Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ]     
Author Message
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23911
I know this case has been mentioned (for some reason could only find it in the Birther Scorecard Update thread. :shock:

So updating the Docket for future reference...

Quote:
General Docket
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-2406
Docketed: 11/26/2012
Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights

Reade, Jr. v. Galvin, et al

Appeal From: District of Massachusetts, Boston
Fee Status: in forma pauperis
Case Type Information:
1) civil
2) private
3) civil rights

Originating Court Information:

District: 0101-1 : 1:12-cv-11492-DJC
Lead: 1:12-cv-11492-DJC

Ordering Judge: Denise J. Casper, U.S. District Judge
Date Filed: 08/09/2012
Date Order/Judgment: 10/30/2012
Date Order/Judgment EOD: 10/31/2012
Date NOA Filed: 11/08/2012
Date Rec'd COA: 11/26/2012

11/26/2012 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #9) filed by pro se Appellant William Reade, Jr. No hearings below. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by pro se Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 01/14/2013 for appellantWilliam Frederick Reade Jr.. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 14 days following service of appellee's brief. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 LETTER filed by pro se appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr. regarding his appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/11/2012 NOTICE to take judicial notice filed by pro se Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr.. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23911
Reade v Galvin Appeal Docket Update


Case/Context

Reade v. Galvin, No. 1:12-cv-11492, 2012 WL 5385683 (D. Mass. Oct. 30, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed against Massachusetts Secretary of State for allegedly refusing to consider plaintiff’s challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be included on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Reade does not have standing to challenge eligibility in court);



APPEAL DOCKET UPDATE (First Circuit Court of Appeals)
Quote:
11/26/2012 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #9) filed by pro se Appellant William Reade, Jr. No hearings below. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by pro se Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 01/14/2013 for appellant William Frederick Reade Jr.. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 14 days following service of appellee's brief. [12-2406] (CP)

12/03/2012 LETTER filed by pro se appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr. regarding his appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/11/2012 NOTICE to take judicial notice filed by pro se Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr.. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

12/21/2012 APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr.. Copies 1. Certificate of service not included. Brief due 01/25/2013 for appellee Martha Coakley and William F. Galvin [12-2406] (RL)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4130
Location: Southwest of down east
When you play for free, you get what you pay for.

This is one of those cases that was dismissed sua sponte by the district court on the way in the door because it was filed by a pro se plaintiff in forma pauperis and was found to be facially frivolous.

At least it hasn't chewed up much in the way of judicial resources so far and the First Circuit won't dally with it either.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23911
Docket Update...

Quote:
01/22/2013 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Martha Coakley and William F. Galvin filed by Attorney John M. Stephan. Certificate of service dated 01/22/2013. [12-2406] (JMS)

01/22/2013 LETTER regarding Response to Appeal filed by Attorney John Michael Stephan for Appellees William F. Galvin and Martha Coakley. Certificate of service dated 01/22/2013. [12-2406] (JMS)

01/23/2013 ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge. We treat appellant's letters, motions and filings, which were docketed in this court on December 3, 2012 and December 11, 2012, as supplements to his brief. To the extent that appellant is asking for immediate relief prior to the final adjudication of this appeal, interim relief is denied. The appeal will be decided in due course. [12-2406] (GK)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:51 pm
Posts: 193
Offtopic :
Quote:
01/23/2013 ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge.


Since when was a circuit judge referred to (as opposed to described as) "Appellate Judge"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9708
chancery wrote:
Offtopic :
Quote:
01/23/2013 ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge.


Since when was a circuit judge referred to (as opposed to described as) "Appellate Judge"?


In New Jersey, Appellate Division judges have the suffix, "J.A.D.," appended to their names. It stands for "Judge of the Appellate Division." If it appears on their docket, that must be the standard appellation.

_________________
"[T]he American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered together under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages, and. . .they grow more timorous, more sniveling, more poltroonish, more ignominious every day." H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9394
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
chancery wrote:
Quote:
01/23/2013 ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge.

Since when was a circuit judge referred to (as opposed to described as) "Appellate Judge"?

Good question. Howard is a circuit judge.

My WAG would be that that's the default for one-judge orders.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23911
Docket Update...

Quote:
Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-2406
Docketed: 11/26/2012
Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights
Reade, Jr. v. Galvin, et al
Appeal From: District of Massachusetts, Boston
Fee Status: in forma pauperis

01/22/2013 LETTER regarding Response to Appeal filed by Attorney John Michael Stephan for Appellees William F. Galvin and Martha Coakley. Certificate of service dated 01/22/2013. [12-2406] (JMS)

01/23/2013 ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge. We treat appellant's letters, motions and filings, which were docketed in this court on December 3, 2012 and December 11, 2012, as supplements to his brief. To the extent that appellant is asking for immediate relief prior to the final adjudication of this appeal, interim relief is denied. The appeal will be decided in due course. [12-2406] (GK)

01/30/2013 LETTER in response to Appellee's letter filed on January 22, 2013 filed by pro se Appellant William Frederick Reade, Jr.. Certificate of service was not included. [12-2406] (CP)

01/31/2013 CASE submitted. Panel: Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Norman H. Stahl, Appellate Judge; Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge. [12-2406] (LM)

02/04/2013 ORDER entered by Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge: Appellant's letter docketed on January 30, 2013 is treated as a motion for appointment of counsel and is denied. [12-2406] (CP)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9394
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Again with the "Appellate Judge" nomenclature. Must be a First Circuit thing. :-k

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: READE v GALVIN - ACT II
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23911
Docket Update...

Dismissal Affirmed

Quote:
06/11/2013 JUDGMENT entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Norman H. Stahl, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge. Affirmed [12-2406] (CP)


Another. Bites. Dust.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ]     

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group