Actually, that's a very good one.

That lacks any semblance of class, tact, politeness, or diplomacy. Which means that he might actually understand it.

I like.

Well, since The Putz calls the legitimately-elected president "putative," using the term before "attorney" seems appropriate. Maybe Crappy "Putative" Attorney Mario Apuzzo?

I like that one, Taverl.

We'll let that pass. But just don't forget to italicize the commas and periods. That would be a heinous error.

If Apuzzo is a real attorney, he would have no problem showing his bar card. What is Apuzzo hiding?

Actually, since he calls a legitimate president putative, I would say that makes him a "Putschtative" Attorney.

I struck the Indiana Supreme Court because (assuming you're referring to Ankeny) they merely denied transfer (the Indiana equivalent of denying certiorari). Therefore, it's not quite correct to say that they ruled or concurred on the issue. If you'd like, Addy, I can explain this further.

I would add to that list the Illinois State Board of Elections in rejecting Michael Jackson's petition the hearing examiner said:

Thank you

In addition to the above, La Putz alas has no discernable sense of humor, he got seriously bent out of shape when I posted this at CAAFLOG during the Lakin debacle.

Mario meets The Supremes….

Justice Alito: Mr Apuzzo, I would….

Mario: Esquire

Justice Alito: I beg your pardon

Mario: It’s Mr Appuzzo Esquire, I’m a lawyer you know.

Justice Alito: I am fully aware you are a lawyer Mr Apuzzo, you’re here arguing a case.

Mario: It’s important to get the terminology right, I paid good money for the Esq.

Justice Scalia: OK already, we get it, the Esq is given lets move on.

Justice Alito: Thanks Tony, moving on, Mr Apuzzo, your case is one that seeks….

Mario: I object

Justice Alito: What ! What do you mean you object, I’m trying to describe your case how can you object to that?

Mario: They are here !!!

Justice Scalia: What, what are you talking about, who is here..?

Mario: Them, those two, over there in the black robes

Justice Thomas: We all wear black robes, that’s all I’m saying and it’s not dicta.

Justice Roberts: Sammy, what’s he saying, look can we hurry up, she who must be obeyed has a long Honey-Do list for me for Christmas

Justice Alito: Mr Apuzzo, just WHAT or WHO are you objecting to?

Mario: Those two there, (points wildly)

Justice Alito: From your frenetic semaphore I take it you mean Justices Sotomayer and Kagan

Mario: Yeah, them two, shouldn’t be here

Justice Kagan: I got this Sammy, OY, paisan, what’s your problem with me, ’cause I’m a woman, ’cause I use Jewish words or ’cause I’m from Noo Yawk. Well, spit it out, don’t keep me waiting.

Mario: You didn’t recuse yourselves that’s why AND YOU KNOW WHY !!!

Justice Kagan: No Joisey, I don’t “know why” why don’t you enlighten Sonia, me and the boys

Mario: You were nominated by the Usurper so you’re tainted, begone by the power of Vattel vested in me.

Justice Sotomayer: Vatell…Vattel, what’s he babbbling about, ¦anyone..?

Justice Kennedy: I seem to remember something from. .no not that’s it ..no…¦Don’t they make childrens toys? Is this a consumer safety case? I thought it was an electoral issue?

Mario: NO not Mattel, Vattel, Vattel he is the most significant contributor to the Constitution and defined Natural Born Citizen, its’ all in my briefs

Justice Ginsburg: I remember, part of a pop quiz back in ’56 at Harvard, “Who was cited the LEAST in the Federalist Papers but had a minor input on international relation definitions in the Constitution”, no one got it, we couldn’t even agree how his name was spelled or his nationality. Nasty ideas but a creature of his time.

Justice Breyer: Oh no..Johnny, he’s a bloody Birther, what in the name of Beelzebubs left nut are we doing with this. We had this chat over 2 years ago

Justice Kagan: A Birfer…A Joisy Birfer..A Joisy Birfer who things he can tell ME to recuse myself? Sammy, did you set this up?

Justice Alito: I’m sorry, a friend asked if I could have a look, I owed him a favor, what can I say. Maybe when I saw all the clerks sending his brief around as a punk’d email I should have looked a little closer.

Mario: I demand they recuse themselves it’s a plot by Soros.

Justice Scalia: Shut it….Sammy, I get it, I understand but really, Birfoons in the court, we had this out when that Mad Cow Orly was around, no Birfoons except at the Christmas party for light entertainment.

Justice Alito: Sorry all, I’ll make it up for everyone in the Christmas present

Mario: But..

Justice Roberts: Can it “esquire”, frivolous case, inherently valeless, a waste of this courts time, what say you ? Show of hands..OK done

Mario: But my case..it’s a Konstitutional Krisis.!!

Justice Roberts: Can it or the sanctions here will make Orly swoon. Bailiff, escort “esquire” from the courts and if he gives you any trouble……

Mario: (voice receding) Let me FEEEENISH

Don't even mention the "Sons of Italy" or the Frank Sinatra lodge to him. . . just sayin'

Capt Pambly thinks she can use this case to further her cause, she left a comment.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/80563782/Tisd ... bama-et-al

.

But her own website seems deathly silent regarding Malihi's ruling.

I think Mario haz a mad at me because I asked him to take up the Tisdale case.

http://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/2012/0 ... omment-694

Well, I've been licensed in New Jersey since 1993 and I've not gotten anything to prove it other than my admission certificate (which is still sitting unframed in a cardboard envelope in my house) and my annual registration form.

In PA we have a wallet card that is replaced every year when our dues are paid, but not in NJ. Maybe some county courthouses provide special cards for attorneys who are there frequently, but I'm not in court in NJ that often.

So you should visit Mario, maybe he has his admission certificate framed and hanging in his office for you to see.

I added the due date for filing an appeal in the 4th Circuit, February 22, to the Birther Calendar. I wanted to make sure that Mario (and Leo) do not miss this important date. I want to help where I can.

RC

Mario claims a notice of appeal has been filed in this case.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/tisda ... -born.html

Can anyone confirm that?

Yes. In fact, contrary to the Putz's moronic statement (as any fool knows that a trial court opinion is generally not controlling precedent), the fact that it is at the Fourth Circuit is right in the parenthetical of this very thread title.

Also, the very first post of the thread includes the entire docket at the Fourth Circuit as of the date of the post. So I'm not sure what that idiot is on about.

Lookie how Apuzzo starts his opus:

E.D. Va.'s dismissal; the 4th hasn't decided anything yet, "counselor."

Thanks, I should have checked the docket. Mario doesn't say he will try to enter the case. Of course, that would involve money out of his pocket and applying for admission to practice in Virginia.

And actually having a case on the merits where his arguments would be laughed out of court. (And he'd probably be found to have litigated frivolously again.)

And he's a coward.

Mario's not going to "enter the fray" again. It's much easier to sit on the sidelines, claim you didn't lose your birther case, and like Leo just make shit up out of whole cloth regarding the Constitution and the law. That way, when the courts all rule against those fantasies you made up to please birthers, you can just claim you are right and the courts are bought off Nazis... rinse/repeat, and you maintain your street cred with the nutcases.