At Before It's News, Linda Jordan has had an epiphany:



Okay .... Now let's take a look at the pdf of the LFBC:



Bingo! They got him on creating a signature on a forged document and for violating Hawaii's law about using ink on vital statistics certificates.

Cue the frogmarchers! Off with their heads!!!!

More at the link: http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1945/875/Major_Discovery_In_Obama_s_LFBC_And_It_s_In_The_Ink.html

But... how can just an image on the interwebs have ink? Shirley they are not admitting its a real paper document?...

Will these morans ever figure out that to perform a forensic analysis on a document you actually need to look at the document itself? And everything else is utter bullshit.

Rhetorical.

Appears that Linda never used a fountain pen. That's can happen when one doesn't have a bar/bat mitzvah.

Obama is Jewish?

Actually, that was their mantra before the LFBC. Saint Sandra Lines herself said you had to look at the original document.

But that was because the COLB was a JPEG, a graphic, a mere scan. It wasn't a document.

The LFBC is a PDF, which means "portable DOCUMENT format". What part of the word "document" is too hard for you?

lol, first comment in the article:



Who the heck is "Dr. LaVendar"

E.F. Lavender of course, from the Bomford BC.

Exactly. Wasn't the whole conclusion of the Posse that the long-form was a computer-generated document?

It's great when you can have it both ways.

God forbid the photos of the Wright brothers' first tests at Kitty Hawk had had layers.

We'd probably still have "flyers," or "grounders," who believe airplanes can't fly. It'd be AviationGate.

I mean, just look at a 747. You can tell from looking at it that it can't suspend itself in the air. It weighs 300 tons!

You don't even need to go back to the Constitution -- it's natural law! Heavy things fall.

That's why Judith Corley is lying when she says she "flew" to Hawai'i and back to get the LFBC.

Sheesh.

Speaking of ink, here's a nice new conspiracy from Freep regarding ink:



The reason "THEY" won't release the originals is that forensic testing of the ink will fail! Keep moving those goalposts, birthers.

And professional forgers keep a stockpile of inks from various eras.................

Not that it would ever happen, but doG the goalpost-moving would be entertaining if any of these "original" documents were subjected to competent forensic examination.

Oh, but those photos of the Wright brothers' flights do exist in digital format and they can be accessed on many webpages.
When you open them with Adobe Illustrator, what do you find ? .....layers.....each and every one of them. Layers galore.
Which gives us "probable cause " to doubt that the Wright brothers ever flew, and likely they themselves never existed.

Same with the B&W class photo of my 3rd grade class that I found on somebody's personal history webpage. Every one of those kids, including the tall kid in the back row making a squinty face (me)....they are all fake. And our teacher, Mrs. Warren, the spinster....I knew there was something spooky about her. She was too strict. Now layers confirm that she, too, was just a .pdf forgery that probably never existed.
As we use birthers' Illustrator investigation technique to dig through all the images on the internet, and discover layers in EVERY one of them...eventually we will have to conclude that none of them is authentic....not even our own vacation and wedding and home appraisal photos. We'll all be as inauthentic as Orly's 1500 pp package of nonsense ebbidence.

Thanks to the sleuthing of the birthers, we will have to accept that all of us are fake, like we are simply characters in an episode of the Twilight Zone. None of this is real, so that makes all of their accusations and conspiracy theories to be true.