Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7159
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
Ducky, I've always assumed the SSN thing is another slam. Who uses phony SSN's? Why, illegal aliens and criminals, thats who.

Law abiding patriots have only one and the secret SSN decoder banana tells you everything you need to knows about them. :D

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9208
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
kimba wrote:
Obama was working at Baskin Robbins in 1977. BR doesn't "pay people under the table".

Says you! ;)

It is, yet again, assumption of illegality to explain away bad facts; the oh-so-predictable rejection of contrary facts to disprove the theory de jour.

(E.g., Obama's selective service registration is fraudulent, except for when you want to prove he has used SSN ending in 4425; then it is genuine.)

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3776
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
Examiner wrote:
Is the 4425 number the one that was on his draft registration, or is that a different one?

Yes. You can check it here: https://www.sss.gov/RegVer/wfVerification.aspx

Examiner wrote:
And if it is, why do we care about the 4425 number?

WE don't. Orly thinks it belonged to someone else and thinks there's something illegal about having one "reserved" for people in another state.

In case you missed it, Sh!t happens: http://www.aolnews.com/2010/06/26/two-w ... ty-number/

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3940
Location: Switzerland
ducktape wrote:
RTH10260 wrote:
Offtopic :
As for the punched stuff, you surely all remember those teletype punched paper strips ?


Offtopic :
There was a paper control tape on the printers in those days. If you didn't have a channel that it needed punched into the tape, the printer would spin the tape (and advance the paper) looking for it, and could fling an entire box of paper through itself and across the wall faster that you could get across the room and turn it off.


Offtopic :
Ahhh - more fond memories: the printer control tape. Yeah and what for a mess when the operator managed to mount the wrong tape and walked away confidently that everything was fine.

In my background as a then part time operator I only knew of using the printer control tapes on an old Univac model 1004, a computer that used hard wired programs on panels, loading a program in that machine was physical work, replacing those programmable boards fitted to a frame, something like 2by2 feet.

The newer printer models of course already had a virtual loop within the controller.


Edit: our controller around here may want to move some posts around, don't we also have a Geek thread hidden somewhere in the large wastes of this forum?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:18 pm
Posts: 2426
Location: Paris, France
Examiner wrote:
Sooo ... he went back in time to 1977 to get an SSN he would need in the 1980s? Maybe he is a reptilian shape-shifter :-k


That is where they lose me. See, I could believe CT Vampire. I could believe reptilian shape-shifter. But there are birthers who seem to believe either or both and THAT is just silly!!

_________________
Incorrible. Please do not incorrige me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9208
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Kerchner walks it back:
Quote:
As I said when I posted my postulated surmise in an attempt to explain reported events that are found in the site at the top posted comment in this thread and others one finds when searching on Sean Paul Ludwig or Jean Paul Ludwig via google ...

"This allegation has not been 100% proven that I know of. But I thought I'd pass it along for the readers here in order to get further vetting of this. But such an event would explain how the SSN from a CT person ended up in Hawaii and used by Obama."

With the added search tip from you, I found the SSDI entry you reported. Thanks for you input. I will add your data to the pot of what is known about the Ludwig who died in Hawaii.

But we still have that SSN that Obama is using with the CT prefix clearly tied to him in the [highlight]backdated[/highlight] Selective Service registration. If one enters the CT prefixed SSN into the Selective Service database it comes back with Obama's name. Search google for that and you will find many examples and screen shots going back 1-2 years on that data point. And others report Obama is using the CT prefix SSN ending in 4425 to this day up to including his latest tax returns.

In other words, Obama has used the SSN ending in 4425. WHICH IS UNDISPUTED.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4600
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
bob wrote:
Kerchner walks it back:
Quote:
As I said when I posted my postulated surmise in an attempt to explain reported events that are found in the site at the top posted comment in this thread and others one finds when searching on Sean Paul Ludwig or Jean Paul Ludwig via google ...

"This allegation has not been 100% proven that I know of. But I thought I'd pass it along for the readers here in order to get further vetting of this. But such an event would explain how the SSN from a CT person ended up in Hawaii and used by Obama."

With the added search tip from you, I found the SSDI entry you reported. Thanks for you input. I will add your data to the pot of what is known about the Ludwig who died in Hawaii.

But we still have that SSN that Obama is using with the CT prefix clearly tied to him in the [highlight]backdated[/highlight] Selective Service registration. If one enters the CT prefixed SSN into the Selective Service database it comes back with Obama's name. Search google for that and you will find many examples and screen shots going back 1-2 years on that data point. [highlight]And others report Obama is using the CT prefix SSN ending in 4425 to this day up to including his latest tax returns[/highlight].


How do they know that?

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9208
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Examiner wrote:
Quote:
[highlight]And others report Obama is using the CT prefix SSN ending in 4425 to this day up to including his latest tax returns[/highlight].

How do they know that?

Engaging birther filter: Obama's tax returns show him using the SSN ending in 4425.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5527
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
Another problem with Chuckie Kerchner's fantasy construction theory postulated surmise:

Quote:
... Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died.


and

Quote:
Grandma Dunham did part-time or volunteer work in the Honolulu probate office. She thus had access to people with SSNs dieing intestate and no known surving relatives. Grandma Dunham simply gives that SSN of a deceased man who died in HI in June 1981 to her grandson Obama to use for his application to Columbia University when he transferred there in 1981. That is the connection and how a CT SSN got from CT to HI and into the hands of the Dunham family and then to Obama.


But but but ... didn't Orly's crack team of genealogy researchers identify Mr. Ludwig's surviving relatives? Like Florence J. Ludwig, born in 1978 in San Luis Obispo -- the same city where Jean Paul died? And John P. Ludwig and Phyllis H. Ludwig, both of Honolulu?

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6640
Quote:
And others report Obama is using the CT prefix SSN ending in X to this day up to including his latest tax returns.


Is using it to this day. Used to register for the selective service. Used for tax returns, so it's the one on his W2's. It's the one on his W2's, it's the one to which his SSI contributions are credited. He's had and used the number for almost 34 years. In that 34 years he's gone to college, law school, worked for various companies and organizations, run for office, purchased and been given a mortgage for at least one house, served as a state legislator and US Senator, now President of the United States. He's submitted this number to employers, banks, state and federal tax authorities, the Selective Service. No one has ever flagged the number for being irregular. Someone from HI has a SS# with a prefix normally issued to applicants with CT mailing addresses. A curiosity at best, evidence of something criminal, irregular, nefarious, doubtful.

What the birthers have proven 100% is this is the Social Security number that was issued to Barack Hussein Obama Jr in 1977 and the one he has used for 34 years. Bravo. The only connection they've proven between Obama and Ludwig is they both have SSN's issued by CT. Oh and they can search the Selective Service database and find Obama, which apparently they're all doing today because if you try to search for Obama, it tells you the number of searches for the day for that information has been exceeded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6640
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
Another problem with Chuckie Kerchner's fantasy construction theory postulated surmise:

Quote:
... Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died.


and

Quote:
Grandma Dunham did part-time or volunteer work in the Honolulu probate office. She thus had access to people with SSNs dieing intestate and no known surving relatives. Grandma Dunham simply gives that SSN of a deceased man who died in HI in June 1981 to her grandson Obama to use for his application to Columbia University when he transferred there in 1981. That is the connection and how a CT SSN got from CT to HI and into the hands of the Dunham family and then to Obama.


But but but ... didn't Orly's crack team of genealogy researchers identify Mr. Ludwig's surviving relatives? Like Florence J. Ludwig, born in 1978 in San Luis Obispo -- the same city where Jean Paul died? And John P. Ludwig and Phyllis H. Ludwig, both of Honolulu?


They're having trouble keeping the story straight. Obama isn't using Mr Ludwig's SSN. Mr Ludwig's number starts with 045. Poor Mr Ludwig's name only came up because someone searched the death index for birth year 1890, issued in CT, last address HI. They keyed in on Mr Ludwig instead of the other poor sod whose name fits 1890, CT and HI because one of the crack genealogists found a death record in CA for Mr. Ludwig and went AHA! CA!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 3112
Location: LA,CA
Occupation: Game designer and code monkey
kimba wrote:
The only connection they've proven between Obama and Ludwig is they both have SSN's usually issued by to applicants from CT.

FIFY

_________________
Ducktape

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear And disregards the rest." Paul Simon, The Boxer
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5254
Jean + Sean + Obama = Image

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3940
Location: Switzerland
As mentioned in another thread, Obamas ghost may also be wandering the WH by the name of "Gene" Ludwig ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18609
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Cashill ------ at the Gulag! :P

Another Look at Obama’s Social Security Number
March 17, 2011, 4:14 am By Jack Cashill Leave a Comment


He says he got his info from Susan Daniels (did we know she was widowed at 30 with 7 kids?) and Neil Sankey. Daniels started researching on her own, but then it sounds like they teamed up.



Quote:
What she and fellow investigator Neil Sankey unearthed was a nugget that could have ended the career of a George Bush or a Sarah Plain: Barack Obama had been using a SocialSecurity number issued in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979, a state in which he never lived or even visited at that time in his life.


And Ayers probably helped him get it.

You can read it here:

http://gulagbound.com/13884/another-loo ... ity-number

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9208
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Cahill's article is also at WND:
Quote:
"[highlight]There have been many playing junior investigator from the start," [Daniels] jokes. "I don't know if they even have their decoder rings yet."[/highlight] =)) =)) =))

This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world's best-known Social Security number – [SSN ending 4425].

"All I can say," says Daniels of [SSN ending 4425], "is that it's phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980."

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama's, [SSN ending 4424]. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.

Wood's Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Wood lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all "042s" applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

[...]

Daniels also sent me a copy of Obama's Selective Service data. Obama appears to have registered on Sept. 4, 1980, a month after his 19th birthday. The form lists the telling last four digits of his "042" number, "4425."

This is the first use of the "042" number that Daniels could find. She is just not sure it is legitimate. [highlight]Some have credibly argued[/highlight] [who?] that the Selective Service information was forged and backdated once Obama became a presidential candidate.

[highlight]"They were stupid to use the CT number on the [Selective Service] card," Daniels adds, "because now there is no way for [Obama] to back out of that number."[/highlight]

Other than the 1980 Selective Service registration, the first time Daniels could find Obama using the "042" number was in 1986 in Chicago.

Other than the anomalous 042 prefix, there's nothing out of the ordinary with the actual evidence presented. The rest is pure speculation. And Obama isn't going to "back out" of the SSN ending 4425 because the evidence they presented show that it is his duly issued SSN!

Quote:
Daniels and Sankey have tracked Obama's many uses of the "042" number in Chicago, in Massachusetts and in Washington. Others numbers appear with the "Obama" name, but Daniels cautions against attributing these numbers – with the exception of those from Obama's college days at Occidental – to the president.

So are they saying Obama used other SSNs while in Occidental? What numbers? How were they used? Why tell the reader this, instead of showing the reader this evidence?

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18609
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Doc C also addressed that article:


Deconstructing Jack Cashill


http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/03/ ... k-cashill/


I only watched him for just a couple of minutes on that video I posted link to the other day. Cashill is talking nonsense, but he is a salesman. Better than any of the others. He's got a likability factor that Corsi, Farah, Berg, Apuzzo, et. al. are sorely lacking. Yeah, it's nonsense. But he can be very convincing.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2361
An interesting addition to the discussion of whether or not president Obama's SSN was the result of a data entry error.

I stumbled upon the following article as part of my profession (I'm in Health Care) and thought it relevant.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419425/

The paper is entitled, "Identification of Special Patterns of Numerical Typographic Errors Increases the Likelihood of Finding a Misplaced Patient File." The idea was... when a patient's ID number is mistyped, it can result in the misfiling of important medical records. So... if these typos were not random, it might help somebody trying to find a lost record if they knew the patterns of likely errors.

Quote:
After analyzing the data, we grouped the typos, by their patterns, into the following categories: single digit replacement (49%), single digit omission (27%), reverse (9%), shift (6%), mirror (2%), duplication (2%), and others (5%).


Of course... the typo we have theorized here is the first sort: a single digit replacement... the most common general sort of numerical typo.

Quote:
Furthermore, we identified the subgroups in the two largest categories— single digit replacement and single digit omission.


They published those in a table... and low and behold the single biggest source of numeric typographical errors is:

(Drum Roll Please)

Quote:
Adjacent position on the numeric panel of the keyboard


Now... I note that the errors identified in the paper based adjacency in the numeric keypad... not the Qwerty keyboard. But in 1977 when President Obama received his SSN clerical workers were still using typewriters, not PCs. Those did not get widely distributed on office worker's desks until the early to mid 80s.

So.. the error we have theorized (a replacement of 9 with 0 as the first digit of Obama's 1977 zip-code) would also be representative of the most common type of numeric typo.

Just another little tid bit.

_________________
"Let me tell you, I'm a really smart guy."

― Donald Trump


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6640
With this new information on numerical typos by Epectitus and the 1976 zip codes by Sequoia - the zip code for the Dunhams in 1976 was 96814 - if one replaces the 9 with a 0, one gets zipcode 06814, a zip code for Danbury, CT . I would like to make a motion to agree going forward that the most likely explanation for why Barack Obama was issued a SSN intended to be issued to someone with a CT mailing address is because the zip code on his SS - 5 Application for Social Security number was keyed into the system incorrectly and to declare the Bogus Social Security Number Claim Officially Debunked. All those in favor say Aye? All those opposed? Can I help in getting this explanation enshrined and captured on the Home page as a Debunked Claim?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4600
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
kimba wrote:
With this new information on numerical typos by Epectitus and the 1976 zip codes by Sequoia - the zip code for the Dunhams in 1976 was 96814 - if one replaces the 9 with a 0, one gets zipcode 06814, a zip code for Danbury, CT . I would like to make a motion to agree going forward that the most likely explanation for why Barack Obama was issued a SSN intended to be issued to someone with a CT mailing address is because the zip code on his SS - 5 Application for Social Security number was keyed into the system incorrectly and to declare the Bogus Social Security Number Claim Officially Debunked. All those in favor say Aye? All those opposed? Can I help in getting this explanation enshrined and captured on the Home page as a Debunked Claim?


Aye!

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Posts: 6468
Location: downstairs
Aye!

_________________
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.--Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20001
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Mebbe.

What if the young Barack was touring Ivy League schools and happened to decide he needed a social security account while he was in Connecticut?

Typographical error is one of at least three innocent explanations. I just gave another. A third is it was a spare number and it was next up in queue so it was given to this Hawai'ian kid with the funny name.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:30 pm
Posts: 2912
Location: The Great Pariah State of Arizona
I randomly did a Westlaw search for any court decisions that have dealt with SSN geographical/assignment issues, and still haven't found a good one but did find one case where a certain report was cited that sounds interesting. It is entitled, Predicting Social Security Numbers From Public Data, and I don't have time to go through it right now but anyone who wants to can: PDF

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image


"What part of 'second' don't you understand?" -Judge Morrison England


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7284
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
kimba wrote:
With this new information on numerical typos by Epectitus and the 1976 zip codes by Sequoia - the zip code for the Dunhams in 1976 was 96814 - if one replaces the 9 with a 0, one gets zipcode 06814, a zip code for Danbury, CT . I would like to make a motion to agree going forward that the most likely explanation for why Barack Obama was issued a SSN intended to be issued to someone with a CT mailing address is because the zip code on his SS - 5 Application for Social Security number was keyed into the system incorrectly and to declare the Bogus Social Security Number Claim Officially Debunked. All those in favor say Aye? All those opposed? Can I help in getting this explanation enshrined and captured on the Home page as a Debunked Claim?

And don't forget the averment of the SSA itself that the state prefix codes were never intended to be, and are not, inviolate nor does it 'mean' anything to be assigned an SSN with a state code different from the state of your birth, the state of your first job, the state from which you applied, or any other variation. It is simply and OFFICIALLY irrelevant.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over into the Orly Zone." -- Geritol

ZOOM IN, BABY. IT'S ALL WRONG.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20001
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
poutine wrote:
I randomly did a Westlaw search for any court decisions that have dealt with SSN geographical/assignment issues, and still haven't found a good one but did find one case where a certain report was cited that sounds interesting. It is entitled, Predicting Social Security Numbers From Public Data, and I don't have time to go through it right now but anyone who wants to can: PDF

Almost two years ago, after reading this article I contacted and had an e-mail exchange with Prof. Acquisti. He was a very nice man. I gave him some info and asked him to guess the social security account numbers of my kids. He wasn't even close on anything.

So, based on my own little test (and I appreciated the fact that Prof. Acquisti accepted my challenge) I think his paper is b.s. Of course, as some in Academia can tell you, many a Ph.D. was made following a paper analyzing the social implications of goat entrails.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group