Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]     
Author Message
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9344
H/T to mirele, who directed me to this.

Arguably, this should be in the Sovereign Citizen thread, and it was mentioned briefly by mimi in that thread almost a year ago.

I don't have any more details except this story, which has the docket number in it.

ASD [AdSurfDaily] Figure Kenneth Wayne Leaming’s Birther Lawsuit Against Obama, Holder Gets Tossed

Quote:
After he was charged with filing false liens and other crimes and jailed near Seattle, AdSurfDaily story figure and purported "sovereign citizen" Kenneth Wayne Leaming apparently thought it prudent to sue President Obama and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Leaming, 56, advanced a theory that Obama was not born in the United States, was not eligible to be President and had appointed Holder unlawfully.

It therefore followed, according to Leaming and co-plaintiff and former business colleague David Carroll Stephenson, that Holder was “Personating [sic] the Attorney General of the United States” and could not lawfully appoint or delegate authority to “Any United States Attorney.”

And because Holder had oversight responsibility over the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Western District of Washington that had brought the criminal charges against Leaming and Stephenson after an FBI probe, the duo apparently surmised, it followed that the prosecution was unlawful and should be declared “VOID For FRAUD” because the U.S. Attorney also is “personating” [sic] a federal officer.


More at the link. Warning: obnoxious "license" popup if you try to cut and paste from site.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 252
Location: Xenu's Red Mountain Trap, Arizona
Occupation: Cog in the machine at a too big to fail financial institution
Here's the nut of it, a writ of habeas corpus with all sorts of kookery.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid= ... NDhmM2VhNA

It's part of a larger collection of documents for the case 12-cv-01090 Leaming-Stephenson and can be found here (scroll down):

https://sites.google.com/site/asdupdate ... -asd-cases

I found this when looking for information about the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme and, well, I just fell down the rabbit hole.

_________________
Oscar Wilde once said, "I find it harder and harder every day to live up to my blue china."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm
Posts: 720
Nothing says "kook" quite like a poorly handwritten suit which asks for a thousand ounces of silver as relief.

_________________
I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a document. - Thomas Jefferson, quoting Charles Babbage on Orly Taitz's submissions.

The ADP notes that the affiant [Zullo] signed the "affidavit" solely in his personal capacity and without any title, even an imaginary one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9344
rosy wrote:
Nothing says "kook" quite like a poorly handwritten suit which asks for a thousand ounces of silver as relief.


The handwritten part is explained by the fact that the litigant is an incarcerated prisoner.

Demanding silver as relief, though, is definitely kooksign.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23538
WA - 2012-09-10 - Stephenson|Leaming v Holder, et al. - Report & Recommendation

Quote:
In this Court’s view, plaintiff’s/petitioner’s claims are substantively frivolous and do not
warrant detailed discussion. However, to the extent petitioners have legitimate jurisdictional
challenges to present, they should present those challenges in the context of the ongoing criminal proceedings and not by way of a separate habeas action.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5177
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
I keep reading this thread as "Learning v. Reality". Very different concept.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:05 pm
Posts: 390
Location: Hotel California Suite P25, Neverwhere, CA 94519
Occupation: Actor/Improv/Sound Designer. I am a Citizen Journalist with a column at Newsvine.com, and a presence on NetRoots Radio. Brain Injured Satirical Genius.
Whatever4 wrote:
I keep reading this thread as "Learning v. Reality". Very different concept.


Thank you, for telling me I am not alone in my creative reading of the subject line.

_________________
Orly: “My word is enough.”
Judge: “No, it’s not.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 4402
Location: between the candle and the star
Flatpointhigh wrote:
Whatever4 wrote:
I keep reading this thread as "Learning v. Reality". Very different concept.


Thank you, for telling me I am not alone in my creative reading of the subject line.


Oh, definitely not! :D

_________________
We have all the wins in court. And Obama is the President.
- Epectitus


I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:02 am
Posts: 164
Location: Near Cleveland, Ohio
Whatever4 wrote:
I keep reading this thread as "Learning v. Reality". Very different concept.


I keep reading it as "Lemming vs Reality".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 252
Location: Xenu's Red Mountain Trap, Arizona
Occupation: Cog in the machine at a too big to fail financial institution
The latest on Kenneth Wayne Leaming, courtesy of Patrick Pretty (thank you Patrick for keeping an eye on this one!), including this choice quote from Judge Ronald B. Leighton:

Quote:
The Court therefore feels some measure of responsibility to inform [Kenneth Wayne Leaming] that all the fancy legal-sounding things he has read on the internet are make-believe. Defendant can call himself a ‘public minister’ and ‘private attorney general,’ he may file ‘mandatory judicial notices’ citing all his favorite websites, he can even address mail to the ‘Washington Republic.’ But at the end of the day, while sovereign citizens and Defendant cite things like ‘Universal Law Ordinances,’ they are subject to both state and federal laws, just like everyone else. – U.S. District Judge Ronald B. Leighton, Feb. 12, 2013


This quote should be immortalized in stone, IMHO.

Read more at the link:

http://www.patrickpretty.com/2013/02/13 ... e-believe/

_________________
Oscar Wilde once said, "I find it harder and harder every day to live up to my blue china."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Leaming v. Reality
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:11 am
Posts: 170
mmmirele wrote:

Quote:
The Court therefore feels some measure of responsibility to inform [Kenneth Wayne Leaming] that all the fancy legal-sounding things he has read on the internet are make-believe. Defendant can call himself a ‘public minister’ and ‘private attorney general,’ he may file ‘mandatory judicial notices’ citing all his favorite websites, he can even address mail to the ‘Washington Republic.’ But at the end of the day, while sovereign citizens and Defendant cite things like ‘Universal Law Ordinances,’ they are subject to both state and federal laws, just like everyone else. – U.S. District Judge Ronald B. Leighton, Feb. 12, 2013


This quote should be immortalized in stone, IMHO.

Read more at the link:

http://www.patrickpretty.com/2013/02/13 ... e-believe/


=D> =D> =D> =D> =D>


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]     

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group