Judd v. Obama (E.D. Cal.)

bob · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:46 am

"For completeness."

E.D. Cal. No. 13-537 (filed Mar. 18, 2013).

[H/T: AnitaMaria]

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:54 am

WTF? Again?

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:01 am

Not much, possibly just trying to lay some groundwork for something else.

All he's asking for is that the court declare Obama to be a British Citizen of Kenya East Africa and that he be declared a NBC.

http://www.archive.org/download/gov.usc ... 50.1.0.pdf

.

bob · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:13 am

GreatGrey wrote:

Not much, possibly just trying to lay some groundwork for something else.

That, or Judd's a prisoner with a lot of time on his hands.

Judd has standing because he is still campaigning to replace Obama and serve out the remaining term. :-bd

This won't survive 1915.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9708

bob wrote:

GreatGrey wrote:

Not much, possibly just trying to lay some groundwork for something else.

That, or Judd's a prisoner with a lot of time on his hands.

Judd has standing because he is still campaigning to replace Obama and serve out the remaining term. :-bd

This won't survive 1915.

Exactly what I was thinking. Recreational litigation by incarcerated prisoners proceeding in forma pauperis doesn't generally last very long these days.

ZekeB · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:21 pm

If he can install himself as president, can he pardon himself?

Piffle · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:32 pm

ZekeB wrote:

If he can install himself as president, can he pardon himself?

Yes, but the shorter path may be to get a pardon from President Turner who's already in office.

gatsby · **Posted:** Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:05 pm

Piffle wrote:

ZekeB wrote:

If he can install himself as president, can he pardon himself?

Yes, but the shorter path may be to get a pardon from President Turner who's already in office.

After today, Judd and Turner will need to do some pardon logrolling. :lol:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23934

Utterly ridiculous

Docket Update...

Quote:

Judd v. Obama et al
Assigned to: Judge Kimberly J. Mueller
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Allison Claire
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

Date Filed: 03/18/2013
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 441 Civil Rights: Voting
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

05/23/2013 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/22/13 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Service is appropriate for defendants President Barack Obama, Debra Bowen, and Democratic Party of California. Plaintiff is directed to submit service documents to the USM and a statement with the court that documents have been submitted within 21 days. The USM shall serve process within 90 days. (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/23/2013)

05/23/2013 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Barack Obama* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Keith Judd 11593-051* *Texarkana Federal Correction Institution* *PO Box 7000* *Texarkana, TX 75505*. (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/23/2013)

05/23/2013 5
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Deborah Bowen, Democratic Party of California* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Keith Judd 11593-051* *Texarkana Federal Correctional Institution* *PO Box 7000* *Texarkana, TX 75505*. (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/23/2013)

05/23/2013 6
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED;Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/30/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/23/2013)

05/23/2013
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, 4 Summons, 5 Summons, 6 Civil New Case Documents for KJM, one copy of the complaint and 3 USM Forms served on Keith Judd. (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/23/2013)

What an absolute crock. :evil:

Piffle · **Posted:** Thu May 23, 2013 4:02 pm

realist wrote:

What an absolute crock. :evil:

...from a baby Magistrate appointed in November, 2012 following a career spent in the public defender's office.

Last I looked, Judd was incarcerated (although not for much longer, IIRC) and his motion to proceed IFP has now been granted. This is what, about his thousandth suit?

Are we to assume that the Court has screened this (as the Court is required to do under the circumstances) and not deemed it frivolous? ](*,)

Edit: Added sentences 2 & 3

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Thu May 23, 2013 4:13 pm

Judd's complaint is better than anything Taitz has ever written.

I understand Judd will be getting out of prison this year. Perhaps he could get a job as a paralegal for Taitz.

It would be a great partnership. As long as he kept away from the dental chair.

Piffle · **Posted:** Thu May 23, 2013 4:30 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

It would be a great partnership. As long as he kept away from the dental chair.

What? After all of Orly's outrage about Berg hiring a paralegal with a criminal record?

Oh, I forgot: IOKIYAtwlithotu

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Thu May 23, 2013 4:46 pm

Berg only had one. When the case before Judge Carter was at its peak (i.e., soon after Taitz had miraculously served the defendants -- because the US Attorney's office finally agreed to accept service), she had THREE felons helping her, two of whom she was going to call to testify, and one of whom she was allegedly sharing her dental chair with and who was cranking out her pleadings in real English. (Indeed, as to the latter fellow, he changed his name AND was convicted for using a phony social security number. Will the ironies never end?)

Taitz's predilection for convicted felons continues. She associates with them and represents them in her abusive civil actions.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Judd v. Obama (E.D. Cal.)

Who is online