Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 532 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 22  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:37 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=148762 :evil:

Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt

Posted on | July 5, 2012 | No Comments


While this one is not "pure" birther on its face, based on the list of defendants... yeah, it is.

Quote:
Press Release

Sent to 30,000 U.S. and International Media outlets

For Immediate Release

Breaking news!

New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt. Additionally, Plaintiff Attorney Orly Taitz, who is seeking a class action certification, is bringing forward a second challenge to Obama Tax, asserting that it is illegal, as it was signed into law by Barack Obama under false pretenses and by virtue of fraud, usurping the position of the U.S. President while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers: forged Selective service Certificate, forged Birth certificate and a fraudulently obtained Social security number. Additional cause of action is RICO, asserting thatObama doe America is a de facto RICO organization created to procure fraud committed by Obama. Additional defendants are Attorney General Holder, Registrar of the Department of health of HI Alvin Onaka, former director of Selective Service William A. Chatfield, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue, former Chair Woman of Democratic National Convention in 2008 Nancy Pelosi, former chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz and a number of other defendants.

While the case was filed in the Southern Division of the Central District of California, it was moved by the clerk of the court to the western Division in Los Angeles. When asked, why was the case moved, the clerk stated that it is a violation of civil rights case, which affects the whole district.

Both DOCX and PDF versions of the complaint are attached

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ


more soon

NOT from the court file, but from Orly's...

:evil: Taitz v Sebelius pages 1-30 :evil:

:evil: Taitz v Sebelius pages 31-60 :evil:

:evil: Taitz v Sebelius pages p61-90 :evil:

:evil: Taitz v Sebelius pages p91-113 :evil:

And mostly the "usual' zibits...

Quote:
Exhibits

1 Affidavit of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, stating that Barack Obama’s alleged Birth certificate, Selective service Certificate and Social Security number represent forgeries.
2 Affidavit of expert Douglas Vogt attesting to the fact that Obama’s birth certificate represent a forgery.
3 Affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.
4 Affidavit of assistant registrar of the state of Hawaii Timothy Adams, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.
5 Affidavit of Adobe Illustrator expert Felicito Papa attesting to the fact that Barack Obama posted his full Connecticut Social security number REDACTED on white House.gov with his 2009 tax returns and posted on April 15, 2010.
6 Affidavit of John Sampson, Senior Deportation officer of the department of homeland security, attesting to the fact that there was no legitimate reason for assigning a Connecticut Social security number to Barack Obama, resident of Hawaii.
7 Affidavit of Linda Jordan and attached e-verify attesting to the fact that Connecticut Social Security number REDACTED issued to Obama was not assigned to Obama.
8 SSNVS (Social security verification systems) printout attesting to the fact that Connecticut social security number REDACTED used by Obama was never issued to Obama
9 Affidavit of typesetting expert Paul Irey attests to the fact that Obama’s alleged long form is a forgery, as bits and pieces of the “certificate” were cut and pasted from different documents, as letters show different fonts and sizes
10 Certification of Nomination of Al Gore issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2000.
11 Certification of Nomination of John Kerry issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2004.
12 Certificate of Nomination of Barack Obama issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2008.
13 Certificate of Nomination of John Kerry by Democratic National Committee sent to the State of Hawaii in 2004.
14 Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee in 2008 sent to 49 states.
15 Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee sent to the Office of Elections of the State of Hawaii in 2008 (with edited wording).
16 School registration #203 for Barack Obama from Assissi school in Jakarta Indonesia and showing Obama using his step father’s last name Soetoro as his legal name, as well as listing his citizenship as Indonesian and his religion Islam
17 Affidavit of Chris Strunk, authenticating passport records of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, received by him under the FOIA request from the Department of State and showing Obama’s legal name in his mother’s passport records to be Barack Obama Soebarkah.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 4216
Ah ha! BEHOLD... "Plan B"

_________________
@Orly: "No one is listening to you anymore. And that’s the way it should always be." - Scott J. Tepper (11/5/2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am
Posts: 5518
Occupation: retired
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp

It sounds as if her new case is based on this old internet rumor and smear. The word 'dhimmitude' sprang to mind as soon as I read it. She must have linked up with the likes of Pam Geller for this one. It just for the smear value.

_________________
Mark Twain
Quote:
Research shows that 87.666 per cent of all statistics are made up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 13596
Location: New England
Occupation: Professor of Sociology
Orly is suing on the basis of a rumor. According to Snopes, it is likely that the Amish, Mennonites, and Hutterites will fall under the religious conscience exemption, but it is not clear that Muslims will do so. Nor is it clear that any Muslims would wish to be exempted. Muslims buy automobile insurance where it is required by law.

_________________
"Someone should tell Mrs. Reagan that young people -- not even young people on drugs -- are not the ones responsible for the major problems besetting the world!" John Irving, A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Novel, p. 370.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:57 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
Off to her usual start.... :P

Quote:
PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE.

Plaintiff Orly Taitz is a citizen of the State of California, tax payer and a registered
voter with a business address of 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100 Rancho Santa
Margarita CA 92688. Taitz was subjected to persecution, harassment and
defamation due to her legal actions, and bringing forward evidence showing
Barack Hussein Obama, currently occupying the position of the President of the
US and a presumptive nominee for the 2012 Presidential general election, to be
usurping the US presidency by fraud and false pretences and use of forged
identification papers.
:^o


](*,)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:59 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
Quote:
Defendant Alvin T. Onaka (hereinafter "Onaka") is being sued in his capacity as
the registrar of the Department of Health, who certified a computer forgery, claiming it to be a true and correct copy of Obama's 1961 typewritten birth
certificate.


=)) =)) =))

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 4216
realist wrote:
Off to her usual start.... :P

See, it is correctly filed here in the Eligibility Lawsuits forum. No worries. ;)

_________________
@Orly: "No one is listening to you anymore. And that’s the way it should always be." - Scott J. Tepper (11/5/2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:56 am
Posts: 331
Location: I stay ova dea.
realist wrote:
:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=148762 :evil:

[b]Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt



Oy ](*,)

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp

_________________
If money is the root of all evil, why do churches constantly ask for it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Kailua, HI (home) Honolulu, HI (work)
Occupation: Development Director for The Arc in Hawaii (non-profit supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities)
Jeez - this is it? This is her "new" approach? Recycled scare tactics about the ACA, debunked here by snopes, plus, also, too, a list of her usual usurperin' and RICO charges against her usual suspects?

Lena, you're startin' to :yawn: me.

_________________
"This leap...is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity."
Judge Clay D. Land - Oct. 13, 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6405
Location: Edmonds, WA
Quote:
"New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt."


There's a slight problem with the above.

Dr. Orly is lying. (yeah, I know, shock and amazement)

Snopes

Quote:
"The fact is that the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PPACA) legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama does not include language which specifically exempts members of any particular religion from health insurance requirements (nor does it use the word "dhimmitude").
The bill contains a general "religious conscience" provision which establishes guidelines under which religious groups which have established conscientious objections to certain forms of insurance may seek exemption from health insurance requirements:

Quote:
RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMPTION — Such term shall not include any individual for any month if such individual has in effect an exemption under section 1311(d)(4)(H) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which certifies that such individual is a member of a recognized religious sect or division thereof described in section 1402(g)(1) and an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division as described in such section.

The key issue here is the determination of which religious groups' members might qualify for this exemption, an issue that has not yet been decided (and probably won't be for some time to come). Such members would have to be adherents of a religion or sect "described in section 1402(g)(1)" of the Internal Revenue Code, which governs exemptions from the payment of Social Security and Medicare taxes on self-employment income:"


FactCheck

Quote:
"Since we posted our article, we’ve obtained a list through the Freedom of Information Act of all the groups that have successfully applied for exemptions from payroll taxes. The overwhelming majority of them are explicitly Anabaptist — that is, Mennonite, Amish or Hutterite. Those that don’t specify their denomination are still explicitly Christian. Having gone through the list, we can say with certainty that no Muslim group, and indeed no non-Christian group, has ever qualified for an exemption under the statute used to define exempt religious groups in the health care law.

Nor are they likely to want to, says Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which opposes discrimination and defamation against Muslims. "I’ve never even heard it brought up as an issue," Hooper told us. "I have health insurance. We give health insurance to our employees. Every Muslim group I know of does the same thing." Hooper told us that he has seen some Muslims raise religious objections to life insurance, but not health insurance, and that, in fact, providing health coverage is very much in line with Islamic ideals of social justice.

As for "dhimmitude," it’s a politically charged academic concept, not a tenet of Muslim faith. The term was coined by scholar Bat Ye’or to describe the condition of the "dhimmis," protected non-Muslims living in Muslim empires starting in the 7th century. Dhimmi populations, Ye’or says, were allowed by their lands’ Muslim conquerors to keep property and practice their faith, as long as they paid a poll tax. It is Ye’or’s assertion that the condition of dhimmitude still persists in countries under shari’a law, and that, furthermore, it is spreading worldwide. In particular, she says, Europeans are accepting a state of dhimmitude and moving toward becoming "Eurabia." This position is controversial, and Ye’or is not secretive about her political commitments. For instance, she is a vocal supporter of Geert Wilders, the Dutch politician who was once banned from the United Kingdom because of his inflammatory anti-Islam views. For the e-mail to present "dhimmitude" as an established Muslim value rather than a scholarly concept from an author with open political commitments is misleading."


About.com

Quote:
"Could Muslims seek exemption from the health care reform law? Yes, but they have given no indication of intending to do so.

Muslims living in non-Islamic countries such as the United States do not believe it is a sin to comply with the health care reform law.

The Muslim scholar Sheikh Muhammed Al-Munajjid advises those practicing Islam in such countries: "If you are forced to take out insurance and there is an accident, it is permissible for you to take from the insurance company the same amount as the payments you have made, but you should not take any more than that. If they force you to take it then you should donate it to charity."

Until that belief changes, the email about Muslims exempt from the health care reform law being circulated by conspiracy theorists remains bogus."


By citing something that's been openly debunked like this, Dr. Orly is rather openly showing her anti-Muslim bigotry and hatred.

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1428
She will never, ever stop until she is sanctioned into bankruptcy or disbarred. Ever.

In other words, I look forward to at least 4 more years here at FB :)

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2114
Disbarment won't stop her. Bankruptcy might, but disbarment won't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:05 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
Obama is a citizen of 4 countries, apparently. none of which are the U.S.

Quote:
3. There was no determination whether US citizens rights were violated due
to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama, ll (Hereinafter "Obama") the
individual who signed the Healthcare bill into law did so under false
pretenses, being a foreign national, citizen of lndonesia, Kenya and Great
Britain,
who got into the position of the US President and signed the bill into law, used a name that is not legally his and was never legitimate for the office, due to his use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification
papers: a forged Birth Certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a
fraudulently obtained Social Security number, which was never assigned to
him.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3773
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
Quote:
4 Affidavit of assistant registrar of the state of Hawaii Timothy Adams, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.


Well whaddaya know, a truthful statement for a change, except of course Timmeh was not an "assistant registrar".

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am
Posts: 566
I can't decide if Orly is Ebeneezer Scrooge dragging around the chains of all her past cases or Madame Defarge knitting all of her previous legal failures into the final accounting of all who will hang for their treason.

What a masterpiece of legal nitwittery!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1428
AnitaMaria wrote:
Disbarment won't stop her. Bankruptcy might, but disbarment won't.



Not clear on what you mean here. Are you saying that she would try to continue? Because as far as a I know, she would be breaking the law directly if she tried to continue practicing law after being disbarred? Am I incorrect on that?

I doubt she could be sanctioned out of the game. Not with a a rich husband.

Like I said - we are gauranteed 4 more years of this, at least. Because the Cal Bar will never, ever disbar her. And sanctions seem like a dream for us but not the reality (pathetically).

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4566
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
This is just a potpourri of teh crazy.

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Kailua, HI (home) Honolulu, HI (work)
Occupation: Development Director for The Arc in Hawaii (non-profit supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities)
To Bill, re: your question about disbarment vs. bankruptcy:

Not speaking for Anita, but many of us think Orly will keep right on filing as a pro-se if she's disbarred.

_________________
"This leap...is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity."
Judge Clay D. Land - Oct. 13, 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
A new Orlyword... Obamatax

Quote:
"Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"
(PPACA) ObamaTax (Hereinafter "Obamatax")
:lol:

And she also appears to be equating the "Obamatax" to an Income Tax. ](*,)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am
Posts: 5518
Occupation: retired
No, she won't stop if she is disbarred. She would continue using lawsuits to smear and do it pro se as she has already done.

It's all about sending out the news to 30,000 media outlets. Yulia must have been busy adding all those media outlets or is there some master list you can buy.

_________________
Mark Twain
Quote:
Research shows that 87.666 per cent of all statistics are made up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3370
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
Yeah, this is gonna end well.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2474
Note that it's TAITZ v .... barred or unbarred, just the same loony foos.

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
I thought it looked so earlier. Yep, dumbass is calling "Obamatax" an Income Tax. ](*,)

Quote:
Consequently, new Obama Judeo-Christian
federal income tax
was brought about by a foreign national, a Muslim
citizen of lndonesia Barack(Barry) Soetoro(Obama). lt heavily taxes
American citizens of Christian and Jewish religion, while exempting
Muslims and making Christians and Jews pay a Jizya for the cost of
Healthcare provided to Muslims.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2114
BillTheCat wrote:
Not clear on what you mean here. Are you saying that she would try to continue? Because as far as a I know, she would be breaking the law directly if she tried to continue practicing law after being disbarred? Am I incorrect on that?


She only needs a law license if she wants to represent clients. She doesn't need a law license to sue if she is the only plaintiff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TAITZ v SEBELIUS, et al.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:27 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23560
As to her request for class action certification and a class representative, plaintiff Taitz states...

Quote:
Taitz will fairly and adequately [-( protect the interests of the class.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 532 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 22  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group