Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 583 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:30 pm
Posts: 2912
Location: The Great Pariah State of Arizona
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
TollandRCR wrote:
So the plaintiffs are awarded "$440,596.68 in reasonable attorney’s fees and $444.33 for costs?" Why? Doesn't this come out of our pockets?


As contempt sanctions. And yes, it does. Because it would be inequitable for one harmed by government misconduct to have to suffer potentially crippling damages, or else suffer the harm from the wrongful conduct.


The greatest case I've ever handled is one I will only talk about in detail in person, but the defendant was the US government. Upon our prevailing, the US Attorney's Office challenged my position on attorney fees, so I had to dig deeply into the EAJA (Equal Access to Justice Act) statute that forms the basis for such awards. The gratifying aspect of that law is that it doesn't merely require the federal government to pay up when it screws up, but it requires the payment to come out of the specific budget of the agency at fault, and not out of the general treasury. Upon winning my award (this wasn't a massive case mind you; just some very unfair and arrogant treatment of a legal immigrant), I took great pleasure in reminding the Assistant US Attorney that we wanted the funds to come out of the local USCIS office and not from the Treasury in Washington. I wanted the director of the local office to feel the burn at an individual managerial level, rather than just passing this off as another problem for someone else thousands of miles away to deal with.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image


"What part of 'second' don't you understand?" -Judge Morrison England


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12868
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
I think Orly should file a motion for clarification as to how much of that money goes to her. ;;)

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10970
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Foggy wrote:
I think Orly should file a motion for clarification as to how much of that money goes to her. ;;)



but but but - it's a Kookstitutional Emergency

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:20 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23522
TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING MAY 11, 2011

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:30 pm
Posts: 2912
Location: The Great Pariah State of Arizona
Cellphone moment #1: :lol:


Cellphone moment #2: =))

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image


"What part of 'second' don't you understand?" -Judge Morrison England


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 3092
Location: LA,CA
Occupation: Game designer and code monkey
By the way, did she ever actually get a ruling denying her motion, or did it just go off into the ether of frivolity?

_________________
Ducktape

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear And disregards the rest." Paul Simon, The Boxer
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19888
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Taitz was clearly surprised that her case was called first and she had to decide -- do I drag my zibit up there or turn off my cellphone? She chose wrong.

I noticed there were 3 other cases. That would be at least 6 more people. Sounds like there was a sign in sheet for each case.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5755
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
What a moron. I don't know anyone who has actually used the word "Esquire" when stating their appearance for the record. What a pompous, ignorant buffoon.

More than one laugh out loud moments in this one.

"Thank you Judge." Yeah, that shows respect.

When asked if she served her reply: "I served a bunch of them and I guess that its going to be on Pacer shortly, also." This actually has more detail than her proof of service affidavits usually do.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19888
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
raicha wrote:
What a moron. I don't know anyone who has actually used the word "Esquire" when stating their appearance for the record. What a pompous, ignorant buffoon.

More than one laugh out loud moments in this one.

"Thank you Judge." Yeah, that shows respect.

When asked if she served her reply: "I served a bunch of them and I guess that its going to be on Pacer shortly, also." This actually has more detail than her proof of service affidavits usually do.

"Doctor Orly Taitz Esquire." She wants the judge to know she's a dentalawyer.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5942
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Doctor Orly Taitz Esquire." She wants the judge to know she's a dentalawyer.

Naw. She wants the judge to think she has achieved the highest degree of higher education.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:01 am
Posts: 735
Occupation: Adverb specialist in the French Ministry of Language Purity
raicha wrote:
What a moron. I don't know anyone who has actually used the word "Esquire" when stating their appearance for the record. What a pompous, ignorant buffoon.

More than one laugh out loud moments in this one.

"Thank you Judge." Yeah, that shows respect.

When asked if she served her reply: "I served a bunch of them and I guess that its going to be on Pacer shortly, also." This actually has more detail than her proof of service affidavits usually do.



Mario the Putz has been known to attach Esquire to his name, and to defend the practice. Although whether he does that or not when stating his appearance is unknown.

_________________
I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 4909
Location: Glocca Morra
ducktape wrote:
By the way, did she ever actually get a ruling denying her motion, or did it just go off into the ether of frivolity?


It was deNINED ages ago.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/55300298/Horn ... ed-5-12-11

Orly just never told her minions.

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 725
Location: Midwest, US
I don't know if it's true but I heard that Orly even signs her birthday cards to her children with Esq after her name. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7261
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
What an awesome way to start the day!! =)) =)) And it's not even Fogbow Friday yet!

BEST LINE:
Quote:
MR. ROSENBLUM: Only this, Your Honor. I appreciate the Court calling us and letting us know that we were going to have a hearing comedy club.

(FIF him.)

Also, too: I'm shocked, just SHOCKED, that the Obot-On-The-Spot report was ackerit. Someone must have gotten to the court reporter, eh?

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over into the Orly Zone." -- Geritol

ZOOM IN, BABY. IT'S ALL WRONG.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7261
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
Three other highlowlights:

O RLY wrote:
I have enlarged exhibits. I have enlarged exhibits so you would be able to see them.

No comment.

O RLY wrote:
And what I wanted to show Your Honor, and it’s obvious, and this shows complete disrespect to this whole nation and system of justice.

Yes it does.

Quote:
THE COURT: These are all materials that you attached to your motion, right?
DR. TAITZ: Yes.
THE COURT: I have already seen them all.
DR. TAITZ: Oh, okay. Well, there are some new materials....

Yes, we can haz take you srsly. Any. Day. Now.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over into the Orly Zone." -- Geritol

ZOOM IN, BABY. IT'S ALL WRONG.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:18 pm
Posts: 2420
Location: Paris, France
verbalobe wrote:
Three other highlowlights:

O RLY wrote:
I have enlarged exhibits. I have enlarged exhibits so you would be able to see them.


I guess all of this stuff about Weiner is making me read things really, really wrong. :oops:

_________________
Incorrible. Please do not incorrige me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:30 pm
Posts: 2912
Location: The Great Pariah State of Arizona
raicha wrote:
Maru wrote:
poutine wrote:
I know I'm repeating myself but I can't help it. This is too good.

Quote:
What I've found out that this is a case where the administration, the federal government, have been impeding -- (Cell phone ringing in courtroom.) I greatly apologize. I'm sorry.
(Pause.)
THE COURT: If any of you have cell phones, please turn them off.
UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Isn't that a local rule?


=)) =)) =))

Can't breathe!! Local rule!!!!


I think the lol part was "UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER". A Greek chorus in the courtroom, commenting on the dramatic action. Really, I haz a lolz.

Edit: [highlight]Me thinks we are in the wrong thread[/highlight]...


Oops, my bad!

But yes, Greek chorus, exactly. The court reporter's label is what caused me to snort coffee through my nose. "UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER." Bwahahaha!!!

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image


"What part of 'second' don't you understand?" -Judge Morrison England


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:40 am
Posts: 2739
Location: Halfway to Paradise
Occupation: digital artist, domestic goddess, mother, patriot
verbalobe wrote:
Three other highlowlights:

O RLY wrote:
I have enlarged exhibits. [highlight]I have enlarged exhibits so you would be able to see them[/highlight].

No comment.

Is "enlarged exhibits" what the kids are calling a uniboob these days?

_________________
Seeking to determine the authenticity of a document by looking at a pixellated photo of the document proves nothing except the stupidity of the person doing so. ~Sterngard Friegen

Hate is universal, but it rarely survives a good bitch-slapping. ~Estiveo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5510
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
raicha wrote:

When asked if she served her reply: "I served a bunch of them and I guess that its going to be on Pacer shortly, also."


"The PACER notifications should be in their email when they return to the office."

This, folks, is known as an ambush. Playing dirty.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 2453
Location: Virginia
Occupation: FEMA Camp Activities & Re-Education Coordinator.
From the clap trap


:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22596 :evil:

Quote:
Bielderberg “cosa nostra” against “we, the people of the world”
Posted on | June 9, 2011 | No Comments
I believe, there has to be legislative initiative passed, that no elected official and no appointed official of state or federal government, should be allowed to be a member of a secret group, as there is always a question of a conflict of interest.
I believe, that each and every member of the Bielderberg group needs to resgn from his position with the government or be removed from his office.
Friends in High Places: Bilderberg 2011 Kicks Off – CNBC
InboxX
Reply |Bill Van Allen to liz.benjamin
show details 8:07 AM (1 hour ago)


WTF???
=)) =)) =))

_________________
On the June day of 14, 192011.
MsDaisy makes fun of the stupid @: http://crazyinternetpeople.blogspot.com/
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3772
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
I just don't get it.

Why would the Judge allow Orly to giver her has-nothing-to-do-with-the actual-case spiel much less drag the real attorneys in the case into his courtroom when he had read her crap and knew it was crap?

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9121
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Sequoia32 wrote:
Why would the Judge allow Orly to giver her has-nothing-to-do-with-the actual-case spiel much less drag the real attorneys in the case into his courtroom when he had read her crap and knew it was crap?

"Protecting the record," as they say in the biz.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3772
Location: USA
Occupation: Cat petter, RN with license voluntarily inactive, just like Michelle Obama's law license.
bob wrote:
Sequoia32 wrote:
Why would the Judge allow Orly to giver her has-nothing-to-do-with-the actual-case spiel much less drag the real attorneys in the case into his courtroom when he had read her crap and knew it was crap?

"Protecting the record," as they say in the biz.


How does letting a lunatic ramble about something that has nothing to do with the case protect the record? Why not just do like Judge Lamberth? Write "file it" and "DENIED" on her motion? I guess I'm just stupid, 'cause I just don't get why she wasn't simply ignored. :oops:

Quote:
DR. TAITZ: Thank you, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Dr. Taitz, you’re welcome.


Not a hint of the ridicule she deserves.

Quote:
MR. ROSENBLUM: Only this, Your Honor. I appreciate the Court calling us and letting us know that we were going to have a hearing.


Really? You appreciate having to drop what you were doing and get to court to listen to Orly's bullshit?

_________________
esseff44 wrote: She reminded listeners that it does not matter how many cases she loses because she only has to win one!

A Legal Lohengrin wrote: That's the reasoning of a terrorist. A terrorist has to succeed only once, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19888
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Of course Mr. Rosenblum appreciated it. His hours had been a little down for the month.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9121
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Sequoia32 wrote:
How does letting a lunatic ramble about something that has nothing to do with the case protect the record?

Lessens issues on appeal.

Quote:
Why not just do like Judge Lamberth? Write "file it" and "DENIED" on her motion?

Judges have differing views on how to handle troublesome people. Compare Judge Carter to Judge Robertson: Who handled their respective cases better; who got a better result?

Quote:
Quote:
MR. ROSENBLUM: Only this, Your Honor. I appreciate the Court calling us and letting us know that we were going to have a hearing.

Really? You appreciate having to drop what you were doing and get to court to listen to Orly's bullshit?

The attorneys will still be in front of that judge after Taitz leaves; just being "polite" (and the attorney was actually make a dig at Taitz).

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 583 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group