Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
bob wrote:
mimi wrote:
It's dead. Yes?

Allen can now appeal the denial w/r/t Obama. Won't the 9th be thrilled....


And voila!!! Allen wasted no time in doing so.

New Docket Entries...

Quote:
01/19/2011 52 ORDER of USCA as to 49 Notice of Appeal filed by Kenneth L Allen. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant shall: file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis; pay $455 to the district court as docketing & filing fees for this appeal & provide proof of payment to this court; or otherwise show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit. Failure to do so will result in automaticac dismissal of this appeal.(BAC) (Entered: 01/24/2011)

01/13/2011 51 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER of USCA as to 49 Notice of Appeal filed by Kenneth L Allen. (GCP) (Entered: 01/14/2011)

01/13/2011 50 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 11-15094 for 49 Notice of Appeal as to 27 Order on Motion to Dismiss Count/Claims. (GCP) (Entered: 01/14/2011)

01/12/2011 49 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit, as to 27 Order on Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief by Kenneth L Allen. (GCP) (Entered: 01/12/2011)


remaining link shortly

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
NINTH CIRCUIT DOCKET...

Quote:
Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-15094 Docketed: 01/13/2011
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Kenneth Allen v. Barry Soetoro, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Arizona, Tucson
Fee Status: Due

Case Type Information:
1) civil
2) united states
3) null

Originating Court Information:
District: 0970-4 : 4:09-cv-00373-FRZ
Trial Judge: Frank R. Zapata, Senior District Judge
Date Filed: 07/06/2009
Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA:
01/04/2011 01/04/2011 01/12/2011 01/12/2011

01/13/2011 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 02/11/2011. Transcript due 03/14/2011. Appellant Kenneth Lee Allen opening brief due 04/22/2011. Appellee Hillary Rodham Clinton, Appellee Department of Homeland Security, Appellee Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, Appellee Janet Napolitano, Appellee Barry Soetoro, Appellee U.S. Citzenship and Immigration Services and Appellee United States Department of State answering brief due 05/23/2011. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7610772] (HC)

01/19/2011 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:CKP):A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant has not paid the docketing and filing fees for this appeal. Within 21 days from the date of entry of this order, appellant shall: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) pay $455.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court; or (3) otherwise show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [7616971] (CKP)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7868
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
I will add these to the calendar later today.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4137
Location: Southwest of down east
realist wrote:
And voila!!! Allen wasted no time in doing so.


Nope. =)) =))

Actually, I think this is Act II, Attempt II. :lol:

IIRC, when the district court initially dismissed his claims with respect to the President, he tried filing an interloctory appeal while the Stanley Ann/Lolo dead-people drama was still unfolding.

Edit: Slight rewording

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
Piffle wrote:
realist wrote:
And voila!!! Allen wasted no time in doing so.


Nope. =)) =))

Actually, I think this is Attempt II, Act II.

IIRC, when the district court initially dismissed his claims with respect to the President, he tried filing an interloctory appeal while the Stanley Ann drama was still unfolding.


You recall correctly.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
01/27/2011 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD $455.00 Date paid: 01/27/2011. [7627375] (RT)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
Additional Docket Entries...

Quote:
02/01/2011 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Helen L. Gilbert for Appellees Hillary Rodham Clinton, DHS, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Barry Soetoro, U.S. Citzenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of State. Date of service: 02/01/2011. [7631891] (HLG)

02/01/2011 5 Received Appellant Kenneth Lee Allen notice regarding notice of payment of fees $455. [7632230] (MT)

02/01/2011 6 Added attorney Helen L. Gilbert for Barry Soetoro, in case 11-15094. [7632439] (MT)


Just as a reminder, these are the initial deadlines set:

Quote:
Transcript ordered by 02/11/2011. [highlight]Transcript due 03/14/2011[/highlight]. Appellant Kenneth Lee Allen [highlight]opening brief due 04/22/2011[/highlight]

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
04/14/2011 7 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Kenneth Lee Allen (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 11 pages. Four copies Excerpts of record in 1 volume. Served on 04/12/2011. [7720901] (GLS)


IIRC, this case was settled in large part and is very limited in scope now. BB may remember the instance of the earlier settlement or may have the documents handy. (If I have time I'll find it and post it, but I'm kind of under a time deadline this evening).

link shortly

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9402
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Executive summary: Word salad "explaining" why he should have been granted Obama's records.

Choc full o' crazy.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20294
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Because nothing quite says you're serious than when you

1. Call the President "Barry Soetoro" and claim he's an illegal alien.
2. Sue Mr. Obama's dead mother and step-father.
3. Puff that you, the appellant, are a natural born citizen (so there!).
4. Tell the court it should find the applicable law since legal research is such a bitch.
5. State that you will be seeking Donald Trump's help in prosecuting the President, or some such.

While Allen appears to have created this abominaton, he's apparently also put the name of a real lawyer on the cover of the brief. Or is that opposing counsel?

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:22 am
Posts: 38
Location: Christchurch. New Zealand
Nice,

gives props to Philip J. Berg for the whole Indonesian adoption thing and then tries Orly's tactic of asking others to do the work for him.

"I'm reaching out to Donald Trump..."

although I note that there is no mention of any SSN's at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Because nothing quite says you're serious than when you

1. Call the President "Barry Soetoro" and claim he's an illegal alien.
2. Sue Mr. Obama's dead mother and step-father.
3. Puff that you, the appellant, are a natural born citizen (so there!).
4. Tell the court it should find the applicable law since legal research is such a bitch.
5. State that you will be seeking Donald Trump's help in prosecuting the President, or some such.

While Allen appears to have created this abominaton, he's apparently also put the name of a real lawyer on the cover of the brief. Or is that opposing counsel?


Helen Gilbert... representing the Appellees.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20294
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Figures. He must have attended classes at Taft Law Skool with Orly Taitz. (Or maybe Freedom Law School.)

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4137
Location: Southwest of down east
Sovereign Citizen Allen wrote:
9. Have you filed any previous cases that have been decided by this court? Yes
10-15290, Allen v Soetoro
04-16308, Allen v. Internal Revenue Service
[highlight]2 other appeals that I can’t remember the numbers.[/highlight]


=)) =)) =))

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
Piffle wrote:
Sovereign Citizen Allen wrote:
9. Have you filed any previous cases that have been decided by this court? Yes
10-15290, Allen v Soetoro
04-16308, Allen v. Internal Revenue Service
[highlight]2 other appeals that I can’t remember the numbers.[/highlight]


=)) =)) =))


Perhaps I can help him out...

From the Ninth Circuit:

Quote:
03-15894
Allen v. IRS, et al 05/14/2003 Kenneth Lee Allen 01/25/2005 12:07:00 CV-03-00070-DKD
U.S. District Court for Arizona, Phoenix

04-16308
Allen v. IRS, et al 06/30/2004 Kenneth Lee Allen 09/14/2006 15:21:00 CV-03-01698-FJM
U.S. District Court for Arizona, Phoenix

04-35736
Iliaifar v. Parksion, et al 08/27/2004 Kenneth Lee Allen 02/08/2006 13:46:00 CV-04-00244-DCA
U.S. District Court for Oregon, Portland

04-56337
Allen, et al v. Pierce, et al 11/03/2005 Kenneth Lee Allen 01/03/2008 11:08:00 AZ-04-01604-KMoS
BAP, 9th Circuit

10-15290
Kenneth Allen v. Barry Soetoro, et al 02/09/2010 Kenneth Lee Allen 05/04/2010 09:54:28 4:09-cv-00373-FRZ
U.S. District Court for Arizona, Tucson

11-15094
Kenneth Allen v. Barry Soetoro, et al 01/13/2011 Kenneth Lee Allen 04/18/2011 16:17:18 4:09-cv-00373-FRZ
U.S. District Court for Arizona, Tucson

93-15906
Allen, et al v. USA, et al 05/19/1993 Kenneth Lee Allen 08/31/1995 13:16:00 CV-92-01010-PMP
U.S. District Court for Nevada, Las Vegas

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5579
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
For his Privacy Act argument Allen freakin' plagiarized a 2009 "article" from the New American. Word for word. He's passing off a publication of the John Birch Society as his appeallant (sic) brief.

_________________
“When I ran the Social Security number through Locate Plus, which is a commercial database that's used by private nvestigators and law enforcement personnel and attorneys, the only person who was associated and affiliated with xxx-xx-4425 was Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.” - sworn testimony of former U.S. Immigration and Customs enforcement officer John N. Sampson, January 26, 2012


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
05/23/2011 9 Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Hillary Rodham Clinton, DHS, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Barry Soetoro, U.S. Citzenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of State. Date of service: 05/23/2011. [7761098] (HLG)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20294
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
A preview of the Government's position in Taitz v. Astrue.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:18 pm
Posts: 2468
Location: Paris, France
Do you think it makes these idiots feel important to have responses to their crap filed with names like President Obama Eric Holder Hilary Clinton excetera on them? The dork in me would find it kind of cool even if I am on the opposing side.

_________________
Incorrible. Please do not incorrige me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9708
Maru wrote:
Do you think it makes these idiots feel important to have responses to their crap filed with names like President Obama Eric Holder Hilary Clinton excetera on them? The dork in me would find it kind of cool even if I am on the opposing side.


That's why they do this bullshit. They desperately want to be in a titantic battle against people who actually matter. They don't realize they're just gnats being swatted with a fly-swatter.

_________________
"[T]he American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered together under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages, and. . .they grow more timorous, more sniveling, more poltroonish, more ignominious every day." H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 3203
Location: LA,CA
Occupation: Game designer and code monkey
Maru wrote:
Do you think it makes these idiots feel important to have responses to their crap filed with names like President Obama Eric Holder Hilary Clinton excetera on them?

Yes, I do. "Look -- I'm dealing at the highest levels, and making them jump through hoops and respond to ME. It shows I'm really important (no matter what miserable existence I have IRL)!"

Attention: babies cry for it, men die for it.

_________________
Ducktape

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear And disregards the rest." Paul Simon, The Boxer
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 10775
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
A preview of the Government's position in Taitz v. Astrue.


Quote:
See also Strunk v. U.S. Dep’t of State , 693 F. Supp. 2d 112, 115 (D.D.C. 2010


\:D/

_________________
"All this talk about blowjobs makes me want to SUE SOMEBODY"-- Sterngard Friegen (quoting Thomas Jefferson)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7375
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
ducktape wrote:
Maru wrote:
Do you think it makes these idiots feel important to have responses to their crap filed with names like President Obama Eric Holder Hilary Clinton excetera on them?

Yes, I do. "Look -- I'm dealing at the highest levels, and making them jump through hoops and respond to ME. It shows I'm really important (no matter what miserable existence I have IRL)!"

Attention: babies cry for it, men die for it.

I've been meaning to comment in this vein for some time.

I think it's more than attention whoring. I think it connects to the essential racism that runs under much of birfism. I think most of these asshats generate a little frisson of power and superiority simply by typing "Barack H. Obama, Defendant." He's halfway to the gallows in their mind's eye, before the toner dries.

Edit: verb shit

_________________
Imagex3 Image
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination.
Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of
unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension
of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over
into the Orly Zone."
-- Geritol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23943
New Docket Entries...

Quote:
05/23/2011 10 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [9] submitted by Hillary Rodham Clinton, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a red cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7761744] (GLS)

05/24/2011 12 Filed Appellee Hillary Rodham Clinton, et al. supplemental excerpts of record on appeal in 2 volumes. [7767148] (GLS)

05/25/2011 11 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [9] filed by Hillary Rodham Clinton. [7764447] (SD)

06/03/2011 13 Received Appellant Kenneth Lee Allen notice regarding judicial notice-evidence. [7775708] (MT)


Document 12 is not available for download.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ALLEN v SOETORO - ACT II
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:19 am
Posts: 270
Location: Chicago area - Illinois
If I have the correct case, the appeals court affirmed the dismissal.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/memoranda/v ... 0000012105

_________________
"ignoring Orly Taitz is not among the crimes listed in 18 U.S.C. § 1962" – Memorandum in Taitz v. Democrat Party of Mississippi


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group