First off, I did not admit a damn thing. Secondly I am not going to argue with you about this.

To You Tube:

Not accurate, Mr. Hemenway does in fact have a computer, however, he is not signed up on the ECF System and the Court is aware of this. For this reason, Hemenway does not receive emails when documents are filed. Berg and Joyce were never provided log-in and passwords although they made application. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Courts just recently began using the ECF system

Let's not thread-jack, y'all.

There are questions for you in your thread Don, if your interested.

fair enough, We can go to my thread, However anything to be directed to lisa also go down there for now

So, a question, and your post is related to this thread, so I will ask here.

So, if the court communications strictly electronically, is it the courts responsibility to make sure that Berg et al gets the Judge's orders and requests for information. I personally think that it is Bergs, and Berg had an opportunity, a window of several wees, to gain entrance to the DC courts. Berg choose not to. So, is the court supposed to make special accommodations for Berg because Hemenway and Berg didn't do what they needed to to have access to the courts communication system? Do you know if such an accommodation was requested?

It is like having a student who takes an online class but doesn't have a computer. Then the student complains about the class even when the student knew that the class only used online communications.

LMK: Yes, it is the Court's responsibility in fact they must file a proof of service, which they have also failed to do. You can check pacer. Berg never had an Opportunity to address the Court. It was up to the Judge to set the Court date, Berg couldn't have done it. In fact, Berg, Hemenway and Joyce filed another motion re: pro hac vice, the court still to date has not responded - see Pacer. Yes an accomodation was requested and if you check pacer you would know this

So, once again Berg lied when he said Hemenway did not have a computer. Thank you for that.

Who is filling you with this nonsense, Don? The court in any jurisdiction does not care one iota whether an attorney is admitted to practice there. It is NOT the court's responsibility to admit anyone to practice before them. It was NOT the court's duty to schedule a pro hac vice hearing, it was clearly Berg's and Joyce's.

They can file all the motions they want, but unless they request a hearing, in light of the court's ruling, they're not going to be admitted. He clearly told them the only way they would be admitted was to come before him in open court.

Could be, but in her case, it's more likely that it is the State of Confusion.

Didn't someone mention that Berg has a brief due today?

Yes, I'm pretty sure that his Reply (if he so chooses to file one) is due today. Nothing showing up on PACER, but ... PACER can be behind a day or two - and it's not yet midnight EDT so... will have to see.

I posted earlier that, on his radio show on Monday, he stated that Obama had filed his reply, and that they were now waiting on the court to make a decision...schedule oral argument, deny or affirm the lower court's decision, at least intimating that they were not going to file a reply brief. And then, of course, if affirmed they are taking it back to SCOTUS...a complete waste of time.

Of course, it was Berg stating the above, so who knows.

How many Obama losses has Berg had to date?

Sounds like OC is taking our advise and giving info to their members rather than having their members look to us for updates!

Bravo, OC!!!

Yeah, but Agent 88? WTF are you talking about, broseph?

Phil didn't even file a reply brief in Berg v. Obama in the Third Circuit, far as I know. I'm almost positive he's not a judge on that court. So how the hell's he gonna file an Order to Show Cause?

Maybe he means a response to the OSC in Hollister? That's in the D.C. District Court, not the Third Circuit ... and John Hemenway is eleventeen different kinds of fool, if he let Phil Berg write that response. It's his ass on the line, not Phil's. If I was Hemenway, I wouldn't let Phil write the proof of service.

Maybe he meant an appeal of Robertson's order in Hollister? That would be the D.C. Circuit, not the Third.

You're confusin' the poor ol' rooster, Agent 88. That's not nice!

Isn't Lisa Agent 88? If so, what a dope. Regardless, nothing has changed. They're still releasing false information.

Secret message, invisible ink. Highlight to read:

I heard that Agent 88 was our deepest undercover secret agent, allison.

If someone has any info on whether or not something was filed regarding Hem's possible sanctions, would love to know.

today was the day they had to show why sanctions should not be imposed. Call me curious. It's a nice name. Unless you're a cat. (need to change my avatar.)

If they filed today, it probably won't show up on PACER until tomorrow, at least, maybe Wednesday.

It has been filed - and is available in this new thread.

Docket doesn't yet reflect this but Berg just said (on the Don & Ray Show) that the Court has tentatively scheduled Oral Argument for mid-May.

He just elaborated as follows: Court sent letter asking counsel to confirm whether they were available for oral argument on 5 dates in May. Per Phil, this means that oral argument WILL be scheduled, although it could be pushed to June or July. Per Phil, this is very encouraging because that means that the Court "wants to hear what we have to say."

Think this is true?