Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:58 am 
Youtube-said-so wrote:
Prove it Donny.. Prove it's not all the time, besides one time is to many for a lawyer... Berg & Lisa are incompetent and you just admitted it..



First off, I did not admit a damn thing. Secondly I am not going to argue with you about this.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:06 am 
To You Tube:

Not accurate, Mr. Hemenway does in fact have a computer, however, he is not signed up on the ECF System and the Court is aware of this. For this reason, Hemenway does not receive emails when documents are filed. Berg and Joyce were never provided log-in and passwords although they made application. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Courts just recently began using the ECF system


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
Let's not thread-jack, y'all.

There are questions for you in your thread Don, if your interested.

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:08 am 
fair enough, We can go to my thread, However anything to be directed to lisa also go down there for now


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
Don Houston wrote:
To You Tube:

Not accurate, Mr. Hemenway does in fact have a computer, however, he is not signed up on the ECF System and the Court is aware of this. For this reason, Hemenway does not receive emails when documents are filed. Berg and Joyce were never provided log-in and passwords although they made application. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Courts just recently began using the ECF system


So, a question, and your post is related to this thread, so I will ask here.

So, if the court communications strictly electronically, is it the courts responsibility to make sure that Berg et al gets the Judge's orders and requests for information. I personally think that it is Bergs, and Berg had an opportunity, a window of several wees, to gain entrance to the DC courts. Berg choose not to. So, is the court supposed to make special accommodations for Berg because Hemenway and Berg didn't do what they needed to to have access to the courts communication system? Do you know if such an accommodation was requested?

It is like having a student who takes an online class but doesn't have a computer. Then the student complains about the class even when the student knew that the class only used online communications.

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:19 am 
LMK: Yes, it is the Court's responsibility in fact they must file a proof of service, which they have also failed to do. You can check pacer. Berg never had an Opportunity to address the Court. It was up to the Judge to set the Court date, Berg couldn't have done it. In fact, Berg, Hemenway and Joyce filed another motion re: pro hac vice, the court still to date has not responded - see Pacer. Yes an accomodation was requested and if you check pacer you would know this


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23944
Don Houston wrote:
To You Tube:

Not accurate, Mr. Hemenway does in fact have a computer, however, he is not signed up on the ECF System and the Court is aware of this. For this reason, Hemenway does not receive emails when documents are filed. Berg and Joyce were never provided log-in and passwords although they made application. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Courts just recently began using the ECF system


So, once again Berg lied when he said Hemenway did not have a computer. Thank you for that.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23944
Don Houston wrote:
LMK: Yes, it is the Court's responsibility in fact they must file a proof of service, which they have also failed to do. You can check pacer. Berg never had an Opportunity to address the Court. It was up to the Judge to set the Court date, Berg couldn't have done it. In fact, Berg, Hemenway and Joyce filed another motion re: pro hac vice, the court still to date has not responded - see Pacer. Yes an accomodation was requested and if you check pacer you would know this


Who is filling you with this nonsense, Don? The court in any jurisdiction does not care one iota whether an attorney is admitted to practice there. It is NOT the court's responsibility to admit anyone to practice before them. It was NOT the court's duty to schedule a pro hac vice hearing, it was clearly Berg's and Joyce's.

They can file all the motions they want, but unless they request a hearing, in light of the court's ruling, they're not going to be admitted. He clearly told them the only way they would be admitted was to come before him in open court.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:01 am
Posts: 740
Occupation: Adverb specialist in the French Ministry of Language Purity
PatGund wrote:
Curious Blue wrote:
LM K wrote:

Has Berg practiced law in other states besides PA?


Yes. He has extensive experience in the State of Denial.


Isn't Dr. Orly admitted to the bar in that State as well?



Could be, but in her case, it's more likely that it is the State of Confusion. :lol:

_________________
I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 19025
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Didn't someone mention that Berg has a brief due today?

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:43 pm 
mimi wrote:
Didn't someone mention that Berg has a brief due today?


Yes, I'm pretty sure that his Reply (if he so chooses to file one) is due today. Nothing showing up on PACER, but ... PACER can be behind a day or two - and it's not yet midnight EDT so... will have to see.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23944
Tes wrote:
mimi wrote:
Didn't someone mention that Berg has a brief due today?


Yes, I'm pretty sure that his Reply (if he so chooses to file one) is due today. Nothing showing up on PACER, but ... PACER can be behind a day or two - and it's not yet midnight EDT so... will have to see.


I posted earlier that, on his radio show on Monday, he stated that Obama had filed his reply, and that they were now waiting on the court to make a decision...schedule oral argument, deny or affirm the lower court's decision, at least intimating that they were not going to file a reply brief. And then, of course, if affirmed they are taking it back to SCOTUS...a complete waste of time.

Of course, it was Berg stating the above, so who knows. :roll:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
How many Obama losses has Berg had to date?

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
Quote:
by Agent 88 on Today, 02:11

We should have a release of the order to show cause that should be filed Today with the 3rd Circuit Court. Yo will want to to view this when it is posted and we will inform you when that happens. We caanot release it until the document is filed with he court and it appears on Pacer.

Agent 88


Sounds like OC is taking our advise and giving info to their members rather than having their members look to us for updates!

Bravo, OC!!!

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 13281
Location: location, location
Occupation: Rocket surgeon
Image Yeah, but Agent 88? WTF are you talking about, broseph?

Phil didn't even file a reply brief in Berg v. Obama in the Third Circuit, far as I know. I'm almost positive he's not a judge on that court. So how the hell's he gonna file an Order to Show Cause?

Maybe he means a response to the OSC in Hollister? That's in the D.C. District Court, not the Third Circuit ... and John Hemenway is eleventeen different kinds of fool, if he let Phil Berg write that response. It's his ass on the line, not Phil's. If I was Hemenway, I wouldn't let Phil write the proof of service.

Maybe he meant an appeal of Robertson's order in Hollister? That would be the D.C. Circuit, not the Third.

You're confusin' the poor ol' rooster, Agent 88. Image That's not nice!

_________________
Ankeny and progeny live together in perfect harmony ...



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23944
LM K wrote:
Quote:
by Agent 88 on Today, 02:11

We should have a release of the order to show cause that should be filed Today with the 3rd Circuit Court. Yo will want to to view this when it is posted and we will inform you when that happens. We caanot release it until the document is filed with he court and it appears on Pacer.

Agent 88


Sounds like OC is taking our advise and giving info to their members rather than having their members look to us for updates!

Bravo, OC!!!


Isn't Lisa Agent 88? If so, what a dope. Regardless, nothing has changed. They're still releasing false information.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 13281
Location: location, location
Occupation: Rocket surgeon
realist wrote:
Isn't Lisa Agent 88?

Secret message, invisible ink. Highlight to read:

I heard that Agent 88 was our deepest undercover secret agent, allison.

_________________
Ankeny and progeny live together in perfect harmony ...



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23944
Foggy wrote:
realist wrote:
Isn't Lisa Agent 88?

Secret message, invisible ink. Highlight to read:

I heard that Agent 88 was our deepest undercover secret agent, allison.


:shock:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 19025
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Image

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 19025
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
If someone has any info on whether or not something was filed regarding Hem's possible sanctions, would love to know.

today was the day they had to show why sanctions should not be imposed. Call me curious. It's a nice name. Unless you're a cat. (need to change my avatar.)

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23944
mimi wrote:
If someone has any info on whether or not something was filed regarding Hem's possible sanctions, would love to know.

today was the day they had to show why sanctions should not be imposed. Call me curious. It's a nice name. Unless you're a cat. (need to change my avatar.)


If they filed today, it probably won't show up on PACER until tomorrow, at least, maybe Wednesday.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:54 pm 
mimi wrote:
If someone has any info on whether or not something was filed regarding Hem's possible sanctions, would love to know.


It has been filed - and is available in this new thread.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:25 pm 
Docket doesn't yet reflect this but Berg just said (on the Don & Ray Show) that the Court has tentatively scheduled Oral Argument for mid-May.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:39 pm 
Tes wrote:
Docket doesn't yet reflect this but Berg just said (on the Don & Ray Show) that the Court has tentatively scheduled Oral Argument for mid-May.

He just elaborated as follows: Court sent letter asking counsel to confirm whether they were available for oral argument on 5 dates in May. Per Phil, this means that oral argument WILL be scheduled, although it could be pushed to June or July. Per Phil, this is very encouraging because that means that the Court "wants to hear what we have to say."


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 9:19 pm
Posts: 5566
Quote:
He just elaborated as follows: Court sent letter asking counsel to confirm whether they were available for oral argument on 5 dates in May. Per Phil, this means that oral argument WILL be scheduled, although it could be pushed to June or July. Per Phil, this is very encouraging because that means that the Court "wants to hear what we have to say."


Think this is true?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group