Orly Taitz Helps Convicted Rapist Threaten NC Elections Board

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:01 am

In a brilliant move, Orly accolyte Danny Alan Vestal filed the "COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD" (that's Hawaii §19-3, mind you ](*,)

) in all 100 counties in North Carolina.

=D>

$\:D/$

$\:D/$

Birther ballot mangling is way too much fun to be legal!

Edit: Chapter 163 of the North Carolina General Statutes can be found here.
Challenge to a Candidacy.

§ 163‑127.1. Definitions.

As used in this Article, the following terms mean:

(1) Board. – State Board of Elections.

(2) Candidate. – A person having filed a notice of candidacy under the appropriate statute for any elective office in this State.

(3) Challenger. – Any qualified voter registered in the same district as the office for which the candidate has filed or petitioned.

(4) Office. – The elected office for which the candidate has filed or petitioned. (2006‑155, s. 1; 2006‑259, s. 48(a).)

* * *

§ 163‑213.4. Nomination by State Board of Elections.

By the first Tuesday in February of the year preceding the North Carolina presidential preference primary, the chair of each political party shall submit to the State Board of Elections a list of its presidential candidates to be placed on the presidential preference primary ballot. The list must be comprised of candidates whose candidacy is generally advocated and recognized in the news media throughout the United States or in North Carolina, unless any such candidate executes and files with the chair of the political party an affidavit stating without qualification that the candidate is not and does not intend to become a candidate for nomination in the North Carolina Presidential Preference Primary Election. The State Board of Elections shall prepare and publish a list of the names of the presidential candidates submitted. The State Board of Elections shall convene in Raleigh on the first Tuesday in March preceding the presidential preference primary election. At the meeting required by this section, the State Board of Elections shall nominate as presidential primary candidates all candidates affiliated with a political party, recognized pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of Chapter 163 of the General Statutes, who have been submitted to the State Board of Elections. Immediately upon completion of these requirements, the Board shall release to the news media all such nominees selected. Provided, however, nothing shall prohibit the partial selection of nominees prior to the meeting required by this section, if all provisions herein have been complied with.

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:08 am

I was hesistant to start a new thread on this when I saw Orly's poopie. I'm not sure that emailing 100 election officials with a completely irrelevant document constitutes filing an "election challenge".

:-?

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:17 am

I posted it because Pambly's Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012 has listed it as the North Carolina challenge. Orly and the rest of the birferin' community apparently believe this complaint is sufficient to set everything in motion. WND runs an article on it in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... ("And now there are four!")

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:23 am

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

I posted it because Pambly's Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012 has listed it as the North Carolina challenge. Orly and the rest of the birferin' community apparently believe this complaint is sufficient to set everything in motion. WND runs an article on it in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... ("And now there are four!")

Well okay then. The birfers are probably right. North Carolina will frog march him outta there in 30 days.

jtmunkus · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:02 am

Foggy · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:30 am

jtmunkus has a stuck button on his keyboard. :shock:

FOR THE RECORD:

There is 0% chance that I will attend 100 election hearings in the 100 counties here.

Britty and yoda have Onslow County; I have Wake, and the rest are on their own.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:33 am

Foggy wrote:

jtmunkus has a stuck button on his keyboard. :shock:

FOR THE RECORD:

There is 0% chance that I will attend 100 election hearings in the 100 counties here.

Britty and yoda have Onslow County; I have Wake, and the rest are on their own.

Oooh, Yadkin! I gots relatives there!

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:18 pm

Whatever4 wrote:

Foggy wrote:

jtmunkus has a stuck button on his keyboard. :shock:

FOR THE RECORD:

There is 0% chance that I will attend 100 election hearings in the 100 counties here.

Britty and yoda have Onslow County; I have Wake, and the rest are on their own.

Oooh, Yadkin! I gots relatives there!

I have a friend or two in Wilkes -- but they are, sadly, Republicans; while thinking Orly is a loon as I am sure they must (both are, heavens, Pro-Choice and actually thinking individuals), they probably wouldn't want to take the time for what they see as helping BO.

Litlebritdifrnt2 · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:24 pm

Actually (if it ever comes to pass which I seriously doubt) I can cover Onslow, Carteret, Duplin, Jones and at a pinch Lenoir, Sampson, Pender, Craven, New Hanover. At my direction a certain person who I will not name but who is related to me by marriage ( :-*

) can cover Columbus, Brunswick, Bladen and Robeson.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:37 pm

Litlebritdifrnt2 wrote:

Actually (if it ever comes to pass which I seriously doubt) I can cover Onslow, Carteret, Duplin, Jones and at a pinch Lenoir, Sampson, Pender, Craven, New Hanover. At my direction a certain person who I will not name but who is related to me by marriage ( :-*

) can cover Columbus, Brunswick, Bladen and Robeson.

Before making plans to travel to multiple hearings, let's check North Carolina law on procedure. I highly doubt that Presidential primary candidates are required to qualify at the county level.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Litlebritdifrnt2 · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:02 pm

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Litlebritdifrnt2 wrote:

Actually (if it ever comes to pass which I seriously doubt) I can cover Onslow, Carteret, Duplin, Jones and at a pinch Lenoir, Sampson, Pender, Craven, New Hanover. At my direction a certain person who I will not name but who is related to me by marriage ( :-*

) can cover Columbus, Brunswick, Bladen and Robeson.

Before making plans to travel to multiple hearings, let's check North Carolina law on procedure. I highly doubt that Presidential primary candidates are required to qualify at the county level.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Like I said, if it ever comes to pass, which I seriously doubt. There is no way Orly is gonna spend the flying monkey airmiles to fly to every county in NC. Not gonna happen.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:16 am

If someone wishes to rely on 163-127.3, they should also take care to comply with .1 and .2.

Those 100 emails were not verified affidavits. There is no North Carolina challenge, IMO.

bob · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:19 pm

Quote:

update in NC

Danny wrote:

Just got off phone with [an N.C. elections investigator] who said he is in receipt of complaint and has forwarded it to [the general counsel for the state elections board].

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28790

Foggy · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:37 pm

Ooh, how exciting!

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:08 pm

bob wrote:

Quote:

update in NC

Danny wrote:

Just got off phone with [an N.C. elections investigator] who said he is in receipt of complaint and has forwarded it to [the general counsel for the state elections board].

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28790

Break out the champagne! The (defective) complaint has been RECEIVED!!! Woo hoo!!!!!!

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:10 pm

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Break out the champagne! The (defective) complaint has been RECEIVED!!! Woo hoo!!!!!!

This oughta be over quick.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:13 pm

raicha wrote:

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Break out the champagne! The (defective) complaint has been RECEIVED!!! Woo hoo!!!!!!

This oughta be over quick.

Orly can make a few substitutions in the caption of her petition to the New Hampshire Supreme Court and get this North Carolina case blazing on the rocket docket. Piece of cake now that she has all the research done.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:15 pm

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

raicha wrote:

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Break out the champagne! The (defective) complaint has been RECEIVED!!! Woo hoo!!!!!!

This oughta be over quick.

Orly can make a few substitutions in the caption of her petition to the New Hampshire Supreme Court and get this North Carolina case on the rocket docket. Piece of cake now that she has all the research done.

Well yes, it is very convenient that one state's law applies in every other. If the NH Supremes have jurisdiction, then certainly NC must.

Litlebritdifrnt2 · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:23 pm

Like I said, I know that this is going nowhere. I know that. BUT, in the wild offchance that it might, someone showing up in Onslow County before the Board of Elections and spouting the kind of stuff that Orly frequently spouts about our POTUS would not get a friendly reception. I have several attorney friends (male and female) who view the POTUS as their BFF. One particular female attorney here (my former boss) has been known to cut a bitch. Just saying.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23926

Quote:

Well yes, it is very convenient that one state's law applies in every other. If the NH Supremes have jurisdiction, then certainly NC must.

Well, of course they do, but not for the reasons you state (or might think).

It's really very simple. It's not so much that one state's laws apply to every other in the sense they are state laws. This is a matter of a "federal" election. All federal statutes are the same, to be applied equally. Therefore, federal election = federal law which then flows downwards to the individual states. Since they can make no law that (for lack of a better term and for the ease of understanding of lurking birthers) "trumps" federal law, federal law obviously applies, and applies equally to all states. Simple really.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:25 pm

Of course, because EVERY COURT has discretionary jurisdiction.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23926

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Of course, because EVERY COURT has discretionary jurisdiction.

Well, there you go. Now you're starting to "get it."

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:32 pm

Fine, you still haven't explained the Santa cartoon in the Fitzpatrick thread and now you want me to learn Orlylaw jurisdiction too?

pfffft yourself.

:twisted:

majorbabs · **Posted:** Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:32 am

bob wrote:

Quote:

update in NC

Danny wrote:

Just got off phone with [an N.C. elections investigator] who said he is in receipt of complaint and has forwarded it to [the general counsel for the state elections board].

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28790

Yes, Orly, these folks are passing around the complaint. People love to share things that make them laugh with their friends and co-workers.

bob · **Posted:** Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:45 am

majorbabs wrote:

Yes, Orly, these folks are passing around the complaint. People love to share things that make them laugh with their friends and co-workers.

If Taitz only knew.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Orly Taitz Helps Convicted Rapist Threaten NC Elections Board

Who is online