can call you Queen of the Zombies or Queen of the Birthers or Queen of anything they want.

You are the Queen of our Hearts and allways will be.

Just keep filing lawsuits and one day one of them will turn up something that no judge can refuse no matter how zombified he is.

Should we call off our Impeach the Kreep campaign? Maybe he would agree to here a lawsuit. Kreep was a friend once. Maybe he will come to his senses today. Unless he has been bit by the Head Zombie. And you know who I mean!!!
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
July 3rd, 2012 @ 1:36 pm
I did not start impeach Kreep campaign. I filed a bar complaint against Kreep, showing that his actions represent a flagrant violation of the code of ethics, which should not allow him to practice law, never mind be a judge.

There was a transcript (poorly spelled and approximating the actual words) in the video itself, lyssandri. Did that not come through for you?

(My sound card ain't working well... can't hear videos much )

Ain't there a spell or incantation for that?

More than a month after the primary election, we’re still wondering how right-wing, “Birther” attorney Gary Kreep received a majority of the votes in his race for a San Diego County Superior Court judgeship. The mystery was further complicated when Voice of San Diego analyzed the precinct data and found that Kreep did exceptionally well in southern San Diego, an area of predominantly Democratic and Latino voters whom one wouldn’t expect to support a candidate linked with the Minutemen movement.

One anonymous reader in the South Bay suggested it may have something to do with a last-minute robocall (listen below) from a group called Taxpayers for Safer Neighborhoods (TSN) that attacked Kreep’s opponent, Deputy District Attorney Garland Peed. The call, a recording of which was provided to CityBeat, said Peed would be the “worst kind of county judge,” claiming that his use of plea bargains put drug dealers back on the streets. [Snipped details on how the robocall conflated 2 different felons.]

Taxpayers for Safer Neighborhoods also broke the law: Robocalls are illegal in California unless they’re introduced by a real person. This one was not.

The call isn't one Kreep could have made himself, since the California Code of Judicial Ethics forbids judge candidates from making statements that misrepresent facts concerning their opponents. Instead, Kreep's friends said it for him.

Gary Kreep, birther king, doing just fine
By Laura Conaway
-
Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:05 PM EDT

When he finally gets inaugurated as a duly elected San Diego County judge this winter, birther Gary Kreep will go on the public payroll with a salary of $178,789. The pay for judicial service is much less than he's used to drawing from his political causes. In 2010, for instance, he made $206,000 (pdf) from his birther United States Justice Foundation -- and that was just the salary.

Kreep also collects rent from the United States Justice Foundation, along with more rent and fees from his Republican Majority Campaign PAC. His San Diego disclosure form is kind of scratched up (pdf), so it's not clear how much he's charging himself. But Republican Majority did file new federal paperwork (pdf) yesterday, filled with delicious clues.

[snip]

With Kreep listed as the president and co-founder, Kreep's PAC reports taking in $1,410,978.66 so far this year, almost all of it in unitemized contributions. Their most recent political buy was a "phone/mail communication" for $100,000 against Barack Obama on June 16, well after the San Diego election.

As for Kreep personally, in April, May and June, his PAC paid him $2,850 in rent. Kreep also took in $16,815.85 for legal services. If he earned at the pace year-round, Kreep would make $67,263.4 for being his own PAC's lawyer.

[...]

It was the early 1990s and the City Council had voted to create the 15-member HRC to promote cultural sensitivity and investigate discrimination complaints. But, according to a press report from the time, the sessions descended into a chaos of "shouting matches and name calling" between gay-rights activists and Christian fundamentalists.

[...]

Kreep was an unapologetically Christian, anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-illegal-immigrant, anti-affirmative-action lawyer from Escondido. His detractors—which included a majority of his fellow commissioners—believed he'd been inappropriately appointed by a City Council member who'd opposed the commission's creation from the beginning.

[...]

Twenty years later, Kreep is poised to spark a ruckus all over again. Last February, encouraged by political operative and longtime friend Jim Sills, Kreep filed paperwork to run for judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County. In the June primary election, he took the legal community by surprise when he eked out a victory over a veteran prosecutor, Deputy District Attorney Garland Peed. The margin was two-fifths of 1 percent.

"Mr. Kreep seems to be a person who has an agenda," attorney Len Simon says. "Judges should not have an agenda; they should decide cases based on law and the facts. Judges with an agenda can be an embarrassment to the court."

Even without knowing what's in this article it is difficult to imagine this POS sitting on the bench.

I agree. Even if he doesn't have an agenda, he's a krappy lawyer based on what I've seen. I just hope there are enough jaywalking and leash law cases to keep him busy.

“Since my marriage to my husband it has become very clear that he has a very strong need to control me emotionally, physically and financially,” Kreep’s ex-wife, a psychologist, wrote in a declaration on file at the East County court house. “The reason I left my husband is because he was verbally and physically and emotionally abusive. He is a recovering alcoholic and unfortunately has to lay blame on me for things he cannot accept in himself. He accuses me of addictive behaviors I don’t have, throws bottles at me, punches holes in walls, and belittles me.”

Wait. I thought Kreep's wife was on the payroll of the USJF. Did he marry again after the contentious divorce? His email comments looks like he still hasn't figured out what proper judicial temperament looks like. While it will be interesting to monitor the proceedings in his court, I have great empathy for the parties who appear before him. Elections matter.